HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Xu, Y. Articles by Kapp, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xu, Y. Articles by Kapp, J. A.

T Cells in Anterior Chamber-Induced Tolerance in CD8⁺ CTL Responses

¹ From the Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
PURPOSE. Delivery of antigen to the anterior chamber (AC) of the eye induces a systemic form of tolerance, referred to as anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID). ACAID is characterized by decreases in delayed-type hypersensitivity responses and complement-fixing antibodies on subsequent challenge with an immunogenic form of the antigen. The current study was designed to test whether priming of antigen-specific CD8⁺ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) are inhibited by injection of soluble antigen into the AC and whether T cells play a role in the inhibition of such responses.

METHODS. Antigen was administered through the AC to normal T-cell-deficient or reconstituted T-cell-deficient mice. Seven days after the AC injection, the mice were primed with antigen in adjuvant and 10 days later, their spleen cells were cultured for 5 to 7 days and the CTL responses measured.

RESULTS. CTL responses were inhibited by antigen delivered through the AC in normal but not T-cell-deficient mice. Tolerance was reconstituted in -chain knockout mice by the adoptive transfer of T cells from normal mice. Moreover, spleen cells and splenic ⁺ T cells, but not ^- T cells, from mice injected with antigen through the AC inhibited development of CTL responses when cultured together with primed effector T cells.

CONCLUSIONS. These data show, for the first time, that administration of soluble antigen in the AC inhibits development of CD8⁺ cytotoxic T-cell responses and that T cells play a critical role in inhibition of CTL responses.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
To prevent excessive tissue damage during an infection that could lead to blindness, the eye has the means of minimizing inflammation. This is exemplified by the extended survival of foreign tissues placed in the AC, the vitreous cavity, and the subretinal space of the eye, compared with tissues grafted in conventional sites, such as the peritoneal cavity or the skin.^{1 2} In addition, antigens introduced into the AC of the eye elicit a deviant form of systemic immunity, anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID), in which animals are refractory to the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) when an immunogenic form of antigen is injected subcutaneously (SC).³ In contrast to DTH responses, the overall antigen-specific antibody response is preserved. Nevertheless, the isotypes of IgG antibodies that fix complement, IgG2a, -2b, and -3, are inhibited, whereas IgG₁ is unaffected by intraocular antigen in some⁴ but not all⁵ strains of mice. These deficiencies suggest that Th1 functions of CD4⁺ T cells are inhibited in this form of tolerance.

Although CD8⁺ T cells are the primary effector cells that eliminate viral infections from various host tissues including the eye, they also can be involved in ocular disease. For example, development of herpes stromal keratitis (HSK) after infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1 involves a variety of immunologic mechanisms.⁶ In certain strains of mice, HSV-1-induced keratitis is dependent on CD8⁺ T cells, but injection of HSV-1 into the AC suppresses development of HSV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) and prevents keratitis.⁷ Yet, the mechanisms regulating CD8⁺ CTL in the eye are poorly understood.

One goal of the studies reported herein was to determine whether the injection of soluble proteins into the AC would inhibit the induction of CD8⁺ CTLs induced by priming with antigen in CFA. Activation of CD8⁺ ß T cells requires presentation of endogenous peptides by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules.⁸ Exogenous antigens, such as ovalbumin (OVA), are not processed for MHC class I presentation by most cells.⁸ However, phagocytic cells have been shown to process exogenous proteins, load peptides onto MHC class I, and stimulate CD8⁺ T cells.⁹ Moreover, injection of OVA emulsified in CFA primes precursors of CD8⁺, MHC class I-restricted, OVA-specific CTLs in H-2^b mice, and this process involves adjuvant and phagocytic cells.¹⁰ Thus, phagocytic cells that have processed exogenous antigen can activate CD8⁺ T cells, raising the possibility that CTL activated by this route may be susceptible to ACAID.

The idea that soluble antigen delivered through the AC may inhibit the CTL response is also supported by the observation that antigen administered by the oral route inhibits activation of CD8⁺ CTLs, as well as CD4⁺ T cells.¹¹ Moreover, mice that are deficient in T cells, TCR -chain knockout (^-/-) mice, or wild-type mice treated with anti--chain antibody are resistant to tolerance induced by oral OVA, as measured by antibody, cytokine production, and priming of CTL precursors.¹¹ These results suggest that T cells play an essential role in oral tolerance.¹² Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that delivery of soluble antigen in the AC of the eye would inhibit the induction of CD8⁺ CTL in a T-cell-dependent fashion.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Experimental Animals
Female C57BL/6 (B6) (H-2^b) mice, 7 to 8 weeks of age, were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, MD). Male or female C57BL/6J-Tcrd^{tm1 Mom} (^-/-) (H-2^b) mice¹³ were bred in the animal facilities at Emory University and used at 7 to 8 weeks of age. All procedures involving animals were conducted according to the principles in the guidelines of the Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council and in adherence to the provisions of the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.

Antigens
Chicken egg albumin (OVA, grade VI) and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). CFA containing Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Ra and incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) were purchased from Difco Laboratories (Detroit, MI). Emulsions of OVA in CFA (2 mg/mL) or OVA in IFA (0.5 mg/mL) were prepared by mixing equal volumes of aqueous antigen and adjuvant.

Target Cell Lines
Two H-2^b tumor cell lines were used for these studies: EL4, an MHC class II-negative T cell lymphoma, and E.G7-OVA, which is an EL4 cell line transfected with the chicken OVA gene¹⁴ (kindly provided by Michael J. Bevan, University of Washington, Seattle, WA). All cells were cultured in standard growth medium (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, and antibiotics) at 37°C in 6% CO₂ in air. E.G7 was periodically cultured with 250 µg/mL neomycin to maintain expression of the OVA gene. All cell lines were free of mycoplasma.

Inoculations
Mice were anesthetized by intramuscular injection of 100 µL of a mixture containing 10 mg/mL ketamine (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) and 2 mg/mL xylazine (Bayer Corp., Shawnee Mission, KS). One drop of proparacaine HCl (Alcon Inc., Humacao, Puerto Rico) was applied topically on the eye before injection. Under a dissecting microscope, 50 µg OVA or KLH in 2 µL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was injected into the AC of one eye with a microliter syringe and a 33-gauge needle (Hamilton, Reno, NV).

Cytotoxicity Assay
Mice were primed for OVA-CTL responses by injection of 200 µg OVA in CFA into the rear footpad. Ten days later, their spleens were harvested and single-cell suspensions prepared. Mononuclear cells (30 x 10⁶ cells/10 mL culture) were incubated with irradiated (20,000 rad) E.G7-OVA at a ratio of 10:1 in standard growth medium for 5 to 7 days. In the coculture system, effector cells (15 x 10⁶) from mice primed with an SC injection of 200 µg OVA in CFA 10 days earlier were cultured with regulatory cells (15 x 10⁶) from naïve mice or mice primed with antigen injected into the AC 10 days earlier and incubated for 5 days in the presence of irradiated EG7-OVA.

E.G7-OVA and EL4 cells were labeled with Na₂⁵¹CrO₄ (DuPont, Boston, MA) at 37° for 60 minutes, washed three times, and added to effector cells in 96-well plates at different E:T cell ratios. Cytolytic activity was quantified by a 4-hour ⁵¹Cr release assay. Supernatants were collected after 4 hours’ incubation at 37°C and radioactivity was detected in a gamma counter (Wallac, Turku, Finland). The percentage of specific lysis was calculated as 100 x [(release by CTL - spontaneous release)/(maximum release - spontaneous release)]. Maximum release was determined by addition of 1% Triton X-100 (EM Science, Gibbstown, NJ). Spontaneous release in the absence of CTLs was generally less than 15% of maximum release. It is important to note that development of OVA-specific CTLs absolutely depends on priming. Spleen cells from mice injected with OVA or CFA do not induce development of CTLs when stimulated with E.G7-OVA, whereas mice primed with both show vigorous CTL responses.¹⁰

The frequency of cytotoxic T-cell precursors (pTc) was determined by the classic limiting-dilution assay as described by Kruisbeek.¹⁵ Briefly, B6 mice were injected with 50 µg of soluble KLH or OVA in the AC. After 10 days, the mice were immunized with SC injection of 200 µg OVA in CFA. Ten days after immunization, spleen cells from three mice per group were pooled and serially diluted in 96-well plates, starting at 3 x 10⁵ cells per well, 24 wells per dilution. Irradiated (20,000 rad) E.G7-OVA (1 x 10⁴ cells/well) were added, and all wells were restimulated 7 days later with irradiated (2,000 rad) splenocytes as filler cells (1 x 10⁵ cells/well), irradiated E.G7-OVA (1 x 10⁴ cells/well), and 20 U/mL recombinant human (rh)IL-2 (Hoffmann-La Roche, Nutley, NJ). Seven days later, the lytic activity of the cultured cells was tested by adding ⁵¹Cr-labeled E.G7-OVA targets (1 x 10⁴ cells/well) to the wells and incubating for 4 hours. Wells that had fewer counts per minute (cpm) than spontaneous release plus 3 SD were counted as negative.¹⁵ The log of the percentage of negative wells was plotted against the number of spleen cells per well, and the precursor frequency was calculated at 37% negative wells.¹⁵

DTH Assay
To determine DTH response, mice were immunized with 100 µg OVA in 50 µL CFA injected SC at the base of the tail. Seven days later, mice were challenged with SC injection of 25 µL IFA containing 12.5 µg OVA in one hind footpad. The same volume of PBS in IFA was used as a negative control in the other hind footpad. The thickness of the footpad was measured 24 hours after challenge by using a micrometer (Mitutoyo 227-101; MTI Corp., Paramus, NJ). The swelling in response to OVA was calculated by the following formula: antigen-specific swelling (in millimeters) = the thickness of the footpad with injection of antigen-IFA (in millimeters) - the thickness of the footpad with injection of IFA-PBS (in millimeters). Footpads were used for DTH responses, because in our hands, larger, more reliable responses were obtained than in measurements of the ear-swelling response. Data from three experiments were pooled. Data were subjected to statistical analysis with Student’s t-test.

T-Cell Purification
Spleen cells from B6 mice that were primed with 50 µg soluble OVA injected into the AC 10 days earlier were pooled and purified by positive selection with antibody-coated MicroBeads and separation through MACS columns (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. B cells were first depleted from the splenocyte suspension using anti-mouse CD19-coated beads. For T-cell isolation, the B-cell-depleted cells were treated with Fc block (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) for 15 minutes followed by the incubation with biotin-conjugated anti-mouse TCR chain antibody (GL3; Pharmingen) on ice for 30 minutes. GL3-treated cells were washed, treated with streptavidin-loaded MicroBeads, and separated (MACS columns; Miltenyi Biotech). In our hands, approximately 0.5% to 1.0% of lymphocytes in the spleens of B6 mice were TCR ⁺ (GL3⁺) cells. Using the magnetic separation method, 0.4% to 0.6% of spleen cells were recovered in the GL3⁺ population, which was routinely 85% pure or more. Positive selection was chosen, because the purity of the cells is higher than in negatively selected cells, particularly when the cells of interest are a minority such as splenic T cells. MACS super-paramagnetic MicroBeads are extremely small, approximately 50 nm in diameter, which is comparable to the size of a virus. Their size and composition (iron oxide and polysaccharide) make the MicroBeads biodegradable, so that labeled cells retain their physiological function. Positive selection with MicroBeads generally does not activate the cells.^{16 17 18}

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Effect of Soluble Antigen Injected into the AC on Priming of CTLs
To determine whether CD8⁺ CTL development is subject to ocular tolerance, OVA-specific CTL responses were measured in B6 mice that were untreated or injected with 50 µg OVA or KLH in the AC 7 days before SC immunization with 200 µg OVA in CFA. Ten days after immunization, spleen cells were harvested and cocultured with irradiated E.G7-OVA. As previously reported, OVA-specific cytolytic activity, was generated in control B6 mice that received no AC treatment (Fig. 1A) . OVA-specific lytic activity was mediated by CD8⁺ T cells because anti-CD8 mAb (53-6.72) blocked CTL activity when added to the in vitro activation culture or to the 4-hour lytic assay (data not shown). Soluble OVA injected into the AC inhibited the generation of CD8⁺ CTL to a level comparable to the lysis of the negative control when EL4 targets were used. By contrast, priming for OVA-specific CTLs in mice injected with the irrelevant antigen KLH was similar to that of control mice without AC treatment. Thus, administration of soluble antigen into the AC before immunization inhibited the priming of CD8⁺ CTL precursors in an antigen-specific manner. Mice that received OVA through the AC also exhibited reduced DTH responses when they were challenged with OVA in the footpad (Fig. 1B) , which verifies the ACAID phenomenon in our experiments. Mice pretreated with the irrelevant protein KLH mounted a strong DTH response to OVA that was comparable to that in the untreated mice. Thus, delivery of antigen to the AC induces tolerance in both the CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell compartments.

View larger version (13K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Intraocularly delivered antigen inhibited priming of CTLs and the DTH responses. B6 mice received no antigen, 50 µg OVA, or 50 µg KLH in the AC of the eye 10 days before SC injection of 200 µg OVA in CFA. Spleen cells of some mice (n = 3 per group) were harvested 10 days after the last exposure to antigen and cultured individually with irradiated E.G7-OVA stimulator cells for 5 or 6 days. OVA-specific cytolytic activity was measured using 51Cr-labeled E.G7-OVA or EL4 targets at various E-to-T cell ratios (A). Data are the mean ± SD of results in three individual mice from a representative experiment repeated three times with similar results. DTH responses to OVA were detected by challenging the hind footpad with SC injection of 12.5 µg OVA in IFA 7 days after immunization (B). Footpad swelling was measured 24 hours after the challenge. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, and the data are the accumulation of results in three experiments with the same protocol. The bar represents the average swelling. Probabilities were calculated with Student’s t-test to compare the control group that received no intraocular treatment with those that received either OVA or KLH.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Reduced cytotoxicity was not observed in -/- mice pretreated with soluble OVA in the AC before the priming for OVA-induced CTLs. B6 or -/- mice that received either no treatment ( or •) or 50 µg OVA in the AC ( or ) on day 0 were immunized with OVA in CFA on day 7 and then challenged with OVA in IFA on day 14. On day 21, spleen cells were harvested, pooled, stimulated with E.G7-OVA, and tested for OVA-specific lytic activity to EG7-OVA targets. The results of a representative experiment, which was repeated three times, are displayed.

View larger version (17K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. B6 T cells reconstituted tolerance of priming for cytolytic T-cell responses in knockout mice with induced ACAID. -/- mice without transplanted cells or OVA through the AC () or with OVA in the AC () were compared with -/- mice that received 0.25 x 106 B6 T cells and AC injection of OVA () or 25 x 106 B6 T cells before AC injection of OVA (). Seven days after AC treatment, all mice were primed with 200 µg OVA in CFA and OVA-specific cytolytic responses to E.G7-OVA targets. Data displayed are representative results ± SD in one of three similar experiments, in which mice were assayed individually.

To investigate this question, the frequency of cytotoxic pTcs was measured in the spleens of mice that were inoculated in the AC with 50 µg KLH or OVA 10 days before receiving SC injection of 200 µg OVA in CFA. The pTc frequency ranged from 0.677 to 4.000 per 10⁶ splenocytes in mice pretreated with KLH in the AC and 0.186 to 0.500 per 10⁶ splenocytes in mice pretreated OVA (Table 1) . The ratio of pTc frequencies (KLH-treated to OVA-treated) showed that 3 to 10 times more pTcs were detected in mice pretreated with the irrelevant antigen KLH than in mice treated with OVA in the AC. These data verify that introducing soluble antigen into the AC before immunization inhibited the activation or expansion of CTL precursors.

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Soluble OVA delivered to the AC induced regulatory cells. Effector cells came from mice primed with SC injection of 200 µg OVA in CFA 10 days earlier, whereas regulatory cells came from mice primed with 50 µg soluble OVA injected into the AC 10 days earlier. Effector cells and regulatory cells were cultured separately with naïve spleen cells to make up the final cell number or together at a 1:1 ratio with irradiated E.G7-OVA. CTLs were measured with 51Cr-labeled E.G7-OVA or EL4 target cells. The means ± SD of results in three mice per group are shown, typical of results obtained in three experiments.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Induction of suppressor cells in ACAID-affected mice was antigen specific. Equal numbers of splenic effector cells and regulatory cells from naïve mice (), mice inoculated in the AC with OVA () or KLH (•) were cocultured with E.G7-OVA, and CTLs were measured with 51Cr-labeled E.G7-OVA. The means ± SD of results in three mice per group are shown, typical of results obtained in three experiments.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. Splenic T cells from ACAID mice inhibited the development of cytolytic CD8+ T cells in vitro. Pooled effector cells (15 x 106) from mice primed with SC injection of OVA in CFA 10 days earlier were cocultured in the presence of stimulator EG7-OVA with pooled regulatory cells consisting of 15 x 106 normal B6 spleen cells (), 15 x 106 unfractionated ACAID spleen cells (), 0.3 x 106 + T cells from ACAID spleens plus 15 x 106 normal B6 spleen cells (), or 15 x 106 - T cells () from ACAID spleens. OVA-specific CTLs were measured 5 days later. Shown is a representative result of three independent experiments.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

The observation that CTL responses to OVA were inhibited by injection of OVA into the AC appears to contradict a previous report that P815 tumor cells from DBA/2 (H-2^d) mice delivered to the AC of BALB/c (H-2^d) mice inhibited DTH responses but stimulated CTL responses equal to those induced by SC injection of P815.²⁶ These differences in sensitivity of CTLs to ACAID are not yet understood, but there are several potential explanations. For example, the antigen presented to BALB/c mice by the P815 tumor is a minor histocompatibility antigen, which is an endogenous peptide that is presented by MHC class I directly to H-2^d-compatible host T cells without the need for processing by APCs. Soluble antigen injected into the AC of the eye is thought to be processed locally by APCs, under the influence of TGFß and other mediators.

Antigen-bearing APCs are believed to migrate from the AC into the bloodstream and take up residence in the spleen where they induce ACAID.²⁷ If the P815 tumor cells exited the AC, they could present antigen through MHC class I directly to peripheral T cells, in the absence of an ACAID-inducing signal, which could promote a CTL response. Alternatively, direct antigen presentation may fail to induce the suppressor cells that appear to be necessary for inhibition of CTL priming in spleen, whereas soluble antigen, which can be processed and presented through the MHC class I and II pathway by APCs,²⁸ may generate the appropriate epitopes to activate both ß and T cells.

In the current findings, it was also shown that injecting antigen into the AC specifically induced regulatory T cells that inhibited in vitro activation of OVA-specific CTL precursors. The T-cell-enriched fraction from ACAID spleens inhibited the lytic function of CTL effector cells, whereas the T-cell-depleted fraction, containing both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ ß T cells, did not. These results suggest that T cells are required for regulatory cells that inhibit CTL responses. These results extend previous reports that T cells serve as negative regulators in immune responses to pathogens,^{29 30} tumors,²⁵ allografts,^{31 32} and autoimmunity.^{22 33}

The observation that splenic ⁺ cells, but not ^- cells that contained CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ ß T cells, inhibited OVA-specific CTL responses seems to contradict the previous report that CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell-regulatory cells inhibit DTH responses.³⁴ One explanation for the discrepancy is that the in vitro CTL response may be subject to different forms of regulation than the DTH responses. On the other hand, these two observations are not necessarily mutually exclusive. The experiments of Wilbanks et al.,³⁴ demonstrating that AC injection induces splenic CD4⁺ afferent and CD8⁺ efferent suppressor T cells, were performed by depletion, by the use of antibody and complement. This method would have left some gd⁺ T cells in both treated populations, because some splenic T cells are CD8⁺, whereas others are CD8^-.³⁵ If the T cells transmitted the ACAID-inducing signal to the remaining CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in each subset, they could have developed into afferent and efferent suppressors, respectively.

The observation that administration of KLH did not induce suppressor cells that inhibited an OVA-induced CTL response raises the possibility that the T cells in the spleen may be antigen specific. T cells have also been reported to inhibit IgE-specific antibody responses to inhaled soluble antigens.²⁴ In addition, they have been identified in the spleens of tolerant, ß T-cell receptor (TCR)-deficient mice.³⁶ In the latter study, T-cell-mediated regulatory activity was MHC unrestricted, indicating that recognition by T cells may not involve antigen presentation by MHC, as ß T cells do, or that antigen was presented by a nonpolymorphic MHC molecule.

The antigenic epitopes recognized by T cells are much less well-defined than those recognized by ß T cells, but they include nonpeptide epitopes that can be presented by nonclassic MHC molecules.^{37 38} T cells from tumor-bearing mice have been reported to recognize directly the tumor cell-associated antigen, Q5, which is a nonclassic class I antigen.²⁵ These activated T cells are suppressors and inhibit CTL responses, which facilitates escape of tumor cells from immune surveillance. Anti -chain mAb (GL3) treatment of mice downregulates TCR in vivo and inhibits T-cell functions that are essential for the induction of oral tolerance,¹² suggesting that the normal functional activity of T cells involves an interaction of the TCR with a ligand. Moreover, the potential diversity of the TCR is greater than that of any other antigen receptor.^{38 39} However, the question of whether the T cells that play a role in ACAID recognize the nominal antigen administered through the AC, peptides presented by conventional APCs, the effector T cells with which they were mixed, or some other cells has not yet been investigated. Conceivably, TCR interacts with their ligands directly or in the context of other cell surface molecules. To determine whether these regulatory cells require the encounter of antigen in vitro to be activated and become inhibitory, stimulators expressing a second protein antigen, such as KLH, are needed. Until a reciprocal system is developed, it is not possible to determine whether the antigenic specificity is a function of the T cells or the ß T cells that are subject to regulation.

The mechanism involved in the inhibition by T cells of development of CTLs in vivo and in vitro is not yet clear. Alteration of ß T cell development has been reported as one mechanism of T cells’ regulating immune responses.^{33 40} T cells are capable of producing a broad spectrum of cytokines, including regulatory cytokines such as TGFß, IL-4, and IL-10.^{23 31 41 42} CD8⁺ OVA-induced CTLs primed by OVA administered in CFA are Tc1 cells that make type 1 cytokines, such as IFN and TNF.⁴³ The IFN production by cells from spleens or lymph nodes of ACAID mice has been reported to be reduced.⁴⁴ Therefore, it is possible that cytokines produced by T cells divert the differentiation of Tc1 cells into a nonlytic pathway. There are also reports that T cells are cytotoxic.^{45 46} Thus, T cells could regulate OVA-induced CTLs by eliminating APCs. Preliminary data suggest that direct cell contact between T cells and OVA-primed spleen cells is required for inhibition of CTL responses.

Splenic B cells⁴⁷ and CD1-reactive natural killer T (NKT) cells⁴⁸ have also been reported to be necessary in the generation of ACAID. Moreover, NKT cells accumulate in the spleen after the induction of ACAID and form clusters with APCs and T cells in the splenic marginal zone.⁴⁹ We have observed that there is also an increase in the percentage of T cells in the spleens of ACAID mice, and CD44 is upregulated in this population.⁵ T cells have been shown to be present primarily in the sinusoids of the avian spleen,⁵⁰ whereas they have been localized to the red pulp in human spleens.⁵¹ Studies are under way to determine where T cells reside in the murine spleen and whether they physically interact with APCs, B cells, or NKT cells in generating the signals for ACAID.

	Acknowledgements

 
The authors thank Wayne Streilein for generously providing time to train them in the techniques used for induction of ACAID, Kyle McKenna for critical review of the manuscript, and Jing Wen for technical assistance with cell separations.

	Footnotes

 
² Present affiliation: Center for Neurological Diseases, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Supported by a research grant and a center grant from the Foundation Fighting Blindness, National Eye Institute Core Grant P30 EYO0636 and Grant EY13459, and a gift from Malcolm and Musette Powell. JAK is the recipient of the Research to Prevent Blindness Jules and Doris Stein Professorship in Ophthalmology.

Submitted for publication July 2, 2002; accepted July 20, 2002.

Commercial relationships policy: N.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Judith A. Kapp, Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Building. B, Room 2602, 1365 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30322; jkapp{at}emory.edu.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Jiang, LQ, Streilein, JW. (1991) Neural retinal allografts are privileged in the anterior chamber and vitreous cavity [ARVO Abstract] Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32(4),S1304Abstract nr 3121
2. Jiang, LQ, Marianela, J, Streilein, JW. (1993) Subretinal space and vitreous cavity are immunologically privileged sites for retinal allografts Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34,3347-3354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Mizuno, K, Clark, AF, Streilein, JW. (1989) Anterior chamber-associated immune deviation induced by soluble antigens Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30,1112-1119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Wilbanks, GA, Streilein, JW. (1990) Distinctive humoral immune responses following anterior chamber and intravenous administration of soluble antigen: evidence for active suppression of IgG2-secreting B lymphocytes Immunology 71,566-572[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Xu, Y, Kapp, JA. (2001) T cells are critical for the induction of anterior chamber-associated immune deviation Immunology 102,1-12[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Streilein, JW, Dana, MR, Ksander, BR. (1997) Immunity causing blindness: five different paths to herpes stromal keratitis Immunol Today 18,443-449[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Hendricks, RL, Tao, MS, Glorioso, JC. (1989) Alterations in the antigenic structure of two major HSV-1 glycoproteins, gC and gB, influence immune regulation and susceptibility to murine herpes keratitis J Immunol 142,263-269[Abstract]
8. Braciale, TJ, Morrison, LA, Sweetser, MT, Sambrook, J, Gething, MJ, Braciale, VL. (1987) Antigen presentation pathways to class I and class II MHC-restricted T lymphocytes Immunol Rev 98,95-114[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Kovacsovics-Bankowski, M, Clark, K, Benacerraf, B, Rock, KL. (1993) Efficient major histocompatibility complex class I presentation of exogenous antigen upon phagocytosis by macrophages Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90,4942-4946[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Ke, Y, Li, Y, Kapp, JA. (1995) Ovalbumin injected with complete Freund’s adjuvant stimulates cytolytic responses Eur J Immunol 25,549-553[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Ke, Y, Kapp, JA. (1996) Oral antigen inhibits priming of CD8⁺ CTL, CD4⁺ T cells and antibody responses while activating CD8⁺ suppressor T cells J Immunol 156,916-921[Abstract]
12. Ke, Y, Pearce, K, Lake, JP, Ziegler, HK, Kapp, JA. (1997) T lymphocytes regulate the induction and maintenance of oral tolerance J Immunol 158,3610-3618[Abstract]
13. Itohara, S, Mombaerts, P, Lafaille, J, et al (1993) T cell receptor d gene mutant mice: independent generation of ß T cells and programmed rearrangements of TCR genes Cell 72,337-48[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Moore, MW, Carbone, FR, Bevan, MJ. (1988) Introduction of soluble protein into the class I pathway of antigen processing and presentation Cell 54,777-785[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kruisbeek, AM. (2000) In vitro assays for mouse lymphocyte function Coligan, JE Kruisbeek, AM Margulies, DH Shevach, EM Strober, W. eds. Current Protocols in Immunology ,3.15.1-3.15.12 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
16. Stanciu, LA, Shute, J, Promwong, C, Holgate, ST, Djukanovic, R. (1997) Increased levels of IL-4 in CD8+ T cells in atopic asthma J Allergy Clin Immunol 100,373-378[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Loetscher, P, Seitz, M, Baggiolini, M, Moser, B. (1996) Interleukin-2 regulates CC chemokine receptor expression and chemotactic responsiveness in T lymphocytes J Exp Med 184,569-577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Turner, J, Dockrell, HM. (1996) Stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with live Mycobacterium bovis BCG activates cytolytic CD8+ T cells in vitro Immunology 87,339-342[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Skelsey, ME, Mellon, J, Niederkorn, JY. (2001) T cells are needed for ocular immune privilege and corneal graft survival J Immunol 166,4327-4333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Takeuchi, M, Alard, P, Streilein, JW. (1998) TGF-ß promotes immune deviation by altering accessory signals of antigen-presenting cells J Immunol 160,1589-1597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Adams, LB, Fukutomi, Y, Krahenbuhl, JL. (1993) Regulation of murine macrophage effector functions by lipoarabinomannan from mycobacterial strains with different degrees of virulence Infect Immunity 61,4173-4181[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Mukasa, A, Hiromatsu, K, Matsuzaki, G, O’Brien, R, Born, W, Nomoto, K. (1995) Bacterial infection of the testis leading to autoaggressive immunity triggers apparently opposed responses of ß and T cells J Immunol 155,2047-2056[Abstract]
23. Suzuki, T, Hiromatsu, K, Ando, Y, Okamoto, T, Tomoda, Y, Yoshikai, Y. (1995) Regulatory role of T cells in uterine intraepithelial lymphocytes in maternal antifetal immune response J Immunol 154,4476-4484[Abstract]
24. McMenamin, C, Pimm, C, McKersey, M, Holt, PG. (1994) Regulation of IgE responses to inhaled antigen in mice by antigen-specific / T cells Science 265,1869-1871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Seo, N, Egawa, K. (1995) Suppression of cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity by T cells in tumor bearing mice Cancer Immunol Immunother 40,358-366[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ksander, BR, Streilein, JW. (1989) Analysis of cytotoxic T cell responses to intracameral allogeneic tumors Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 30,323-329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Streilein, JW, Ksander, BR, Taylor, AW. (1997) Immune deviation in relation to ocular immune privilege J Immunol 158,3557-3560[Abstract]
28. Witmer-Pack, MD, Crowley, MT, Inaba, K, Steinman, RM. (1993) Macrophages, but not dendritic cells, accumulate colloidal carbon following administration in situ J Cell Sci 105,965-973[Abstract]
29. Fu, YX, Roark, CE, Kelly, K, et al (1994) Immune protection and control of inflammatory tissue necrosis by T cells J Immunol 153,3101-3115[Abstract]
30. Mombaerts, P, Arnoldi, J, Russ, F, Tonegawa, S, Kaufmann, SH. (1993) Different roles of ß and T cells in immunity against an intracellular bacterial pathogen Nature 365,53-56[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Gorczynski, RM, Cohen, Z, Leung, Y, Chen, Z. (1996) TCR⁺ hybridomas derived from mice preimmunized through the portal vein adoptively transfer increased skin allograft survival in vivo J Immunol 157,574-581[Abstract]
32. Shiohara, T, Moriya, N, Hayakawa, J, Itohara, S, Ishikawa, H. (1996) Resistance to cutaneous graft-vs.-host disease is not induced in T cell receptor d gene-mutant mice J Exp Med 183,1483-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Cardillo, F, Falcao, RP, Rossi, MA, Mengel, J. (1993) An age-related T cell suppressor activity correlates with the outcome of autoimmunity in experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infection Eur J Immunol 23,2597-2605[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Wilbanks, GA, Streilein, JW. (1990) Characterization of suppressor cells in anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) induced by soluble antigen: evidence of two functionally and phenotypically distinct T-suppressor cell populations Immunology 71,383-389[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Sato, K, Ohtsuka, K, Watanabe, H, Asakura, H, Abo, T. (1993) Detailed characterization of / T cells within the organs in mice: classification into three groups Immunol 80,380-387[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Szczepanik, M, Anderson, LR, Ushio, H, et al (1996) T cells from tolerized ß T cell receptor (TCR)-deficient mice inhibit contact sensitivity-effector T cells in vivo, and their interferon-g production in vitro J Exp Med 184,2129-2139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Born, W, Cady, C, Jones-Carson, J, Mukasa, A, Lahn, M, O’Brien, R. (1999) Immunoregulatory functions of T cells Adv Immunol 71,77-144[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Steele, CR, Oppenheim, DE, Hayday, AC. (2000) T cells: non-classical ligands for non-classical cells Curr Biol 10,R282-R285[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Rock, EP, Sibbald, PR, Davis, MM, Chien, YH. (1994) CDR3 length in antigen-specific immune receptors J Exp Med 179,323-328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Huber, SA, Mortensen, A, Moulton, G. (1996) Modulation of cytokine expression by CD4⁺ T cells during coxsackievirus B3 infections of BALB/c mice initiated by cells expressing the ⁺ T-cell receptor J Virol 70,3039-3044[Abstract]
41. Gorczynski, RM, Chen, Z, Zeng, H, Fu, XM. (1997) Specificity for in vivo graft prolongation in T cell receptor+ hybridomas derived from mice given portal vein donor-specific preimmunization and skin allografts J Immunol 159,3698-3706[Abstract]
42. Harrison, LC, Dempsey-Collier, M, Kramer, DR, Takahashi, K. (1996) Aerosol insulin induces regulatory CD8 T cells that prevent murine insulin-dependent diabetes J Exp Med 184,2167-2174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Ma, H, Kapp, JA. (2000) Antigenic epitopes regulate the phenotype of CD8+ CTL primed by exogenous antigens J Immunol 164,5698-5703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Kosiewicz, MM, Alard, P, Streilein, JW. (1998) Alterations in cytokine production following intraocular injection of soluble protein antigen: impairment in IFN- and induction of TGF-ß and IL-4 production J Immunol 161,5382-5390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Lundqvist, C, Melgar, S, Yeung, MMW, Hammarstrom, S, Hammarstrom, ML. (1996) Intraepithelial lymphocytes in human gut have lytic potential and a cytokine profile that suggest T helper 1 and cytotoxic functions J Immunol 157,1926-1934[Abstract]
46. Udaka, K, Marusic-Galesic, S, Walden, P. (1994) CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ ß and T cells are cytotoxic effector cells of ß₂-microglobulin-deficient mice against cells having normal MHC class I expression J Immunol 22,2843-2850
47. D’Orazio, TJ, Niederkorn, JY. (1998) Splenic B cells are required for tolerogenic antigen presentation in the induction of anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) Immunology 95,47-55[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Sonoda, K-H, Exley, M, Snapper, S, Balk, SP, Stein-Streilein, J. (1999) CD1-reactive natural killer T cells are required for development of systemic tolerance through an immune-privileged site J Exp Med 190,1215-1225[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Faunce, DE, Sonoda, KH, Stein-Streilein, J. (2001) MIP-2 recruits NKT cells to the spleen during tolerance induction J Immunol 166,313-321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Bucy, RP, Chen, CL, Cihak, J, Losch, U, Cooper, MD. (1988) Avian T cells expressing gamma delta receptors localize in the splenic sinusoids and the intestinal epithelium J Immunol 141,2200-2205[Abstract]
51. Bordessoule, D, Gaulard, P, Mason, DY. (1990) Preferential localisation of human lymphocytes bearing gamma delta T cell receptors to the red pulp of the spleen J Clin Pathol 43,461-464[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. O'Brien, M. A. Taylor, J. Hartley, T. Nuhsbaum, S. Dugan, K. Lahmers, M. K. Aydintug, J. M. Wands, C. L. Roark, and W. K. Born Protective Role of {gamma}{delta} T Cells in Spontaneous Ocular Inflammation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 3266 - 3274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Cui, H. Shao, C. Lan, H. Nian, R. L. O'Brien, W. K. Born, H. J. Kaplan, and D. Sun Major Role of {gamma}{delta} T Cells in the Generation of IL-17+ Uveitogenic T Cells J. Immunol., July 1, 2009; 183(1): 560 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chattopadhyay, J. O'Rourke, and R. E. Cone Implication for the CD94/NKG2A-Qa-1 system in the generation and function of ocular-induced splenic CD8+ regulatory T cells Int. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 20(4): 509 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Brouard, E. Mansfield, C. Braud, L. Li, M. Giral, S.-c. Hsieh, D. Baeten, M. Zhang, J. Ashton-Chess, C. Braudeau, et al. Identification of a peripheral blood transcriptional biomarker panel associated with operational renal allograft tolerance PNAS, September 25, 2007; 104(39): 15448 - 15453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. M. Ashour and J. Y. Niederkorn {gamma}{delta} T Cells Promote Anterior Chamber-Associated Immune Deviation and Immune Privilege through Their Production of IL-10 J. Immunol., December 15, 2006; 177(12): 8331 - 8337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. C. McKenna and J. A. Kapp Accumulation of Immunosuppressive CD11b+ Myeloid Cells Correlates with the Failure to Prevent Tumor Growth in the Anterior Chamber of the Eye J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1599 - 1608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Faunce, A. Terajewicz, and J. Stein-Streilein Cutting Edge: In Vitro-Generated Tolerogenic APC Induce CD8+ T Regulatory Cells That Can Suppress Ongoing Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis J. Immunol., February 15, 2004; 172(4): 1991 - 1995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Skelsey, E. Mayhew, and J. Y. Niederkorn Splenic B Cells Act as Antigen Presenting Cells for the Induction of Anterior Chamber-Associated Immune Deviation Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 5242 - 5251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Xu, Y. Articles by Kapp, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Xu, Y. Articles by Kapp, J. A.