IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:1632-1639.)
© 2005 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.04-0813
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashida, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tano, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashida, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tano, Y.

Ocular Surface Reconstruction Using Autologous Rabbit Oral Mucosal Epithelial Sheets Fabricated Ex Vivo on a Temperature-Responsive Culture Surface

Yasutaka Hayashida,1 Kohji Nishida,1 Masayuki Yamato,2 Katsuhiko Watanabe,1 Naoyuki Maeda,1 Hitoshi Watanabe,1 Akihiko Kikuchi,2 Teruo Okano,2 and Yasuo Tano1

1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Medical School, Osaka, Japan; and the 2Institute of Advanced Biomedical Engineering and Science, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. Autologous stem cell transplantation for total limbal stem cell deficiency is immunologically preferable, to avoid allograft rejection. This study was undertaken to investigate the possibility of a novel tissue engineering approach for ocular surface reconstruction, using autologous oral mucosal epithelial stem cells expanded ex vivo on temperature-responsive cell culture surfaces.

METHODS. Rabbit oral mucosal epithelial cells cultured on temperature-responsive culture surfaces with mitomycin-C-treated 3T3 feeder cells for 2 weeks produced confluent epithelial cell sheets. Putative progenitor cell populations were estimated by colony-forming assays. Autologous transplantation of these cell sheets to surgically manipulated eyes was performed, and ocular surface reconstruction and cell phenotypic modulation were examined.

RESULTS. All cultured oral epithelial cells were nonenzymatically harvested as transplantable intact cell sheets by reducing culture temperature to 20°C. Oral epithelial cells were stratified in three to five cell layers more similar to corneal epithelium than to oral mucosal epithelium. Colony-forming assays and immunofluorescence for p63, ß1-integrin, and connexin 43 indicated retention of viable stem and/or progenitor cell populations in cell sheets. Autologous transplantation to rabbit corneal surfaces successfully reconstructed the corneal surface, with restoration of transparency. Four weeks after transplantation, epithelial stratification was similar to that in the corneal epithelium, although the keratin expression profile retained characteristics of the oral mucosal epithelium.

CONCLUSIONS. Cell sheet harvest technology enables fabrication of viable, transplantable, tissue-engineered epithelial cell sheets that retain putative progenitor cells from autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells. Promising clinical capabilities for autologous tissue-engineered epithelial cell sheets for ocular surface reconstruction are indicated.

The ocular surface is covered by conjunctival, limbal, and corneal epithelia, which are adjacent but stratified squamous and nonkeratinized epithelia with distinct phenotypes.1 2 3 These cell layers protect the eye from pathogenic microbes, foreign invasion, and dryness while producing optical advantages. The basal layer of the limbal epithelia located at the transitional zone between corneal and bulbar conjunctiva contains corneal epithelial stem cells4 5 that renew the corneal epithelium by generating transient amplifying (TA) cells that migrate outward from the limbal basal layer.6 7 8 9 10 Limbal epithelial stem cells are often completely lost in patients who have severe trauma or eye disease, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, ocular pemphigoid, and thermal and chemical burns, so that adjacent conjunctival tissues cover the cornea, leading to corneal vascularization, opacification, and severe visual loss.11 12 13 Such pathologic events are considered to represent limbal stem cell deficiencies.

Corneal reconstruction in patients with limbal stem cell deficiencies can be facilitated by transplantation of limbal epithelial stem cells. Transplantation of autologous limbal epithelium has been a promising procedure for treating unilateral limbal stem cell deficiencies,9 but reconstruction of the ocular surface that has been affected bilaterally is a challenging problem. Transplantation of allogeneic limbal epithelium in the form of a keratolimbal allograft from cadaveric tissue10 14 15 or conjunctival limbal allografts from living-related donors16 17 can be performed in patients with bilateral deficiencies. These procedures, however, necessitate postoperative immunosuppression, and even after systemic immunosuppression with oral cyclosporine, the long-term success rate (>1 year) ranges from 20% to 60% (cadaveric donors)10 14 15 and 70% to 80% (living-related donors).16 17 Moreover, success rates tend to decrease gradually with time.

To improve the surgical outcome of ocular surface reconstruction, recent attempts have been made to fabricate corneal epithelial graft constructs ex vivo from expanded autologous limbal stem cells. Pellegrini et al.18 initially reported the clinical use of autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Their work was followed by that of several groups who used different carriers, such as collagen,19 amniotic membranes,20 21 22 23 fibrin gel,24 and cross-linked gels of fibronectin and fibrin.25 We have recently obtained and clinically applied a new, carrier-free transplantable cell construct harvested from novel temperature-responsive cell culture surfaces, producing intact, transplantable, multilayered epithelial sheets.26 27 A temperature-responsive polymer, poly(N-isopropylacrylamide; PIPAAm), when covalently immobilized to surfaces of commercial cell culture dishes, facilitates cell adhesion, spreading, and growth in culture conditions at 37°C above the polymer’s lower critical solution temperature of 32°C. When the culture temperature is reduced below that temperature, the surface rapidly hydrates and swells, prompting rapid and complete detachment of adherent cells without the need for typical proteolytic enzymes or EDTA treatments. Using this approach, we have reported treatment of damaged cornea by transplantation of these viable, bioengineered, corneal epithelial sheets expanded from limbal stem cells without any carriers or the need for suturing.26

We have recently reported early clinical outcomes of autologously transplanted tissue-engineered epithelial cell sheets expanded ex vivo from patients’ oral mucosal epithelial cells.28 After a more than 1-year follow-up, all four patients who received these autografts have fully restored eyesight. It is important to note that transplanted cell sheets become increasingly transparent and provide smoother, integrated surfaces on corneal stroma over time, further resembling normal corneal epithelium. This observation suggests a phenotypic modulation or transdifferentiation of grafted oral mucosal epithelial cells to corneal epithelial cell phenotypes when transplanted. Nakamura et al.29 reported a short-term (10 days after transplantation) study in a rabbit model similarly using autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells cultured on amniotic membranes as a carrier to replace damaged corneal epithelium. Amniotic membranes give the constructs easy handling for transplantation. The drawback is that little is known about the integration of the amniotic membranes after grafting. Indeed, Cooper et al.30 have reported that the amniotic membrane remains intact for 1 year after cultivated corneal epithelial transplantation using an amniotic membrane carrier.

In the present study, we transplanted autologous tissue-engineered epithelial cell sheets fabricated from harvested oral mucosal epithelium in a rabbit model. Keratin expression profiles were examined in the tissue-engineered cell sheets just before and 4 weeks after transplantation and were compared with those from native corneal and oral mucosal epithelia. Data support the occurrence of phenotypic modulation of oral mucosal epithelial cells.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Preparation of Temperature-Responsive Cell Culture Surfaces
Specific procedures for the preparation of PIPAAm-grafted cell culture surfaces have been described.31 Briefly, N-isopropylacrylamide monomer (IPAAm, kindly provided by Kohjin Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) in 2-propanol solution was spread onto commercial cell culture inserts (Falcon 3090; BD Labware, Bedford, MA) and subjected to irradiation with a 0.3-MGy electron beam generated by an area beam electron processing system (Nisshin High Voltage, Kyoto, Japan). After the PIPAAm-immobilized inserts were rinsed with cold distilled water to remove nonimmobilized IPAAm, they were sterilized with ethylene oxide gas.

Primary Culture of Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cells
Animals were treated in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and with the experimental procedure approved by the Committee for Animal Research of Osaka University Medical School. Oral mucosal biopsy specimens (3 mm radius) were taken from New Zealand White rabbits (2.0 kg) under deep anesthesia induced by intramuscular injection of xylazine hydrochloride (4 mg/kg) and ketamine hydrochloride (40 mg/kg). The biopsy specimens were washed three times with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing antibiotics and antimycotics. These specimens were then incubated at 4°C for 4 hours with Dispase II (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) and treated with trypsin-EDTA solution for 20 minutes at room temperature, to scatter the epithelial cells. The suspended cells were cultured on temperature-responsive culture inserts (CellSeed, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at an initial cell density of 1.7 x 105 cells/23-mm insert with mitomycin C (MMC)-treated NIH/3T3 cells32 separated by cell culture inserts (Fig. 1) . One week later, oral epithelial cells reached confluence, and after an additional week of culturing, the resultant cell sheets were harvested by reducing the culture temperature to 20°C for 30 minutes.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Ocular surface reconstruction by autologous transplantation of tissue-engineered cell sheets fabricated from oral mucosal epithelial cells on temperature-responsive cell culture inserts. Oral mucosal tissues containing whole epithelial cell layers were excised from rabbit oral cavities and treated with dispase and trypsin-EDTA to obtain single epithelial cell suspensions. Cells were then seeded onto temperature-responsive culture inserts preseeded with mitomycin-C (MMC)-treated 3T3 cell feeder layers. Cultured cells were harvested as a cell sheet by reducing culture temperature and transplanted onto keratectomized corneal surfaces.

 
Colony-Forming Assay
To evaluate putative progenitor cell populations in the biopsied and cultured cells, colony-forming assays were performed. Primary cells isolated from rabbit oral epithelial tissues were divided and seeded on normal commercial cell culture dishes (60 mm, Falcon 3002; BD Labware) for colony-forming assays (CFAs) and onto temperature-responsive culture inserts, to prepare and the harvest cell sheets. Secondary cells isolated from tissue-engineered cell sheets by trypsin digestion were also subjected to CFA. Culture conditions for both primary and secondary CFA were the same as that for cell sheet preparation except for the seeded cell density of 1 x 104 and 3 x 104 cells/dish (60-mm diameter), respectively. After 10 to 12 days in culture, cells were fixed and stained with rhodamine B. Colony formation was screened over the entire dish under a dissecting microscope. The primary colony-forming efficiency (CFE) was calculated by dividing the number of colonies per dish by the total number of cells initially seeded onto the dishes. The CFE for fabricated cell sheets (secondary cell CFE) was calculated by dividing the number of colonies per dish originating from cells dissociated from harvested cell sheets by the numbered of seeded cells (n = 6 duplicates of each sample). The number of putative progenitor cells within the cell population initially seeded onto each temperature-responsive culture insert to prepare cell sheets was obtained by multiplying the primary CFE by the number of cells seeded onto each temperature-responsive culture insert. Similarly, the number of putative progenitor cells within a harvested cell sheet was obtained by multiplying the secondary CFE by the total number of cells in each cell sheet harvested by reducing the culturing temperature, followed by trypsin digestion and counting.

Cultured Oral Epithelial Cell Sheet Transplantation
Tissue-engineered cell sheets fabricated from oral mucosal epithelial cells were autologously transplanted onto keratectomized ocular surfaces of the rabbit stem cell deficiency model33 surgically prepared 3 weeks before transplantation. The rabbits were chosen randomly for epithelial cell transplantation or the sham surgery. Keratectomy was used to excise the entire corneal surface, including the limbus and the conjunctival tissue within 5 mm of the limbus, completely removing the corneal and limbal epithelium and exposing the stroma. Three weeks after keratectomy, conjunctival scar tissue with some neovascularization covered the entire corneal stromal surface, inducing severe corneal opacity. Before cell sheet transplantation, the conjunctivalized ocular surface was surgically removed to reexpose the native transparent corneal stroma. Then, tissue-engineered cultured cell sheets, fabricated ex vivo from autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells, were harvested by temperature reduction and transferred to a poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVDF) support membrane (outer diameter, 23 mm, with a 16-mm hole in the center) and placed over the transparent stromal bed immediately (Fig. 1) . Within 5 minutes, the cell sheets spontaneously produced stable attachment to the stroma, and the PVDF membranes were removed with scissors. For healing protection, the corneal surface was finally covered with a soft contact lens, and a tarsorrhaphy was performed. Antibiotics (0.3% ofloxacin) and steroids (0.1% betamethasone) were topically applied three times daily after transplantation. The eyes were carefully observed with a slit lamp biomicroscope and recorded with serial photographs of the rabbit anterior ocular segment for 4 weeks. Control (sham) rabbits underwent all procedures but did not undergo transplantation. Four weeks after surgery, rabbits were killed with an overdose of anesthetic agent (pentobarbital) and eyes were enucleated for histology. Three ophthalmologists carefully examined the histologic slides in a masked fashion. All found corneal epithelial regeneration in each eye of the transplantation group, but did not observe such regeneration in the sham-operation group. We used 10 rabbits in each group.

Immunofluorescence
Native rabbit corneas, rabbit oral mucosa, tissue-engineered epithelial cell sheets harvested from dishes, and reconstructed ocular surfaces (4 weeks after grafting) were all examined by immunofluorescence. Cryosections (12-µm thick) were treated with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in 50 mM Tris-buffered saline (TBS; pH 7.2) containing 0.4% Triton X-100 for 60 minutes at room temperature. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted with 1% BSA in TBS containing 0.4% Triton X-100. Primary antibodies included a rabbit polyclonal anti-cytokeratin 12 (K12; the kind gift of Winston W. Kao, University of Cincinnati, OH),34 mouse monoclonal anti-cytokeratin 3 (K3; AE5l Progen, Heidelberg, Germany), anti-cytokeratin 4 (K4; MP Biomedicals Inc. [formerly ICN], Irvine, CA), anti-cytokeratin 13 (K13; American Research Products, Inc., Belmont, MA), anti-cytokeratin 1 (K1; YLEM, Roma, Italy), anti-cytokeratin 10 (K10; Biomeda Corp., Foster City, CA), anti-connexin 43 (Chemicon, Temecula, CA), anti-ß1 integrin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), and anti-p63 (4A4; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). 4A4 was shown to recognize both p63 and {Delta}Np63.35 Negative control sections were incubated identically with normal mouse IgG or rabbit IgG. Rabbit limbal and corneal epithelia were used as positive control tissues. FITC-labeled secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA) were used. Sections were costained with propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (LSM-410; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Fabrication of Tissue-Engineered Cell Sheets from Expanded Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cells
Mucosal epithelial cells isolated from the oral cavity were seeded on temperature-responsive culture surfaces. Cell colonies grew to confluence within a week (Fig. 2a) . After an additional week of culture, tissue-engineered cell sheets were harvested by incubation at 20°C for 30 minutes, comprising three to five stratified, well-differentiated cell layers (Fig. 2b) , showing a morphology similar to that of native corneal epithelium and corneal epithelial sheets fabricated from limbal stem cells and harvested by the same technique (Fig. 2c) .



View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Transplantable carrier-free epithelial cell sheets. Oral mucosal epithelial cells grew to confluence within 1 to 2 weeks (a). After one additional week of culturing, all cells were harvested as intact cell sheets having three to five cell layers (b). These harvested oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets were similar in morphologic appearance to corneal epithelial cell sheets fabricated from limbal epithelial cells (c). From colony-forming assays of both primary (d) and secondary cells (e), the number of putative progenitor cells was determined (f). Scale bar, 50 µm.

 
Colony-forming assays were used to estimate the number of putative progenitor cells within cell populations of both primary cultured cells used for cell sheet preparation and harvested cell sheets. From these sources, 3.38 ± 0.61 x 103 and 1.31 ± 0.31 x 103 cells (mean ± SE, n = 6) were determined, respectively (Figs. 2d 2e 2f) . Harvested cell sheets were also examined by immunofluorescence. The putative marker of cornea epithelial and epidermal stem cells p63 and/or {Delta}Np6336 was detected in the nuclei of the basal cell layers (Fig. 3a) . ß1-Integrin, suggested as a putative marker for stem cells as well as TA cells,37 38 39 was also expressed in basal layers of the cell sheets (Fig. 3b) . Together, these results suggest that harvested cell sheets contain putative progenitor cells. Connexin 43 comprising gap junctions is expressed in epidermal basal cell layers, but is absent from limbal epithelial basal cells,5 11 40 41 42 and serves as a negative marker for epithelial stem cells.43 It was absent from some portions of basal cell layers in cell sheets (Fig. 3c) , implying that basal cells within harvested cell sheets contain putative progenitor cells.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Expression of progenitor cell markers in transplantable carrier-free epithelial cell sheets. Oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets were harvested from temperature-responsive culture dishes by reducing the temperature and then were subjected to immunofluorescence with anti-p63 (a), anti-ß1 integrin (b), and anti-connexin 43 (c) antibodies. Every panel consists of three microphotographs: nuclei-staining (top), immunofluorescence (middle), and the two images superimposed (bottom). Scale bar, 50 µm.

 
Autotransplantation of Tissue-Engineered Cell Sheets
Autologous tissue-engineered cell sheets were successfully transplanted onto ocular surfaces in a rabbit corneal stem-cell–deficiency model, as previously reported for tissue-engineered corneal epithelial cell sheets fabricated from limbal stem cells,27 as well as tissue-engineered human epithelial cell sheets fabricated from autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells. Transplanted oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets readily resisted displacement under tension with forceps, implying stable adhesion to the corneal stroma. Damaged ocular surfaces in the model failed to repel fluorescein penetration into the stroma before cell sheet transplantation. However, corneal surfaces were completely protected from fluorescein penetration by grafted cell sheets immediately after transplantation (Fig. 4) . During postsurgery healing, corneal transparency gradually improved, with corneal surfaces appearing fairly clear and smooth under slit lamp microscopy 7 days after transplantation (Fig. 4a) . Within 4 weeks after transplantation, ocular surfaces were completely reconstructed with clarity and smoothness comparable to those of normal cornea, with faint or no observable defects. Control rabbits not receiving cell sheet transplantation showed no signs of corneal epithelialization at postoperative day 7. However, complete conjunctivalization was observed 2 weeks after surgery under a slit lamp (Fig. 4b) . Rabbits were then killed, and the eyes were histologically evaluated 4-weeks after transplantation. Gaps between regenerated epithelium and stroma, underlying stromal vascularization, inflammatory cells, and goblet cells were not observed in corneas receiving cell sheet-transplants (Fig. 5a) . Reconstructed ocular surfaces resembled native corneas morphologically (Fig. 5b) , significantly distinct from oral mucosa in epithelial thickness and surface smoothness (Fig. 5d) . However, we observed heterogeneity in basal cell morphology in regenerated epithelium, because most of the basal epithelial cells displayed the characteristic cuboidal cell shape, whereas others were flat. In contrast, corneal surfaces in sham control rabbits that did not undergo cell sheet transplantation were covered with conjunctival epithelial cells containing numerous goblet cells, with vascularized stromal layers (Fig. 5c) .



View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. Autologous transplantation of harvested epithelial cell sheets onto keratectomized corneal surfaces. Treated and control eyes were followed up by using a slit lamp biomicroscope without (top) and with (bottom) fluorescein dye staining. In the limbal stem-cell–deficiency model, preoperative corneal surfaces were very rough, with neovascularization and inflammation. At 1 week, corneal surfaces engrafted with cell sheets became clear and smooth, with ocular transparency improving within the follow-up period of 4 weeks (a). Control corneal surfaces without cell sheet transplantation showed no signs of epithelialization at 1 week after transplantation, but conjunctival invasion and scar formation were observed at 2 and 4 weeks (b).

 


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. Epithelial tissue histology. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of tissue sections of cornea engrafted with tissue-engineered cell sheets fabricated from autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells (a), native cornea (b), control cornea without cell sheet transplantation (c), and native oral mucosa (d). There were numerous goblet cells (arrows) and subepithelial neovascularization (arrowheads), representing conjunctival in-growth onto the cornea in control eyes. Scale bar, 50 µm.

 
Keratin Expression Profiles
For analysis of cell phenotypic modulation in grafted oral mucosal epithelial cells after transplantation onto corneal stroma, we used keratin expression profiles compared among tissue-engineered cell sheets, reconstructed ocular surfaces (4 weeks after transplantation), normal oral mucosa, and normal cornea (Fig. 6 ; Table 1 ). K3, often used as a specific marker of corneal epithelia cells, was expressed in all epithelial layers in all four tissues. Another corneal-epithelium–specific marker, K12, was expressed only in normal corneal epithelia. K4 and -13 were expressed in all oral mucosal epithelial layers except basal cells. K4, however, was expressed only in superficial cells, and K13 expression was not detectable in normal cornea. Harvested cell sheets expressed K4 only in superficial cells, and expression was retained at 4 weeks after surgery, implying cell phenotypic modulation within the culture. In contrast, K13 was detectable in superficial cells, but undetectable 4 weeks after surgery, suggesting cell phenotypic modulation after cell sheet transplantation. Neither K1 nor -10, both classified as keratinized species, was detected in any epithelial layers.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6. Keratin expression profile. Immunofluorescence analysis was performed using antibodies against K3, -12, -4, -13, -1, and -10 in normal oral mucosa, tissue-engineered epithelial cell sheets fabricated from oral mucosa before and after (4 weeks) transplantation, and normal cornea. Scale bar, 50 µm.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Results of Immunohistochemical Staining

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
We demonstrated that autologous tissue-engineered cell sheets fabricated from oral mucosal epithelium are effective substitutes for allogeneic limbal tissues in ocular surface reconstruction. The choice of the oral mucosal epithelium as a cell source for ocular surface reconstruction is based primarily on several considerations. First, oral mucosal epithelium in vivo expresses K3, also expressed by the corneal epithelium but not by epidermis.4 44 Cultured oral mucosal cells showed no obvious loss of nuclei or keratinization, whereas cultured epidermal cells showed extensive keratinization.45 46 The absence of both keratinization and a loss of nuclei in oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets encouraged us to use them to reconstruct corneal epithelium that lacks both the loss of nuclei and keratinization. Second, excision of a small piece of oral mucosal tissue from the patient is straightforward, and the resultant wound heals without incident within several days without scarring. Third, direct transplantation of autologous buccal mucosal grafts onto ocular surfaces has been reported.47 48 These traditional buccal grafts are suitable for treating corneal ulcers and perforations, but not for improving vision, given the opacity of cografted connective tissues. In contrast, the transparency of carrier-free, tissue-engineered epithelial cell sheets fabricated from only oral mucosal epithelial cells was comparable to that of corneal epithelial cell sheets originating from limbal stem cells.27

Recently, Nakamura et al.29 reported a short-term (10 days after transplantation) study in a similar rabbit model using autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells cultured on amniotic membranes as a carrier to replace damaged corneal epithelium. They also examined keratin expression profiles, but lack immunofluorescence data for grafted epithelia and any consideration of progenitor cell populations. In the present study, we show evidence of the existence of putative progenitor cells in both oral mucosal epithelia and harvested cell sheets. Colony-forming efficiency for the primary oral epithelial cells is approximately 15% of that of rabbit limbal epithelium.27 Therefore, we seeded oral mucosal epithelial cells at five times higher cell density than limbal epithelial cells, to prepare transplantable epithelial cell sheets. Furthermore, autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells exhibit phenotypic modulation in culture before transplantation and after transplantation onto corneal stroma (Fig. 6 , Table 1 ). Native oral mucosal epithelium on a substantia propria rich in blood vessels was much thicker than native corneal epithelium, and its surface was more irregular than the corneal surface (Figs. 5b 5d) . However, the reconstructed corneal surfaces showed a thin, smooth epithelium (Fig. 5a) . Correlating with this histologic finding, keratin expression profiles for harvested oral mucosal epithelial cells were altered during the 4 weeks after transplantation onto corneal stroma (Fig. 6 , Table 1 ). It was presumed that the grafted oral mucosal epithelial phenotype was modulated by the underlying stromal keratocytes, although further investigation is needed to elucidate the role. If so, temperature-responsive cell sheet harvest may be effective in enabling epithelial phenotypic modulation, since these cell sheets are directly transplantable onto corneal stroma in a carrier-free manner, and grafted oral mucosal epithelial cells immediately and directly interact with corneal stromal keratocytes without carrier interference. Hence, clinical outcome, including postoperative corneal transparency and graft survival after autologous transplantation of tissue-engineered oral mucosal epithelial cell constructs may be influenced by the choice of carrier.

In summary, we have demonstrated that tissue-engineered epithelial cell sheet grafts fabricated ex vivo from autologous oral mucosal epithelium can alter their phenotype, depending on their transplanted context. Our cell sheet fabrication approach, exploiting the use of new temperature-responsive culture surfaces, produces robust, viable, multilayered epithelial cell sheets without enzymatic processing, support substrates, or carriers, and promotes strong, rapid adhesion of transplanted sheets onto corneal stroma in vivo without the need for suturing. The transplantation of these epithelial sheets without any accompanying stromal components, as shown in this study, may provide a distinct therapeutic advantage. These results indicate a strong potential for the application of cultured oral mucosal epithelial cells in the reconstruction of ocular surfaces in bilateral diseases such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome and ocular pemphigoid, typically refractory to allograft transplantation.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank David W. Grainger (Colorado State University) and Joseph Yang (Tokyo Women’s Medical University) for useful comments and technical criticism, and Winston W. Kao (University of Cincinnati) for the gift of K12 antibody.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 15390530, 16200036, and 16300161; the High-Tech Research Center Program and the Center of Excellence Program for the 21st Century from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology in Japan; and the Core Research for Evolution Science and Technology from the Japanese Science and Technology Agency.

Submitted for publication July 10, 2004; revised November 22, 2004, and January 6, 2005; accepted January 7, 2005.

Disclosure: Y. Hayashida, None; K. Nishida, None; M. Yamato, None; K. Watanabe, None; N. Maeda, None; H. Watanabe, None; A. Kikuchi, None; T. Okano, CellSeed, Inc. (I) and Kohjin Co., Ltd. (F); Y. Tano, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Kohji Nishida, Department of Ophthalmology, Osaka University Medical School, Room E7, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; knishida{at}ophthal.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Thoft RA, Friend J. Biochemical transformation of regenerating ocular surface epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977;16:14–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wei ZG, Wu RL, Lavker RM, Sun TT. In vitro growth and differentiation of rabbit bulbar, fornix, and palpebral conjunctival epithelia: implications on conjunctival epithelial transdifferentiation and stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1814–1828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Wei ZG, Sun TT, Lavker RM. Rabbit conjunctival and corneal epithelial cells belong to two separate lineages. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:523–533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Schermer A, Galvin S, Sun TT. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol. 1986;103:49–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cotsarelis G, Cheng SZ, Dong G, Sun TT, Lavker RM. Existence of slow-cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell. 1989;57:201–209.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Thoft RA, Friend J. The X, Y, Z hypothesis of corneal epithelial maintenance. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24:1442–1443.[Free Full Text]
  7. Buck RC. Measurement of centripetal migration of normal corneal epithelial cells in the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:1296–1299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kinoshita S, Friend J, Thoft RA. Sex chromatin of donor corneal epithelium in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:434–441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kenyon KR, Tseng SC. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:709–722.discussion 722–723[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Tsubota K, Satake Y, Kaido M, et al. Treatment of severe ocular-surface disorders with corneal epithelial stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1697–1703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Tsai RJ, Sun TT, Tseng SC. Comparison of limbal and conjunctival autograft transplantation in corneal surface reconstruction in rabbits. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:446–455.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Shapiro MS, Friend J, Thoft RA. Corneal re-epithelialization from the conjunctiva. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:135–142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dua HS, Forrester JV. The corneoscleral limbus in human corneal epithelial wound healing. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;110:646–656.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Solomon CM, Nduaguba C, Baltatzis S, Foster CS. Limbal stem cell transplantation in chronic inflammatory eye disease. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:862–868.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Fujishima H, Tsubota K. Association of preoperative tear function with surgical outcome in severe Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1518–1523.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Daya SM, Ilari L. Living related conjunctival limbal allograft for the treatment of stem cell deficiency. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:126–134.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Rao SK, Rajagopal R, Sitalakshmi G, Padmanabhan P. Limbal allografting from related live donors for corneal surface reconstruction. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:822–828.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Pellegrini G, Traverso CE, Franzi AT, et al. Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet. 1997;349:990–993.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Schwab IR. Cultured corneal epithelia for ocular surface disease. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. ;97:891–986.999
  20. Tsai RJ, Li LM, Chen JK. Reconstruction of damaged corneas by transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial cells. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:86–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Schwab IR, Reyes M, Isseroff RR. Successful transplantation of bioengineered tissue replacements in patients with ocular surface disease. Cornea. 2000;19:421–426.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Koizumi N, Inatomi T, Suzuki T, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S. Cultivated corneal epithelial stem cell transplantation in ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1569–1574.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Shimazaki J, Aiba M, Goto E, Kato N, Shimmura S, Tsubota K. Transplantation of human limbal epithelium cultivated on amniotic membrane for the treatment of severe ocular surface disorders. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1285–1290.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Rama P, Bonini S, Lambiase A, et al. Autologous fibrin-cultured limbal stem cells permanently restore the corneal surface of patients with total limbal stem cell deficiency. Transplantation. 2001;72:1478–1485.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Han B, Schwab IR, Madsen TK, Isseroff RR. A fibrin-based bioengineered ocular surface with human corneal epithelial stem cells. Cornea. 2002;21:505–510.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Nishida K. Tissue engineering of the cornea. Cornea. 2003;22:S28–S34.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, et al. Functional bioengineered corneal epithelial sheet grafts from corneal stem cells expanded ex vivo on a temperature-responsive cell culture surface. Transplantation. 2004;77:379–385.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Nishida K, Yamato M, Hayashida Y, et al. Corneal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cell sheets composed of autologous oral mucosal epithelium. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1187–1196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Nakamura T, Endo K, Cooper LJ, et al. The successful culture and autologous transplantation of rabbit oral mucosal epithelial cells on amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:106–116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Cooper LJ, Fullwood NJ, Koizumi N, Nakamura T, Kinoshita S. An investigation of removed cultivated epithelial transplants in patients after allocultivated corneal epithelial transplantation. Cornea. 2004;23:235–242.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Hirose M, Kwon OH, Yamato M, Kikuchi A, Okano T. Creation of designed shape cell sheets that are noninvasively harvested and moved onto another surface. Biomacromolecules. 2000;1:377–381.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Rheinwald JG, Green H. Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells. Cell. 1975;6:331–343.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ti SE, Anderson D, Touhami A, Kim C, Tseng SC. Factors affecting outcome following transplantation of ex vivo expanded limbal epithelium on amniotic membrane for total limbal deficiency in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2584–2592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kao WW, Liu CY, Converse RL, et al. Keratin 12-deficient mice have fragile corneal epithelia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2572–2584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Yang A, Kaghad M, Wang Y, et al. p63, a p53 homolog at 3q27-29, encodes multiple products with transactivating, death-inducing, and dominant-negative activities. Mol Cell. 1998;2:305–316.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Pellegrini G, Dellambra E, Golisano O, et al. p63 identifies keratinocyte stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:3156–3161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Adams JC, Watt FM. Fibronectin inhibits the terminal differentiation of human keratinocytes. Nature. 1989;340:307–309.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Jones PH, Harper S, Watt FM. Stem cell patterning and fate in human epidermis. Cell. 1995;80:83–93.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Janes SM, Lowell S, Hutter C. Epidermal stem cells. J Pathol. 2002;197:479–491.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Davanger M, Evensen A. Role of the pericorneal papillary structure in renewal of corneal epithelium. Nature. 1971;229:560–561.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Kruse FE, Chen JJ, Tsai RJ, Tseng SC. Conjunctival transdifferentiation is due to the incomplete removal of limbal basal epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1903–1913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Matic M, Petrov IN, Chen S, Wang C, Dimitrijevich SD, Wolosin JM. Stem cells of the corneal epithelium lack connexins and metabolite transfer capacity. Differentiation. 1997;61:251–260.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Matic M, Evans WH, Brink PR, Simon M. Epidermal stem cells do not communicate through gap junctions. J Invest Dermatol. 2002;118:110–116.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, Geiger B, Krepler R. The catalog of human cytokeratins: patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell. 1982;31:11–24.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Ueda M, Ebata K, Kaneda T. In vitro fabrication of bioartificial mucosa for reconstruction of oral mucosa: basic research and clinical application. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;27:540–549.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Hata K, Kagami H, Ueda M, Torii S, Matsuyama M. The characteristics of cultured mucosal cell sheet as a material for grafting; comparison with cultured epidermal cell sheet. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34:530–538.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Shore JW, Foster CS, Westfall CT, Rubin PA. Results of buccal mucosal grafting for patients with medically controlled ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:383–395.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Gipson IK, Geggel HS, Spurr-Michaud SJ. Transplant of oral mucosal epithelium to rabbit ocular surface wounds in vivo. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104:1529–1533.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Stem CellsHome page
F. Arnalich-Montiel, S. Pastor, A. Blazquez-Martinez, J. Fernandez-Delgado, M. Nistal, J. L. Alio, and M. P. De Miguel
Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Are a Source for Cell Therapy of the Corneal Stroma
Stem Cells, February 1, 2008; 26(2): 570 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
J.-A. Ko, Y. Liu, R. Yanai, T.-i. Chikama, T. Takezawa, and T. Nishida
Upregulation of Tight-Junctional Proteins in Corneal Epithelial Cells by Corneal Fibroblasts in Collagen Vitrigel Cultures
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 113 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
S. Raeder, T. P. Utheim, O. A. Utheim, B. Nicolaissen, B. Roald, Y. Cai, K. Haug, A. Kvalheim, E. B. Messelt, L. Drolsum, et al.
Effects of Organ Culture and Optisol-GS Storage on Structural Integrity, Phenotypes, and Apoptosis in Cultured Corneal Epithelium
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 5484 - 5493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
N. Di Girolamo, J. Chui, D. Wakefield, and M. T Coroneo
Cultured human ocular surface epithelium on therapeutic contact lenses
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2007; 91(4): 459 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
Y. Hayashida, K. Nishida, M. Yamato, J. Yang, H. Sugiyama, K. Watanabe, Y. Hori, N. Maeda, A. Kikuchi, T. Okano, et al.
Transplantation of Tissue-Engineered Epithelial Cell Sheets after Excimer Laser Photoablation Reduces Postoperative Corneal Haze
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 552 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayashida, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tano, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayashida, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tano, Y.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS