|
|
||||||||
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Diabetes Center, Tokyo Womens Medical University, Tokyo, Japan; the 2Department of Ophthalmology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan; the 3Department of Ophthalmology, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Hiroshima, Japan; the 4Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; the 5Department of Ophthalmology, Hyogo Medical College, Hyogo, Japan; and the 6Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Womens Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. VEGF and endostatin levels in vitreous fluid specimens obtained during vitreous surgery were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Expression of VEGF and endostatin in epiretinal membranes was assessed immunohistochemically. Patients were prospectively followed up for 6 months.
RESULTS. No improvement and/or progression of PDR was seen in 11 (25%) of 44 eyes (progression group). The vitreous fluid level of VEGF was significantly higher in the progression group than in the regression group (P = 0.0023). Conversely, the vitreous fluid level of endostatin was significantly higher in the regression group than in the progression group (P = 0.0299). Eyes with a high vitreous fluid level of VEGF and a low endostatin level had a significantly greater risk of progression of PDR after vitreous surgery than did eyes with low VEGF and high endostatin levels (odds ratio = 10.00, P = 0.047). VEGF and endostatin were detected immunohistochemically in the fibrovascular epiretinal membranes resected from the subjects.
CONCLUSIONS. In this study both VEGF and endostatin were expressed in eyes with PDR. VEGF and endostatin levels in the vitreous fluid correlated with the outcome of vitreous surgery for PDR. Therefore, the outcome of PDR surgery can probably be predicted by measuring cytokines and/or growth factors in the vitreous fluid, with VEGF and endostatin being good candidates.
Because PDR causes visual impairment, it is the main target of ocular treatment in patients with diabetes.1 Current evidence suggests that changes in the balance between stimulators and inhibitors of angiogenesis may activate the angiogenic switch mechanism in PDR.2 Accordingly, we investigated whether vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an angiogenesis stimulator, and endostatin, an angiogenesis inhibitor, can influence the outcome of vitreous surgery for PDR. Our previous study showed that the vitreous fluid levels of VEGF and endostatin correlate with the severity of diabetic retinopathy and with proliferative fundus changes such as new vessel formation.3 4 In contrast, the plasma levels of VEGF and endostatin did not correlate with these parameters. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the local balance between VEGF and endostatin in the eye may determine whether retinal neovascularization occurs in PDR. In an attempt to predict the prognosis of PDR, we investigated whether VEGF and endostatin levels in the vitreous fluid have an influence on the outcome of vitreous surgery for PDRthat is, whether it is possible to predict the result of surgery by analyzing samples of vitreous fluid obtained during surgery. We found that the vitreous fluid levels of VEGF and endostatin correlated significantly with the result of vitrectomy and that eyes with high VEGF and low endostatin levels had a significantly greater risk of postoperative progression of PDR.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pars plana vitrectomy was performed by a standardized technique involving three pars plana sclerotomy incisions. Samples of undiluted vitreous fluid (0.30.7 mL) were aspirated under standardized conditions from directly above the retina at the beginning of surgery and were immediately transferred to sterile tubes. After collection, the vitreous fluid was removed as far as the vitreous base, followed by segmentation and delamination of proliferative membranes, removal of the posterior vitreous surface, and panretinal endolaser photocoagulation of the retina up to the ora serrata. Retinal detachment was treated with gas tamponade (25% SF6) at the end of vitreous surgery. All operations were performed at Tokyo Womens Medical University Hospital.
Exclusion criteria were previous ocular surgery, a history of ocular inflammation, and retinal detachment associated with a retinal tear.
Fundus Findings
Preoperative, operative, and postoperative fundus findings were recorded in each subject. The severity of diabetic retinopathy was assessed by standardized fundus color photography and fluorescein angiography (FA), which were performed with a fundus camera that is part of an image-net system (TRC-50IA; Topcon; Tokyo Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and a preset lens with a slit lamp3 4 1 day before vitreous surgery and 6 months afterward. Diabetic retinopathy was graded according to the modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) retinopathy severity scale.5 6 In particular, the severity of new vessels elsewhere (NVE), new vessels on or within 1 disc diameter of the disc (NVD), fibrous proliferation elsewhere (FPE), vitreous hemorrhage, and retinal detachment were graded according to the ETDRS system.3 4 5 Retinal photocoagulation was divided into three categories: grade 0, no photocoagulation; grade 1, focal photocoagulation; and grade 2, panretinal photocoagulation (defined as 1200 laser applications or more to the whole retina). The severity of fundus findings in each photograph was graded to calculate the average severity.
Sample Collection
Samples of vitreous fluid were collected into sterile tubes at the time of vitreoretinal surgery and were rapidly frozen at -80°C.3 4
Blood samples were also collected from the 44 patients. The blood was immediately placed on ice and subjected to centrifugation at 3000g for 5 minutes at 4°C, after which the separated plasma was rapidly frozen at -80°C until assay.3 4
Measurement of VEGF and Endostatin
Both VEGF and endostatin were measured in vitreous fluid from the same eye, as well as in plasma samples, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for human VEGF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or an ELISA for endostatin (Cytimmune Sciences, College Park, MD).3 4 Each assay was performed according to the manufacturers instructions and our previous reports.3 4 The VEGF and endostatin levels in vitreous fluid and plasma were within the detection range of the respective assays, because the minimum detectable concentration was 15.6 pg/mL for VEGF and 0.95 ng/mL for endostatin (intra-assay coefficient of variation [CV] was 3.5% and interassay CV was 5.8% for VEGF versus 4.0% and 6.2% for endostatin).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed to confirm the intraocular expression of VEGF and endostatin at the protein level. Resected membranes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated, embedded in OCT compound, and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Eight-micrometer sections were cut and stained to detect VEGF or endostatin by an indirect immunofluorescence method. In brief, the sections were incubated in 5% skim milk in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 minutes, followed by two washes with PBS. Anti-human VEGF mouse antibody (1:200 in PBS containing 1% skim milk and 1% normal goat serum; Immuno-Biological Laboratories, Fujioka, Japan) or anti-human endostatin rabbit antibody (1:200 in PBS containing 1% skim milk and 1% normal goat serum; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) was added, and sections were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. After they were washed in PBS, the sections were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with either fluorescein-labeled goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (Alexa Fluor 488; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR; diluted 1:200 in PBS). After a further wash with PBS, the sections were examined under a photomicroscope (Optiphot-2; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Control sections were stained without the primary antibody and did not show any positive reaction.
As a negative control, the samples were treated with nonimmunized IgG instead of the primary antibody. Frozen sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to observe the histologic features.
Measurement of Clinical Variables
The following variables were measured at baseline. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured by affinity chromatography (HPLC, normal range: 4.3%5.8%; Kyoto Chemical, Kyoto, Japan). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer with the patient in the sitting position, after the patient had rested for 10 minutes. Hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure of 140 mm Hg or higher, a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher, or treatment with antihypertensive medication. The urinary albumin concentration was measured by an immunoturbidometric method, with a reference of less than 12.0 mg/g creatinine. Microalbuminuria was defined as a urinary albumin concentration of 12 mg/g creatinine or more, and proteinuria was defined as a concentration of 300 mg/dL or more.
Statistical Analysis
Analyses were performed on computer (SAS System 8e software; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).7 Results are presented as the mean ± SD or as the geometric mean ± SD for logarithmic data. To assess the relationship between each angiogenic factor and the ETDRS grade for severity of retinopathy, Spearmans rank-order correlation coefficients were calculated. Odds ratios were calculated with a logistic regression model with three dummy variables. Two-tailed probabilities of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
= 0.537, P = 0.0002 and
= -0.258, P = 0.0106, respectively; Fig. 1 ).
|
= -0.255, P = 0.0944).
|
= 0.39428, P = 0.0081 and
= 0.63469, P < 0.0001, respectively), but did not correlate significantly with NVD, FPE, or retinal detachment (
= -0.16636, P = 0.2805,
= 0.15284, P = 0.3220, and
= 0.22041, P = 0.1505, respectively; Table 5 ). The vitreous fluid level of endostatin was significantly correlated with regression of NVE (
= -0.32238, P = 0.0328), but not with regression of vitreous hemorrhage, NVD, FPE, or retinal detachment (
= -0.20900, P = 0.1734,
= 0.11637, P = 0.4519,
= -0.12706, P = 0.4111, and
= -0.15227, P = 0.3238, respectively; Table 5 ).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been reported that vitreous fluid levels of VEGF are significantly elevated in patients with active PDR when compared with patients with quiescent PDR8 9 and that VEGF plays a key role in the process of angiogenesis in eyes with PDR. Endostatin is a 20-kDa proteolytic fragment of collagen XVIII, which has been shown to inhibit VEGF- and fibroblast growth factor (FGF)induced vascular endothelial cell migration and proliferation in vitro.10 In the eye, collagen XVIII is localized to the inner retinal limiting membrane and the retinal pigment epithelium.11 Local production of endostatin may occur during corneal wound healing, because the relevant enzymes and the substrate (collagen XVIII) are present in the basement membrane during this process. Endostatin inhibits VEGF-induced endothelial cell migration in vitro and inhibits tumor growth in vivo.12 However, it has been unclear whether endostatin is involved in the regulation of retinal and choroidal neovascularization. Recently, Mori et al.13 reported that intravenous injection of adenoviral vectors containing an expression construct for endostatin significantly reduced laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in mice, and they found a strong negative correlation between the area of CNV and the serum level of endostatin. Based on these reports, we selected VEGF and endostatin to predict the outcome of vitreous surgery.
As the first step toward predicting the outcome of vitrectomy, we stratified the patients into four groups according to the vitreous fluid levels of VEGF and endostaitn. We found that group 4 (high VEGF and low endostatin levels) had a significantly greater risk of progression of PDR after vitreous surgery than did group 1 (low VEGF and high endostatin levels). These results suggest that both a high vitreous fluid level of VEGF and a low level of endostatin stimulate neovascularization, whereas a high endostatin level and a low VEGF level inhibit neovascularization in PDR-affected eyes, and a change in the balance between VEGF and endostatin may influence the progression and/or regression of PDR after vitreous surgery.
The present study confirmed that endostatin is produced in proliferative membranes and is not directly related to new vessel formation, because vitreous fluid levels of endostatin correlated with the grade of NVE but not with the grade of NVD. In fact, the level of endostatin was lower in eyes with NVD than in eyes with NVE alone. To further clarify the clinical significance of endostatin, we must investigate the regulation of its expression and its possible inhibitory effect on neovascularization at the molecular level, including cross talk with VEGF and other stimulators of angiogenesis.
An important finding in this study is that patients with panretinal photocoagulation before surgery had higher endostatin levels than did patients without previous photocoagulation, but had lower VEGF levels than did the patients without photocoagulation. The latter result was in agreement with previous reports.8 14 15 Pournaras et al.16 17 demonstrated that scatter photocoagulation reverses tissue hypoxia in miniature pigs with experimental vasoproliferative microangiopathy16 and that hyperoxia reduces VEGF production in ischemic retina.17 Retinal photocoagulation induces the regression of neovascularization and has been shown to be associated with a decrease in neovascularization.18 Presumably, the effect of photocoagulation itself and the reduction of retinal ischemia after photocoagulation lead to increased expression of angiogenesis inhibitors, such as pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF), angiostatin, and transforming growth factor-ß2 (TGF-ß2).14 19 20 However, it has not been clarified whether expression of endostatin is increased by photocoagulation and/or by reduction of retinal ischemia. Taken together, these results suggest that the vitreous fluid levels of endostatin and VEGF may be related to the extent of retinal ischemia and to the area of previously photocoagulated retina.
In conclusion, in the present study, vitreous fluid levels of VEGF and endostatin correlated with the activity or severity of PDR and that the balance between VEGF (a stimulator of angiogenesis) and endostatin (an inhibitor of angiogenesis) was closely related to the progression or regression of PDR after vitreous surgery. Accordingly, evaluation of the balance between VEGF and endostatin in the eye may have the potential to predict the outcome of vitreous surgery.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication April 15, 2002; revised September 11, 2002; accepted October 28, 2002.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Hideharu Funatsu, Department of Ophthalmology, Diabetes Center, Tokyo Womens Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan; tfunatsu{at}nifty.com.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. I.V. Errera, L. H. Canani, M. E. R. Silva, E. Yeh, W. Takahashi, K. G. Santos, K. E.P. Souto, B. Tschiedel, I. Roisenberg, J. L. Gross, et al. Functional Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor -634G>C SNP Is Associated With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A case-control study in a Brazilian population of European ancestry Diabetes Care, February 1, 2007; 30(2): 275 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Wahl, T. L. Moser, and S. V. Pizzo Angiostatin and Anti-angiogenic Therapy in Human Disease Recent Prog. Horm. Res., January 1, 2004; 59(1): 73 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Abdollahi, K. E. Lipson, A. Sckell, H. Zieher, F. Klenke, D. Poerschke, A. Roth, X. Han, M. Krix, M. Bischof, et al. Combined Therapy with Direct and Indirect Angiogenesis Inhibition Results in Enhanced Antiangiogenic and Antitumor Effects Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8890 - 8898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |