IOVS JNNP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2004;45:4263-4267.)
© 2004 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-0078
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maugeri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maugeri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, K.

A Novel Mutation in the ELOVL4 Gene Causes Autosomal Dominant Stargardt-like Macular Dystrophy

Alessandra Maugeri,1 Francoise Meire,2 Carel B. Hoyng,3 Carolien Vink,1 Nicole Van Regemorter,4 Goutam Karan,5 Zhenglin Yang,5,6 Frans P. M. Cremers,1,7 and Kang Zhang5,6,7

1From the Departments of Human Genetics and 3Ophthalmology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; the 2Department of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; the 4Centre de Genetique ULB, Hopital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium; and the 5Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science and the 6Program in Human Molecular Biology and Genetics, Eccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. To conduct clinical and genetic studies in a European family with autosomal dominant Stargardt-like macular dystrophy (adSTGD-like MD) and to investigate the functional consequences of a novel ELOVL4 mutation.

METHODS. Ophthalmic examination and mutation screening by direct sequencing of the ELOVL4 gene was performed in two affected individuals. Wild-type and mutant ELOVL4 genes were expressed as enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fusion proteins in transient transfection in NIH-3T3 and HEK293 cells. To determine the subcellular localization of ELOVL4, an endoplasmic-reticulum (ER)–specific marker for pDsRed2-ER was cotransfected with ELOVL4 constructs. Transfected cells were viewed by confocal microscopy. Western blot analysis was performed to assess protein expression using an anti-GFP antibody.

RESULTS. Affected patients exhibited macular atrophy with surrounding flecks characteristic of adSTGD-like MD. A novel ELOVL4 p.Tyr270X mutation was detected in affected individuals. In cell-transfection studies, wild-type ELOVL4 localized preferentially to the ER. In contrast, the mutant protein appeared to be mislocalized within transfected cells.

CONCLUSIONS. In a European family with adSTGD-like MD, a novel ELOVL4 mutation was found to underlie the disorder. Transfection studies indicated that, unlike wild-type ELOVL4, the mutant protein does not localize to the ER but rather appears to be sequestered elsewhere in an aggregated pattern in the cytoplasm. Further analysis of the function of normal and mutant ELOVL4 will provide insight into the mechanism of macular degeneration.

Stargardt disease (STGD) is an early-onset hereditary macular dystrophy, characterized by decreased central vision, atrophy of the macula, and frequent appearance of orange-yellow flecks in the posterior pole of the retina.1 STGD is most commonly inherited as an autosomal recessive trait, but numerous affected families have been described in which features of the disease showed autosomal dominant (ad) inheritance.2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mutations in the photoreceptor-specific ABCA4 gene seem to account for all recessive forms of STGD (STGD1; MIM248200). Conversely, adSTGD is a genetically heterogeneous disorder, as two loci already have been identified. One locus for adSTGD was mapped to 4p (STGD4; MIM603786).4 Another locus (STGD3, MIM600110) was localized to 6q14 in a large North American family.2 Subsequently, several additional adSTGD-like families and ad macular dystrophy (adMD) families were mapped to the STGD3 locus.5 6 9 10 Genealogy and haplotype analyses indicated that they were all linked through an ancestral founder.5 7 10 Positional cloning revealed that a photoreceptor-specific gene, ELOVL4 (elongation of very long chain fatty acids-like 4) is responsible for STGD3.7 The ELOVL4 protein was shown to be homologous to a group of yeast proteins involved in the biosynthesis of very-long-chain fatty acids and is likely to play a central role in the biosynthesis of lipid components of the photoreceptor outer segment membrane. A 5-bp deletion in the ELOVL4 gene was found to segregate with the disease in all five families.7 Subsequently, the identification of a second mutation in the ELOVL4 gene in a large unrelated pedigree confirmed ELOVL4 as a disease-causing gene in adMD and adSTGD.8 The second mutation consisted of two 1-bp deletions separated by four nucleotides, which occurred at the same location as the previously described 5-bp deletion and had an almost identical predicted truncating effect on the ELOVL4 protein.

Herein, we describe the identification of a third ELOVL4 mutation in a European family with adSTGD-like macular dystrophy. To assess the functional consequence of this ELOVL4 mutation, we investigated the subcellular location of normal and mutant ELOVL4. We demonstrated that the wild-type enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-ELOVL4 fusion protein localizes to the ER compartment in transfected cells. In contrast, the mutant EGFP-ELOVL4 fusion protein does not localize to the ER but rather appears to be sequestered elsewhere in an aggregate pattern in the cytoplasm.


   Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
Two individuals with adSTGD-like MD, a woman in a Belgian family and her affected daughter, were available for clinical and molecular investigation (patients III:2 and IV:1, Fig. 1 ). Both patients gave their informed consent before inclusion in the study as part of a protocol that adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Clinical investigation included visual acuity measurement, dilated fundus examinations, and fluorescein angiography.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Pedigree of the autosomal dominant STGD family described in this study.

 
Mutation Analysis
DNA of both patients was screened by direct sequence analysis of all six exons and flanking splice sites of the ELOVL4 gene using primers and conditions as reported in Table 1 . The identified novel ELOVL4 mutation was tested on a panel of 96 ethnically matched control individuals, using an amplification-refractory mutation specific (ARMS) technique.11 Wild-type-allele–specific and mutant-allele–specific forward primers used for ARMS were, respectively, 5'-AACTTCTACATTCGGACATAC-3' and 5'-AACTTCTACATTCGGACATAG-3'. The reverse primer was 5'-TCAACAACAGTTAAGGCCCA-3'.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide Primer Sequences and Conditions Used for ELOVL4 Mutation Analysis

 
Transfection Studies
Media and reagents for cell culture and transfection were purchased from Invitrogen-Gibco (Grand Island, NY). Anti-EGFP monoclonal antibody and poly-L-lysine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Chamber slides were purchased from Nalge Nunc (Rochester, NY).

Generation of Expression Constructs.
Wild-type and mutant ELOVL4 cDNAs were cloned separately into a pEGFPC1 vector (BD-Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). This vector utilizes a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter and expresses EGFP after transfection into mammalian cells. PCR was performed with one forward primer containing a KpnI site (5'-CGGGGTACCGCGATGGGGCTCCTGGACTC-3'), and two reverse primers containing a BamH1 site (5'-CGGGATCCCGTTAATCTCCTTTTGCTTTTC-3' for the wild-type ELOVL4 and 5'-CGGGATCCCGCTATGTCCGAATGTAGAAG-3' for the mutant 270X ELOVL4), with wild-type cDNAs used as a template. The resultant PCR products were digested with KpnI and BamHI, and cloned into the KpnI and BamHI sites of a pEGFPC1 vector in frame at the C-terminal end of EGFP. The recombinant plasmids containing EGFP-ELOVL4 fusion constructs were verified by direct DNA sequencing, amplified and purified with a plasmid isolation kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA).

Cell Transfection and Imaging.
NIH3T3 and HEK293 were used for all transfection studies. The recombinant plasmids were transfected into the cell lines using Lipofectamine Reagent 2000 (Invitrogen-Gibco) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells were monitored for fluorescence between 7 and 36 hours after transfection, by epifluorescence microscopy.

NIH3T3 cells were seeded onto poly-L-lysine–coated, four-well chamber glass slides at a confluence of 20% to 30% and transfected with recombinant plasmids containing wild-type or mutant ELOVL4. Cotransfection with an ER-organelle–specific marker pDsRed2ER was performed with wild-type and mutant ELOVL4 to determine the subcellular localization of ELOVL4. Transfected cells were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, washed with PBS, fixed in methanol-acetone (50:50, vol/vol), and mounted on glass slides with antifade medium (Vectashield; Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA) for microscopy. To assess subcellular localization of wild-type and mutant ELOVL4 protein, transfected cells were observed at different time intervals. However, all data were collected at approximately the same time point after transfection.

Images of green fluorescence were collected with a confocal laser scanning microscope (IX70; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) using a 488-nm excitation source and a 505- to 550-nm band-pass barrier filter. A red fluorescence (DsRed2) marker for ER was examined using 568-nm excitation light from the Kn laser, a 575-nm dichromic mirror, and a 580- to 625-nm filter. The cells were illuminated sequentially to avoid bleed through (3.7 seconds per frame for EGFP and DsRed2), and images were collected in a single optical section of 0.35 µm, where they were compared for colocalization analyses.

Electrophoresis and Immunoblot Analysis.
To analyze the expression of wild-type and mutant ELOVL4, we grew transfected cells for 24 hours, harvested them from the plates, and briefly washed them with PBS. Cells were lysed on ice for 20 minutes with a buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 0.01% SDS, 0.05 M Tris-HCl, and 1 mM EDTA (pH 7.5). The cell lysates were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 minutes and the supernatants used for electrophoresis.

SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed according to the method of Laemmli.12 Ten microliters of sample (~7 µg) was loaded onto a 9% polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed at 110 V for 1 hour. The resolved proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and blocked for 2 hours at room temperature with 5% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TTBS). The membrane was incubated for 2 hours with monoclonal anti-GFP antibody diluted 1:2000 in 5% milk containing TTBS, and then probed with peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (1:4000 dilution in TTBS; Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) for 1 hour and developed with a chemiluminescence detection kit according to the manufacturers’ protocol (ECL; Amersham Bioscience).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Clinical Investigation
Clinical features of both patients included in the study (patients III:2 and IV:1) are summarized in Table 2 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Clinical Features of the Patients with Autosomal Dominant Stargardt Disease

 
Patients experienced vision loss at young age (11 and 9 years, respectively). At 26 years of age, the mother (III:2) had a visual acuity of 20/400 in both eyes. At 16 years of age, the visual acuity of her daughter (IV:1) also had decreased to 20/400 in both eyes. In both patients, the fundus examinations showed macular pigmentary changes and the appearance of yellow flecks characteristic of adSTGD-like MD (Figs. 2C 2D 2E) . Fluorescein angiography revealed macular RPE defects in both individuals (Figs. 2B 2F 2G) .



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms of patients IV:1 (A–C) and III:2 (D–G), carrying the p.Tyr270X ELOVL4 mutation. (A, B) Patient IV:1 at 10 years of age. (A) Fundus photograph showing discrete macular alterations but no flecks. (B) Fluorescein angiography demonstrating window defects in the macula. (C) Fundus photograph of patient IV:1 at age 16. Yellow flecks extend beyond the arcade vessels. (D–G) Patient III:2 at the age 39. (D, E) Characteristic yellow flecks in the perimacular area, RPE atrophy, and pigmentary changes are shown. (F, G) Fluorescein angiography photographs of the left eye (F) in a middle phase and of the right eye (G) in the late venous phase, showing early fluorescence in the macular area due to RPE atrophy.

 
ELOVL4 Mutation Analysis
Because mutations in the ELOVL4 gene had been associated with adSTGD, we screened both patients for mutations in ELOVL4. In both patients, we identified a C-to-G change at nucleotide c.810 in exon 6 of the ELOVL4 gene. This change resulted in a novel substitution of a stop codon for tyrosine 270, leading to a truncated protein lacking the last 45 amino acids. The mutation was not found in 96 healthy control individuals.

Characterization of EGFP-ELOVL4 Fusion Proteins
We expressed wild-type and mutant ELOVL4 as EGFP fusion proteins to facilitate direct visualization of subcellular localization. Western blot analysis confirmed the synthesis of EGFP-ELOVL4 fusion proteins, and single bands were visualized for each construct at ~61 kDa for wild-type ELOVL4 and ~56 kDa for the EGFP-ELOVL4 truncated mutant (Fig. 3) .



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Western blot analysis of ELOVL4 expression in NIH3T3 cells. Transfected cells were allowed to express EGFP-ELOVL4 fusion proteins (lane 1: Tyr270stopELOVL4; lane 2: wtELOVL4) and EGFP alone (lane 3) for 24 hours, followed by immunoblot analysis with anti-GFP monoclonal antibody.

 
Subcellular Localization of ELOVL4
Confocal microscopy was used to determine the subcellular localization of wild-type and mutant EGFP-ELOVL4 in transfected NIH3T3 cells. Wild-type EGFP-ELOVL4 localized preferentially to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) compartment (Fig. 4) . In contrast, mutant EGFP-ELOVL4 showed a markedly different subcellular localization pattern in the transfected cells. It did not localize to the ER. Instead, the pattern of its subcellular distribution is consistent with an aggregated form in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4) . As a control, EGFP when expressed alone, localized to the cytoplasm (data not shown).13



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. Localization of ELOVL4 with ER-organelle–specific markers in NIH3T3 cells. Twenty-four hours after cotransfection, the cells were imaged by confocal microscopy. (A) Cotransfected cell with EGFP-wtELOVL4 and pDsRed2-ER, specific for endoplasmic reticulum. (B) Cotransfected cell with EGFP-mtELOVL4 and pDsRed2-ER. Green: expression of ELOVL4; red: ER organelle. Merged image: superimposed image of expression of ELOVL4 and the ER organelle.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Autosomal dominant STGD-like MD is a juvenile macular dystrophy. Most affected families in North America have been linked to the STGD3 locus on 6q14.2 5 6 9 10 Subsequently, haplotype and ELOVL4 mutation analyses have shown that all affected individuals share the same disease haplotype5 7 10 and harbor a 5-bp deletion in the ELOVL4 gene.7 The only unrelated family described up to now was also of North American origin and carried a 2-bp deletion mutation that, oddly enough, occurred at the same location as the previously described 5-bp deletion.8

Herein, we describe the identification of a novel ELOVL4 mutation in a family of European origin with adSTGD-like MD. This c.810C>G mutation predicts a p.Tyr270X change.

Both previously identified ELOVL4 mutations were small deletions that generate a frameshift leading to a truncated protein lacking the last 51 amino acids.7 8 The p.Tyr270X mutation results in the absence of the last 45 amino acids. In all three cases, a KXKXX dilysine-targeting signal at the carboxyl terminus of the ELOVL4 protein is deleted. This signal is known to be responsible for the retention of transmembrane proteins in the ER,14 the site of very-long-chain fatty acid biosynthesis.15 As expected, subcellular localization studies showed that, unlike wild-type ELOVL4, the mutant does not localize to the ER. The mislocalized protein seems to be sequestered in another subcellular compartment exhibiting dense fluorescence-positive aggregates. Similar results were also observed with 5-bp ELOVL4 mutants.16 17 Future studies with additional cell markers and/or electron microscopy will elucidate the subcompartmental localization and underlying mechanism of the ELOVL4 mutant proteins.

It is interesting that all three ELOVL4 mutations were clustered in the C terminus; so far, no mutations in the N terminus have been reported. This may suggest a dominant negative nature of the mutant ELOVL4 protein, rather than a mechanism of haploinsufficiency. Consistent with this notion, the 5-bp deletion mutant causes cell death when transfected into cultured cells.17

The identification of the third mutation in the ELOVL4 gene further supports its important role in macular degeneration, and provides another entry point from which ELOVL4 function in retinal physiology and disease can be investigated.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank Bellinda van den Helm and Saskia D. van der Velde-Visser for expert technical assistance.


   Footnotes
 
7 Contributed equally as senior authors. Back

Supported by the British Retinitis Pigmentosa Society (AM, FPMC). KZ is supported by Grants R01EY14428 and R01EY14448 from the National Eye Institute; the American Health Assistance Foundation; the Karl Kirchgessner Foundation; The Ruth and Milton Steinbach Fund; Ronald McDonald House Charities; Macular Vision Research Foundation; Val and Edith Green Foundation; and the Simmons Family Foundation. GK and ZY are supported by grants from Fight for Sight and the Knights Templar Eye Research Foundation.

Submitted for publication January 27, 2004; revised June 28, 2004; accepted August 9, 2004.

Disclosure: A. Maugeri, None; F. Meire, None; C.B. Hoyng, None; C. Vink, None; N. Van Regemorter, None; G. Karan, None; Z. Yang, None; F.P.M. Cremers, None; K. Zhang, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Alessandra Maugeri, Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 10, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; a.maugeri{at}antrg.umcn.nl.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Stargardt K. Uber familiäre, progressive degeneration in der Maculagegend des Auges. Graefes Arch Ophthalmol. 1909;71:534–550.[CrossRef]
  2. Stone EM, Nichols BE, Kimura AE, Weingeist TA, Drack A, Sheffield VC. Clinical features of a Stargardt-like dominant progressive macular dystrophy with genetic linkage to chromosome 6q. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:765–772.[Abstract]
  3. Zhang K, Bither PP, Park R, Donoso LA, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. A dominant Stargardt’s macular dystrophy locus maps to chromosome 13q34. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:759–764.[Abstract]
  4. Kniazeva M, Chiang MF, Morgan B, et al. A new locus for autosomal dominant Stargardt-like disease maps to chromosome 4. Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:1394–1399.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Edwards AO, Miedziak A, Vrabec T, et al. Autosomal dominant Stargardt-like macular dystrophy: I. clinical characterization, longitudinal follow-up, and evidence for a common ancestry in families linked to chromosome 6q14. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:426–435.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Lagali PS, MacDonald IM, Griesinger IB, Chambers ML, Ayyagari R, Wong PW. Autosomal dominant Stargardt-like macular dystrophy segregating in a large Canadian family. Can J Ophthalmol. 2000;35:315–324.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Zhang K, Kniazeva M, Han M, et al. A 5-bp deletion in ELOVL4 is associated with two related forms of autosomal dominant macular dystrophy. Nat Genet. 2001;27:89–93.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Bernstein PS, Tammur J, Singh N, et al. Diverse macular dystrophy phenotype caused by a novel complex mutation in the ELOVL4 gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:3331–3336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Griesinger IB, Sieving PA, Ayyagari R. Autosomal dominant macular at 6q14 excludes CORD7 and MCDR1/PBCRA loci. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:248–255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Donoso LA, Frost AT, Stone EM, et al. Autosomal dominant Stargardt-like macular dystrophy: founder effect and reassessment of genetic heterogeneity. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:564–570.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Newton CR, Graham A, Heptinstall LE, et al. Analysis of any point mutation in DNA: the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:2503–2516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of head of bacteriophage-T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Niswender KD, Blackman SM, Rohde L, Magnuson MA, Piston DW. Quantitative imaging of green fluorescent protein in cultured-cells: comparison of microscopic techniques, use in fusion proteins and detection limits. J Microsc. 1995;180:109–116.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Jackson MR, Nilsson T, Peterson PA. Identification of a consensus motif for retention of transmembrane proteins in the endoplasmic-reticulum. EMBO J. 1990;9:3153–3162.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Cinti DL, Cook L, Nagi MN, Suneja SK. The fatty-acid chain elongation system of mammalian endoplasmic-reticulum. Prog Lipid Res. 1992;31:1–51.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Ambasudhan R, Wang XF, Jablonski MM, et al. Atrophic macular degeneration mutations in ELOVL4 result in the intracellular misrouting of the protein. Genomics. 2004;83:615–625.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Karan G, Yang ZL, Zhang K. Expression of wild type and mutant ELOVL4 in cell culture: subcellular localization and cell viability. Mol Vis. 2004;10:248–253.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
V. Vasireddy, Y. Uchida, N. Salem Jr, S. Y. Kim, M. N. A. Mandal, G. B. Reddy, R. Bodepudi, N. L. Alderson, J. C. Brown, H. Hama, et al.
Loss of functional ELOVL4 depletes very long-chain fatty acids (>=C28) and the unique {omega}-O-acylceramides in skin leading to neonatal death
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2007; 16(5): 471 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
V. Vasireddy, M. M. Jablonski, M. N. A. Mandal, D. Raz-Prag, X. F. Wang, L. Nizol, A. Iannaccone, D. C. Musch, R. A. Bush, N. Salem Jr, et al.
Elovl4 5-bp-Deletion Knock-in Mice Develop Progressive Photoreceptor Degeneration.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2006; 47(10): 4558 - 4568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
D. Raz-Prag, R. Ayyagari, R. N. Fariss, M. N. A. Mandal, V. Vasireddy, S. Majchrzak, A. L. Webber, R. A. Bush, N. Salem Jr, K. Petrukhin, et al.
Haploinsufficiency Is Not the Key Mechanism of Pathogenesis in a Heterozygous Elovl4 Knockout Mouse Model of STGD3 Disease.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 3603 - 3611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Grayson and R. S. Molday
Dominant Negative Mechanism Underlies Autosomal Dominant Stargardt-like Macular Dystrophy Linked to Mutations in ELOVL4
J. Biol. Chem., September 16, 2005; 280(37): 32521 - 32530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
Y. P. Conley, A. Thalamuthu, J. Jakobsdottir, D. E. Weeks, T. Mah, R. E. Ferrell, and M. B. Gorin
Candidate gene analysis suggests a role for fatty acid biosynthesis and regulation of the complement system in the etiology of age-related maculopathy
Hum. Mol. Genet., July 15, 2005; 14(14): 1991 - 2002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Karan, C. Lillo, Z. Yang, D. J. Cameron, K. G. Locke, Y. Zhao, S. Thirumalaichary, C. Li, D. G. Birch, H. R. Vollmer-Snarr, et al.
Lipofuscin accumulation, abnormal electrophysiology, and photoreceptor degeneration in mutant ELOVL4 transgenic mice: A model for macular degeneration
PNAS, March 15, 2005; 102(11): 4164 - 4169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maugeri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maugeri, A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, K.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS