|
|
||||||||
1From the Departments of Cell Biology and Physiology and 2Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico; the 4New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, New Mexico; and 3Ångstrom Pharmaceuticals Inc, San Diego, California.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Retinal neovascularization was induced by exposing newborn mice to 75% oxygen on postnatal day 7 for 5 days, followed by exposure to room air on days 12 to 17. The expression of uPAR in the retina was investigated by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. The role of uPAR in ischemic retinopathy was investigated by quantitating the extent of retinal neovascularization in the uPAR-/- mouse. The effects of inhibiting the uPA/uPAR interaction on the development of retinal neovascularization were studied in this animal model with a uPA-derived peptide, Å6. Animals were treated with an intraperitoneal injection of Å6 at a dose of 5, 10, or 100 mg/kg once a day on days 12 to 16. Control animals included oxygen-exposed mice treated with similar amounts of PBS only on days 12 to 16. The effect of Å6 on the expression of uPAR in the retina was examined by real-time RT-PCR.
RESULTS. The expression of uPAR mRNA was upregulated in experimental animals during the period of angiogenesis and was localized to endothelial cells in the superficial layers of the retina. The uPAR-/- mouse demonstrated normal retinal vascular development; however, the absence of functional uPAR resulted in a significant reduction in the extent of retinal neovascularization. Histologic analysis of mice treated with Å6 peptide showed significant inhibition of retinal neovascularization, and the response was dose dependent. The RT-PCR analysis of the retinas of the Å6-treated animals showed a greater than twofold decrease in uPAR expression.
CONCLUSIONS. Expression of the urokinase receptor uPAR is essential to the development of retinal neovascularization. Inhibition of the activity of uPAR suppresses retinal neovascularization, possibly through a reduction in cell-associated proteolytic activity, cell signaling, or cell-matrix adhesion necessary for cell migration during angiogenesis. The uPA/uPAR interaction may be an important therapeutic target in the management of proliferative retinopathies.
The process of angiogenesis in the retina and other tissues is characterized by distinct phases or activities including an initial response to locally produced angiogenic factors and signals. This event is followed by a rapid upregulation of extracellular proteinases that facilitate the breakdown of the capillary basal lamina and the migration of endothelial cells into and through the surrounding extracellular matrix. After the proliferation of endothelial cells, new capillary tubes are formed and stabilized through the action of specific growth factors and interactions with surrounding pericytes.3 4 5
The main focus of our laboratory has been the role of urokinase (uPA) and other extracellular proteinases in facilitating the development of new vessels in the retina and the potential for these enzymes to serve as targets for the development of new antiangiogenic therapies.6 7 We have reported an increased level of urokinase in the ocular tissues of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Epiretinal neovascular membranes obtained from these patients at the time of surgery showed significantly elevated levels of this proteinase.7 A similar finding was reported in the retinal tissue of mice with ischemia-induced retinal neovascularization.6 The importance of urokinase in the regulation of cell migration has been shown in numerous studies and is partially dependent on its localization at the cell surface by the urokinase receptor, uPAR (CD87).8 9 10 The objectives of this study were to determine the role of uPAR in the development of retinal neovascularization and the ability of Å6, a peptide derived from the non-receptor-binding region of urokinase, to inhibit this process. The Å6 peptide inhibits the interaction of uPA with uPAR in a noncompetitive manner, inhibits tumor cell invasion in vitro, and has antiangiogenic and antitumor activity in vivo.11 12 13
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Animals.
Seven-day-old C57BL/6J mice were placed into an oxygen chamber maintained at 75% oxygen until postnatal day (P)12.14 Mice were removed from the chamber on P12 and maintained in room air until P17. By P17, retinal neovascularization was present in 100% of the experimental animals.
Control Animals.
Newborn mice exposed only to room air served as the control. Mice without a functional uPAR gene (uPAR-/- mice)15 were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME), and a colony is maintained at the University of New Mexico. In some experiments, these mice underwent the identical angiogenesis-inducing oxygen protocol as did the C57BL/6J mice.
Histologic Quantitation of Retinal Neovascularization
Eyes from control and experimental animals were fixed overnight in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections (6 µm) parallel to the optic nerve were mounted on gelatin-coated slides, stained with Griffonia simplicifolia lectin I-fluorescein isothiocyanate (GSA-FITC; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and coverslipped with mounting medium containing diamidinophenylindole (DAPI) (Vectashield; Vector Laboratories). Every third section was examined with a fluorescence microscope, and nuclei of GSA-positive cells on the vitreous side of the inner limiting membrane of the retina were counted manually. Sections containing the optic nerve were excluded because of epiretinal vasculature that may be mistaken for neovascular nuclei. Data are expressed as the number of nuclei per section. Two-sample t-tests were used to make comparisons between experimental and control animals.
Immunostaining
Eyes were collected from experimental (n = 4) and control (n = 2) animals and fixed overnight in zinc fixative (IHC; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) after removal of the cornea and lens. The eye cups were processed and embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 6 µm. Sections were pretreated with hydrogen peroxide, blocked with 10% normal goat serum and incubated with either an anti-mouse uPAR antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or anti-mouse CD31 antibody (BD PharMingen). Sections were washed, incubated with a peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody, and reacted with diaminobenzidine.
ADPase Staining
The retinal vasculature was examined in day 17 C57BL/6J (n = 3) and uPAR-/- mice (n = 3) by a modification of the lead sulfide technique.16 Eyes were enucleated and the retinas were removed and fixed overnight in 10% formalin. The retinas were incubated in an adenosine diphosphatase (ADPase)-containing solution and cleared with ammonium sulfide. The retinas were viewed as wholemounts, and six random images of each retina were collected with a digital camera. The images were analyzed on computer (MetaMorph; Universal Imaging Corp., Downingtown, PA) for the percentage of retinal area occupied by vascular profiles.
Å6 Treatment
In some studies, experimental C57BL/6 mice were injected intraperitoneally twice daily from P12 to P16 with increasing doses (10, 50, or 100 mg/kg) of the Å6 peptide (Ångstrom Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA; n = 4 mice per dose of Å6 peptide). As a control, some experimental animals received an equal volume of PBS (n = 4 mice). Eyes were collected at P17 and analyzed histologically for the extent of retinal neovascularization. In some studies, experimental mice were treated with Å6 (100 mg/kg) from P12 to P14 and the retinas collected on P15 (n = 2 mice). The retinal mRNA was then extracted for PCR analysis.
Semiquantitative and Real-Time RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from control and experimental retinas and used to generate first-strand cDNA using reverse transcriptase (Superscript; Gibco, Grand Island, NY). PCR was performed with primers specific for the uPAR mRNA (5'-TTCCACCGAATGGCTTCCAG-3' and 5'-AGGCAATGAGGCTGAGTTGAGC-3'). In some cases, the relative level of the specific product was standardized to a coamplified invariant internal standard (18s ribosomal RNA). Ten microliters of each reaction was examined by agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining and band densities quantitated on computer (Alpha Imager 2200 software package; Alpha Innotech Corp., San Leandro, CA). For real-time RT-PCR analysis, cDNA samples were analyzed using a fluorescently-labeled probe and primers specific for mouse uPAR and 18s RNA. Primers were designed on computer (Primer Express; Applied Biosystems) and purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). Reactions were run in triplicate, and mean values were characterized by comparing threshold cycle (Ct) values.17 Transcripts of the 18s RNA gene were used as an endogenous control, with each unknown sample normalized to 18s content.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, uPAR was significantly upregulated in the retina during the process of angiogenesis in experimental mice. The uPAR protein was localized to vascular endothelial cells within the superficial layers of the retina and on tufts of new capillaries on the surface of the inner limiting membrane that extended into the vitreous cavity. Control P17 mice demonstrated no uPAR expression, as evidenced by both immunostaining and RT-PCR. This result was initially surprising, because most normal retinal vasculature development takes place after birth, and uPAR may be expected to play a role. The absence of uPAR expression and staining may be explained by the fact that the migration of endothelial cells to the peripheral avascular region of the retina is complete or nearly complete by P17.30 It should also be noted that the formation of the superficial retinal vasculature is postulated to occur by the process of vasculogenesis, as opposed to angiogenesis that may depend on or use different cellular mechanisms.30
The uPAR-/- mouse was used as a model to explore further the role of this protein in retinal angiogenesis. The uPAR-/- mouse was generated by elimination of the third exon of the uPAR gene that encodes a portion of the uPA-binding domain.14 Disruption of the uPAR gene in this way resulted in the production of mutant mRNA transcripts in the uPAR-/- mice that did not give rise to any detectable or functional uPAR protein. Analysis and comparison of normal C57BL6 and uPAR-/- mice revealed no difference in the pattern or extent of retinal vascularization in the P17 mouse, based on ADPase staining and quantitation. These results together with the absence of expression of uPAR suggest that uPAR may not be necessary for normal vasculogenesis of the retina or that some level of compensation by other proteins exists.
The requirement of uPAR in abnormal or pathologic retinal angiogenesis was confirmed in studies in which the extent of experimentally induced angiogenesis was significantly reduced in uPAR-/- mice when compared with normal C57BL6 mice. uPAR may be necessary to facilitate the formation of new vessels from the existing superficial retinal vasculature, or it may be required for the migration of other cell types contributing to the new vessels. Recent studies have suggested that some endothelial cells of vessels that form during pathologic angiogenesis are derived from a population of bone marrow stem cells.31 32 It is unclear at the present time whether the model used in these studies uses a population of stem cells as part of the mechanism for oxygen-induced retinal neovascularization. However, if this turns out to be the case, then the absence of functional uPAR may prevent the mobilization of endothelial stem cells from the bone marrow, thus contributing to a decrease in the extent of angiogenesis.
The current treatment for the proliferative retinopathies is panretinal laser photocoagulation, which in many cases is effective but not optimal. In addition to possible recurrence and progression of the disease requiring repeated laser treatments, there are also significant side effects that include the loss of peripheral and night vision. Several experimental approaches have been undertaken to develop new alternative therapies designed to curtail the development and/or progression of retinal neovascularization without the side effects. These approaches include targeting growth factors,33 34 35 36 37 38 39 cell surface receptors,40 and proteinases.6 41 Many of these approaches may be useful, either in conjunction with the current therapy or as alternatives to the laser treatment.
Our studies further explored the possibility that the Å6 peptide may provide an efficient means of disrupting the uPA/uPAR system, so as to inhibit the extent of retinal angiogenesis in the mouse model. Experimental animals treated with Å6 peptide demonstrated a significant reduction in the extent of retinal angiogenesis compared with PBS-treated animals. The reduction of neovascularization was nearly the same as that in the uPAR-/- mice suggesting that disruption of uPAR function may be an efficient and effective means of regulating the extent of abnormal new vessel formation. Å6 has been shown to inhibit the interaction of uPA with uPAR in a noncompetitive, allosteric manner.11 The peptide has been administered to animals and shown to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis with no detectable toxic side effects.11 A recent study42 demonstrated that the administration of Å6, in a syngeneic model of breast cancer, inhibited tumor growth through a decrease in blood vessel density and increased tumor-cell death. The authors further demonstrated that a mammary adenocarcinoma cell line treated with Å6 showed decreased TGF ß activity and expression of the VEGF receptor flk-1. Although this was not specifically demonstrated in the animals, it may be a direct or indirect result of inhibition of the uPA/uPAR interaction, leading to the inhibition of new vessel formation.
In the present study, the level of uPAR mRNA was quantitatively reduced in experimental mice treated with Å6. This reduction in uPAR mRNA may simply reflect an overall reduction in the number of uPAR-expressing endothelial cells in the treated tissues or could indicate a direct or indirect effect on the expression of uPAR itself. Further studies of Å6-treated cultured cells may help resolve this issue.
Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the uPA/uPAR system is important in facilitating the development of abnormal new vessels in the retina of mice. The uPA/uPAR interactions may represent a new target for the development of antiangiogenic therapies based on the results showing that the Å6 peptide was effective in inhibiting the development of abnormal new vessels in the retina with no observable toxic side effects. This peptide may be useful alone or in combination with other current therapies to inhibit the progression or the recurrence of the proliferative retinopathies.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by National Eye Institute Grant R01-EY12604-04 (AD).
Submitted for publication November 14, 2002; revised January 8, 2003; accepted January 21, 2003.
Disclosure: P.G. McGuire, None; T.R. Jones, Ångstrom Pharmaceuticals (E, F); N. Talarico, None; E. Warren, None; A. Das, Ångstrom Pharmaceuticals (C, R)
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Arup Das, Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 2211 Lomas Boulevard NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131; adas{at}unm.edu.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
v/ß3 and
v/ß5 in ocular neovascular diseases Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93,9764-9769This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Basu, G. Menicucci, J. Maestas, A. Das, and P. McGuire Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) Facilitates Retinal Angiogenesis in a Model of Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2009; 50(10): 4974 - 4981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Navaratna, G. Menicucci, J. Maestas, R. Srinivasan, P. McGuire, and A. Das A peptide inhibitor of the urokinase/urokinase receptor system inhibits alteration of the blood-retinal barrier in diabetes FASEB J, September 1, 2008; 22(9): 3310 - 3317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Navaratna, J. Maestas, P. G. McGuire, and A. Das Suppression of Retinal Neovascularization With an Antagonist to Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2008; 126(8): 1082 - 1088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Yamaguchi, J. M. Lopez-Guisa, X. Cai, S. J. Collins, D. M. Okamura, and A. A. Eddy Endogenous urokinase lacks antifibrotic activity during progressive renal injury Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): F12 - F19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Colombo, G. Menicucci, P. G. McGuire, and A. Das Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Scatter Factor Promotes Retinal Angiogenesis through Increased Urokinase Expression Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1793 - 1800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Das, N. Boyd, T. R. Jones, N. Talarico, and P. G. McGuire Inhibition of Choroidal Neovascularization by a Peptide Inhibitor of the Urokinase Plasminogen Activator and Receptor System in a Mouse Model Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 2004; 122(12): 1844 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Koh, K. Bessho, L. Cheng, D.-U. Bartsch, T. R. Jones, G. Bergeron-Lynn, and W. R. Freeman Inhibition of Choroidal Neovascularization in Rats by the Urokinase-Derived Peptide A6 Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2004; 45(2): 635 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |