|
|
||||||||
1From the Departments of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences and 2Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska; and the 3Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. The human TXN gene was cloned from a human lens cDNA library. Trx1 activity was measured by insulin reduction assay. For study of the upregulation of Trx1, 1.6 million human lens epithelial cells (HLE B3) were exposed to H2O2 (0.1 mM) for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes. The cells were lysed with lysis buffer and used for Trx1 activity assay, Western blot analysis, and real-time PCR.
RESULTS. The sequence of the human lens TXN gene was identical with that of other human tissues. Recombinant Trx1 was sensitive to iodoacetic acid but showed strong resistance to oxidation (0.1 mM H2O2) at its approximate physiological protein level. Western blot analysis and assay of Trx activity revealed that Trx1 was expressed in HLE B3 cells and localized in epithelial, cortical, and nuclear regions of human and porcine lenses. In vivo oxidative stress of HLE B3 cells resulted in a 35% upregulation of the level of Trx1 protein after 10 minutes of H2O2 treatment. Real-time PCR analysis showed an increase of approximately 50% in the level of Trx1 mRNA under the same oxidative stress conditions.
CONCLUSIONS. The upregulation of Trx1 in HLE B3 cells under oxidative stress and the presence of Trx1 in the lens suggest that the thioredoxin system may be an effective defense system that protects the lens against oxidative stress.
![]() |
![]() |
Thioredoxin has been demonstrated to be a multifunctional protein implicated in a wide variety of biochemical functions. It is a source of reducing equivalent for ribonucleotide reductase, methionine sulfoxide reductase, and sulfate reductase1 and for enzymes directly inactivated under oxidative stress conditions, including glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase,2 ornithine decarboxylase,3 and iodothyronine 5'-deiodinase.4 Thioredoxin selectively activates the DNA-binding of several transcription factors, such as AP-1,5 NF-
B,6 glucocorticoid receptor,7 and other factors. It can act as a catalyst to facilitate refolding of disulfide-containing proteins8 and also as a growth factor for a variety of cell types.9 There is evidence suggesting that thioredoxin may have a neuroprotective function through the activation of AP-110 and may play a role in resistance to the cell-killing effect of anticancer drugs.11 Furthermore, thioredoxin can act as an antioxidant to protect cells against oxidative stress by removing H2O212 or scavenging free radicals.13 Thus, accumulating evidence suggests that thioredoxin regulates an increasing number of cell processes, such as cell division, radical scavenging, nonspecific defense, transcription, DNA replication, immune response, detoxification, meiosis, and embryogenesis, and has emerged as a regulatory protein that plays a fundamental role in plants and animals.
Oxygen metabolism occurring in the cells of all aerobic organisms continuously generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the cells, such as superoxide anion (O2-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (·OH).14 15 Cells also can be exposed to environmental oxidants such as UV and ionizing radiation, heavy metals, redox active chemicals, anoxia, and hyperoxia, which increase ROS production.16 Aerobic organisms have widely adapted oxidationreduction reactions to function in key metabolic and regulatory pathways necessary for normal cellular function. The primary antioxidants, which include nonenzymatic (e.g., glutathione [GSH], vitamin C, vitamin E, and carotenoids) and enzymatic systems (e.g., glutathione peroxidase, thioredoxin peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase), act as ROS scavengers to prevent their accumulation and possible deleterious effect.17 When the level of ROS exceeds the primary cellular antioxidant defenses, the repair enzyme systems are used to repair the oxidatively damaged proteins and to regulate redox homeostasis in the cells. Such repair systems include NADPH-dependent thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase and glutathione-dependent thioltransferase (TTase; glutaredoxin). Oxidative stress is considered one of the major risk factors for human age-related cataract formation.18 19 The lens is rich in oxidant-sensitive SH-containing proteins. Oxidation of the sulfhydryl groups (S-thiolation) of the lens proteins can lead to formation of protein-thiol mixed disulfide conjugates, such as protein-GSH and protein-cysteine, as well as intra- and intermolecular proteinprotein disulfides.20 21 The altered redox status of cysteine residues can affect both the structure and the function of proteins and lead to decreased protein solubility, formation of high molecular weight aggregates, and eventual opacification of the lens (cataract).21 Findings in one a study have suggested that the epithelial cell layer is an initial target of oxidative stress.22 It has been shown that epithelial cell damage precedes the loss of lens transparency in the eye.20 Most biochemical activities in the lens are concentrated in the epithelial cell layer, whereas fiber cells contain a high concentration of structural proteins that have a lower level of defense against oxidative stress.23 Therefore, the defense systems that protect the lens against oxidation are also concentrated in the epithelium.24 25 The lens has an usually high level of GSH26 and of the complete primary antioxidants and oxidation defense enzymes.18 19 The oxidation damage-repair enzyme, GSH-dependent thioltransferase, has been identified in the lens,27 and the gene has been cloned from human lens epithelial cells.28 The second repair system in the lens, NADPH-dependent Trx/TrxR, is not well-studied. Although cytosolic Trx1 has been found in the human lens and in the Emory mouse lens,29 this lens protein has neither been purified nor characterized. Herein, we report the cloning of the human lens TRX1 gene and the functional characterization and tissue distribution of Trx1, to study the role of Trx1 in the control of physiological processes in the human lens.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein Expression and Purification
The human TXN gene containing plasmid, pCR-Trx, was digested with NdeI and EcoRI, and the isolated Trx cDNA fragment was cloned into the NdeI-EcoRI sites of the pET23a(+) expression vector (Novagen, Madision, WI) driven by the T7 promoter. The purified PCR fragment of 318 bp was cloned into the NdeI-XhoI sites of the pET23a(+) vector directly and was designated pET-Trx(His). The expression plasmids pET-Trx and pET-Trx(His) were transformed into the BL2l (DE3) cells (Novagen). For the expression of recombinant proteins, transformed BL21 (DE3) cells were grown at 37°C in LB medium with 50 µg/mL ampicillin until an optical density at 600-nm absorbance (OD600) of 0.4 to 0.6 was reached. Then, expression of the fusion proteins was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM isopropyl-1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG). The cells were harvested after 3 to 4 hour by centrifugation, and the pellet was resuspended in 1:25 culture volume of reagent (BugBuster with Benzonaze Nuclease; Novagen). The supernatant of the lyzed cells was cleared by centrifugation and loaded onto a resin column (His·Bind; Novagen) equilibrated with binding buffer (5 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9]). The column was washed with binding buffer followed by washing buffer (60 mM imidazole, 0.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9]), and then recombinant Trx1 was eluted with a linear gradient from 5 to 1000 mM imidazole in binding buffer. Fractions containing Trx1 activity were combined, dialyzed against TE buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, [pH 7.5]), concentrated, and applied to a gel filtration column (Sephadex G-50; Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) equilibrated with TE buffer. Fractions containing Trx1 activity were pooled, concentrated, and stored at -20°C. The size and purity of recombinant Trx1 was confirmed by SDS-PAGE. Protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) microprotein assay30 with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard.
Purification of Mammalian TrxR
Thioredoxin reductase was purified from porcine liver according to the method of Arner et al.31 with modification. The procedure included anion-exchange (DEAE-Sepharose), affinity (ADP-Sepharose), anion-exchange (Q-Sepharose), and gel-filtration (Sephadex G-75) chromatographic steps (Amersham Biosciences). The enzyme was usually electrophoretically pure after the Q-Sepharose step. Otherwise, an additional gel filtration step (Sephadex G-75) was used to remove traces of contaminating proteins.
Trx and TrxR Assay
The activity of Trx1 was determined by insulin32 and 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic) acid (DTNB)33 assays. The insulin assay is based on the ability of Trx to reduce insulin with NADPH in the presence of an excess of TrxR. Briefly, aliquots of Trx1 were preincubated at 37°C for 15 minutes with 2 µL buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 100 µg/mL BSA, and 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) in a total volume of 70 µL. Then, 40 µL of a reaction mixture composed of 250 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 2.4 mM NADPH, 10 mM EDTA, and 6.4 mg/mL insulin was added. The reaction started with the addition of 10 µL of TrxR from porcine liver (3.0 A412 unit), and incubation was continued for 20 minutes at 37°C in a final volume of 120 µL. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.5 mL of 6 M guanidine-HCl and 1 mM DTNB, and the absorbency at 412 nm (A412) was measured. The rate of DTNB reduction was calculated from the increase in A412, using a molar extinction coefficient of 27,200 M-1 cm-1 (reduction of DTNB by 1 mole of Trx-(SH)2 yields 2 moles of TNB, with a molar extinction coefficient of 13,600 M-1 cm-1). One unit of activity was calculated by A412 x 0.62/(13.6 x 2) as the micromoles of NADPH oxidized, because 1 mole of NADPH corresponds to 2 moles of sulfhydryl groups. The activity of porcine liver TrxR was determined by DTNB assay, as described by Holmgren and Bjornstedt.32
Hydrogen Peroxide and Iodoacetamide Treatment of Trx
To ensure that the rTrx1 was fully reduced before exposure to H2O2, the protein was treated with DTT activation buffer composed of 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM EDTA, and 2 mM DTT at room temperature for 20 minutes. Then an aliquot (5 µL) of the 2 or 20 µM rTrx1 solution was added to an equal volume of H2O2 solution to achieve a final concentration of H2O2 at 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, or 1 mM. The final concentration of DTT after the addition of hydrogen peroxide was 28 µM. The reaction mixture was incubated for 20 minutes at 30°C. Catalase (2 µg) was added for an additional 5 minutes to detoxify the unused H2O2. An aliquot of each reaction mixture was used to measure Trx1 activity. Hydrogen peroxide mixed with catalase before incubation with rTrx1 was used as a control. For iodoacetamide (IAA) studies, an aliquot of 20 µM rTrx was added to 5 µL solution containing 12 µM IAA, and the complete reaction mixture was incubated for 0, 1, 2, and 5 minutes An aliquot of each reaction mixture was used for the Trx1 activity assay. RTrx1 pretreatment without IAA was used as a control.
Preparation of Porcine and Human Lens Homogenate
Prefrozen normal human lenses (19, 21, and 37 years) were obtained from the Lions Eye Bank of Omaha, Nebraska. The whole porcine eyes were delivered fresh on ice from Farmland, Inc. (Crete, NE). The lenses were removed surgically, and the capsule epithelial layer was peeled off and immediately frozen on dry ice. The decapsulated lens was also placed on dry ice until half frozen before further dissection. A cork borer (3 mm) was used to remove the center cone of the lens, and both ends (1 mm) were removed with a razor blade. This center piece was considered the nucleus (25%30% of the whole lens weight), and the remaining portion was considered the cortex. Each lens portion was homogenized in 200 µL (epithelium) or 500 µL (cortex or nucleus) ice-cold buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 1 µg/mL aprotinin, and 100 µg/mL PMSF. The homogenate was centrifuged at 13,000g for 25 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatant was used for determination of the protein content, Trx assay, and immunoblot analysis. Human lens was processed similarly.
Cell Culture and H2O2 Treatment of HLE B3 Cells
HLE B3 cells were cultured in MEM containing 20% FBS and 50 µg/mL gentamicin in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. Cells were seeded and grown to a density of 4 x 106 cells per 100 mm tissue in a culture dish. The cells were weaned from the serum by first incubating overnight in 2% FBS and then in serum-free medium for 30 minutes before subjecting to a bolus of 0.1 mM H2O2 for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes. The medium at each time point was removed, and H2O2 concentration was determined. The cells were washed twice with PBS, scraped in 500 µL EDTA buffer (2 mM), and sonicated. The cell homogenates were centrifuged at 13,000g for 30 minutes at 4°C, and the supernatants were measured for protein content and assayed for Trx activity. Cell lysates from each plate were made by using 500 µL of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% [vol/vol] NP-40, 1 mM Na3VO4, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, and 1 µg/mL each of aprotinin, pepstatin, and leupeptin). The lysates were used for Trx analysis by immunoblot analysis.
Western Blot Analysis
Cell lysates were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a membrane (TransBlot; Bio-Red). The membrane was incubated with goat anti-human Trx IgG (American Diagnostica Inc., Greenwich, CT) diluted 1:1000 in TBST buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 100 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20) containing 1% blot-qualified BSA and then treated with donkey anti-goat IgG-horseradish peroxidase (HRP; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) diluted 1:2000. Immunodetection was performed with chemiluminescent reagent (Luminol; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The immunoblot was analyzed with an imaging system (Fluor-S MAX MultImager; Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA), and the contents of Trx1 in different regions of the lens were estimated.
Real-Time PCR
mRNA from HLE B3 cells was isolated and reverse transcribed (Micro PolyA Pure kit and RETROscript kit; Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the manufacturers instructions. The oligonucleotides Trx1 forward, 5'-CCATGGAGAAGGCTGGGG-3', and Trx1 reverse, 5'-CAAAGTTGTCATGGATGACC-3', were used for the amplification of the 104-bp fragment of Trx1 mRNA. The oligonucleotides glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) forward, 5'-CCATGGAGAAGGCTGGGG-3', and GAPDH reverse, 5'-CAAAGTTGTCATGGATGACC-3', were used for the amplification of a 199-bp fragment of the GAPDH mRNA. GAPDH cDNA transcripts were analyzed for each sample as a control to monitor the equal amounts of total cDNA. Primers were designed using on computer (Primer3; http://www.genome.wi.mit.edu/ provided in the public domain by the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA).
Two microliters of cDNA (total 20 µL) was amplified by incubation at 94°C for 30 seconds, 53°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 30 seconds in a PCR thermocycler (Techgene; Techne, Princeton, NJ). Purified PCR fragments (104 bp) of the Trx1 mRNA were cloned into a plasmid (pGEM-T Easy; Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturers instructions. The resultant plasmid with the cDNA insert was used as a standard. Real-time PCR was performed for quantification of expression of Trx1 mRNA (QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit; Bio-Rad) using a real-time detection system (Icycler IQ; Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturers instructions. Briefly, the PCR reaction was hot started by incubating at 95°C for 15 minutes to activate the Taq DNA polymerase (HotStarTaq) contained in the fluorescent green PCR master mix (2xQuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). A series plasmid dilution was prepared from a stock solution to generate a standard curve (plot of threshold cycle [CT]values/crossing points of different standard dilutions against the log of the amount of standard). Comparison of the CT (which marks the cycle when the fluorescence of a given sample significantly exceeds the baseline signal) value of the unknown amounts of the target with the standard curve allows calculation of the initial amount of the target used in real-time PCR. The following thermocycler program was used for real-time PCR: 15-minute preincubation at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of incubation at 94°C for 30 seconds, 53°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 30 seconds. After amplification, a melting curve was performed to confirm that multiple specific products were amplified in these reactions. The PCR products were also verified by agarose electrophoresis. The real-time PCR experiment was repeated three times under identical conditions.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Properties of rTrx1
To test the activity of the recombinant protein, we examined the ability of rTrx1 to reduce insulin in an insulin reduction assay. The insulin disulfides were effectively reduced by rTrx1 with NADPH in the presence of porcine liver TrxR (Fig. 4A) . The recombinant enzyme showed an activity of 68 U/mg.
|
The purified rTrx1 showed strong resistance to heat treatment. The activity of the rTrx1 remained intact after a 5-minute incubation at a temperature increasing from 37°C to 80°C (data not shown). rTrx1 displayed optimal activity at a pH range of 7.6 to 7.9 (data not shown). We used the Trx-dependent DTNB reduction assay to determine the affinity of porcine liver TrxR for rTrx1. To obtain saturation Michaelis-Menten kinetics, we used a low concentration of TrxR (10 nM). The Km of TrxR for recombinant Trx1 at pH 7.0 and 25°C was 1.8 ± 0.18 µM. TrxR showed a slightly lower Km for human rTrx1 than the rat liver TrxR for its homologous Trx1 (2.5 µM for rat liver Trx1).35
Sensitivity of rTrx1 to Deactivation by H2O2 and IAA
Proteins may be differently sensitive to oxidation according to their conformation, their content of critical cysteine residues, their cellular levels or the intensity of oxidative stress. Because Trx has vicinal dithiol moieties at its active site, the protein may be vulnerable to oxidative damage. We compared the inactivation of rTrx1 by H2O2 at a low concentration (1 µM) of Trx1 with the inactivation at the approximate physiological concentration of the Trx1 (10 µM). rTrx1 at low concentration was sensitive to H2O2 and showed a 20% activity loss after treatment with 0.05 mM H2O2 for 20 minutes and a 40% loss after treatment with 1 mM H2O2. In contrast, at the physiological level, rTrx1 was resistant to H2O2, in which approximately 80% activity remained even when the protein was exposed to 1 mM H2O2. The data are summarized in Fig. 5A .
|
Trx1 Activity and Expression in the Porcine and Human Lens Tissues
Trx1 activity was detected in epithelial, cortical, and nuclear regions of the porcine lens. To decrease the background in the insulin assay due to interaction of DTNB with -SH groups, we used heated lens extracts (70°C, 10 minutes). The lens epithelial layer showed the highest activity at 151.9 ± 10.5 mU/mg of total soluble protein, whereas, the lens cortical and nuclear regions displayed a lower activity at 59.4 ± 4.5 mU/mg and 65.8 ± 4.4 mU/mg, respectively (Fig. 6A) . Total soluble fractions prepared from various porcine and human lens tissues were subjected to immunoblot analysis with human antibody specific to Trx1 (Figs. 6B 6C) . Comparison of the blot intensities of proteins with various amounts of purified rTrx1 provided an estimation of the amount of Trx1 in the crude extracts of various regions of the porcine and human lenses (Figs. 6D 6E) . The amounts of Trx1 in the epithelial layer and the cortical and nuclear regions of porcine lenses were estimated by a fluorescence imaging system (Fluor-S MAX MultiImager; Bio-Rad) analysis to be 2.2 ± 0.07, 0.8 ± 0.05, and 0.9 ± 0.06 µg/mg of total soluble protein, respectively (Fig. 6D) . Thus, the levels of Trx1 in various regions of porcine lens calculated from immunoblot analysis were in agreement with the calculated values in the Trx assays. The amounts of Trx1 in epithelial, cortical, and nuclear regions of the human lens were similar to the level found in porcine lens and estimated to be 1.60 ± 0.32, 1.12 ± 0.15, and 0.93 ± 0.14 µg/mg of total soluble protein, respectively (Fig. 6E) . However, studies with fresh human lenses are needed to confirm these data.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The purified rTrx1 also showed similar properties to the Trx1 from other mammalian tissues, including the enhanced activity on DTT reduction and the nature of heat resistance. The kinetic parameters for rTrx1 were also similar to other mammalian Trxs.35
Our results showed that the lens possessed approximately three times more Trx1 protein (per milligram soluble protein) in the epithelial cell layer than in the fiber cells (Fig. 6) . This seems reasonable considering that lens epithelial cells are known to be constantly exposed to oxidative stress, either from the oxidant in the aqueous humor38 or in situ through direct photo-oxidation.39 The cortex and nucleus showed lower but almost equal amounts of Trx1, indicating that the fiber cells maintained their Trx1 level after differentiation and that the embryonic lens (the nucleus) and the younger section of the lens (cortex) may use the enzyme for certain physiological functions. A similar distribution pattern of TTase, another oxidation damage repair enzyme, has been reported in the lens.27 It has been demonstrated that TTase in the HLE B3 cells can dethiolate and reactivate the oxidation-modified and inactivated key metabolic enzymes.40 However, the partially oxidized and inactivated recombinant TTase could be reactivated by the TrxTrxR system in vitro.28 A recent has shown a possible cross-link between the Trx and glutathioneglutaredoxin (TTase) systems,41 in which Trx undergoes glutathionylation in T cells exposed to oxidative stress, but the recombinant Trx1 deglutathionylates itself. Also, it is well-known that glutathionylated enzymes-proteins can be reduced by glutaredoxins (TTases).28 42 43 Thus, these two oxidation defense systems may contribute synergistically to repair the damaged protein thiols that occur during oxidative stress. To further understand the possible oxidation and inactivation of the thiol-containing Trx, we determined the sensitivity of rTrx1 to deactivation by subjecting the protein to various concentrations of H2O2 in vitro. The fact that the remarkably H2O2-resistant nature of rTrx1 at the physiological concentration far exceeded that of TTase28 further supports our speculation that Trx1 is an important oxidation defense protein in the lens. Recent studies have shown that the expression of the TXN gene and its protein in the human lens appeared to decline with advanced age and suggested that altered Trx1 at an advanced age may be associated with senile cataractogenesis.44
Few studies have been published on lens Trx1 as a major regulatory protein with protective functions against oxidative damage. Bhuyan29 has reported that expression of Trx1, but not Trx2, is specifically upregulated in the lens under oxidative stress in the age-related cataract model of the Emory mouse. It is important to note that the upregulation of the TXN gene and its protein in the Emory mouse lens under in vivo oxidative stress is a tissue-specific adaptation. We conducted studies on the regulation of Trx1 expression in HLE B3 cells and found a distinct but transient upregulation of Trx1 under oxidative stress conditions. The rapid upregulation of Trx expression, which was followed by downregulation when the oxidant (H2O2) was totally detoxified from the media, may be an adaptive protective response of the cells to restore the altered redox state. Increased levels of the Trx1 protein and Trx1 mRNA under oxidative stress suggest the activation of gene expression and possibly the increase of the Trx1 mRNA half life but not the activation of presynthesized protein. Similar activation of the TXN gene as a possible response to oxidative stress has been shown in yeast cells.45
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication December 23, 2002; revised March 9, 2003; accepted April 1, 2003.
Disclosure: S. Yegorova, None; A. Liu, None; M.F. Lou, None
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Marjorie F. Lou, Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, UNL, Lincoln, NE 68583-0905; mlou1{at}unl.edu.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Lofgren, M. R. Fernando, K.-Y. Xing, Y. Wang, C. A. Kuszynski, Y.-S. Ho, and M. F. Lou Effect of Thioltransferase (Glutaredoxin) Deletion on Cellular Sensitivity to Oxidative Stress and Cell Proliferation in Lens Epithelial Cells of Thioltransferase Knockout Mouse Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 4497 - 4505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Moon, M. R. Fernando, and M. F. Lou Induction of Thioltransferase and Thioredoxin/Thioredoxin Reductase Systems in Cultured Porcine Lenses under Oxidative Stress Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 3783 - 3789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |