|
|
||||||||
1From The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; the 3Division of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; the 4Laboratory and Ocular Tissue Bank, Department of Ophthalmology, and the 5Centre for Applied Genomics, Institute for Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Linkage analysis was performed on 52 members of two Czech families with PPCD and polymorphic microsatellite markers and lod scores were calculated. The candidate gene VSX1 was also screened for mutations.
RESULTS. Significant lod scores were obtained with microsatellite markers on chromosome 20. Linkage analysis delineated the Czech PPCD locus to a 2.7-cM locus on chromosome 20, region p11.2, between flanking markers D20S48 and D20S139, which excluded VSX1 as the disease-causing gene in both families. In addition, the exclusion of VSX1 was confirmed by sequence analysis.
CONCLUSIONS. This study reports the localization of PPCD in patients of Czech origin to chromosome 20 at p11.2. Linkage data and sequence analysis exclude VSX1 as causative of PPCD in two Czech families. This refined locus for PPCD overlaps the congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED1) disease interval, and it is possible that these corneal dystrophies are allelic.
PPCD is a rare bilateral disorder, affecting both the corneal endothelium and Descemets membrane, which is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait.1 2 3 4 PPCD is usually a nonprogressive disorder that does not severely affect vision.4 5 6 On slit lamp examination PPCD is characterized by bilateral endothelial bands, vesicles, and polymorphous opacities at the level of Descemets membrane and endothelium7 that can be accompanied by iridocorneal peripheral adhesions, iris atrophy, and corectopia.4 8 The major morphologic change identified is the proliferation of epithelial-like cells, resulting in replacement of the hexagonal corneal endothelial cells.9 10 11 12 Although PPCD is generally considered to be a rare disease, with affected patients largely asymptomatic, in the Czech Republic, PPCD is one of the most frequently occurring corneal dystrophies, often presenting with a severe phenotype, with a high percentage including secondary glaucoma and necessitating keratoplasty.13 Several chromosomal loci for PPCD, CHED, and FECD have been reported.14 15 16 17 18 19 The first localization of PPCD was to a 30-cM region spanning the centromere on chromosome 20 flanked by markers D20S98 and D20S108 (Fig. 1) .14 Subsequently, CHED1 was mapped to an overlapping pericentromeric region on chromosome 20, between the markers D20S48 and D20S471, which suggests that these diseases may be allelic.15
|
The genetic heterogeneity of PPCD was exemplified by the mapping of a family with early-onset FECD to chromosome 1 at p34.3-p32 and the identification of mutations within the COL8A2 gene in patients with PPCD or FECD.18 More recently, a large American family with PPCD was mapped to chromosome 10, further demonstrating the genetic heterogeneity of this disorder.19
In this study, we showed segregation of PPCD on chromosome 20p11.2 in two large Czech families with PPCD. Haplotype analysis refined the PPCD locus to a 2.7-cM interval, similar to that described for CHED1. Our linkage analysis excluded VSX1 as the causative gene for PPCD in two Czech families.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In family I, blood samples for linkage analysis were obtained from 14 affected members, 7 unaffected first-degree relatives, and 5 spouses. In family II, blood samples were obtained from 14 affected members, 7 unaffected first-degree relatives, and 5 spouses.
DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using a DNA genomic DNA extraction kit (Nucleon III BACC3), according to the manufacturers instructions (GE Healthcare, Amersham, UK).
Seven commercially available polymorphic microsatellite markers (D20S98, D20S114, D20S48, D20S605, D20S182, D20S139, and D20S106) and a novel dinucleotide marker (M189K21), designed from the chromosome 20 genomic sequence, were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Table 1 ). Amplification was performed in 25-µL reaction volumes. Forty-nine individuals were genotyped for these markers. Alleles were sized on computer (Genescan and Genotyper software; analyzed on the Prism 3100 Genetic Analyzer; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Two-point lod scores were calculated between polymorphic markers and PPCD, with the program MLINK (a program of the LINKAGE package available at http:www.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk/; provided in the public domain by the Human Genome Mapping Project Resources Centre, Cambridge, UK) under the assumption of a dominant mode of inheritance and 0.001 frequency of the disease allele. Because of the variable expressivity of the disease phenotype, only affected individuals, obligate carriers, and spouses were included in the lod score calculation (Table 2) .
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In family I (Fig. 2A) , 36 family members were examined Of these, 15 were found to be affected (5 male, 10 female). Four patients in this family showed signs of secondary glaucoma, and five had undergone corneal graft surgery (three bilateral). Although in family II (Fig. 2B) , 64 family members were examined, and only 16 were found to have PPCD (7 male, 9 female), seven patients had secondary glaucoma, and four underwent corneal graft surgery (two bilateral). The changes found on slit lamp examination in affected members of both families included pathologic endothelium, geographic lesions, vesicles, and polymorphous opacities at the level of Descemets membrane and the endothelium. Some family members exhibited corneal edema, band keratopathy, iridocorneal peripheral adhesions, iris atrophy, pupillary ectropion, and corectopia. The visual acuity in affected members in both families ranged from 1.0 to no light perception.
|
= 0 (Table 2) . Recombination with the marker D20S139 was detected in family II, refining the proximal crossover (Fig. 3B) . In family II, a distal crossover was seen with marker D20S48 (Fig. 3B) , and the maximum lod score was 3.22 with marker D20S605 at recombination fraction
= 0 (Table 2) . As both families share a common phenotype and haplotype (Fig. 3) , it is likely that they are ancestrally related, and it is therefore possible to combine the lod scores of each family. For novel marker M189K21, the combined two-point lod score would be 6.557 at recombination fraction
= 0 (Table 2) . Assuming that the two families are ancestrally related, the critical interval for Czech PPCD is delineated by the markers D20S48 and D20S139, spanning 2.7 cM (Figs. 1 3) .
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our study, linkage was found to chromosome 20, region p11.2, in both families. These families originate from the same region of Bohemia within the Czech Republic and it is likely that they have a common founder, as they share a similar haplotype (Fig. 3) .
VSX1 was considered a candidate gene as mutations have been associated with several abnormalities, including craniofacial anomalies; abnormal retinal and auditory bipolar cells23 ; PPCD; and keratoconus.20 24 VSX1 was excluded by both sequence analysis and recombination events. The previously described P247R change was observed in unaffected individuals from a branch of family I and therefore does not segregate with disease. This result was not surprising, because this sequence variation has been described in control, unaffected chromosomes.20 Recently, Aldave25 has questioned the validity of screening VSX1 in all patients with CHED, PPCD, and keratoconus.25 The exclusion of VSX1 in our Czech patients with PPCD supports the conclusions of Aldave et al.26 and indicates that VSX1 may not be a common cause of corneal endothelial dystrophies.
The genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of PPCD has been reported with three different loci.14 18 19 This study demonstrates the localization of PPCD in patients of Czech origin to chromosome 20 at p11.2, flanked by the markers D20S48 and D20S139, spanning an interval of 2.7 cM. Our refined critical interval for PPCD has the same distal flanking marker as the CHED1 locus, raising the possibility that these two corneal dystrophies are allelic. If they are indeed allelic, our data potentially reduce the critical interval by 20 kb. There are currently 20 annotated candidate genes within the shared disease interval for CHED1 and Czech PPCD.
We have localized the disease interval for PPCD in two large Czech families to 20p11.2 and excluded VSX1 as a candidate gene. Therefore, the disease-causing gene in Czech PPCD remains to be identified.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Supported by the Medical Research Council (RG); Grant Agency of the Czech Republic Grant GA-CR301/03/1040, The Charles University Mobility Fund, and The Ulverscroft Foundation (PL); Grant VZ 206 1011, Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic (MF, KJ, SK); and The Wellcome Trust (EJH, CLS, PD).
Submitted for publication March 2, 2005; revised June 23, 2005; accepted October 17, 2005.
Disclosure: R. Gwilliam, None; P. Liskova, None; M. Filipec, None; S. Kmoch, None; K. Jirsova, None; E.J. Huckle, None; C.L. Stables, None; S.S. Bhattacharya, None; A.J. Hardcastle, None; P. Deloukas, None; N.D. Ebenezer, None
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Neil D. Ebenezer, Division of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, UCL 11-43 Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK; n.ebenezer{at}ucl.ac.uk.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Liu, X. Peng, J. Tan, D. S. Darling, H. J. Kaplan, and D. C. Dean Zeb1 Mutant Mice as a Model of Posterior Corneal Dystrophy Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 1843 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Aldave and B. Sonmez Elucidating the Molecular Genetic Basis of the Corneal Dystrophies: Are We There Yet? Arch Ophthalmol, February 1, 2007; 125(2): 177 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |