|
|
||||||||
1From the Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and 3Biochemistry, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan; and the 2Department of Clinical Pharmaceutics and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. EIU was induced in male Lewis rats by subcutaneous injection of 200 µg lipopolysaccharide. Lutein or dexamethasone was administered intravenously at 30 minutes before, at the same time as, and at 30 minutes after LPS treatment. The aqueous humor was collected at 24 hours after LPS injection, the number of infiltrating cells, the protein concentration, and the levels of nitric oxide (NO), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
, interleukin (IL)-6, prostaglandin (PG)-E2, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 in the aqueous humor were determined. Immunohistochemical staining with a monoclonal antibody against activated nuclear factor (NF)-
B was performed to evaluate the effect of lutein on NF-
B activation in the iris-ciliary body (ICB) of rats. A mouse macrophage cell line (RAW264.7 cells) was stimulated with LPS in the presence or absence of lutein. Expression of inducible NO synthase (iNOS), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and degradation of inhibitor
B (I
B) were analyzed by Western blot analysis.
RESULTS. Lutein suppressed the development of EIU in a dose-dependent fashion. The anti-inflammatory effect of 100 mg/kg lutein was as strong as that of 1 mg/kg dexamethasone. Treatment with lutein reduced the concentrations of NO, TNF-
, IL-6, PGE2, MCP-1, and MIP-2 in aqueous humor. Lutein also suppressed the activation of NF-
B in the ICB as well as iNOS and COX-2 expression and I
B degradation in RAW cells.
CONCLUSIONS. These findings indicate that lutein has anti-inflammatory effects on EIU by inhibiting the NF-
B dependent signaling pathway and the subsequent production of proinflammatory mediators.
|
, interleukin (IL)-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2 were observed concomitant with maximum EIU.12 13 Other inflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide (NO)14 and prostaglandin (PG)-E215 are also involved in the pathogenesis of EIU.
Production and release of inflammatory cytokines by LPS depends on inducible gene expression mediated by the activation of transcription factors. Nuclear factor (NF)-
B, which is one of the most ubiquitous transcription factors, has been suggested to play a key role in these reactions.16 Under quiescent conditions, NF-
B is sequestered in the cytosol bound to the inhibitor (I)-
B. Exposure of cells to LPS triggers phosphorylation cascades that ultimately lead to phosphorylation and degradation of I
B. Once I
B dissociates from the complex, NF-
B translocates into the nucleus where binding to specific DNA motifs in the promoter region occurs, leading to increased gene transcription.17
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of lutein on EIU in rats. We investigated the effects of lutein on cellular infiltration, protein leakage, and levels of TNF-
, IL-6, MCP-1, MIP-2, PGE2, and NO in the aqueous humor. To elucidate the mechanism underlying the anti-inflammation effects of lutein, we investigated the activation of NF-
B in the iris-ciliary body (ICB) of the rats treated with lutein. In addition, we investigated the effects of lutein on the LPS-induced expression of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and the degradation of I-
B in RAW 264.7 cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Number of Infiltrating Cells and Protein Concentration in Aqueous Humor
At 24 hours after LPS injection, the rats were euthanatized, and the aqueous humor was collected immediately from both eyes by an anterior chamber puncture (1520 µL/rat) using a 30-gauge needle under the surgical microscope. The aqueous humor was then accurately diluted 10-fold with PBS (pH 7.4).
For cell counting, the aqueous humor sample was suspended in an equal amount of Türk stain solution, and the cells were counted with a hemocytometer under a light microscope. The number of cells per field (an equivalent of 0.1 µL) was manually counted, and the number of cells per microliter was obtained by averaging the results of four fields from each sample. The total protein concentration in the aqueous humor samples was measured with a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The aqueous humor samples were stored in ice water until testing, and cell counts and total protein concentrations were measured on the day of sample collection.
Determination of NO Levels in Aqueous Humor
The total level of nitrate plus nitrite in the aqueous humor was measured by using a total nitrite colorimetric assay kit (Oxis International, Portland, OR) according to the manufacturers instructions. The absorbance values were measured at 540 nm in the microtiter plate reader.
Levels of TNF-
, IL-6, PGE2, MCP-1, and MIP-2 in Aqueous Humor
The levels of TNF-
, IL-6, PGE2, MCP-1, and MIP-2 in the aqueous humor were assessed with a commercially available ELISA kit (PGE2; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN; the others, BioSource International, Camarillo, CA) according to the manufacturers instructions. The ELISA assay was performed in duplicate.
Histopathologic Evaluation
At 24 hours after LPS injection, rats were euthanatized. The eyes were enucleated immediately and stored in a mixture of 10% formalin and 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 hours, and then the eyes were embedded in paraffin. Sagittal sections (5 µm thick) were cut near the optic nerve head and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Immunohistochemical Studies for NF-
B
At 3 hours after LPS injection, rats were anesthetized, and the eyes were fixed by an intracardiac perfusion of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS. The eyes were enucleated and immersed in the same fixative for 12 hours and embedded in paraffin. Next, 5-µm sagittal sections were cut near the optic nerve head. Sections were dewaxed with xylene and rehydrated with ethanol. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating sections in a microwave oven. The sections were rinsed in PBS twice and incubated with normal goat serum and then with the p65 antibody (c-20, dilution, 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Binding of the primary antisera was localized with Cy-3 conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (dilution, 1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc, West Grove, PA). Nuclei were then stained with PBS containing YO-PRO-1 (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR) for 5 minutes. The sections were examined by laser scanning confocal microscopy (MRC-1024; Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA; and LSM 510: Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Oberkochen, Germany). Within each ICB sample, two areas were randomly photographed, and the number of activated NF-
Bpositive cells was counted by a masked researcher. The results of two areas were averaged for each sample and in each group. This analysis was performed in the eight eyes of four rats in each group.
Cell Culture and LPS Stimulation
RAW 264.7, a mouse macrophage cell line, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen-Gibco, Grand Island, NY) and maintained at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. These cells were pretreated with 1, 10, 100 µg/mL lutein for 24 hours and subsequently stimulated with 1 µg/mL LPS from Salmonella typhimurium (Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 hours, unless otherwise stated.
Western Blot Analysis
RAW cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and then lysed in cold NP-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% NP-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 µg/mL each of leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin) for 15 minutes at 4°C. Plates were then scraped, and crude lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 14,000g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Aliquots of the lysates were diluted with 2x SDS sample buffer and boiled for 2 minutes. Lysates were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon; Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were then incubated in blocking solution (3% wt/vol dried low-fat milk and 0.1% vol/vol Tween 20 in PBS). Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with anti-COX-2 antibody (Alexis Biochemicals, Carlsbad, CA), anti-iNOS antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), anti-I
B antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-
-tubulin antibody (Laboratory Vision, Westinghouse Drive Fremont, CA). The membranes were then probed with horseradish peroxidaseconjugated secondary antibody (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) and visualized by chemiluminescence (GE Healthcare).
Cell Viability
Cell viability was determined by MTT assay after a 48-hour exposure to various concentrations of lutein. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (5 mg/mL; Chemicon, Temecula, CA) was added to 0.1 mL of cell suspension for 4 hours, and the formazan formed was then dissolved in isopropanol. Optical density was measured with a plate reader at 570 nm.
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Tukey-Kramer test was used as a post hoc comparison to compare the two treatment groups; P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
, IL-6, PGE2, MCP-1, and MIP-2 in Aqueous Humor
, IL-6, PGE2, MCP-1, and MIP-2 in the aqueous humor was seen in LPS group. Lutein treatment significantly reduced their concentrations in aqueous humor with a dose-dependent fashion. The reduction of these inflammatory mediators in the 100 mg/kg of lutein group was almost the same as that in the 1-mg/kg dexamethasone group (Fig. 4) .
|
B p65 in the ICB after LPS Injection
B p65 immunoreactivity was strongly expressed in the ICB. In contrast, the number of activated NF-
B-positive cells were lower in the ICB of rats treated with lutein. Normal control experiments showed only background levels (Fig. 5A) .
|
B activity in the ICB, the active NF-
B-positive cells were counted. In the control group, no active NF-
B-positive cells were detected in the ICB. LPS injection resulted in a marked increase in the percentages of active NF-
B-positive cells in the ICB at 3 hours (31.79% ± 3.62%). In the lutein groups, the percentages of active NF-
B-positive cells decreased significantly in a dose-dependent fashion (P < 0.01; Fig. 5B ).
Expression of iNOS Protein and COX-2 Protein
No iNOS or COX-2 signals were detected in unstimulated RAW cells (Fig. 6 , lane 1). LPS stimulation induced considerable expression of iNOS and COX-2 proteins (Fig. 6 , lane 2). Lutein inhibited the expression of both iNOS and COX-2 proteins in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 6 , lanes 35). It did not decrease the cell viability of RAW264.7 cells when these cells were incubated with 100 µg/mL lutein for 48 hours (data not shown).
|
B
B, we examined the cytoplasmic levels of I-
B
protein in lutein-treated RAW cells by Western blot.
A large amount of I-
B
protein was detected in the cytoplasmic extract of nontreated RAW cells (control group; Fig. 7 , lane 1). After stimulation with LPS for 15 minutes, the cytosolic I-
B
protein decreased significantly (Fig. 7 , lane 2). However, when RAW cells were incubated with lutein for 24 hours before the stimulation of LPS, the degradation of I-
B
was inhibited (Fig. 7 , lanes 35).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To elucidate the anti-inflammatory mechanism of lutein, we measured several proinflammatory mediators including NO, PGE2; cytokines TNF-
and IL-6; and chemokines MCP-1 and MIP-2 all of which contribute to the pathophysiology of EIU. NO is a highly reactive radical that is regarded as a key mediator in uveitis. NO can be produced in large amounts by iNOS in response to endotoxin and cytokines. Excessive production of NO by iNOS mediates increased protein leakage as well as hemodynamic and vascular permeability changes associated with EIU.21 22 A large increase in iNOS mRNA was detected in the ICB and retina during EIU.23 Many reports have shown that inhibition of iNOS protects against the development of EIU,21 23 24 which suggests that activation of iNOS and large amounts of NO contribute to the pathogenesis of EIU. In our study, we demonstrated that lutein reduced NO production in aqueous humor significantly. The expression of iNOS in LPS-stimulated RAW cells was also inhibited by lutein. Thus, it appears that lutein suppresses NO production by blocking iNOS protein expression. PGE2 is another inflammatory mediator involved in the pathogenesis of EIU and is also thought to contribute to breakdown of the bloodaqueous barrier during EIU.25 Cyclooxygenase (COX) is an enzyme that converts arachidonic acid to PGs. COX-2 is an inducible form responsible for the production of large amounts of proinflammatory PGs at the inflammatory sites in animals as well as patients with inflammatory diseases.26 27 Our data showed that lutein could suppress LPS-induced COX-2 expression in RAW264.7 cells and PGE2 production in the aqueous humor. Therefore, our results suggest that lutein suppresses PGE2 through inhibition of the COX-2 enzyme. The inhibition of the iNOS-NO pathway and the COX-2-PGE2 pathway would improve the therapeutic management of uveitis.15
The contribution of cytokines TNF-
and IL-6 to EIU is pleiotropic. Some data suggest these two cytokines have a protective role in ocular inflammation.28 On the contrary, both cytokines appear to be proinflammatory. Injection of TNF-
or IL-6 into the vitreous of rats produced severe intraocular inflammation.29 30 TNF-
and IL-6 are produced principally by activated macrophages and monocytes, whose recruitment depends on chemokine MIP-2 and MCP-1, respectively. Both chemokines are considered to be essential in the pathogenesis of EIU.31 32 Data from this study have shown that lutein can decrease the cytokines and chemokines concentrations in aqueous humor in a dose-dependent manner. These findings suggest that part of the mechanism of lutein suppression of EIU must include the prevention of the cytokines and chemokines in the anterior chamber.
Considering that NF-
B response elements are present on the promoters for iNOS, COX-2, as well as TNF-
, IL-6, MCP-1, and MIP-2 genes,33 34 and lutein significantly inhibits the expression of iNOS and COX-2 and the levels of these inflammatory cytokines, it is reasonable to postulate that lutein regulates the expression of these proteins by inhibiting NF-
B activation. Our results indicate that lutein suppressed LPS-induced activation of NF-
B in the ICB. Thus, the inhibition of NF-
B activation and subsequent synthesis of inflammatory mediators can help explain the beneficial effect of lutein in EIU treatment.
Although the precise primary targets involved in the inhibition of NF-
B activation by lutein have not yet been identified, our data have shown that lutein can block the degradation of I-
B
from the cytosolic fraction in activated macrophages. Thus, I-
B still binds to NF-
B and prevents NF-
B translocation to the nucleus where the NF-
B positively regulates the expression of genes involved in the immune and inflammatory responses. Although a possibility that lutein may also inhibit other transcription factors induced by LPS and suppress the gene transcription of inflammatory mediators remains, our results demonstrate that lutein-induced inhibition the expression of inflammatory mediators is at least partially due to the inhibition of I-
B degradation. Whether there are other pathways involved in the anti-inflammatory mechanism of lutein needs further investigation.
We have measured the plasma lutein concentration of the rat at different times after three injections of lutein by the method of HPLC (data not shown). The plasma lutein concentration reaches the peak immediately after lutein injection, then decreases rapidly. Park et al.35 reported plasma lutein concentration in mice fed a diet containing lutein rapidly increased on day 3 and no further increase or decrease was observed during lutein uptake. These results suggest that the acute effect of lutein injections may not be the same as the effect of chronic accumulation of lutein obtained from the diet. The antiocular-inflammation effects of lutein obtained from the diet should be investigated further. Human plasma lutein levels can be increased by taking supplement or dietary modification, but the effects of lutein on human uveitis still remain unclear.
In summary, this study indicates that lutein shows a dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effect on EIU. In particular, the ocular anti-inflammatory effect of 100 mg/kg lutein was as strong as that of 1 mg/kg dexamethasone. A possible mechanism for this effect of lutein may depend on its ability to inhibit the activation of NF-
B and the subsequent production of proinflammatory mediators.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication November 5, 2005; revised February 2 and February 20, 2006; accepted April 24, 2006.
Disclosure: X.-H. Jin, None; K. Ohgami, None; K. Shiratori, None; Y. Suzuki, None; T. Hirano, None; Y. Koyama, None; K. Yoshida, None; I. Ilieva, None; K. Iseki, None; S. Ohno, Kemin Industries (F)
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Kazuhiro Ohgami, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15, West 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan; kohgami{at}med.hokudai.ac.jp.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Izumi-Nagai, N. Nagai, K. Ohgami, S. Satofuka, Y. Ozawa, K. Tsubota, K. Umezawa, S. Ohno, Y. Oike, and S. Ishida Macular Pigment Lutein Is Antiinflammatory in Preventing Choroidal Neovascularization Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2007; 27(12): 2555 - 2562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |