|
|
||||||||
From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. Forty eyes were imaged with a custom-built, real-time OCT to obtain heights, curvatures, and cross-sectional areas of upper and lower tear menisci simultaneously. The central TFT was indirectly determined as the difference between the combined thickness of the central cornea and tear film and the true corneal thickness obtained after instillation of artificial tears. Dynamic tear distribution was determined by OCT imaging immediately and 5, 20, 40, and 60 minutes after tear instillation. Measurements taken after two blinks of one eye at each visit were repeated on the next day. Measurements from the companion eye were made on separate days.
RESULTS. There were no significant differences between the two measurements of each variable made on consecutive days. At baseline, upper tear meniscus variables were strongly correlated with the comparable lower meniscus variables. However, there were no significant correlations between TFT and any tear meniscus variable. Immediately after instillation of artificial tears, all measured variables increased significantly. TFT, upper and lower menisci heights, and upper meniscus area remained elevated for at least 5 minutes. In addition there were significant correlations between TFT and the lower tear meniscus height and area.
CONCLUSIONS. The custom-built OCT showed good repeatability and holds promise in measuring the dynamic distribution of artificial tears on the ocular surface.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At each visit, one eye of each subject was imaged for two normal blinks using real-time OCT. After baseline imaging, artificial tears (35 µL, Refresh Liquigel; Allergan, Irvine, CA) were instilled into the eye, and OCT imaging followed immediately at t = 0. On the following day at the same time, the procedure was repeated. The other eye was similarly tested, so that each subject had four visits to test both eyes. OCT imaging was repeated at t = 5, 20, 40, and 60 minutes after instillation.
The OCT was custom built as described in our previous study,4 and similar descriptions can be found in other studies.5 6 Briefly, the OCT light source was 1310 nm with a bandwidth of 60 nm. It was connected to a telecentric optical probe with a maximum 15-mm scanning width at up to eight frames per second. The probe was mounted on a standard slit lamp with a digital video system. The viewing system of the slit lamp facilitated positioning scan locations on the cornea. As the subjects looked at an external target, they were exposed only to ambient room light. Because of the long wavelength of the incident OCT light, it was not visible to the subjects. OCT settings were similar to those described in our previous study.4 A vertical optical section crossing the central cornea and eyelids was taken continuously while a specular reflex was present in the OCT images. The entire scanned image was 960 pixels (12 mm) in width and 384 pixels (2.0 mm) in depth in air. The axial interval between two image pixels was 3.7 µm, assuming a group corneal refractive index of 1.389 with 1310-nm light.7
Custom software was used to process OCT images to yield all variables. To avoid the distortion of the central specular hyperreflective reflex of each image, the central 30 axial scans (0.39 mm width) were removed. After that, the central 21 axial scans of eight consecutive images immediately after blinking were processed to yield OCT longitudinal reflectivity profiles from corneal inner side to the outer side. The peak location of the OCT longitudinal reflectivity profile was used to locate the inner and outer borders, similar to that used in many previous studies by us and others.8 9 Total thickness of the cornea and tear film was defined as the distance between the first and last peaks. True corneal thickness was defined as the distance between the first and last second peaks. The TFT was obtained by subtracting the corneal thickness without tear film measured after the instillation of artificial tears (Fig. 1B) from the total thickness, with tear film measured at baseline and 5, 20, 40, and 60 minutes (Figs. 1A 1C 1D 1E 1F) . The interface between the epithelium and artificial tears was clearly visualized in high-magnification images (Fig. 2B) . TFT immediately after the instillation was obtained directly as the distance between last two peaks in OCT longitudinal reflectivity profiles. Immediately after the subject blinked, the first good image of the first eight images showing both the upper and lower tear menisci was processed to obtain six variables: upper tear meniscus radius of curvature (UTMC), height (UTMH), and cross-sectional area (UTMA) and lower tear meniscus radius of curvature (LTMC), height (LTMH), and cross-sectional area (LTMA).
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After the instillation of artificial tears, strong correlations between the TFT and the LTMH and the LTMA were evident. This is probably due to the increased volume of the upper and lower tear menisci, which no doubt contributed to the spreading of the tear film during blinking. The greater volume of tears held by the lower tear meniscus may have been due to gravity and/or possible structural differences. Of interest, the correlations between the TFT and both upper and lower tear menisci were nearly identical as shown in Figures 4D 4E 4F . This may indicate equal contributions to the increase of tear film from upper and lower tear menisci, although the magnitudes of the increases in meniscus variables were significantly different. There may be some limit of the increase in the upper tear meniscus, since we found that UTMH and UTMA stopped rising with the increase of central TFT (Figs. 4D 4E 4F) . The separate contribution of upper or lower tear menisci to the tear film thickness warrants further studies.
The tears were about equally distributed between the menisci of both eyelids at baseline; however, more were present on the lower lid when extra tears were introduced. Based on the measurements made in our study, tear volumes could be calculated when ocular surface area and lengths of both eyelids were known. Although we did not calculate tear volume in this study, the OCT method provides the potential for estimating volume changes over time in human eyes. Artificial tears supplement natural tears in patients with dry eyes by increasing the TFT of the cornea and tear menisci for periods that vary from one individual to another. However, the dimensional changes and distribution of the tears after instillation of the artificial tears remain unclear and how long the effect lasts remains unknown. There are no validated methods that could be used objectively to evaluate the impact of the supplemental tears on TFT and menisci variables, which makes it more difficult for the development of truly effective artificial tears to improve the tear system. The method used in our study determined the dynamic distribution on the ocular surface after the instillation of the tears. The retention time can be obtained by analyzing the recovery time of all variables representing tear volume and the effects on TFT. In this study, the retention time was between 5 and 20 minutes. Further studies should be performed to compare different artificial tears with control solutions like normal saline and relate the dimensional findings to commonly used clinical tests, such as tear break-up time, ocular comfort, and clinical signs and symptoms of dry eye.
The OCT developed in this study has the following features that are essential for simultaneous measurements of dynamic distribution of tears. Real-time imaging with a wide-scan width (up to 12 mm) enables quick acquisition of multiple images across the upper and lower eye lids. Telecentric design of the probe allows recording of true dimensional information of the tears for precise image processing. Image processing software is essential to analyze multiple axial scans of multiple images to yield precise thickness information. The OCT with approximately 10 µm optical resolution has good repeatability, with variations in measurements of corneal thickness of from approximately 1 µm9 to 4 µm.11 12 In other words, the location of an interface could be found as precise as 1 µm if many scans or measurements were averaged to obtain the total thicknesses with and without tear film. The repeatability of our system was tested in vitro with a set of PMMA lenses and in vivo with a group of human corneas in a short period. The repeatability for the lens measurements was 0.9 µm and that for corneal thickness was 1.5 µm. The interval between two pixels in axial direction for our OCT system is 3.7 µm, which is larger than the thickness of the normal tear film itself. This necessitates making indirect estimates of TFT by determining the corneal thickness after instillation of artificial tears, then subtracting that value from the combined thickness of the cornea and tear film at baseline before addition of the artificial tears. In the future, some improvements will be made to enhance the precision of OCT biometry of tears. The use of an ultrahigh-resolution light source would enable direct measurement of TFT and avoid errors caused by calculations. Corneal hydration after the instillation of the tears may introduce measurement error in the indirect measurement of central tear film. We used true corneal thickness obtained immediately after the installation to calculate tear film thickness at any other check points, assuring that corneal thickness remained the same over the study period. The TFT would be thicker than that which we found if corneal hydration occurred shortly after the instillation. The effect (if it occurs) appears to be small, since no difference was found between baseline and 60 minutes in total corneal thickness. Further studies are warranted to investigate from this standpoint.
In summary, a novel method for imaging the tears on ocular surface was developed and used to take highly repeatable measurements of the distribution of artificial tears. OCT holds promise in studying the distribution and retention time of artificial tears. This method may open a new era in characterizing the human tear system to diagnose dry eye and in evaluating dry-eyerelated treatments, such as artificial tears and punctual occlusion.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication January 19, 2006; revised March 13, 2006; accepted June 6, 2006.
Disclosure: J. Wang, Bausch & Lomb, Allergan (F); J. Aquavella, None; J. Palakuru, None; S. Chung, None
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Jianhua Wang, Department of Ophthalmology, Box 314, University of Rochester Eye Institute, Rochester, NY 14642; jianhua_wang{at}urmc.rochester.edu.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Q. Chen, J. Wang, M. Shen, C. Cai, J. Li, L. Cui, J. Qu, and F. Lu Lower Volumes of Tear Menisci in Contact Lens Wearers with Dry Eye Symptoms Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2009; 50(7): 3159 - 3163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shen, J. Li, J. Wang, H. Ma, C. Cai, A. Tao, Y. Yuan, and F. Lu Upper and Lower Tear Menisci in the Diagnosis of Dry Eye Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2009; 50(6): 2722 - 2726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, I. Cox, and W. T. Reindel Upper and Lower Tear Menisci on Contact Lenses Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 1106 - 1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wang, P. Simmons, J. Aquavella, J. Vehige, J. Palakuru, S. Chung, and C. Feng Dynamic Distribution of Artificial Tears on the Ocular Surface Arch Ophthalmol, May 1, 2008; 126(5): 619 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Palakuru, J. Wang, and J. V. Aquavella Effect of Blinking on Tear Dynamics Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3032 - 3037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |