|
|
||||||||
1From the Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2Medicine, 7Ophthalmology, 3Physiology and Biophysics, 9Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 4Biomedical Engineering, and 5Molecular Pharmacology and Toxicology; the 8Doheny Eye Institute; and the 6Will Rogers Institute Pulmonary Research Center, Schools of Pharmacy, Medicine, and Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Changes in Isc and specific binding properties of ouabain were evaluated in a modified Ussing chamber setup, using conjunctival tissues freshly excised from pigmented rabbits. Effective concentrations of H2O2 at which 50% of Isc was inhibited (IC50) were determined for the mucosal and serosal instillation of the agent. The rate of exogenous H2O2 consumption in the mucosal and serosal bathing fluids was estimated. Mucosal 8-Br cAMP at 3 mM, serosal bumetanide at 0.5 mM, and both mucosal and serosal bathing of the conjunctiva with Na+-free bicarbonated Ringers solution (BRS) were used to estimate contributions of conjunctival ion transport mechanisms in Isc changes elicited by mucosal H2O2 at IC50. Specific binding of 3H-ouabain to the serosal side of the conjunctiva was estimated in the presence of mucosal or serosal H2O2 to assess the role of functional Na+/K+-ATPase pumps in H2O2 injury. The effect of mucosally instilled GSH and other reductive and nonreductive agents on possible restoration of oxidant-induced decrease in conjunctival Isc was also determined.
RESULTS. Mucosal and serosal H2O2 decreased conjunctival Isc gradually in a dose-dependent manner. The mucosal IC50 of H2O2was 1.49 ± 0.20 mM, whereas the serosal IC50 was estimated at 10.6 ± 2.0 µM. The rate of H2O2 consumption from mucosal fluid was six times faster than that from serosal fluid. Conjunctival tissues pretreated with mucosal H2O2 at IC50 retained approximately 50% of their maximum 8-Br cAMP-dependent increases in Isc. Serosal bumetanide did not further reduce the Isc beyond the initial 70% decrease caused by mucosal H2O2. When conjunctiva was bathed with Na+-free BRS on both the mucosal and serosal sides, before or after addition of mucosal H2O2, the combined effects were additive, decreasing Isc by up to 95% to 99%. Mucosal, but not serosal, GSH or reduced L-glutathione mono-ethyl ester (GSH-MEE) superfusion of conjunctival tissues pre-exposed to mucosal H2O2 at IC50 recovered to 60% to 80% of the initial pre-H2O2 Isc after approximately 100 minutes. The specific binding of 3H-ouabain to the serosal side of the tissue was inhibited by 85% in the presence of mucosal or serosal treatment with H2O2 at their respective IC50 values. Pretreatment for 60 minutes with either 5 mM GSH, 2 mM GSH-MEE, or 0.1 mM ebselen, when instilled into the mucosal fluid, resulted in 30%, 45%, or 55% reductions, respectively, in ouabain binding after exposure to mucosal H2O2 at IC50. Furthermore, mucosal posttreatment with 10 mM GSH or 5 mM GSH-MEE of conjunctival tissues pre-exposed to mucosal H2O2 resulted in a 30% recovery of the ouabain-binding level above that observed in tissues exposed to 1.5 mM H2O2 alone on the mucosal side. By contrast, the decrease in conjunctival Isc or in the ouabain-binding level elicited by serosal H2O2 at IC50 was irreversible.
CONCLUSIONS. A higher mucosal IC50 of [H2O2] on conjunctival Isc corresponds to the faster consumption of exogenous H2O2 from mucosal bathing fluid. In addition, actively secreted GSH by conjunctival epithelial cells may help reduce the injury by mucosally applied H2O2. Injury by H2O2 may directly affect vital membrane components (e.g., Na+,K+-ATPase) involved in active ion transport across conjunctiva. Mucosal protection by GSH (or its analogues) of active conjunctival ion transport may be useful in maintaining the physiological functions of conjunctiva under oxidative stress.
Efflux of intracellular GSH occurs in its reduced or oxidized form, or as a chemical conjugate with toxins, predominantly contributing to the turnover of cellular GSH. Secretion of reduced GSH into the luminal fluid lining polarized epithelia of intestines, kidney, upper airway, and ocular surface has been shown.4 5 6 7 8 Using primary conjunctival epithelial cell layers from pigmented rabbits, we reported net secretion of intact GSH under physiological conditions.6 The conjunctival epithelium that covers most of the ocular surface is thought to function as a protective barrier and to participate in the maintenance of tear film stability by means of the mucus secreted from resident goblet cells.9 10 Potential damage emanating from light, heat, chemicals, atmospheric gases, or physical abrasion can be inflicted locally on the conjunctiva because of its immediate proximity to the surrounding environment.11 The thin tear film covering the conjunctiva serves as the front line of defense against environmental harm. A continuous supply of endogenous antioxidants is thought to be essential, considering that the tear film is a compartmentalized discrete milieu. The presence of several antioxidant molecules (e.g., cysteine, ascorbate, glutathione, urate, and tyrosine) in tear fluid secretions has been recognized. Their origin may be in the lacrimal gland and/or the conjunctiva.2
Conjunctival short-circuit current (Isc), measured under zero voltage-clamp conditions, essentially describes the algebraic sum of all active, energy-driven, and electrogenic ion transport processes occurring across the tissue. Dependency on temperature and the inhibitory effect of serosal ouabain (a cardiac glycoside that blocks the active efflux of Na+ and reuptake of K+, with characteristics of saturable and specific binding to serosal Na+,K+-ATPase pumps) on the rabbit conjunctival Isc are characteristic of active Na+,K+-ATPase-driven ion transport in this tissue.12 Immunocytochemical analysis of conjunctival tissues reveals an intense staining by anti-
1-subunit antibodies of Na+,K+-ATPase exclusively at the serosal surface.13 Inhibition studies of rabbit Na+,K+-ATPase indicate a model with two binding sites for ouabain: a high-affinity (Ki
16 nM) and a low-affinity (Ki
4.2 µM) site.14 Measurements of tissue Isc or whole cell membrane conductance and currents have been used as suitable endpoints in characterizing the effect of oxidative stress on ion transport across a number of epithelia. Related studies of Isc in rat tracheal15 or alveolar epithelial cell monolayers cultured on permeable support,16 as well as in several ocular tissues, including those of the amphibian corneal epithelium17 and the human fetal retinal pigment epithelium,18 19 have been reported. t-Butylhydroperoxide-induced changes in solute permeability and ion permeation selectivity in rat tracheal epithelium,15 as well as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and GSH modulation of specific Cl- channels expressed in the human retinal pigmented epithelium,20 have been considered in light of the importance of epithelial ion transport processes in the regulation of cellular pH and the volume or levels of extracellular fluid.21 22
To identify the role of conjunctival mucosal GSH in ocular surface health, we tested the hypothesis that exogenously instilled oxidants can directly alter conjunctival permeability to ions by evaluating the effects of H2O2 injury and GSH protection on the Isc of excised pigmented rabbit conjunctival tissues. We sought to determine whether mucosal supplementation with exogenous GSH can prevent or reverse injurious effects of H2O2 on active ion transport across conjunctival epithelium. We also studied the rate of consumption of exogenously added H2O2 in this model and evaluated whether treatments with H2O2 or GSH influences total conjunctival GSH level.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hydrogen peroxide solution (H2O2, 30% wt/wt), reduced L-glutathione (g-glu-cys-gly; GSH), reduced L-glutathione mono-ethyl ester (g-glu-cys-gly-OEt; GSH-MEE), bumetanide (3-aminosulfonyl-5-butylamino-4-phenoxybenzoic acid), ebselen (2-phenyl-1,2-benzisoselenazol-3(2H)-one), DL-dithiothreitol ((±)-threo-1,4-dimercapto-2,3-butanediol; DTT), 8-bromoadenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (8-Br cAMP), 2-mercaptoethanol, D-mannitol, sucrose, ouabain, and bovine serum albumin (96% pure; lyophilized powder) were all obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO). [3H(G)]-ouabain (specific activity 18 Ci/mmol) was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Science Products, Inc. (Boston, MA).
Buffer Solutions
Experiments were conducted in normal, Na+-free, or K+-free bicarbonated Ringers solution (BRS) maintained at 37°C and pH 7.4 under 95% air/5% CO2. The normal BRS contained 110 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 30 mM NaHCO3, 1.0 mM NaH2PO4, 1.0 mM CaCl2 · 2H2O, 0.75 mM MgCl2 · 6H2O, and 5 mM D-glucose. Na+-free BRS was prepared by equimolar replacement of NaCl, NaH2PO4, and NaHCO3 with choline chloride, KH2PO4, and choline bicarbonate, respectively. K+-free BRS was prepared by equimolar replacement of KCl with NaCl. The osmolality of normal, Na+-free, and K+-free BRS was adjusted to 300 mOsm/kg H2O with sucrose, as needed.
Short-Circuit Current Recording
Pentobarbital sodium solution at 85 mg/kg was administered via a marginal ear vein to kill the rabbits, and the entire eyeball was surgically removed from the orbit to excise conjunctival epithelium from adjoining ocular tissues. The excised conjunctiva was mounted in a special tissue adapter with a circular aperture of 0.96 cm2. The adapter-tissue assembly was installed in a modified Ussing chamber and maintained at 37°C by a circulating water bath. The bathing solution (6 mL on each side) was bubbled with 95% air/5% CO2 to maintain pH at 7.4 and to provide sufficient mixing of the solution.12
Short-circuit conditions were achieved with a automatic voltage-clamp device (model 558C-5; Bioengineering Department, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA), which was externally controlled by custom-programed computer software (SP System 2002) with methods for external command of the voltage clamp device (558C-5). The software is a LabView (National Instruments [NI], Austin, TX) graphical G-programming-language-based program used for analog device control and simultaneous digital data acquisition, analysis, and presentation. The system comprises a data acquisition board (NI-DAQ model PCI 6024E), linked to an external analog-to-digital converter interface box (NI-BNC 2120), which was connected to the voltage-clamp device with cables (Bayonet Navy Connector cables; BNC) (minimum computing requirements for LabView, NI-DAQ, and NI-BNC 2120 can be found at http://www.ni.com/ National Instruments Corp.). The potential difference across conjunctival tissues was measured with a pair of calomel electrodes, and the direct current flowing across the tissue was transmitted with a pair of Ag/AgCl electrodes. The Isc (in microamps per square centimeter) was monitored and digitally recorded with the SP System 2002. A separate module of SP System 2002, "Resistance," was used to estimate and automatically compute the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) of tissues. Briefly, the Resistance module was programed to impose a 2-mV pulse for 3 seconds at 1-minute intervals across the short-circuited tissue to calculate the TEER using Ohms law as a surface-area-normalized ratio of applied voltage pulse to the resultant current.12 23 24 Measurements of all non-Isc endpoints (e.g., H2O2 levels in bathing fluids, total tissue GSH level, and 3H-ouabain binding) described in the following sections were performed when Isc reached the steady state level after each treatment.
Conjunctival Studies of Isc on H2O2 Dose-Response and Treatment with Other Reagents
The effect of hydrogen peroxide on conjunctival Isc was studied as a function of increasing concentrations applied to either mucosal or serosal normal BRS bathing the conjunctival tissue at 37°C. Hydrogen peroxide-induced changes in conjunctival Isc were expressed as a percentage of initial Isc, plotted against log[H2O2] in the bathing fluids, and analyzed with a sigmoidal dose-response plot with a variable slope. Kinetic parameters (e.g., IC50 and maximum inhibition) for the H2O2 dose-response in the conjunctiva were estimated by nonlinear least-squares regression analysis of the data on computer (Prism, ver. 3.0; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and the equation
![]() |
To determine ion transport mechanisms that may be influenced during inhibition of conjunctival Isc with mucosal (or serosal) H2O2 at IC50, conjunctival tissues were treated sequentially with H2O2 followed by a maneuver that is known to modulate Isc in the following combinations: (1) 3 mM mucosal 8-Br cAMP before or after mucosal 1.5 mM H2O2 in normal BRS, (2) 0.5 mM serosal bumetanide before or after mucosal 1.5 mM H2O2 in normal BRS, (3) Na+-free BRS superfusion of both mucosal and serosal sides before or after mucosal 1.5 mM H2O2 in normal or Na+-free BRS, respectively. The rationale for reversing the order of administering H2O2 and these agents was to determine the effect of H2O2-induced oxidant stress on normal conjunctival Isc, or the remaining Isc after the specific maneuver, which partially alters a component thereof. To determine whether the H2O2-induced decreases in conjunctival Isc could be restored with GSH treatment, all tissues were treated in normal BRS sequentially with mucosal or serosal H2O2 at IC50 and then with mucosal or serosal GSH (or a control reagent replacing GSH) and in the reverse order, for Isc measurements. Periods of exposure to each agent were determined by the amount of time it took for a given treatment to achieve a maximum effect on conjunctival Isc.
Estimation of Consumption Rates of Exogenous H2O2 Instilled into Normal BRS Bathing Fluids
Detection of H2O2 was performed with a colorimetric kit (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR). Exogenous H2O2 at 100 µM was added simultaneously to the mucosal and serosal normal BRS bathing the conjunctival tissue mounted in the Ussing chamber. A control study was run simultaneously under identical conditions, replacing the conjunctival tissue with a parafilm to assess the rate of H2O2 autodegradation in normal BRS. An aliquot (50 µL) was taken from normal BRS control, mucosal, and serosal fluids bathing conjunctival tissues at predetermined time points (1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes) and assayed for H2O2 activity. The detection assay uses a one-step 1:1 stoichiometry reaction between a red fluorescent label (Amplex Red; 10-acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine; Molecular Probes) and H2O2 to produce a red fluorescent oxidation product, resorufin (lmax, 563 nm). Samples and standards were loaded in a 96-well polystyrene flat-bottomed plate (EIA/RIA Plate; Corning-Costar, Cambridge, MA) and the amount of H2O2 was determined by measuring absorbance at 560 nm in a microplate reader (MRX Microplate Reader; Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA). First-order rate constants and half-lives (t1/2) of H2O2 were determined from the semilog plot of the integrated first-order velocity equation. All H2O2 consumption data were adjusted for autodegradation of H2O2 in parafilm experiments.
The first-order rate constant and half-lives for H2O2 consumption in the mucosal and serosal fluids bathing excised conjunctivas were estimated using the equation
![]() |
Estimation of Total Tissue GSH Level
Hydrogen peroxide at a final concentration of 1.5 mM was directly instilled into the normal BRS bathing the mucosal side of conjunctival tissues mounted in the modified Ussing chamber, while Isc was continually monitored on the SP System 2002. For serosal treatment, 15 µM H2O2 was used instead. These concentrations of H2O2 were chosen based on H2O2 dose-response studies of Isc (as described earlier). After the H2O2 effect reached steady state Isc, the tissues were mucosally superfused (posttreated) with normal BRS containing 10 mM GSH, 5 mM GSH-MEE, 5 mM DTT, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM D-mannitol, 10 mM sucrose, or 0.1 mM ebselen and allowed to incubate with these reagents in the modified Ussing chamber for approximately an additional 100 minutes.
Mucosal pretreatments of conjunctival tissues before mucosal instillation of H2O2 were also performed, where GSH and GSH-MEE were instilled at 5 and 2 mM, respectively, whereas all other reagents were used at the same concentration as used for posttreatment experiments. Total tissue GSH level was estimated by a colorimetric microplate assay kit (model GT20; Oxford Biomedical Research, Oxford, MI), before and after the treatments just described. The molecular form of GSH and other thiols (e.g., oxidized glutathione [GSSG], cysteine, and cystine) in isolated conjunctival tissue homogenates (prepared on ice using a Pyrex tissue grinder; 16 x 150 mm; Corning, Inc., Corning, NY) was verified according to an established chromatographic method.25
3H-ouabain-Binding Studies
To establish that the alterations in conjunctival Isc were associated with actively driven ion transport, labeled ouabain binding to the conjunctival serosal Na+,K+-ATPase was estimated in K+-free BRS. Potassium competes with ouabain for binding sites on functional Na+,K+-ATPase pumps, therefore KCl was replaced from the incubation buffer with equimolar NaCl.26 The procedure of Horowitz et al.26 was modified to determine levels of specific 3H-ouabain binding in conjunctival tissues. The concentration of serosal ouabain at which 50% of rabbit conjunctival tissue Isc is inhibited was reported by our laboratories to be approximately 20 µM with a t1/2 for Isc decrease of 41.5 ± 6.06 minutes. Preliminary studies established that steady state binding of serosal 3H-ouabain at 15 nM (without serosal K+) was reached after 80 minutes of incubation, and further incubation for a total of 180 minutes did not alter the overall amount of radioactivity associated with conjunctival tissues from the amount observed at 80 minutes. The Isc was measured during specific segments of 3H-ouabain binding studies to determine whether the maximum effect of (1) mucosal or serosal H2O2 at IC50, (2) mucosal 0.1 mM ebselen pretreatment, (3) mucosal 5 mM pre- or 10 mM posttreatment using GSH, and (4) mucosal 2 mM pre- or 5 mM posttreatment using GSH-MEE was achieved. Binding studies were initiated after the stable Isc from all treatments by adding 3H-ouabain at a final concentration of 15 nM to the K+-free BRS bathing the serosal side of the conjunctiva mounted in the modified Ussing chamber, while the mucosal side was bathed with the normal BRS. Tissues were incubated with 3H-ouabain for 80 minutes, followed by excision of the conjunctivas and washing them three consecutive times in 100 mL each of 1.5 mM unlabeled ouabain in ice cold K+-free BRS. The rationale for using unlabeled ouabain in the washing solution was to displace nonspecific association of the labeled form from conjunctivas, because the dissociation of specifically bound 3H-ouabain is slow at 4°C.26 After they were washed, the conjunctival tissues were placed in 1 mL of tissue-solubilizing solution (0.5 N NaOH and 15% Triton X-100 in K+-free BRS) for 1 hour at room temperature with continuous ultrasonication (185 W). Twenty microliters from each tissue homogenate was taken for a protein assay (DC; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with bovine serum albumin as a standard, and the remainder was mixed with a liquid scintillation cocktail (Econosafe; Research Products International, Mount Prospect, IL) for a 3H-activity assay. The amount of 3H-ouabain associated with conjunctival tissue was determined by measuring 3H-activity in a liquid scintillation counter (LS1801; Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA). Nonspecific binding was determined by estimating 3H-ouabain binding as described earlier with the concomitant presence of 1.5 mM unlabeled ouabain during the 80-minute incubation period.
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as the mean ± SEM for 3 to 10 determinations. The unpaired, two-tailed Students t-test was used to determine the statistical difference between two group means, where applicable. Comparisons among three or more group means were performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical significance among the group (
3) means was determined by the modified Fishers least-squares difference approach. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
When conjunctival tissues were treated with mucosal 3 mM 8-Br cAMP, the conjunctival Isc increased above baseline by 66%. Mucosally applied H2O2 at maximum 8-Br cAMP effect drastically inhibited the Isc to 15% below the initial baseline (Fig. 2A) . For the reverse treatment sequence, Isc was inhibited by nearly 60% with 1.5 mM mucosal H2O2, which was elevated by posttreatment with mucosal 8-Br cAMP to a level of 36% above the H2O2-pretreated baseline.
|
Effect of GSH Treatment on H2O2-Induced Isc Impairment
The Isc inhibitory effect of serosal H2O2 at IC50 could not be protected or recovered using mucosal or serosal GSH, or any of the other combinations of treatments tested. By contrast, mucosally applied GSH protected Isc from 1.5 mM mucosal H2O2-induced conjunctival Isc decrease. When used at 1 and 2.5 mM, GSH was ineffective during mucosal pre- or posttreatments in recovery of Isc within the time course tested, whereas at 5 mM it was ineffective in Isc protection when used in posttreatments, but effective in pretreatments.
Pretreatment.
In pretreatment of conjunctival tissues with 5 mM GSH or 2 mM GSH-MEE in normal BRS in the mucosal bathing fluid for 60 minutes, Isc or TEER did not change significantly from baseline. In contrast, 0.1 mM ebselen pretreatment led to decreases in Isc and TEER by 45% and 85%, respectively (Table 1) . When these pretreated tissues were superfused from both the mucosal and serosal sides using 60 mL of normal BRS, the subsequent addition of 1.5 mM mucosal H2O2 did not elicit a change in Isc. The final Isc recorded at 60 minutes after mucosal H2O2 insult in these tissues was significantly higher than that in conjunctivas with mucosal H2O2 treatment alone (Table 1) . Pretreatments with GSH and GSH-MEE preserved the TEER of conjunctival tissues. However, mucosal pretreatment with ebselen did not protect TEER (Table 1) . When 15 µM serosal H2O2 was used on GSH-, GSH-MEE-, or ebselen-pretreated tissues, it still elicited a 60% decrease in Isc after 15 minutes of H2O2 treatment. Furthermore, when conjunctival tissues were pretreated with 10 mM D-mannitol, 5 mM DTT, 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, or 10 mM sucrose, subsequent application of mucosal or serosal H2O2 at IC50 still produced a 60% decrease in Isc.
|
|
|
Estimation of Consumption Rates of Exogenously Instilled H2O2
H2O2 autodegraded with a first-order reaction rate constant (k) of 2.99 x 10-3/min in normal BRS in the absence of conjunctival tissues. The adjusted first-order rate constant for the disappearance of H2O2 from the mucosal bathing fluid of conjunctival tissues was 2.74 x 10-2/min, when an initial concentration of 100 mM H2O2 was used. In contrast, at the same starting concentration of H2O2 the first-order rate constant for the disappearance of H2O2 from the serosal fluid was 4.83 x 10-3/min (Fig. 4) . Thus, the consumption rate of exogenous H2O2 when applied to mucosal bathing fluid of conjunctivas appeared to be approximately six times faster than when added to the serosal bathing fluid.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Asymmetrical Effect of H2O2 on Isc
Transport characteristics of GSH in conjunctival epithelial cells under normal conditions, together with the mucosal presence of tear fluid, may be responsible for the observed more than a 100-fold difference in H2O2 sensitivity of conjunctival Isc in the serosal versus mucosal surface (Fig. 1) . Results of H2O2 treatment studies of active ion transport and resistance to passive solute flow were similarly asymmetric in rat alveolar epithelial cell monolayers cultured on permeable supports.16 H2O2 decreased alveolar epithelial Isc gradually in a dose-dependent manner from both apical and basolateral fluids, and the basolateral treatment was approximately 100 times more potent in IC50 concentration of H2O2. Furthermore, the sensitivity of Isc to apical H2O2 was inversely dependent on catalase (a ubiquitous heme protein that catalyzes the dismutation of H2O2 into water and molecular oxygen) activity, whereas that of the basolateral treatment was not.16 The activity of catalase is considered as important as GSH in cellular defense against H2O229 and has also been biochemically assessed within the lacrimal fluid of healthy and injured eyes.30 Minimally stimulated tear samples collected from human subjects do not display a detectable catalase or GSH-peroxidase activity, suggesting that the tear film may lack a GSH/GSSG cycle that provides significant protection from oxidative properties of H2O2 inside the cells.31
Amounts of H2O2 have been determined by chemiluminescent, radioisotopic, and enzymatic methods in the aqueous humor32 and lenses33 of several animal species, including humans. Estimated concentrations of H2O2 present in the aqueous humor of most species range from 5 to 41 µM, whereas in humans with cataracts the average level is 189 ± 88 µM in aqueous humor and approximately 100 µM in lens tissue.32 33 Furthermore, the levels of H2O2 have been shown to increase up to 20-fold in certain age-related diseases of the eye with oxidative stress characteristics.2 Because H2O2 is an ultimate byproduct of cellular respiration, it may be present in tear fluid secretions under normal conditions. It can also arise in vitro spontaneously from ascorbic acid (found in tear fluid at concentrations of 0.80.9 mM34 ), through a reaction with riboflavin (detected in ocular surface tissues of the rabbit35 ), and light or trace amounts of unbound metals. There may be a dynamic equilibrium for H2O2 through its continuous production in the ocular surface and tear film and subsequent elimination.2 In this regard, net GSH secretion by conjunctival epithelial cells may be a critical factor for the maintenance of this equilibrium.6 Considering a steady state GSH concentration to be 110 and 15 µM for the tear side and serosal side of the conjunctiva, respectively, the estimated intracellular GSH level is approximately 1 mM.6 The rate of elimination of exogenous H2O2 from normal BRS bathing the mucosal surface of conjunctival tissues in this study was six times faster than the rate measured at the serosal aspect. It has been reported that, in adult pigmented rabbits, buthionine sulfoximine (BSO, an inhibitor of GSH biosynthesis) increased the t1/2 of elimination of intracamerally injected 10 mM H2O2 by 77%, whereas suppression of catalase activity with 3-aminotriazole increased it by only 40%,36 indicating the dual involvement of GSH and catalase activity in elimination of H2O2 exogenously delivered to the eye. Whether the mucosal surface of the conjunctival epithelium exhibits similar catalase activity (either from tear source or conjunctival elaboration) is unknown.
Mechanisms of H2O2- and GSH-Induced Changes in Isc
Conjunctival epithelial cells display an active mucosal secretion of Cl-, a phenomenon estimated to account for approximately 70% of Isc of this tissue.12 Net conjunctival Cl- flux is modulated by at least three different mechanismscAMP, protein kinase C, and Ca2-mediated processessuggesting the presence of multiple mucosal Cl- exit pathways (Fig. 7) .37 Apical localization of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR, a chloride channel activated by intracellular cAMP-dependent protein kinases) has been confirmed by electrophysiological, molecular biological, and immunocytochemical methods in the pigmented rabbit conjunctival epithelium.38 39 In our studies, conjunctival Isc was stimulated 60% to 70% above baseline in a sustained manner after the addition of mucosal 8-Br cAMP and remained comparably sensitive to mucosal H2O2 at IC50 as the untreated tissues (Fig 2A) . Furthermore, approximately 30% of the 8-Br cAMP-inducible Isc persisted in conjunctival tissues pretreated with mucosal H2O2 at IC50, suggesting that H2O2-induced oxidant stress may partly inhibit mechanisms of conjunctival cAMP dependent Cl- secretion. In our previous study, when conjunctival epithelial cell layers in primary culture were treated with BSO for 24 hours, a more than 90% depletion of their total cellular GSH level was observed, whereas 80% lower levels of cAMP production were detected after 10 minutes of stimulating cells with forskolin (a cell-permeable diterpenoid that possesses adenylyl cyclase activating properties).40
|
Investigations of tear fluid on formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the tear specimens from different human hosts showed marked inhibition of hydroxy radical formation, but did not affect superoxide or H2O2 levels.42 The efficacy of GSH when added to the mucosal bathing fluid in preventing (Table 1) or helping recovery (Table 2 , Fig. 3 ) of mucosal H2O2-induced impairment of conjunctival Isc (but not that of serosal H2O2) may be attributable to the highly polarized distribution of chloride12 41 43 and GSH6 secretory machinery in the mucosa of the conjunctival epithelium (Kannan R, et al. IOVS 2002;43:ARVO E-Abstract 905). In addition, the exit of GSH from epithelial cells may be partially coupled and regulated by the parallel secretion of Cl-,5 44 although we do not think CFTR actually conducts GSH. Using an established adenovirus type 5 ocular infection model in pigmented rabbits,45 46 manifesting characteristics of oxidative stress, we have recently described the pharmacological regulation of diminished chloride and fluid secretion,43 as well as significant reduction in GSH secretion, using excised conjunctival tissues from these animals (Kannan R, et al. IOVS 2002;43:ARVO E-Abstract 905).
In our study, the relative ineffectiveness of the stronger reducing agents DTT and 2-mercaptoethanol (compared with the effects of exogenous GSH) in preventing or reversing the damaging effects of H2O2 (Tables 1 and 2) is noted. Partial recovery of Isc in conjunctival tissues pretreated with mucosal H2O2 was achieved by mucosal instillation of mannitol, another known hydroxyl radical scavenger.47 48 An interesting observation was that when tissues were pretreated with ebselen, a small-molecule antioxidant characterized by glutathione peroxidase-mimicking properties,49 the inhibitory effects of mucosal H2O2 on conjunctival Isc were prevented, even though the tissue TEER decreased to a much greater extent than with other antioxidants. At present, we do not know why. By contrast, when GSH-MEE, a zwitterionic analogue of GSH with better diffusion characteristics across cell membranes, was used,50 recovery and protection of conjunctival Isc was achieved with smaller doses compared with those of GSH necessary to achieve similar results. Although limited information exists on the ability of mammalian tears to neutralize H2O2, these findings suggest that the ocular surface and tear film may be endogenously endowed with some antioxidant capacity under normal conditions.
To our knowledge, the specific role of the conjunctiva and that of its mucosal GSH secretion have not been studied for their role in protection from oxidant injury to the ocular surface. Especially the mechanisms underlying the observed irreversible serosal H2O2-mediated damage to factors governing conjunctival Isc may be related to its direct damage of ion-transporting proteins (e.g., Na+,K+-ATPase), or other detrimental effects resulting in a general compromise of the conjunctival epithelial barrier. Chemical modification of the protein residues essential for Na+,K+-ATPase activity, peroxidation of the enzyme-lipid environment, or the effect of lipid peroxidation products on the enzymes structure are known to occur with H2O2.51 Furthermore, other reports indicate that the exposure of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells to H2O2 causes a significant derangement of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and b-catenin, resulting in a general reduction of cell adherence and impairment of tight junctions.52
(Extra)cellular Antioxidants
The shorter mucosal t1/2 for H2O2 disappearance may be due to the presence of peroxide-scavenging mechanisms localized in the mucosal surface of rabbit conjunctival tissues. Conjunctival tissues pre-exposed to mucosal 1.5 mM H2O2 for 120 minutes displayed significant intracellular GSH depletion, whereas those with GSH or GSH-MEE pre- or posttreatment preserved at least 100% of their total GSH (Fig. 5) . We noted that 15 µM serosal H2O2 did not cause any changes in total cellular GSH from conjunctival tissues (Fig. 5) . These results suggest that the relationship between mucosal or serosal H2O2-induced changes in Isc and total cellular GSH from conjunctival tissues exposed to these same treatments may be more complex. Similarly, studies in which the response of cultured bovine lens epithelial cells to oxidative challenge was investigated reveal a comparable 44% decrease in intracellular GSH with 1 mM H2O2 treatment.53 As the decrease in total tissue GSH may affect several mechanisms (including the rate of mucosal GSH secretion) and could mediate the changes in conjunctival barrier properties, further studies are needed to investigate the protective role of mucosal GSH and conjunctival GSH secretion under oxidant insult. That exogenous application of GSH esters (mono- and diethyl-ester analogues) increases intracellular GSH content has been established,50 but to our knowledge it has not been directly considered for functional modulation of tissue or cellular ion transport.
Na+,K+-ATPase-Dependent Changes in Isc
Glutathione is known to modulate the activity of several cytoplasmic enzymes and membrane spanning proteins (e.g., transporters).20 54 The action of oxidative agents on membrane channel currents and channel conductance properties has been studied in retinal pigmented epithelial cells, where the application of extracellular GSH abolished the inhibitory effect of H2O2 on membrane channel currents measured in whole-cell recordings. Furthermore, precursors known to increase the intracellular GSH level partially protected these currents from subsequent exposure to harmful levels of H2O2, in a partially glutathione S-transferase-dependent manner.20 In line with these reports, in this study we estimated the amount of functional Na+,K+-ATPase expressed on the serosal side of conjunctival tissues by using a specific inhibitor of Na+,K+-ATPase-dependent transport, ouabain.14 26 In our studies, an 80-minute incubation with 15 nM serosal 3H-ouabain in K+-free BRS did not alter the Isc, whereas in the presence of mucosal or serosal H2O2 at IC50 the specific serosal binding of 3H-ouabain was highly inhibited (Fig. 6) . Mucosal application of ouabain (
0.5 mM) to pigmented rabbit conjunctival tissues did not influence the Isc, whereas virtually all of the Isc was inhibited at 0.1 mM or more ouabain added serosally.12 Pretreatment of tissues with GSH, GSH-MEE, or ebselen for 60 minutes in the mucosal fluid, or posttreatment with mucosal GSH or GSH-MEE for up to 100 minutes reduced the degree of inhibition in 3H-ouabain binding from 85% to 30%55% (Fig. 6) . The strong inhibitory effect of serosal H2O2 on the rabbit conjunctival Isc may be related to the characteristics of the active Na+,K+-ATPase-driven short-circuit current in this tissue.12 Conjunctival mucosal GSH appears only to protect from direct mucosal (but not serosal) oxidative insult by H2O2, whereas serosal GSH is not protective in both cases. The actual propagation mechanism of the exclusive mucosal protection with GSH of conjunctival serosal transporters (such as the Na+,K+-ATPase) responsible for the maintenance of normal membrane permeability to ions and solutes is unidentified and requires further investigation.
A hypothetical scheme describing possible mechanisms of an H2O2-induced decrease in conjunctival ion transport is presented in Figure 7 , which is based on previous reports on GSH transport6 and the localization of relevant conjunctival ion transporters.13 37 38 39 Mucosal application of H2O2 can directly deplete the steady state tear fluid GSH level, generating various ROS on the mucosal side of conjunctival tissues. In addition, H2O2 can rapidly equilibrate across tissue membranes, diffusing into conjunctival epithelial cells where we observed a significant depletion of total GSH (Fig. 5) . A decrease in cellular GSH is accompanied by an increase in ROS, which may lead to further epithelial cell oxidative damage. An increase in cytoplasmic ROS or H2O2 may interfere with the function of various ion transporters by blocking regulatory pathways (i.e., 8-Br cAMP results from Fig. 2A ) or triggering the sequestering and/or destruction of oxidized ion transporters (i.e., decrease in specific ouabain binding to Na+,K+-ATPase in Fig. 6 ). The irreversible decreases in Isc by serosal application of H2O2 may be attributable to the oxidant-caused derangement in the function or number of the Na+,K+-ATPase pump and the bumetanide-sensitive Na+,K+,2Cl- cotransporter.13 In addition, the role of catalase in conjunctival tissues is mostly unclear.
In summary, our results show that the presence of mucosal GSH is crucial for the maintenance of proper ion transport activity in isolated pigmented rabbit conjunctival tissues. Protection by mucosally applied GSH (or analogues) of functional Na+,K+-ATPases in the serosal membranes may be useful in maintaining the physiological activity of conjunctiva under oxidative stress. Conjunctival net GSH secretion may be the primary method of counteracting mucosally generated peroxides present within the immediate microenvironment of the tear film in contact with this tissue. Glutathione may be important in the modulation of cellular responses that lead to the processing of oxidized, damaged, and nonfunctional membrane proteins found in age-related ocular diseases under oxidant stress.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication May 2, 2003; revised July 1, 2003; accepted July 9, 2003.
Disclosure: H.J. Gukasyan, None; K.-J. Kim, None; R. Kannan, None; R.A. Farley, None; V.H.L. Lee, None
Presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, May, 2002 and 2003.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Vincent H. L. Lee, University of Southern California, School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1985 Zonal Avenue, PSC 704, Los Angeles, CA 90089-9121; vincentl{at}hsc.usc.edu.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |