HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kawaguchi, I. Articles by Sugiyama, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kawaguchi, I. Articles by Sugiyama, K.

In Vivo Imaging and Quantitative Evaluation of the Rat Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Using Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion References

 
PURPOSE. To determine whether scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) is useful for in vivo imaging and quantitative evaluation of rat retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) using an optic nerve crush model.

METHODS. The optic nerve of the right eye was crushed intraorbitally with a clip. The left eye served as the untreated control. Fundus images of both eyes were recorded by SLO using an argon blue laser before and 1, 2, and 4 weeks after optic nerve crush. The focused plane was sequentially moved by changing the refractive values in the SLO setting. The range of refractive values (F) in which the RNFL reflex was clearly observed was determined. The RNFL thickness in retinal sections was measured and compared to the F value from SLO images taken before histologic preparation.

RESULTS. Striations of RNFL radiating from the optic disc were clearly visible by SLO. No obvious changes in the RNFL reflex were observed 1 week after optic nerve crush. However, striations of RNFL became uniformly darker and thinner 2 weeks after the crush and were barely visible 4 weeks after the crush. The F value was unchanged 1 week after the crush, but then decreased significantly and progressively after the second week. F was unchanged in the control eyes during the experimental period. The F value correlated significantly with the histologically determined RNFL thickness.

CONCLUSIONS. SLO is a useful and valuable tool for in vivo imaging and quantitative evaluation of rat RNFL.

Ocular hypertension, ischemia–reperfusion, and optic nerve crush rodent models have been used to elucidate the pathophysiology of glaucoma and other optic neuropathies.⁴ In these models, loss of retinal ganglion cells has usually been evaluated histologically by counting the number of cell bodies in the retina or their axons in the optic nerve.^{5 6 7 8} For intraretinal axons of retinal ganglion cells, qualitative assessment of the effect of axotomy has been performed by staining the axons in the flatmount retina.^{6 9} However, there have been no reports of in vivo evaluation of RNFL changes in rodent models of optic nerve injury.

In this study, we determined whether the SLO is useful for in vivo imaging and quantitative evaluation of the rat RNFL using the optic nerve crush model.

	Methods

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion References

 
Animals
Male Brown Norway rats, 12 weeks of age and weighing 200 to 250 g, were used in this study. The rats had free access to food and water and were maintained in cages in an environmentally controlled room with a 12-hour light–dark cycle. All experiments were conducted on rats anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection (65 mg/kg) of sodium pentobarbital (Somnopentil; Schering-Plough Animal Health, Omaha, NE). All animals were treated in accordance with the ARVO statement for the Use of Animal in Ophthalmic and Vision Research.

Optic Nerve Crush Model
The conjunctiva of the right eye was incised in the supratemporal quadrant to expose the optic nerve by careful blunt dissection under an operating microscope. The optic nerve was crushed 2 mm behind the globe for 30 seconds with a 60-g vascular clip (Micro Vascular Clip; Roboz Surgical Instrument Co., Gaithersburg, MD). Special care was taken not to damage the blood supply to the eye traveling along the inferior side of the optic nerve.¹⁰ Immediate recovery of retinal blood supply after removal of the clip was observed by indirect ophthalmoscopy in each eye. The left eye served as the untreated control.

In Vivo Imaging of RNFL over Time Using SLO
Before and 1, 2, and 4 weeks after optic nerve crush, the retinal images of both eyes were recorded by SLO (SLO 101; Rodenstock Instruments) with argon blue laser illumination (wavelength: 488 nm, output: 190–210 µW) in 21 rats. The eyes were dilated with 0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride eye drops (Santen Pharmaceuticals, Osaka, Japan). To preserve corneal clarity throughout the experiment, a custom-made contact lens with a radius of curvature of 2.75 mm and a diameter of 5.0 mm (Kyoto Contact Lens, Kyoto, Japan) was placed on the cornea after topical anesthesia with 0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride eye drops (Santen Pharmaceuticals). A rat was placed on a heating pad (Deltaphase Isothermal Pad; Braintree Scientific, Inc., Braintree, MA) and its head was gently held manually to keep the eye in position for illuminating the fundus evenly with the argon blue laser.

Fundus images with a field angle of 40° were recorded by digital video (GV-D1000; Sony Co., Tokyo, Japan). First, the widest confocal aperture (C3) was used for qualitative observation of RNFL. Then, for the quantitative evaluation of RNFL thickness, the narrowest confocal aperture (C1) was used to maximize the image contrast of the focused plane and the axial resolution. The focused plane was sequentially moved through the retina, sclerad to vitread, by changing the refractive values (maximum range, –20 D to +20 D) in the SLO setting (i.e., altering the setting of the ametropic corrector). The fundus images were recorded with a nominal 1-D step and the range of refractive values (F) for RNFL thickness was determined by a masked observer.

As the focus measurements in this study were subjective, representative SLO images of RNFL with different focused planes, as shown in Figure 1 , were used as the reference images for determining F. For all 1-D steps of SLO images of each rat fundus, we looked carefully at the retinal location, approximately 1 disc diameter apart from the edges of the optic disc and determined the most sclerad focal plane where the radial striations of RNFL become just visible. We also determined the most vitread focal plane with the striations of RNFL reflex just before being covered by the dark area around the optic disc which enlarges with larger refractive values. For evaluation of the reproducibility and reliability of these subjective focus measurements, we calculated intra- and interobserver agreement in the measurements using the SLO image series of 24 rat fundi (six image series each at baseline and 1, 2, and 4 weeks after the optic nerve crush). Two observers independently determined F for each rat fundus. The image series were presented in a random sequence on two separate occasions. The statistic was 0.92 and 0.83 for intra- and interobserver agreement respectively, indicating that reproducibility of the focus measurements was relatively good.

View larger version (117K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. SLO images of normal rat fundus recorded under argon blue laser illumination through the narrowest confocal aperture. The focused plane was sequentially moved from sclerad (A) to vitread (D) by changing the refractive values (F) in the SLO setting. (A) Refractive value, –8 D. White mottled reflex from the retinal pigment epithelium was prominent. Striations of RNFL are not visible. (B) Refractive value, –4 D. Radial striations of RNFL became visible. (C) Refractive value, +3 D. The striations of RNFL reflex were prominent. The dark area around the optic disc increased in size with larger refractive values than with this one. (D) Refractive value, +5 D. The large dark area around the optic disc indicates that the focused plane was in front of the retinal surface. In this case, the range of refractive values in which radial striations of RNFL are clearly observed near the optic disc is from –4 D to +3 D, and thus F is 7 D. The pattern of retinal vessels in the SLO images (A vs. B, arrows) of the same retinal area are different at different focal planes, a finding that confirms the ability of the SLO for optical sectioning of rat retina using a 488-nm laser.

Correlation of F and Histologically Determined RNFL Thickness
Sixteen rats were divided into four groups (four rats in each group). An optic nerve crush was performed in the right eye in three groups. Retinal sections of the right eye were prepared for RNFL thickness measurement at 1, 2, and 4 weeks after optic nerve crush. One group of rats was used for each time point. For baseline data, the optic nerve was not crushed in the remaining group of rats, and the right eye was processed similarly. Immediately after the recording of the fundus by SLO, the eyes were enucleated after administration of an anesthetic overdose of intraperitoneal pentobarbital sodium. The anterior segment was removed and a small marking cut was placed on the edge of the posterior eye cup to identify the superior retinal portion. The eye cup was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-0.5% glutaraldehyde and 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline for 2 hours at room temperature, and was embedded in mounting compound (Tissue-TeK OCT; Sakura Finetechnical, Tokyo, Japan) followed by freezing with dry ice. Serial frozen sections (16 µm thick) were collected along the vertical meridian of the globe. After they were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, the retinal sections were observed under an optical microscope (Eclipse TE300; Nikon Corp., Kanagawa, Japan) and were recorded as JPEG files with a digital cooled CCD camera (DS-5Mc-L1; Nikon) and a personal computer (Dimension 8300; Dell Inc., Round Rock, TX). For each eye, RNFL thickness of three consecutive sections derived from a location approximately 500 µm temporal from the center of the optic disc (1 disc diameter from the edge of the optic disc) was measured using image-analysis software (Image-Pro Express 4.0; MediaCybernetics, Inc., Silver Spring, MD) and averaged. The RNFL thickness in the retinal sections was compared by the F determined from SLO images.

We also counted the number of cells in the ganglion cell layer in the retinal sections used for RNFL thickness measurements and calculated the mean number of cells in each eye.

Statistical Analysis
The difference in F was analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for comparison between control and crushed eyes and by the Friedman test and post hoc tests for comparison of F measured at different time points. The differences in RNFL thickness and the number of cells in the ganglion cell layer in retinal sections at different time points were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and post hoc tests. Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the significance of the correlation between F and RNFL thickness measured in retinal sections. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.

	Results

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion References

 
Striations of RNFL radiating from the optic disc were clearly visible in each eye by SLO under argon blue laser illumination when appropriately focused (Fig. 1) . The fundus images were sharper, but darker through a C1 than through a C3 confocal aperture (data not shown). After the optic nerve crush, no obvious changes in RNFL reflex were observed 1 week later. However, 2 weeks after the crush, striations of RNFL became uniformly darker and thinner, suggesting diffuse loss of retinal ganglion cell axons. Disappearance of RNFL striations was more evident 4 weeks after the crush (Fig. 2) . The RNFL changes after the optic nerve crush were consistent in all 21 rats. In contrast, RNFL appearance of control eyes was unchanged throughout the experimental period.

View larger version (138K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. RNFL changes over time caused by optic nerve crush. SLO images at baseline (A, E) and 1 (B, F), 2 (C, G), and 4 (D, H) weeks after axonal injury. (A–D) Fundus images taken at the lower limit of refractive value for RNFL observation. (E–H) Fundus images taken at the upper limit of refractive value for RNFL observation. The refractive value of each SLO image is shown at top right.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. Changes of F in SLO images over time caused by the optic nerve crush. Fundus images were recorded using a 1-D step and the range of refractive values (F) where radial striations of RNFL were clearly observed near the optic disc was determined. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 21 each). *P < 0.001 (Friedman test and post hoc tests). **P < 0.001 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

View larger version (165K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 4. Representative photographs of retinal sections showing the changes of RNFL after the optic nerve crush. (A) Baseline and (B) 1, (C) 2, and (D) 4 weeks after axonal injury. White line demarcates the area of RNFL in each retinal section. The size of the RNFL area was measured with image-analysis software and the average RNFL thickness of three serial sections was determined. Scale bar, 50 µm.

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 5. Correlation of F and histologically determined RNFL thickness. Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient analysis shows a significant positive relationship between F and the histologically determined RNFL thickness (r = 0.86, P < 0.001, n = 16).

	Discussion

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion References

The clinical usefulness of RNFL evaluation by SLO is limited because SLO evaluation of human RNFL remains qualitative. Other imaging modalities such as optical coherence tomography and nerve fiber layer polarimetry are more suitable for quantitative evaluation of RNFL thickness. However, there have been no reports of in vivo quantitative measurement of RNFL in rodent retina by these methods. The radial striations of RNFL in SLO images appeared to be much stronger in Brown Norway rats than in humans. We used pigmented rats for RNFL evaluation, as visualization of RNFL by argon laser is better in pigmented than in albino rats (data not shown). This better visualization by pigmentation is probably because most of the incident light is absorbed by pigments in the retinal pigment epithelium and the choroid and then reflected light from these tissues is greatly reduced.

We then attempted to evaluate rat RNFL quantitatively by SLO. The smallest setting of the confocal aperture in the SLO used in this study was 1 mm (C1), a setting considerably larger than those in tomographic instruments. Woon et al.¹¹ measured the axial resolution of this SLO using a C1 confocal aperture in a human model eye and reported that the resolution was 300 µm in a 20° field of view. They used a model eye that consisted of a 16-mm lens and a micrometer mounted mirror. The pixel brightness of the SLO image of the mirror was then plotted against the axial displacement of the mirror. The full-width-at-half-maximum brightness was taken as the axial resolution. Even with this setting, the possibility of optical sectioning and in vivo three-dimensional reconstruction of the human fundus by SLO was reported.¹² Furthermore, considerably improved axial resolution can be achieved with an SLO (Rodenstock). Fitzke et al.¹³ reported an optical section of 28 µm with a confocal aperture of 1 mm using a x8 magnification system for the prototype SLO (Rodenstock).

A similar situation occurs when viewing the rat fundus by SLO. According to data of representative rat¹⁴ and human (Gullstrand’s schematic eye) eyes, the axial length of a rat eye is much shorter than that of humans (6.29 vs. 24.00 mm), and the total power of the rat eye is much greater than in humans (300.705 vs. 58.64 D). Therefore, lateral magnification of the rat fundus in SLO images should be approximately five times larger than that of the human fundus. We confirmed that SLO images of the rat fundus were approximately five times larger than images of the human fundus, with the size of the rat and human optic discs (300 vs. 1500 µm in diameter) being similar in SLO images with the same size field of view. Given that axial magnification is determined by the square of the lateral magnification, the axial magnification of the SLO images of a rat fundus should therefore have been approximately 25 times larger than those of humans in a field of view of the same size. Therefore, when taking SLO images in a 40° field of view, as used in this study, the axial magnification of a rat fundus will be 6.25 times larger than human SLO images in a 20° field of view with the axial resolution of 300 µm.¹¹ Accordingly, the axial resolution of the rat SLO images would have been approximately 50 µm in this study. Given that the thickness of human and rat retina are similar (typically 250 vs. 170 µm¹⁴ ), optical sectioning of a rat fundus by an SLO (Rodenstock) should be superior to that achieved in humans.

As for the 1-D step of the ametropic corrector to evaluate RNFL thickness in this study, adding 1 D to the ametropic correction moves the plane of focus approximately 0.3 mm in the direction of the vitreous in the human eye, because adding 1 D to the total power of the human eye makes the posterior focal length approximately 0.3 mm shorter in Gullstrand’s schematic eye. In contrast, the posterior focal length in a rat eye¹⁴ is calculated to be approximately 10 µm shorter when adding 1 D to the total power of the rat eye. Thus, a 1-D step in the ametropic correction moves the focal plane approximately 10 µm, a step that is not too wide for measuring RNFL thickness (25 µm) with an axial resolution of approximately 50 µm.

In agreement with the theoretical consideration of the ability of the SLO for optical sectioning of a rat fundus, the focus measurement of rat RNFL (F) using this technique was performed successfully with good intra- and interobserver reproducibility using a 1-mm confocal aperture.

In the next step, we compared the F and the actual RNFL thickness in histologic sections to verify that F is a reliable indicator of RNFL thickness. Although RNFL thickness may vary at different distances from the optic disc, we consistently measured the RNFL thickness at a location approximately 500 µm temporal from the center of the optic disc. At this location, the visibility of radial striations of RNFL in SLO images was suitable for determination of the F value and also the RNFL was thick enough for measuring the changes in retinal sections.

Given a nominal 1-D step of the ametropic corrector corresponding to approximately 10-µm movement of the focal plane and the axial resolution of approximately 50 µm (full-width-at-half-maximum brightness) in SLO images of rat fundus, the F of approximately 7 D for the 25-µm thickness of normal rat RNFL is reasonable. In contrast, F was approximately 1 D for <5 µm of RNFL thickness in the retina 4 weeks after the optic nerve crush, although it should have been 5 D, theoretically. This discrepancy may be explained as follows. The half-maximum brightness of the normal rat RNFL reflex in SLO images may be similar to the threshold of seeing the reflex. However, for thinner RNFL, the visibility became lower, and then stricter focusing (i.e., smaller F values) may have been needed to see the reflex.

The significant positive relationship between F and the histologically determined RNFL thickness indicates that F is a reliable indicator of actual RNFL thickness and, thus, quantitative analysis of rat RNFL can be performed by SLO.

The RNFL thickness was unchanged until the first week after the optic nerve crush in SLO images and retinal sections. Furthermore, we did not notice any qualitative changes of the RNFL reflex in either SLO images or intraretinal axon bundles in histologic sections between baseline and 1 week after the crush. As for the loss of retinal ganglion cell bodies after the optic nerve crush or axotomy, the time course and magnitude of cell death depends on the severity of the injury^{15 16} and the distance of the injury site from the ganglion cell bodies.¹⁷ When the optic nerve is damaged intraorbitally, ganglion cell death starts several days after injury,¹⁸ reaches 30% to 50% 1 week after,^{19 20 21} and progresses further thereafter. In this study, as an index of ganglion cell loss, we counted the number of cells in the ganglion cell layer in the retinal sections used for measuring RNFL thickness and found that the decrease in cell counts was significant 1 week after the crush. Thus, the result of this study suggests that loss of cell bodies may precede the loss of intraretinal axons of retinal ganglion cells after the optic nerve crush. The implication of dissociation between the time course of changes in intraretinal axons and cell bodies is currently unknown. Given that retinal ganglion cells of the adult rat die through apoptosis when axotomized,²² the clearance processes for apoptotic cell bodies may differ from those for intraretinal axons. Further studies are needed to examine this hypothesis.

In conclusion, SLO is a useful and valuable tool for in vivo imaging and quantification of rat RNFL. Evaluation of rat RNFL by SLO will be informative not only in optic nerve crush models but also in other models of optic nerve damage for studying the pathology of optic neuropathy including glaucoma and for developing new therapies.

	Footnotes

 
Supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Japan.

Submitted for publication September 1, 2005; revised February 3 and March 5, 2006; accepted May 1, 2006.

Disclosure: I. Kawaguchi, None; T. Higashide, None; S. Ohkubo, None; H. Takeda, None; K. Sugiyama, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Ichiro Kawaguchi, Department of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208641 Japan; ichiro-k{at}mub.biglobe.ne.jp.

	References

Top Abstract Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Blumenthal EZ, Weinreb RN. Assessment of the retinal nerve fiber layer in clinical trials of glaucoma neuroprotection. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001;45:S305–S312.
2. Miglior S, Rossetti L, Brigatti L, Bujtar E, Orzalesi N. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer evaluation by dynamics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:16–23.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Nishiwaki H, Ogura Y, Kimura H, Kiryu J, Honda Y. Quantitative evaluation of leukocyte dynamics in retinal microcirculation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:123–130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Goldblum D, Mittag T. Prospects for relevant glaucoma models with retinal ganglion cell damage in the rodent eye. Vision Res. 2002;42:471–478.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Allcutt D, Berry M, Sievers J. A quantitative comparison of the reactions of retinal ganglion cells to optic nerve crush in neonatal and adult mice. Brain Res. 1984;318:219–230.[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Villegas-Perez MP, Vidal-Sanz M, Bray GM, Aguayo AJ. Influences of peripheral nerve grafts on the survival and regrowth of axotomized retinal ganglion cells in adult rats. J Neurosci. 1988;8:265–280.[Abstract]
7. Chauhan BC, Pan J, Archibald ML, LeVatte TL, Kelly ME, Tremblay F. Effect of intraocular pressure on optic disc topography, electroretinography, and axonal loss in a chronic pressure-induced rat model of optic nerve damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2969–2976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Mabuchi F, Aihara M, Mackey MR, Lindsey JD, Weinreb RN. Optic nerve damage in experimental mouse ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4321–4330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Allcutt D, Berry M, Sievers J. A qualitative comparison of the reactions of retinal ganglion cell axons to optic nerve crush in neonatal and adult mice. Brain Res. 1984;318:231–240.[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Sugiyama K, Gu ZB, Kawase C, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y. Optic nerve and peripapillary choroidal microvasculature of the rat eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:3084–3090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Woon WH, Fitzke FW, Bird AC, Marshall J. Confocal imaging of the fundus using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:470–474.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Fitzke FW, Masters BR. Three-dimensional visualization of confocal sections of in vivo human fundus and optic nerve. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12:1015–1018.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Fitzke FW, Woon H, Timberlake G, Robinson L, Marshall J, Bird AC. Optical modifications to a scanning laser ophthalmoscope for high magnification, narrow optical section imaging. Lasers Light Ophthalmol. 1991;4:7–14.
14. Hughes A. A schematic eye for the rat. Vision Res. 1979;19:569–588.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Berkelaar M, Clarke DB, Wang YC, Bray GM, Aguayo AJ. Axotomy results in delayed death and apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in adult rats. J Neurosci. 1994;14:4368–4374.[Abstract]
16. Gellrich NC, Schimming R, Zerfowski M, Eysel UT. Quantification of histological changes after calibrated crush of the intraorbital optic nerve in rats. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:233–237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Villegas-Perez MP, Vidal-Sanz M, Rasminsky M, Bray GM, Aguayo AJ. Rapid and protracted phases of retinal ganglion cell loss follow axotomy in the optic nerve of adult rats. J Neurobiol. 1993;24:23–36.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Levkovitch-Verbin H, Quigley HA, Martin KRG, Zack DJ, Pease ME, Valenta DF. A model to study differences between primary and secondary degeneration of retinal ganglion cells in rats by partial optic nerve transaction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3388–3393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Barron KD, Dentinger MP, Krohel G, Easton SK, Mankes R. Qualitative and quantitative ultrastructural observations on retinal ganglion cell layer of rat after intraorbital optic nerve crush. J Neurocytol. 1986;15:345–362.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Mansour-Robaey S, Clarke DB, Wang YC, Bray GM, Aguayo AJ. Effects of ocular injury and administration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on survival and regrowth of axotomized retinal ganglion cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:1632–1636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Selles-Navarro I, Ellesam B, Fajardo R. Retinal ganglion cell and nonneural cell responses to a microcrush lesion of adult rat optic nerve. Exp Neurol. 2001;167:282–289.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Garcia-Valenzuela E, Gorczyca W, Darzynkiewicz Z, Sharma SC. Apoptosis in adult retinal ganglion cells after axotomy. J Neurobiol. 1994;25:431–438.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Nagata, T. Higashide, S. Ohkubo, H. Takeda, and K. Sugiyama In Vivo Quantitative Evaluation of the Rat Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer with Optical Coherence Tomography Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2009; 50(6): 2809 - 2815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kawaguchi, I. Articles by Sugiyama, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kawaguchi, I. Articles by Sugiyama, K.