|
|
||||||||
1 From the Departments of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and 2 GenVec Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Ad vectors containing reporter gene constructs were injected into the vitreous cavity or subretinal space of wild-type mice or mice with proliferative retinopathies, and quantitative comparisons were made of expression of transgenes.
RESULTS. In normal eyes, peak Ad-mediated expression of luciferase, driven by a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, occurred after injection of 107 to 108 viral particles and was 10 times greater after subretinal injections than after intravitreous injections. Intravitreous injections of Ad containing ß-galactosidase (LacZ) expression constructs (AdLacZ.10) resulted in strong expression of LacZ in epithelial cells of the iris and ciliary body and focal expression in the retina. Subretinal injections of AdLacZ.10 resulted in strong expression in RPE cells. Expression of LacZ after intravitreous injection of AdLacZ.10 was significantly greater in mice with two types of proliferative retinopathy (ischemic retinopathy or transgenic mice with retina-specific expression of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB or PDGF-AB) than littermate control animals. Cells within epiretinal membranes and activated Müller cells were preferentially transduced in eyes with proliferative retinopathy.
CONCLUSIONS. These data suggest that although higher intraocular expression levels can be achieved after subretinal injection of adenoviral vectors, intravitreous injections provide good transduction of cells lining the vitreous cavity. Compared with normal eyes, eyes with proliferative retinopathy showed increased transduction, which occurred preferentially in cells participating in the disease process. Intravitreous injection of adenoviral vectors containing appropriate expression constructs may provide a good strategy for acute treatment of proliferative retinopathies, such as diabetic retinopathy and proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The choice of vector depends on many factors, including tropism of target cells, efficiency of transduction, size of the transgene, and needs regarding latency and duration of expression. Replication-defective adenoviral vectors have the advantages of large capacity (8 kb), short latency, good levels of expression in many settings, transduction of both dividing and nondividing cells, and relative ease of growth, allowing concentration to high titers. Previous studies have investigated intraocular injection of adenoviral vectors containing reporter gene constructs in wild-type animals and have demonstrated that intravitreous injections result in transduction of anterior segment tissues and some limited transduction of ganglion cells, whereas subretinal injections result in efficient transduction of retinal pigmented epithelial (RPE) cells, but relatively poor transduction of photoreceptors, except in neonatal mice.1 2 3 4 5 6
Transduction in a diseased eye may differ from that in a normal eye. We sought to explore the possible role of adenoviral gene transfer as a treatment for proliferative retinopathies, and therefore we compared transfer of adenovirus-mediated reporter genes in normal mice and in mice with proliferative retinopathies.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intraocular Injection of Vector Constructs
Intravitreous or subretinal injections of vector constructs were performed as previously described9
in C57BL/6 mice, C57BL/6 mice with oxygen-induced ischemic retinopathy,10
or transgenic mice that express platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-A,11
PDGF-B,12
both PDGF-A and -B, or littermate control animals. Intraocular injections were performed with a Harvard pump microinjection apparatus and pulled-glass micropipettes. Each micropipette was calibrated to deliver, on depression of a foot switch, 1 µL vehicle containing viral particles. The mice were anesthetized, pupils were dilated, and under a dissecting microscope, the sharpened tip of the micropipette was passed through the sclera just behind the limbus into the vitreous cavity, and the foot switch was depressed. Subretinal injections were performed with the aid of a condensing lens system on the dissecting microscope, which allowed visualization of the retina during the injection. The pipette tip was passed through the sclera posterior to the limbus and was positioned just above the retina. Depression of the foot switch caused the jet of injection fluid to penetrate the retina. The blebs, which are areas of retinal detachment caused by the subretinal injection of vector, were uniform in size.
Mouse Model of Oxygen-Induced Ischemic Retinopathy
Ischemic retinopathy was produced in C57BL/6 mice by a method described by Smith et al.10
Seven-day-old (postnatal day [P]7) mice and their mothers were placed in an airtight incubator and exposed to an atmosphere of 75% ± 3% oxygen for 5 days. Incubator temperature was maintained at 23 ± 2°C, and oxygen was continuously monitored with an oxygen controller (PROOX model 110; Reming Bioinstruments Co., Redfield, NY). At P12 or P16, mice were given an intravitreous injection of 108 particles of AdLacZ.10 and then killed on P16 or P21, respectively. Four or five days after injection was selected as the time point for examination of expression of transgenes, because it is within the period of peak expression. Eyes were rapidly removed and histochemically stained for LacZ, as described later.
Transgenic Mice with Increased Expression of PDGF in Photoreceptors
Transgenic mice with increased expression of PDGF-A or -B in photoreceptors have been described.11
12
PDGF-B transgenic mice show development of spontaneous traction retinal detachment and model aspects of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR). Mice with increased expression of both PDGF-A and -B were generated by mating PDGF-A mice with PDGF-B mice. Transgenic mice and littermate control animals received an intraocular injection of vector on P5, P7, or P12 and were killed on P8, P12, or P17, respectively. The eyes were used for wholemounts or sections as described later.
Luciferase Assay
Three days after intravitreous and subretinal injections of several doses (0, 105, 106, 107, 108, 5 x 108, and 109) of AdLuc.10, mice were killed, and eyes were enucleated. To assess the time course of expression after intravitreous injection, 5 x 108 viral particles were injected, and eyes were enucleated at 3, 7, 14, and 30 days. Immediately after enucleation, eyes were snap frozen and stored at -80°C. Eyes were ground with a cold mortar and pestle on dry ice and lysed (Reporter Lysis Buffer; Promega, Madison, WI). Resultant lysates were analyzed with a luciferase assay system according to the manufacturers protocol (Promega). The total protein concentration was determined to normalize the measurement of luciferase expression based on a Bradford dye binding procedure with a protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Histochemical Examination and Image Analysis
For histochemical analysis, eyes were fixed in 0.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) for 1 hour and rinsed twice in 25% sucrose in PBS. Specimens were incubated in 25% sucrose in PBS overnight and embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY). Ten-micrometer frozen sections were rinsed in PBS and reacted overnight with 1 mg/mL 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl galactopyranoside (X-gal; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in a solution containing 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6-3H2O, and 1 mM MgCl2 in PBS. Sections were postfixed for 15 minutes in 0.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS and washed in PBS. Some sections were also histochemically stained with biotinylated Griffonia simplicifolia lectin B4 (GSA; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), which selectively binds to vascular cells. Slides were incubated in methanol-H2O2 for 10 minutes at 4°C, washed with 0.05 M Tris-buffered saline (TBS; pH 7.6), and incubated for 30 minutes in 10% normal porcine serum. Slides were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with biotinylated GSA, and, after they were rinsed with 0.05 M TBS, they were incubated with avidin coupled to peroxidase (Vector Laboratories) for 30 minutes at room temperature. After being washed for 10 minutes with 0.05 M TBS, slides were incubated with diaminobenzidine (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) to give a brown reaction product.
For retinal wholemounts, eyes were fixed for 30 minutes in cold 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and rinsed five times for 10 minutes in PBS. Whole eyes were incubated overnight in 1 mg/mL X-gal in a solution containing 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6-3H2O, and 1 mM MgCl2 in PBS. Eyes were postfixed for 30 minutes and wholemounted. To perform quantitative assessments, retinas were examined with a microscope (Axioskop; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and images were digitized using a 3-charge-coupled device (CCD) color video camera and a frame grabber. Image-analysis software (Image-Pro Plus; Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD) was used to delineate X-galstained areas of the retina, and the total area of staining was measured.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Adenoviral VectorMediated Expression in a Model of PVR
In rho/PDGF-B mice, there is extensive proliferation of glial cells, pericytes, and RPE cells.12
These mice show spontaneous development of epiretinal membranes and traction retinal detachment and mimic aspects of PVR. In rho/PDGF-A mice, there is mild proliferation of glial cells, but not other cell types. They provide a model of mild nonvascular proliferative retinopathy, in which epiretinal membranes occur, but there is no traction retinal detachment.11
At P7, wild-type and transgenic mice were given an intravitreous injection of 5 x 108 particles of the vector containing the ß-galactosidase expression cassette. At P12, wholemounts showed prominent staining of the optic nerve and mild focal staining throughout the retina in wild-type mice (Fig. 3J) . In rho/PDGF-A mice, there was increased LacZ staining in and around the optic nerve and increased focal staining of the retina (Fig. 3K) . Rho/PDGF-B mice showed a marked increase in focal staining throughout the retina (Fig. 3L) , as did mice that carried both PDGF-A and PDGF-B transgenes, which have a phenotype similar to that of mice that carry only a PDGF-B transgene (Fig. 3M) . Cross sections of PDGF-B or PDGF-AB mice showed strong staining in epiretinal membranes (Fig. 3N , arrowheads) and staining of linear structures within the retina (arrows) that probably represent Müller cells. Image analysis confirmed that the area of LacZ staining in the retina was significantly greater in rho/PDGF-B and -AB mice compared with that in wild-type or rho/PDGF-A mice (Fig. 4) . When mice were given an intravitreous injection of 5 x 108 particles of the vector at P5 and then killed at P8, before there was much proliferation in the retina, there was no significant difference in the total area of LacZ staining among the four types of mouse (Fig. 4) . In cross sections, all four types of mouse at P8 showed more intense staining localized around the optic nerve (Fig. 3O) compared with older mice. In mice given an intravitreous injection of 5 x 108 particles of vector at P7 or P12 and killed at P12 or P17, respectively, the area of LacZ staining was significantly greater in PDGF-B and -AB mice than in wild-type littermates (Fig. 4) . LacZ staining was particularly strong in epiretinal membranes (Figs. 3N 3P) .
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In two models of proliferative retinopathy, there was more adenoviral vector- mediated reporter gene expression than in normal mice. In a transgenic model in which epiretinal membranes caused traction retinal detachment, as is the case in humans with PVR, there was prominent expression of transgenes in the epiretinal membranes. In a model of proliferative retinopathy in which retinal nonperfusion and neovascularization occurs, similar to that in proliferative diabetic retinopathy, there was prominent expression of transgenes in neovascularization on the surface of the retina, in the optic nerve, and in Müller glia cells within the retina. Therefore, in proliferative retinopathies, adenoviral vectormediated gene transfer is not only increased compared with that in normal retinas, but the greater expression occurs in pathologic tissue. Although adenoviral vectors can transduce nondividing cells, it is clear that this type 5 E1-deleted, E3-deleted adenoviral vector provides enhanced transduction of proliferating cells. When cells enter the cell cycle, the proteins expressed on the cell surfaces can be altered. Apparently, that alteration resulted in enhanced transduction of the adenoviral vector we used. This may provide a means through which expression of antiangiogenic or antiproliferative gene products are preferentially directed to sites where they are most needed. Müller cells also showed increased adenoviral-mediated transduction in the retinas of mice with proliferative retinopathies. Müller cells become activated after retinal detachment or other insults and increase their expression of glial fibrillaryassociated protein. Activated Müller cells migrate and proliferate and participate in proliferative disorders, and therefore increased expression of an inhibitory protein by Müller cells may decrease their participation in the proliferative process and thereby have a beneficial effect.
Toxicity consisting primarily of inflammation has been demonstrated after injection of some adenoviral vectors. There is one report of toxicity to the retina and RPE after subretinal injection of E1- and partial E3-deleted adenoviral vectors in rats.13 Before use in humans, appropriate safety studies must be performed. All vectors have advantages and disadvantages. A key point of our study is that adenoviral vectors showed a previously unrecognized benefit for the treatment of proliferative retinopathies, because they preferentially transduced proliferative tissue. This is important information for investigators interested in ocular gene therapy. Because of this benefit, it may be worth the effort to further modify adenoviral vectors to decrease their inflammatory effects. Another potential benefit of the enhanced transduction of proliferating tissue is that such tissue is part of the pathologic process and is unwanted, so that any vector-mediated toxicity to those tissues could be beneficial.
Recently, it has been demonstrated that adenoassociated viral (AAV) vectors result in long-term expression of transgenes in photoreceptors and, to a lesser extent, in RPE after subretinal injections.14 These characteristics are advantageous for gene-replacement therapy in photoreceptors or RPE, or for long-term delivery of agents, such as neurotrophic factors.15 However, AAV vectors have a long latency period of 4 to 6 weeks, which is a problem in treating acute disease. Proliferative retinopathies can progress quickly and often require rapid intervention. The risk of retinal detachment caused by PVR is greatest in the first 4 to 6 weeks after retinal reattachment surgery. The rapid onset of expression of transgenes and the preferential expression in epiretinal membranes and activated Müller cells after intravitreous injection of adenoviral vectors are ideal for this situation, and the time course of expression may be well suited for the time course of the disease process.
In patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, clear media and an attached retina are needed to perform scatter photocoagulation, and when photocoagulation can be performed, it usually takes 3 weeks for it to achieve maximum effect. Antiangiogenic agents packaged in adenoviral vectors may be a useful way to achieve a beneficial effect in several situationsfor instance, in patients with neovascularization and vitreous hemorrhage that prevents scatter photocoagulation. The rapid onset of expression of transgenes and targeting of expression to the optic nerve, neovascular tissue, and activated Müller cells provides a potential way to treat neovascularization, allowing time for the vitreous hemorrhage to clear and scatter photocoagulation to be performed. Severe neovascularization and traction retinal detachment present another particularly difficult treatment dilemma. If some regression of neovascularization can be achieved with adenoviral vectormediated gene therapy, there is likely to be less bleeding during surgery, and therefore an improved surgical prognosis. Patients with severe neovascularization and macular edema often need aggressive scatter photocoagulation which exacerbates macular edema. Some regression of neovascularization with adenoviral vectormediated gene therapy would allow more gradual photocoagulation which could result in less exacerbation of macular edema.
Recently, we have demonstrated that systemic administration of adenoviral vectors containing an expression construct for endostatin or intraocular injection of adenoviral vectors containing an expression construct for pigment epitheliumderived factor inhibit intraocular neovascularization.9 16 The present study demonstrates that despite the transient expression profile achieved with adenoviral vectors, they may be well suited to deliver antiangiogenic agents in patients with ischemic proliferative retinopathies or antiproliferative agents in patients with PVR.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication July 13, 2001; revised December 27, 2001; accepted January 15, 2002.
Commercial relationships policy: E (VG, DM, LW); N ( all others).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Peter A. Campochiaro, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Maumenee 719, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-9277; pcampo{at}jhmi.edu.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Y. Park, R. S. Chuck, M. Cano, M. Yew, V. Nguyen, J. Parker, K. Mori, and P. L. Gehlbach Periocular Triamcinolone Enhances Intraocular Gene Expression after Delivery by Adenovirus Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 399 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hamilton, D. E. Brough, D. McVey, J. T. Bruder, C. R. King, and L. L. Wei Repeated Administration of Adenovector in the Eye Results in Efficient Gene Delivery Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2006; 47(1): 299 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Anzai, S. Yoneya, P. L. Gehlbach, D. Imai, L. L. Wei, and K. Mori Laser Photocoagulation and, to a Lesser Extent, Photodynamic Therapy Target and Enhance Adenovirus Vector-Mediated Gene Transfer in the Rat Retina Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3883 - 3891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Watanabe, H. Takagi, K. Suzuma, I. Suzuma, H. Oh, H. Ohashi, S. Kemmochi, A. Uemura, T. Ojima, E. Suganami, et al. Transcription Factor Ets-1 Mediates Ischemia- and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Dependent Retinal Neovascularization Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2004; 164(5): 1827 - 1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takita, S. Yoneya, P. L. Gehlbach, E. J. Duh, L. L. Wei, and K. Mori Retinal Neuroprotection against Ischemic Injury Mediated by Intraocular Gene Transfer of Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 4497 - 4504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |