|
|
||||||||
1From the Departments of Ophthalmology, 2Experimental Pathology, 3Pediatrics, and 4Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and the 5Pathology Laboratory, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slides of 4 normal control eyes and 14 eyes with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to AMD were examined. Three eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were studied as the positive control. IGF-I and IGF-IR mRNA was detected by in situ hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes. IGF-IR protein was studied by immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS. In the normal retina, IGF-I and IGF-IR mRNA expression was found throughout the neuroretinal layers, in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and in some choriocapillary and retinal capillary endothelial cells. In eyes with CNV we found IGF and IGF-IR mRNA in capillary endothelial cells, some transdifferentiated RPE, and fibroblast-like cells. IGF-IR protein was found in normal eyes in all neuroretinal layers, in the RPE, and in the choroidal vessels. In eyes with CNV, IGF-IR protein was present in the RPE monolayer, in transdifferentiated RPE, and in newly formed vessels.
CONCLUSIONS. The colocalization of protein and receptor indicates an autocrine function of IGF-I in the normal human retina. Because IGF-I participates in ocular neovascularization, synthesis of IGF-IR and IGF-I in endothelial cells, RPE cells, and fibroblast-like cells in CNV may point toward a role for this growth factor in the pathogenesis of neovascular AMD.
Growth factors are acknowledged to play an important role in retinal neovascularizations. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an endothelium-specific mitogen, is regarded as one of the most important ocular angiogenic factors, especially under hypoxic circumstances.2 3 Other angiogenic factors in ocular neovascularization include basic fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor-ß, platelet-derived growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I.2 4
In an earlier study, we demonstrated that most CNVs in AMD express somatostatin receptor type 2A, which binds potential antiangiogenic somatostatin analogues.5 Somatostatin receptors are present on cultured human retinal endothelial cells. Proliferation of retinal endothelial cells6 and choroidal endothelial cells7 can be inhibited by somatostatin analogues. In mice, inhibition of IGF-I by somatostatin analogues or by downregulation of growth hormone (GH) can decrease ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization.8 IGF-I is a growth-promoting polypeptide that has mitogenic and differentiating effects on many cell types, among which are ocular vascular endothelial cells,9 RPE cells,10 11 and neuronal cells.12 IGF-I can act as a direct angiogenic factor on retinal endothelial cells,6 7 or indirectly through increased VEGF gene expression of cultured RPE cells.13
Most studies describe the role of IGF-I in in vitro models6 7 14 15 16 17 or in situ in diabetic retinopathy.18 19 So far, IGF-I has not been studied in ARM.
The purpose of our study was to localize the expression of IGF-I and its receptor (IGF-IR) mRNA and IGF-IR protein in situ in normal human eyes and to examine the presence of expression in eyes with CNV, to elucidate its possible role in angiogenesis in AMD.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients
All eyes were retrieved from the Ophthalmic Pathology Department of the University Hospital of Rotterdam. Four enucleated eyes without ischemic disease (enucleated for other reasons) and three enucleated eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were used as the control. Fourteen eyes (five enucleated eyes, four donor eyes and five surgically removed subretinal neovascular membranes) of 13 patients with neovascular AMD were studied. The clinical and histologic diagnosis of the eyes and the classification of CNV are described in Table 1 . The eyes were processed for routine diagnostic procedures by fixation in 10% buffered formaldehyde and were embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer sections were prepared for in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry.
|
In Situ Hybridization
Sections were deparaffinated with xylene and rehydrated. The slides were incubated in the following solutions: 0.2 N HCl, 0.3% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), RNase-free proteinase K (5 µL/mL for 20 minutes at 37°C) and 4% formalin in PBS. Subsequently, acetylation was performed with acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine. The slides were rinsed in 2x SSC (1x SSC containing 150 mM NaCl and 15 mM sodium citrate) and preincubated in 50% formamide in 2x SSC at 37°C. For hybridization, antisense and sense probes were diluted in hybridization solution (50% deionized formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 4x SSC [IGF-I] or 2x SSC [IGF-IR], 1x Denhardts solution, 1 µg/mL tRNA, and 250 µg/mL herring sperm RNA) to a concentration of 400 ng/mL, and incubated at 68°C for 30 minutes. The hybridization solution was then layered onto the sections and hybridized overnight at 55°C in a humid chamber. Posthybridization washes were performed at 45°C for 30 minutes in the following solutions: 50% formamide in 2x SSC, 50% formamide in 1x SSC, 0.1x SSC (IGF-IR), or 0.5x SSC (IGF-I). The slides were incubated with RNase T1 (2 U/mL) in 2x SSC and 1 mM EDTA in 37°C for 15 minutes and washed at 45°C with 1x SSC and at room temperature with 2x SSC. The digoxigenin-labeled hybrids were detected by antibody incubation performed according to the manufacturers instructions (Roche Diagnostics) with the following modifications. A 1:1000 dilution of anti-digoxigenin (Fab) conjugated to alkaline phosphatase was used for a 2.5-hour incubation at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Afterward, an extra washing step of 0.025% Tween in Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.5) was performed. For staining, sections were layered with detection buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.05 M MgCl2 [pH 9.5]) containing 4-nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (NBT), 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP; both from Vector, Burlingame, CA) and 6% polyvinylalcohol (molecular weight 31,000 to 50,000, from Aldrich Chemical, Milwaukee, WI). The color reaction was performed in the dark and was stopped when the desired intensity of the resultant blue precipitate was reached. Sections were washed in 10 mM Tris-HCl and 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), counterstained with nuclear red solution, dehydrated with ethanol gradients, and mounted.
Immunohistochemistry
Polyclonal rabbit antibodies against IGF-IR (1:750 dilution) were obtained from Research Diagnostics (Flanders, NJ). Immunohistochemistry against IGF-I was not performed, because adequate antibodies for paraffin-embedded material are not available. Antibodies against pankeratin (monoclonal mouse antibodies; 1:100 dilution); factor VIII (monoclonal mouse antibodies; 1:50 dilution), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; polyclonal rabbit antibodies; dilution 1:200) were obtained from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark). Monoclonal mouse antibodies against smooth muscle actin (SMA; 1:150 dilution) were obtained from Biogenex (San Ramon, CA). Sections were deparaffinated and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed for the IGF-IR and pankeratin antibodies (microwave heating for 10 minutes) and for the factor VIII antibodies (pronase treatment for 20 minutes at 37°C). After the slides were blocked with normal goat serum (Dako, 1:10) for 15 minutes, they were incubated with the primary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature or overnight at 4°C (IGF-IR). The sections were further incubated with biotinylated multilink antibodies for 30 minutes, followed by alkaline phosphatase-labeled antibiotin (both Biogenex) for 30 minutes. The complex was visualized by incubation with new fuchsin (as a red chromogen) for 30 minutes in the dark. The slides were counterstained with Mayer hematoxylin, mounted, and examined by light microscopy. Negative controls for immunohistochemistry included (1) omission of the primary antibody, (2) incubation with an irrelevant polyclonal rabbit antibody, and (3) preabsorption of the IGF-IR antibodies with ten times the amount of the immunizing IGF-IR peptide as of the antibody (Research Diagnostics) for 4 hours.
Grading of Expression and Statistics
The slides were examined by light microscopy. Grading of mRNA and IGF-IR protein expression was performed in a masked fashion by two authors (ACL, CMM) twice and once, respectively. Slides were blinded and randomly graded per cell type in three categories (Table 2) : (1) no staining, (2) staining in less than 50% of cells, (3) staining in more than 50% of cells.
|
For inter- and intraobserver variability, a
statistic was calculated.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Situ Hybridization
IGF-I.
In the normal retina, IGF-I mRNA expression (Figs. 1A 1D) was found in the ganglion cell layer, inner nuclear layer, outer limiting membrane, RPE monolayer, and some cells in the choroid. Choriocapillary endothelial cells and retinal vessels were positive infrequently. Further expression was found in the lens epithelium, and in all corneal layers (not shown). Hybridization with the sense probe was negative. In eyes with CNV we found IGF mRNA in the retina in the same pattern as in normal retina. Staining in the preexistent RPE monolayer was similar to normal eyes. In 8 of 14 eyes with CNV, expression was found in vascular endothelial cells, some RPE cells, and fibroblast-like cells (Table 2 ; Figs. 2A 2D 2G 2J ). Eyes with PDR showed identical expression in retinal layers. In the preretinal membranes, endothelial cells from newly formed capillaries and fibroblast-like cells stained positive (Fig. 1G) . Hybridization with the sense probe was negative (Fig. 2L) .
|
|
Immunohistochemistry
In the normal eyes, we found IGF-IR protein in the choroidal vessels, in the RPE, and in all layers of the neuroretina (Figs. 1C 1F) ; the choriocapillaris was negative. The negative controls showed no staining, except for the peptide control, in which staining of the RPE monolayer was not totally blocked compared with retinal staining, indicating an aspecific component in the RPE staining. In all eyes with CNV, we found the IGF-IR protein in RPE cells, and in 9 of 13 classifiable eyes, staining was present in newly formed vessels (Table 2 ; Figs. 2C 2F 2I ). Eyes with PDR showed expression in the retina similar to that in normal eyes, and, in the diabetic preretinal membranes, endothelial cells from newly formed capillaries were positive (Fig. 1I) .
Statistics
Grading of mRNA and IGF-IR protein expression was performed in a masked fashion by two authors (ACL, CMM), twice, with an interval of 7 weeks, and once, respectively. For interobserver and intraobserver variabilities,
was 0.75 and 0.83, respectively.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The observed hybridization signal of IGF-IR was much stronger than that of IGF-I. This may represent a real difference in expression, confirming the findings of higher IGF-IR expression in cultured human RPE.14 15 However, intensity of staining is not a reliable quantitative criterion, and the IGF-IR probe may be more sensitive than the IGF-I probe.
In CNV secondary to ARM, we demonstrated mRNA expression of IGF-I and IGF-IR in vascular endothelial cells, in RPE cells, and in fibroblast-like cells. Similarly, we found expression of IGF-I mRNA and its receptor in epiretinal membranes in eyes with PDR, including endothelial cells from newly formed capillaries and in fibroblast-like cells. This is in accordance with a previous diabetic retinopathy study, in which binding sites for IGF-I (receptors or binding proteins) were demonstrated in vessel walls, as well as in cells in fibrous tissue in human diabetic epiretinal membranes.18 In human and rat diabetic retinas, IGF-I mRNA levels are decreased,19 28 but vitreous levels of IGF-I are elevated.29 30 31 32 33 Our findings confirm that intraocular synthesis may contribute to these elevated concentrations.32
The pathogenesis of neovascular AMD involves the choroidal vasculature rather than the retinal vasculature, as in diabetic retinopathy. In vitro, IGF-I stimulates the proliferation of choroidal endothelial cells.7 Therefore, synthesis of IGF-IR and IGF-I in endothelial and RPE cells in CNV may point toward a role for this growth factor in the pathogenesis of neovascular AMD, because both cell types appear to have an important role in this process.1
IGF-I participates in ocular neovascularization.23 It is involved in the degradation of basement membranes, and proteolysis of extracellular matrix, and in migration and proliferation of vascular endothelial cells.6 Intravitreous injection of IGF-I produces preretinal neovascularization in rabbits34 or microangiopathy resembling diabetic microangiopathy in pigs.35 IGF-I also increases RPE cell migration and proliferation in vitro.11 Furthermore, IGF-I induces upregulation of VEGF mRNA expression in RPE cells13 and fibroblasts,36 which in turn also stimulates endothelial cells.13 Antagonism of IGF-IR suppresses retinal neovascularization and reduces the retinal endothelial cell response to VEGF,37 which allows for the hypothesis that IGF-I has a permissive role in VEGF-induced neovascularization.
Inhibition of IGF-I, achieved with somatostatin analogues,8 may occur at different levels. First, somatostatin inhibits the GH-IGF axis. Furthermore, somatostatin can inactivate the mitogenic potential of IGF-I directly by inactivating the phosphorylated, active form of IGF-IR.23 38 Finally, somatostatin can act directly as an antiangiogenic agent through binding to somatostatin receptors.6 Therefore, somatostatin analogues may be an effective therapy for neovascular AMD.
IGF-I is recruited in normal wound repair.39 40 This may partly explain the presence of IGF-I in CNV, because formation of the disciform lesion is regarded as normal wound repair.1
In conclusion, in this descriptive study we localized the expression of IGF-I mRNA and IGF-IR protein and mRNA in the normal eye. The colocalization of protein and receptor indicates an autocrine function of IGF-I in the human retina. Furthermore, we detected synthesis of both IGF-I and its receptor, and IGF-IR protein in ocular neovascular membranes of patients with AMD and patients with diabetes. Because IGF-I participates in ocular neovascularization, synthesis of IGF-IR and IGF-I in vascular endothelial, RPE, and fibroblast-like cells in CNV may indicate a role for this growth factor in the pathogenesis of neovascular AMD. The exact role of the IGF family in CNV and its possible therapeutic possibilities are yet to be established.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Commercial relationships policy: N.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Antoinette C. Lambooij, Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; a.lambooij{at}erasmusmc.nl.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A C Browning, H S Dua, and W M Amoaku The effects of growth factors on the proliferation and in vitro angiogenesis of human macular inner choroidal endothelial cells Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2008; 92(7): 1003 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Economou, J. Wu, D. Vasilcanu, L. Rosengren, C. All-Ericsson, I. van der Ploeg, E. Menu, L. Girnita, M. Axelson, O. Larsson, et al. Inhibition of VEGF Secretion and Experimental Choroidal Neovascularization by Picropodophyllin (PPP), an Inhibitor of the Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2620 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nagai, Y. Oike, K. Izumi-Nagai, T. Urano, Y. Kubota, K. Noda, Y. Ozawa, M. Inoue, K. Tsubota, T. Suda, et al. Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor-Mediated Inflammation Is Required for Choroidal Neovascularization Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2006; 26(10): 2252 - 2259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Slomiany and S. A. Rosenzweig Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1-Dependent and -Independent Regulation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1-Stimulated Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Secretion J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2006; 318(2): 666 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Strauss The Retinal Pigment Epithelium in Visual Function Physiol Rev, July 1, 2005; 85(3): 845 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Morimoto, T. Miyoshi, S. Matsuda, Y. Tano, T. Fujikado, and Y. Fukuda Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation Rescues Axotomized Retinal Ganglion Cells by Activating Endogenous Retinal IGF-1 System Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 2147 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Slomiany and S. A. Rosenzweig IGF-1-Induced VEGF and IGFBP-3 Secretion Correlates with Increased HIF-1{alpha} Expression and Activity in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cell Line D407 Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2004; 45(8): 2838 - 2847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |