(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2003;44:4275-4281.)
© 2003 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0089
Novel Enzymatic Isolation of an Entire Viable Human Limbal Epithelial Sheet
Edgar M. Espana,1,2,3
Andre C. Romano,3
Tetsuya Kawakita,1,2,3
Mario Di Pascuale,2,3
Robert Smiddy,3 and
Scheffer C. G. Tseng1,2,3
From
1TissueTech, Inc.,
2Ocular Surface Center, and
3Ocular Surface Research and Education Foundation, Miami, Florida.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
OBJECTIVE. To develop a reproducible method of isolating an intact viable human limbal epithelial sheet.
METHODS. Human pigmented limbus was incubated at 4°C for 18 hours in supplemental hormonal epithelial medium (SHEM) containing 50 mg/mL dispase II and 100 mM sorbitol. A loose limbal epithelial sheet was separated by a spatula. The remaining stroma was digested and subcultured. The viability of isolated cells was assessed. Isolated epithelial sheets and remaining stroma were subjected to immunostaining. Sheets 1.5 mm in length were cultured in SHEM on plastic until confluence, and cell extracts were subjected to Western blot analysis.
RESULTS. Intact limbal epithelial sheets were consistently isolated. Pigmented palisades of Vogt revealed large superficial squamous cells and small basal cuboidal cells. No epithelial cells grew from the remaining stroma. Mean viability was 80.7% ± 9.1%. The basal epithelium was negative to keratin 3 and connexin 43, but was scatter positive for p63. The epithelial sheet showed negative staining for laminin 5 and collagen VII, but interrupted linear basal staining for collagen IV. The remaining stroma showed negative staining for laminin 5, positive linear staining for collagen IV in the basement membrane, and diffuse staining for collagen VII in the superior stroma subjacent to the basement membrane. Western blot analysis revealed that cells originating from the limbal sheets expressed keratin 3 and p63.
CONCLUSIONS. An intact limbal epithelial sheet can be consistently and reproducibly isolated and contains stem cell characteristics in the basal epithelium by degrading laminin 5 and part of collagen IV, and disassembling collagen VII.
The maintenance of a healthy corneal epithelium under both normal and stressed conditions is achieved by a unique population of stem cells (SCs) located in the limbal basal epithelium.1 2 The existence of these limbal epithelial SCs is supported by the following facts: These cells do not express such corneal epithelial differentiation markers as keratin 3,1 keratin 12,3 4 5 and connexin 43,6 7 but have a superior proliferative capacity under both in vivo and in vitro conditions.2 8 9 10 Epithelial neoplasias, diseases affecting the SCs, frequently involve the limbal area.11 Destruction of the limbal region has catastrophic consequences for corneal wound healing and integrity.12 13 Transplantation of limbal tissue can replenish the SC population to support regeneration of the entire corneal surface epithelium.14 15
As a first step to investigate the aforementioned remarkable biological and clinical properties of limbal SCs, it is important to develop a consistent and reproducible method of isolating an intact and viable limbal epithelial sheet including the basal epithelium. Previously, conjunctival,16 corneal,17 18 19 and limbal20 epithelium have been removed mechanically,17 chemically with EDTA20 , or enzymatically with dispase II.18 19 However, no report has demonstrated the complete removal of an intact viable human limbal epithelial sheet.
Herein, we report our new technique of isolating an intact and viable human limbal epithelial sheet using dispase II under a special digestion protocol. We have further characterized the cleavage plane and reported their unique findings different from those of ethanol treatment used in laser assisted epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). The significance of this new isolation technique is further discussed.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Plastic cell culture dishes (60 mm) were from Falcon (Franklin Lakes, NJ). Amphotericin B, Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (DMEM), F-12 nutrient mixture, fetal bovine serum (FBS), gentamicin, Hanks balanced salt solutions (HBSS), HEPES-buffer, neomycin, penicillin, streptomycin, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), RNA extraction reagent (TRIzol), and 0.05% trypsin/0.53mM EDTA were purchased from Invitrogen-Gibco (Grand Island, NY). A cell viability-cytotoxicity (Live/Dead) kit was from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Dispase II powder was obtained from Roche (Indianapolis, IN). Tissue-Tek OCT compound and cryomolds were from Sakura Finetek (Torrance, CA). Other reagents and chemicals, including bovine serum albumin (BSA), cholera-toxin (subunit A), collagenase A, dimethyl sulfoxide, hydrocortisone, insulin-transferrin-sodium selenite (ITS) media supplement, mouse-derived epidermal growth factor (EGF), prestained broad-band SDS-PAGE standard, and sorbitol, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). An immunoperoxidase staining kit (Vecstatin) and antifade mounting medium containing 4',6'-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vectashield) were obtained from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). We obtained the following monoclonal antibodies: keratin 3 (AE5; ICN, Aurora, OH), integrin ß4 (Chemicon, Temecula, CA); laminin 5 (Accurate Chemicals, Westbury, NY); mouse anticollagen VII antibody, rhodamine-conjugated rabbit anti-goat antibody, and fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); and a goat polyclonal antibody against collagen IV (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL).
Enzymatic Isolation of Limbal Epithelial Sheets
Twelve pigmented human corneoscleral rims from donors younger than 50 years and less than 4 days after harvesting were obtained from the Florida Lions Eye bank within 8 hours after penetrating keratoplasty. Figures 1A and 1C show the amount of pigmentation in the selected rims and Figures 1B 1D and 1E show a view of Vogts palisades with a high magnification. After corneal transplantation, they were immediately transferred to supplemental hormonal epithelial medium (SHEM), which was made of an equal volume of HEPES-buffered DMEM and Hams F12 containing bicarbonate, 0.5% dimethyl sulfoxide, 2 ng/mL mouse-derived EGF, 5 µg/mL insulin, 5 µg/mL transferrin, 5 ng/mL sodium selenite, 0.5 µg/mL hydrocortisone, 30 ng/mL cholera toxin A subunit, 5% FBS, 50 µg/mL gentamicin, and 1.25 µg/mL amphotericin B. They were then transported at 4°C within 2 hours to the laboratory, where the rims were rubbed off the endothelium and the uveal tissue with a cotton tip and cut by a razor blade into four symmetrical segments, each spanning three clock hours starting from 12 oclock. Each segment was incubated at 4°C in SHEM containing 50 mg/mL dispase II and 100 mM sorbitol for 18 hours. Under a dissecting microscope, an already loose limbal epithelial sheet was separated by inserting and sliding a noncutting flat stainless-steel spatula into a plane between the limbal epithelium and the stroma. This maneuver was videophotographed. The video is available online at http://www.iovs.org/cgi/content/full/44/10/4275/DC1.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 1. (A, C) Photographs illustrating the amount of pigmentation in two different corneoscleral rims. (B, D, E) Palisades of Vogt were clearly distinguishable at higher magnifications.
|
|
Cell Culture of Remaining Stroma
To determine whether there was any epithelial cell left, 16 remaining stromal segments from eight different donor rims were incubated at 37°C for 20 minutes in DMEM containing 1 mg/mL collagenase A. After centrifuge to remove the digestion solution, the remnants were cultured for 2 weeks at 37°C in a DMEM medium containing 10% FBS, 20 mM HEPES, 50 µg/mL gentamicin, and 1.25 µg/mL amphotericin B in a 5% carbon dioxide humidified environment. The medium was changed every 2 to 3 days. Five segments that were not exposed to dispase II digestion were subjected to the same collagenase digestion as described earlier and used as a positive control.
Viability Evaluation
To determine the cell viability, six isolated limbal epithelial sheets from six different donor rims were incubated at 37°C for 5 minutes in Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) containing 0.05% trypsin and 0.53 mM EDTA. After a brief pipetting to achieve a single cell suspension, cells were centrifuged at 800g for 5 minutes and resuspended in PBS containing 2 µM calcein AM and 4 µM ethidium homodimer for 45 minutes at room temperature before cells were counted under a fluorescence microscope at 100x. A mean percentage of live cells was calculated by counting both dead (red fluorescence) and live (green fluorescence) cells at 10 different locations in a plastic dish. Cultured human corneal epithelial cells expanded from limbal explants21 that were exposed to methanol for 1 hour were used as a positive control as dead cells.
Immunofluorescent Staining
After the corneoscleral rims were incubated in dispase II, as described earlier, one piece of corneoscleral rim was embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT), without removing the epithelium, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for 5-µm frozen sectioning. As a comparison, epithelial sheets and remaining stroma were separately subjected to frozen sectioning. After fixation in cold acetone for 10 minutes at -20°C, immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described,22 using antibodies against the following antigens: keratin 3 (1:100), connexin 43 (1:100), p63 (1:40), integrin ß4 (1:100), collagen IV (1:50), collagen VII (1:100), and laminin 5 (1:100). The primary antibody was detected with a fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody, except for collagen IV, in which a rhodamine-conjugated antibody was used. Sections were mounted in antifading solution containing DAPI (Vectashield; Vector Laboratories), and analyzed with an epifluorescence microscope (Te-2000u Eclipse; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Characterization of Isolated Epithelial Sheet Outgrowth on Plastic
Segments of isolated limbal epithelial sheets (n = 7) of 1.5 mm of arc length were cultured until confluence in 60-mm dishes containing SHEM. To determine the expression of keratin 3, which is regarded as a corneal differentiation marker1 and p63 nuclear protein, which is a presumed corneal SC marker,23 proteins of confluent cultures were extracted (TRIzol; Invitrogen-Gibco) and precipitated by centrifuging at 12,000g in 100% isopropyl alcohol. After washing and centrifuge for three times, the protein pellet was precipitated with a solution of 95% ethanol containing 0.3 M guanidine hydrochloride. A final wash was performed with 100% ethanol and the protein pellet was air dried for 10 minutes. Prestained broad-band SDS-PAGE standard and protein samples were dissolved into 1x SDS loading buffer: 50 mM Tris Cl (pH 6.8), 100 mM dithiothreitol, 2% SDS, 1% bromophenol blue, and 10% glycerol. Ten micrograms of total proteins were electrophoresed in a 7.5% gradient polyacrylamide gel. After proteins were electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, the membrane was immersed for 30 minutes in Tween-Tris-buffered saline (TTBS), which contained 0.1% (vol/vol) Tween 20 in 100 mM Tris and 0.9% NaCl (pH 7.5), followed by 1 hour of blocking with 5% low-fat dry milk in TTBS. Membranes were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with primary antibody against p63 (1:250 dilution) and keratin 3 (1:1000 dilution). After being washed with TTBS, each membrane was transferred to a 1:200 diluted solution of biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody in TTBS containing 1% horse serum. After incubation for 30 minutes, the membrane was incubated with 1:50 diluted avidin biotin complex (ABC) reagent (Vectastain Elite; Vector Laboratories) conjugated with peroxidase for 30 minutes and developed in diaminobenzidine (DAB; Dako, Carpinteria, CA) for between 1 and 3 minutes.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Isolation of Epithelial Sheet
Intact limbal epithelial sheets were consistently removed from 48 limbal segments, demonstrating the procedures simplicity and reproducibility. As shown in Figure 2 , the entire isolated limbal sheet with pigmented palisades of Vogt can be obtained (Fig. 2A as an example). Microscopic evaluation of the remaining limbal stromal surface revealed the lack of pigmented tissue (not shown). A phase-contrast microscopic view of the isolated limbal sheets showed large superficial cells on the surface (Fig. 2B) and small basal epithelial cells on the basal surface of the sheet (Fig. 2C) . The isolated limbal epithelial sheet was easy to handle and could be transferred to a culture dish in a mediumusing a transfer pipette to maintain the sheets integrity in all cases.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 2. (A) Example of an entire limbal epithelial sheet isolated using the described method. The normal architecture of palisades of Vogt was maintained after removal. (B) Phase-contrast view of large, flat superficial cells on the limbal epithelial sheet surface. (C) Phase-contrast view of small rounded cells at the bottom of the sheet. Scale bar, 40 µm.
|
|
Culturing the Stromal Remnants after Epithelial Sheet Removal
No epithelial outgrowth was seen in any of 16 limbal stromal remnants that were digested by collagenase A and cultured for 2 weeks. Instead, abundant fibroblasts grew out of these stromal remnants in every remnant. In contrast, all five control samples with an intact limbal epithelium showed a characteristic epithelial outgrowth. These findings confirmed that there was no epithelial cell remaining on the stroma after the isolation.
Cell Viability
The isolated epithelial sheet was then subjected to a brief trypsin-EDTA treatment to render single-cell suspensions. The mean viability rate of six different samples was 80.7% ± 9.1% (ranging from 66.3% to 90.7%) when 31.23 ± 5.9 cells were counted per 100x field. The positive control of methanol-treated cultured human corneal epithelial cells showed a viability of 0% (i.e., 100% of dead cells).
Characterization of Epithelial Phenotype of Isolated Limbal Sheets
Hematoxylin staining of the isolated limbal epithelial sheet showed a stratified and organized epithelium identical with that noted in vivo human limbus. This stratified epithelium consisted of superficial large squamous cells, intermediate wing cells, and small basal epithelium, which was associated with pigmentation (Fig. 3A 3B) . The superficial surface was smooth, whereas the basal surface was undulating. Immunostaining of the isolated limbal epithelial sheet showed strong intracytoplasmic staining for the AE-5 antibody, which recognizes keratin 3, in the full-thickness stratified epithelium, corresponding to the peripheral corneal epithelium (Fig. 3C , to the right of the arrow), and suprabasal cell layers of the limbal epithelium (Figs. 3C 3D , to the left of the arrow). This AE-5 staining pattern showing the basal negativity of keratin 3 has been reported as a proof of limbal epithelial SCs.1 The intercellular punctuate staining of connexin 43 was found in the suprabasal cells, but was absent in the basal cells (Fig. 3E) , a pattern noted previously as well.6 7 The staining for the transcription factor p63, a reportedly limbal SC marker,23 was located exclusively in the basal cell layer (Fig. 3F) .

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 3. (A) Hematoxylin staining showed an isolated limbal epithelial sheet with flat superficial cells, intermediate wing cells, and small, occasionally pigmented cells in the basal layer. (B) Higher magnification showed an undulating basal layer with pigmentation as seen in vivo. (C) Full-thickness staining by an anti-keratin 3 antibody in the peripheral cornea (right of the arrow), but suprabasal staining in the limbal epithelium (left of the arrow). (D) A higher-magnification view shows the absence of anti-keratin 3 staining in the basal region of the limbal sheet. (E) Connexin 43 staining was positive in intercellular junctions of suprabasal epithelial cells. (F) The basal positive p63 staining was observed in the entire limbal sheet. Scale bar, 40 µm.
|
|
Characterization of the Basement Membrane Adhesion Complex after Complete Digestion
After complete dispase digestion, we analyzed the basement membrane-adhesion complex before the limbal epithelium was separated. Hematoxylin staining showed that the limbal epithelium was loosely adherent to the underlying stroma, as evidenced by the spaces created between (Fig. 4A , asterisk). The staining for collagen IV was positive in the blood vessels and the superficial stroma of the limbus, with discontinuous staining in the basement membrane area of the basal surface of the loose limbal epithelial sheet (Fig. 4B) . The staining for collagen VII was linearly positive in the superficial stroma of the corneal portion, but was weak in the superficial stroma of the limbus after digestion (Fig. 4C) . Under higher magnification, a strong linear pattern of staining was located in the basement membrane zone of the peripheral cornea (Fig. 4D) . Nevertheless, the staining was diffuse in the superficial stroma of the limbus (Fig. 4E) . Staining for laminin 5 was negative in the basement membrane zone of the entire region (Fig. 4F) , suggesting total digestion of this protein during the 18-hour incubation.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 4. (A) Hematoxylin staining showed a loosely adherent limbal epithelial sheet, as evidenced by the spaces created between the epithelium and the underlying stroma ( ). (B) Collagen IV was positive in the blood vessels and the superficial stroma of the limbus with a discontinuous staining in the basal surface of the loose limbal epithelial sheet. (C) Collagen VII had positive linear staining pattern in the superficial stroma of the corneal portion, but was weak in that of the limbus after digestion. (D) Higher magnification of the peripheral cornea showed a linear staining for collagen VII. (E) However, collagen VII was diffuse in the superficial stroma of the limbus. (F) Negative laminin 5 staining in the limbus after digestion. Scale bar, 40 µm.
|
|
Characterization of the Basement Membrane Adhesion Complex after Epithelial Sheet Isolation
After digestion, we isolated limbal epithelial sheets and then analyzed the sheet and the remaining stroma separately by immunostaining. The staining for integrin ß4 was linearly positive on the basal epithelial cell surface (Fig. 5A) , but was absent on the remaining stroma (not shown). The staining for laminin 5 was negative on the entire epithelial sheet (Fig. 5B) and negative on the remaining stroma (not shown). The staining for collagen IV was sporadically positive on the basal surface of the isolated sheet (Fig. 5B) , but was strongly positive in a linear pattern on the superficial surface of the remaining stroma (Fig. 5F) . Staining for collagen VII was negative on the isolated limbal sheet (Fig. 5D) , but was diffusely positive in the superficial stroma of the stromal remnant (Fig. 5G) . These findings were consistent with those described in Figure 4 .

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 5. (A) Linearly positive staining for integrin ß4 was present on the basal epithelial cell surface of the isolated sheets. (B) Negative laminin 5 staining was noted in the entire epithelial sheet. (C) Collagen IV was sporadically positive on the basal surface of isolated sheets. (D) No collagen VII was observed in any isolated sheet. (E) Hematoxylin staining of a remaining stroma showed the absence of epithelial cells. (F) Collagen IV was strongly positive in a linear pattern on the superficial surface of the remaining limbal stroma. (G) Collagen VII was diffusely positive in the superficial stroma of the stromal remnant. Scale bar, 40 µm.
|
|
Characterization of Epithelial Outgrowth Derived from Isolated Limbal Epithelial Sheets in Culture
One small segment of isolated limbal epithelial sheet having a size of 1.5 mm of arch length was seeded on the center of each 60-mm plastic dish and cultured in SHEM. Cells rapidly grew out of the sheet and reached the border of the dish in 17.7 ± 3 days (Fig. 6A) . Epithelial cells continued to grow onto the side wall of the dish to the level of the medium (Fig. 6B) . Phase contrast microscopy showed that cells appeared to be small and formed a compact monolayer (Figs. 6C 6D) . Western blot analysis of proteins extracted from these cells after confluence showed a positive band of p63 at 60 kDa and a positive band of keratin 3 at 64 kDa (Fig. 6E) .

View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 6. (A) Two different limbal epithelial sheets (1.5 mm arc length), cultured until confluence, were stained with crystal violet. (B) Side view showing the extent of the outgrowth on the dish wall. (C, D) Phase-contrast microscopy showed a monolayer of small, compact epithelial cells. (E) Western blot analysis of the proteins extracted from expanded cells showed a band at 60 kDa (p63) and another at 64 kDa (keratin 3).
|
|
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Our technique of isolating the entire limbal epithelial sheet is based on digestion by dispase II, a neutral protease from Bacillus polymyxa that was originally used to separate the epidermis from the dermis.24 In the skin, the proteolytic action of dispase II is thought to target fibronectin and collagen IV of the basement membrane.25 Spurr and Gipson19 demonstrated disappearance of immunoreactivity to laminin in the rabbit cornea after 6 hours of incubation with 2.4 U dispase II at 37°C. We noted that an 18-hour incubation of 50 mg/mL dispase II at 4°C degraded laminin 5 completely and nearly all the collagen IV in the corneal and limbal basement membranes. In addition, such a digestion regimen did not degrade collagen VII, which forms anchoring fibrils in the corneal basement membrane, but caused their complete disassembly in the limbal basement membrane. Dispase II did not alter integrin ß4 of the basal epithelium. Taken together, these findings support that the cleavage plane created by dispase II is at the lamina densa of the basement membrane. The differences in the composition and anatomy of the limbal and central corneal basement membranes20 26 may explain why a different digestion regimen is needed to separate an intact human limbal epithelium from the stroma.
The digestion by dispase II would have to be extended to 18 hours to remove the limbal epithelial sheet completely. This notion was verified by the absence of epithelial outgrowth from the remaining stroma after subculturing for 2 weeks. In contrast, we noted that some limbal basal epithelial cells remained in the stroma when the same dispase dose was incubated at 37°C for 1 hour or at 4°C for 14 hours (not shown). Because it was necessary to incubate in dispase II for such a long period, it is important to keep it at a low temperature (4°C) to reduce metabolic activity and maintain the tissue in a medium with growth supplements to maintain the viability and in the presence of 100 mM sorbitol to prevent cell swelling by increasing the osmolarity.27 By doing so, we confirmed that isolated limbal epithelial sheets indeed retained a high viability of 80.7%. Because human limbal rings used in this study were not fresh and were studied at variable times after death, stored in Chen medium, and transported to the laboratory, there may have been cell death before digestion. Therefore, we applied the same digestion protocol to several samples of fresh, pigmented rabbit limbus, and obtained a mean maximum cell viability of 93% (not shown).
Because the cleavage plane is within the basement membrane zone, the cell membrane and intercellular junctions remain intact. As a result, cells retain high viability and preserve such intercellular structures as cadherins, integrins,28 and connexins. In this study, we noted that the basal epithelium of the isolated limbal epithelium retained pigmentation, did not express keratin 3 and connexin 43, but actively expressed p63. These characteristics are identical with SC features reported in human limbal epithelium in vivo.1 6 23
The cleavage plane created by this dispase digestion is different from the brief treatment of 20% ethanol used to prepare an epithelial flap before excimer laser ablation in the LASEK procedure, in which the cleavage plane is characterized as located in the lamina lucida and the hemidesmosomes of the basement membrane, and there is ethanol-induced cell membrane damage.29 To further verify that isolated limbal epithelial sheets indeed were viable and functioned properly, we seeded a small fragment of 1.5-mm arc length at the center of a 60-mm plastic dish, and the fragment rapidly grew into a confluent monolayer with small and compact epithelial cells. Furthermore, the final epithelial outgrowth expressed keratin 3 and p63, both of which are regarded as differentiation and proliferation markers of the limbal epithelial SCs, respectively.1 23
With such an intact and viable epithelial sheet isolated from the human limbus, one can begin to study limbal SCs with respect to their properties, proliferation, and differentiation into the corneal epithelium and their interaction with the underlying stromal niche. This technique may also facilitate the purification of limbal SCs once the surface marker has been identified. Furthermore, it may also be useful to use isolated limbal epithelial sheets to expand limbal epithelial SC ex vivo for therapeutic epithelial transplantation. Such a new method of separating the epithelial sheet may also improve the clinical efficacy of LASEK when viable epithelial flaps are better preserved.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, May 2003.
Supported in part by National Eye Institute Grant EY06819 (SCGT) to TissueTech, Inc., and in part by an unrestricted grant from the Ocular Surface Research and Education Foundation (EME, ACR)
Submitted for publication January 28, 2003; revised April 11, 2003; accepted May 29, 2003.
Disclosure: E.M. Espana, TissueTech, Inc. (E); A.C. Romano, None; T. Kawakita, TissueTech, Inc. (E); M. Di Pascuale, None; R. Smiddy, None; S.C.G. Tseng, TissueTech, Inc. (E)
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Scheffer C. G. Tseng, Ocular Surface Center and Ocular Surface Research and Education Foundation, 8780 SW 92 Street, Suite 203, Miami, FL 33176; tseng{at}ocularsurface.com.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Schermer, A, Galvin, S, Sun, T-T. (1986) Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells J Cell Biol 103,49-62[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schermer, A, Galvin, S, Sun, T-T. (1986) Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells J Cell Biol 103,49-62
- Chen, WY, Mui, MM, Kao, WW, Liu, CY, Tseng, SC. (1994) Conjunctival epithelial cells do not transdifferentiate in organotypic cultures: Expression of K12 keratin is restricted to corneal epithelium Curr Eye Res 13,765-778[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kiritoshi, A, SundarRaj, N, Thoft, RA. (1991) Differentiation in cultured limbal epithelium as defined by keratin expression Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32,3073-3077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Liu, C-Y, Zhu, G, Converse, R, et al (1994) Characterization and chromosomal localization of the cornea-specific murine keratin gene Krt1.12 J Biol Chem 260,24627-24636
- Matic, M, Petrov, IN, Chen, S, Wang, C, Dimitrijevich, SD, Wolosin, JM. (1997) Stem cells of the corneal epithelium lack connexins and metabolite transfer capacity Differentiation 61,251-260[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wolosin, JM, Xiong, X, Schütte, M, Stegman, Z, Tieng, A. (2000) Stem cells and differentiation stages in the limbo-corneal epithelium Prog Retinal and Eye Res 19,223-255[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lindberg, K, Brown, ME, Chaves, HV, Kenyon, KR, Rheinwald, JG. (1993) In vitro preparation of human ocular surface epithelial cells for transplantation Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34,2672-2679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pellegrini, G, Golisano, O, Paterna, P, et al (1999) Location and clonal analysis of stem cells and their differentiated progeny in the human ocular surface J Cell Biol 145,769-782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lavker, RM, Wei, ZG, Sun, TT. (1998) Phorbol ester preferentially stimulates mouse fornical conjunctival and limbal epithelial cells to proliferate in vivo Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39,301-307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pizzarello, LD, Jakobiec, FA. (1978) Bowens disease of conjunctiva: A misnomer Jakobiec, FA. eds. Ocular and Adnexal Tumors Acculapius Birmingham.
- Chen, JJY, Tseng, SCG. (1991) Abnormal corneal epithelial wound healing in partial thickness removal of limbal epithelium Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32,2219-2233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Huang, AJW, Tseng, SCG. (1991) Corneal epithelial wound healing in the absence of limbal epithelium Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 32,96-105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kenyon, KR, Tseng, SCG. (1989) Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders Ophthalmology 96,709-723[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Tsai, RJF, Sun, T-T, Tseng, SCG. (1990) Comparison of limbal and conjunctival autograft transplantation for corneal surface reconstruction in rabbits Ophthalmology 97,446-455[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Geggel, HS, Gipson, IK. (1985) Removal of viable sheets of conjunctival epithelium with dispase II Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26,15-22[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Khodadoust, AA. (1967) Techniques for the preparation of sheets of pure corneal epithelium Am J Ophthalmol 63,942-945[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gipson, IK, Grill, SM. (1982) A technique for obtaining sheets of intact rabbit corneal epithelium Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 23,269-273[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Spurr, SJ, Gipson, IK. (1985) Isolation of corneal epithelium with dispase II or EDTA: effects on the basement membrane zone Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26,818-827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gipson, IK. (1989) The epithelial basement membrane zone of the limbus Eye 3,132-140
- Tseng, SCG, Zhang, S-H. (1995) Limbal epithelium is more resistant to 5-fluorouracil toxicity than corneal epithelium Cornea 14,394-401[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Grueterich, M, Espana, E, Tseng, SC. (2002) Connexin 43 expression and proliferation of human limbal epithelium on intact and denuded amniotic membrane Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43,63-71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pellegrini, G, Dellambra, E, Golisano, O, et al (2001) p63 identifies keratinocyte stem cells Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98,3156-3161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Green, H, Kehinde, O, Thomas, J. (1979) Growth of cultured human epidermal cells into multiple epithelia suitable for grafting Proc Natl Acad Sci 76,5665-5668[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Stenn, KS, Link, R, Moellmann, G, Madri, J, Kuklinska, E. (1989) Dispase, a neutral protease from Bacillus polymyxa, is a powerful fibronectinase and type IV collagenase J Invest Dermatol 93,287-290[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ljubimov, AV, Burgeson, RE, Butkowski, RJ, Michael, AF, Sun, T-T, Kenney, MC. (1995) Human corneal basement membrane heterogeneity: topographical differences in the expression of type IV collagen and laminin isoforms Lab Invest 72,461-473[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Pfefer, BA. (1991) Improved methodology for cell culture of human and monkey retinal pigment epithelium Prog Retinal Eye Res 10,251-291
- Poumay, Y, Roland, IH, Leclercq-Smekens, M, Leloup, R. (1994) Basal detachment of the epidermis using dispase: tissue spatial organization and fate of integrin alpha 6 beta 4 and hemidesmosomes J Invest Dermatol 102,111-117[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
- Espana, EM, Grueterich, M, Mateo, A, et al (2003) Cleavage of corneal basement membrane components by ethanol exposure like LASEK J Cat Refract Surg 29,1192-1197[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kawakita, S. Shimmura, K. Higa, E. M. Espana, H. He, J. Shimazaki, K. Tsubota, and S. C. G. Tseng
Greater Growth Potential of p63-Positive Epithelial Cell Clusters Maintained in Human Limbal Epithelial Sheets
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
October 1, 2009;
50(10):
4611 - 4617.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Higa, S. Shimmura, H. Miyashita, N. Kato, Y. Ogawa, T. Kawakita, J. Shimazaki, and K. Tsubota
N-Cadherin in the Maintenance of Human Corneal Limbal Epithelial Progenitor Cells In Vitro
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
October 1, 2009;
50(10):
4640 - 4645.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Higa, S. Shimmura, N. Kato, T. Kawakita, H. Miyashita, Y. Itabashi, K. Fukuda, J. Shimazaki, and K. Tsubota
Proliferation and Differentiation of Transplantable Rabbit Epithelial Sheets Engineered with or without an Amniotic Membrane Carrier
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
February 1, 2007;
48(2):
597 - 604.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Li, Y. Hayashida, H. He, C.-L. Kuo, and S. C. G. Tseng
The Fate of Limbal Epithelial Progenitor Cells during Explant Culture on Intact Amniotic Membrane
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
February 1, 2007;
48(2):
605 - 613.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Li, A. L. Sabater, Y.-T. Chen, Y. Hayashida, S.-Y. Chen, H. He, and S. C. G. Tseng
A Novel Method of Isolation, Preservation, and Expansion of Human Corneal Endothelial Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
February 1, 2007;
48(2):
614 - 620.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. V. Patel, T. Sherwin, and C. N. J. McGhee
Laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy of the normal human corneoscleral limbus.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
July 1, 2006;
47(7):
2823 - 2827.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. M. Espana, T. Kawakita, M. A. Di Pascuale, W. Li, L.-K. Yeh, J.-M. Parel, C.-Y. Liu, and S. C. G. Tseng
The Heterogeneous Murine Corneal Stromal Cell Populations In Vitro
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
December 1, 2005;
46(12):
4528 - 4535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kawakita, E. M. Espana, H. He, W. Li, C.-Y. Liu, and S. C.G. Tseng
Intrastromal Invasion by Limbal Epithelial Cells Is Mediated by Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Activated by Air Exposure
Am. J. Pathol.,
August 1, 2005;
167(2):
381 - 393.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kawakita, E. M. Espana, H. He, A. Hornia, L.-K. Yeh, J. Ouyang, C.-Y. Liu, and S. C. G. Tseng
Keratocan Expression of Murine Keratocytes Is Maintained on Amniotic Membrane by Down-regulating Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 22, 2005;
280(29):
27085 - 27092.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kawakita, E. M. Espana, H. He, L.-K. Yeh, C.-Y. Liu, and S. C. G. Tseng
Calcium-Induced Abnormal Epidermal-like Differentiation in Cultures of Mouse Corneal-Limbal Epithelial Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
October 1, 2004;
45(10):
3507 - 3512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Romano, E. M. Espana, S. H. Yoo, M. T. Budak, J. M. Wolosin, and S. C. G. Tseng
Different Cell Sizes in Human Limbal and Central Corneal Basal Epithelia Measured by Confocal Microscopy and Flow Cytometry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
December 1, 2003;
44(12):
5125 - 5129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. M. Espana, T. Kawakita, A. Romano, M. Di Pascuale, R. Smiddy, C.-y. Liu, and S. C. G. Tseng
Stromal Niche Controls the Plasticity of Limbal and Corneal Epithelial Differentiation in a Rabbit Model of Recombined Tissue
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
December 1, 2003;
44(12):
5130 - 5135.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|