|
|
||||||||
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tiqva; 4Neonatal Department, Helen Schneider Womens Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tiqva; 5Pediatric Ophthalmology Unit, Schneider Childrens Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tiqva; and 2Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. A case-control study was performed. The study sample included full-term infants born from March 1 to August 14, 2006, in the Neonatal Department of Helen Schneider Womens Hospital, Rabin Medical Center. Data were collected on sex, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar score, head circumference, body length, and mode of conception (IVF/natural). A full ophthalmologic examination was performed, including measurement of intraocular pressure, keratometry, ultrasound biometry, pachymetry, and funduscopy.
RESULTS. Sixty-six infants (132 eyes) were examined; 32 were conceived by IVF, and 34 were conceived naturally. Girls accounted for 56% of the IVF group and 44% of the natural conception group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in sex, gestational age, head circumference, intraocular pressure, axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness. The IVF infants had lower birth weight and body length than the infants born by natural conception (P = 0.032, t-test). Their keratometric and pachymetric values were also higher, but when birth weight and length were controlled, this difference remained statistically significant only for infants with a birth weight of less than 3000 g and a body length of less than 48.5 cm.
CONCLUSIONS. IVF apparently has no effect on early development of the eyes in full-term infants. The steeper corneal curvature and greater central corneal thickness in a subset of smaller IVF infants may reflect delayed corneal maturation.
In a previous study,11 we investigated ocular growth in premature neonates conceived by IVF compared with those conceived naturally. We found no effect of IVF on early ocular growth, intraocular pressure, changes in corneal curvature, or retinal vascularization. Although our findings might have reflected a true similarity in ocular growth in infants conceived naturally and those conceived by IVF, we were concerned that the prematurity might have masked possible differences between the groups.
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of IVF on early development of the eyes in full-term healthy infants.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Healthy, full-term infants born from March 1 to August 14, 2006, at the Neonatal Department of the Helen Schneider Womens Hospital of Rabin Medical Center were eligible for the study. For the infants conceived by IVF, we performed ocular examination in those for whom parental consent was obtained; the parents refused in five cases. For the naturally conceived infants, we performed the examination at random in those for whom parental consent was obtained; parents refused in about half the cases. Family history of eye disease and the parents refractive errors were obtained.
Neonates from both groups who needed intensive care treatment or had medical, neurologic or ocular problems were excluded.
Data Collection
The records of every infant in the study were reviewed, and data were collected on gestational age, birth weight, Apgar score, head circumference at birth, and postconceptional age (PCA), in addition to type of conception (IVF or natural) and type of pregnancy (twin or singleton).
Ophthalmologic Examination
A single ophthalmologic examination was performed in each infant 36 to 72 hours after delivery. It included measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP), keratometry, ultrasound biometry, pachymetry, and funduscopy. The same ophthalmologist (ZH) performed all the examinations, and the same pediatric orthoptist/optometrist (IS) performed all the refraction measurements. The ophthalmologist was unmasked, and the pediatric orthoptist was masked as to the mode of conception of the examined infants.
IOP was measured (Tono-Pen; Solan, Jacksonville, FL) after instillation of two drops of topical anesthetic (oxybuprocaine HCl 0.4%; Fischer Pharmaceuticals, Tel Aviv, Israel). The eyelids were retracted gently with the use of a pediatric wire speculum; no pressure was applied to the globe. Measurements were performed only when the infants were quiet, to prevent IOP fluctuations.12 Three measurements with no more than a 2-mm Hg difference were obtained for each eye, and the average IOP was recorded.
Corneal curvature was measured with a hand-held autokeratometer (model KM 500; Nidek, Gamagori, Japan) after insertion of pediatric lid retractor. The keratometer was placed perpendicularly to the eye and focused until three readings were obtained. Average horizontal and vertical radii were recorded for each eye.
Biometry was performed with an ultrasound biometer (model 820; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA), using the technique described by Butcher and OBrien.13 This involved applanation of the cornea with the A-scan probe after instillation of topical anesthetic (oxybuprocaine HCl 0.4%). The probe was placed lightly on the center of the cornea, perpendicular to its axis. Special care was taken to avoid corneal indentation. The probe was maintained in this position until three clear traces were obtained on the screen. The average value of the five measurements was recorded for each eye. Data included axial length, anterior chamber depth, and lens thickness.
Central corneal thickness was measured using ultrasound pachymetry (Corneo-Gage Plus TM 1A; Sonogage, Cleveland, OH). The probe was applied perpendicularly to the central cornea, and the average of five consecutive measurements was calculated.
For the funduscopic examination, an additional drop of phenylephrine hydrochloride 2.5% and of cyclopentolate hydrochloride 0.5% (Akorn Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL) were instilled. Refraction was measured using a hand-held retinoscope.
Statistical Methods
Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, 2006). The following tests were used as appropriate:
2 analysis, t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Pearson correlation. P
0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 test).
Vaginal delivery was performed in 24 naturally conceived infants (70%) and 16 IVF infants (50%); the rest were born by cesarean section. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.110,
2 test).
Gestational age, birth weight, head circumference, and body length in the two groups are presented in Table 1 . Birth weight and body length were statistically significantly lower in the IVF group than in the natural conception group (P = 0.032 for both, t-test for two independent samples). The female infants had a significantly mean lower birth weight than the male infants in both groups (2925.3 g [SD ±486 g] vs. 3247.4 g [SD ±474.64 g], respectively in the whole cohort; P = 0.015, t-test for two independent samples).
|
|
In the whole cohort, as well as in each group separately, correlations were found for gestational age, birth weight, head circumference, and body length with corneal radius of curvature (negative correlations) and with axial length and anterior chamber depth (positive correlations; all P values ranged between 0.0001 and 0.004; Pearson correlation). No correlations were found with spherical equivalent, lens thickness, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure. A statistically significant correlation was found in the whole cohort between myopia (neonates with spherical equivalent of less than +1 D) and family history of myopia of more than –1 D (P = 0.016,
2 test).
Retinal hemorrhages were found in six eyes of three infants in the IVF group and in five eyes of three naturally conceived infants, all of them after vaginal delivery. Retinal vascularization was normal in all infants.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ocular findings have also been reported in infants conceived by IVF, including reduced visual acuity, anisometropia, and ocular malformations,10 in addition to a possible increased risk for retinoblastoma.20 The authors of a recent Swedish study, which found an increase in anomalies in the eye, head, and neck in infants born by IVF and other reproduction technologies, concluded that ART should be considered potentially teratogenic, thus requiring that information be given to the physicians and the public.21 A Danish population-based cohort study of 9255 IVF children showed an increased risk for cerebral palsy because of the large proportion of preterm deliveries.22
At the same time, however, other studies have demonstrated no difference in neurologic or developmental outcome between infants conceived by IVF or conceived naturally. One prospective study of 21 infants born after in vitro maturation failed to find signs of neurologic impairment, malformations, or developmental delay during infancy and early childhood.23 In another study, 19% of the IVF infants showed minor developmental problems at 1 year, but by 2 years neuropsychological development was within normal range.24 A Danish study of 3438 twins conceived by IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and 10,362 non-IVF twins reported that despite the higher discordance in birth weight and more intensive care unit admissions in the ART infants, neonatal outcome seemed to be comparable between the groups.2 These findings were supported by another twin study, of neurologic sequelae, showing no difference between children born after ICSI or after IVF.25
To the best of our knowledge, information on normal biometric and refractive parameters in full-term healthy IVF infants has not been published to date. In our previous study of 133 premature neonates,11 we found that the biometric and IOP values, as well as retinal vascularization, did not differ between IVF infants and infants conceived naturally. However, these findings might have been biased by differences attributed to prematurity. For example, a previous oculometric study on preterm versus full-term infants demonstrated that in premature infants, 40-week adjusted axial lengths were shorter in infants with shorter gestational age. In preterm infants, more fetal anterior segment proportions, with flatter anterior chambers and thicker lenses, were found. Compared with the full-term infants, absence of the usual correlation between axial length and refractive value was noted, indicating a disturbance resulting from preterm delivery.26 The results of this oculometric study showed that prematurity (without retinopathy of prematurity) may influence ocular growth. Therefore, in the present study, we examined full-term infants and excluded those with neurologic diseases or malformations. The only difference between the groups was the mode of conception.
We found no statistically significant differences between the naturally conceived and IVF infants in refraction, axial length, lens thickness, anterior chamber depth, and intraocular pressure. Biometric values were similar to those in our previous study.11 Corneal curvature, however, was less steep in the present study, with the mean corneal radii of curvature in the premature infants (previous study) measuring 6.61 mm (SD ± 0.7) at PCA 37 weeks and 6.63 mm (SD ± 0.26) at PCA 41 weeks. Given that the cornea flattens with maturation and growth, these differences may be an effect of prematurity on corneal development.
In the present study, the corneal radius of curvature was significantly greater in the IVF infants than in the naturally conceived infants of birth weight less than 3000 g or body length less than 48.5 cm. The differences were not significant for the heavier or longer infants. Interestingly, our study of premature neonates11 yielded a significant correlation between lower corneal curvature and greater birth weight and between lower corneal curvature and increased PCA. As in premature infants, the steeper cornea in the smaller full-term IVF infants compared with the full-term naturally conceived infants may reflect delayed maturation. This assumption may also hold true for corneal thickness, which was significantly greater in the IVF infants smaller than 48.5 cm than in the natural conception group (Table 2) .
A previous study of preterm infants reported a mean central corneal thickness of 691 µm at 31 weeks that decreased to 564 µm at term, concomitant with an increase in corneal diameter. The authors suggested that growth of the eye, with possible remodeling and stretching of the collagen fibers, may play a role in the reduction of central corneal thickness.27 However, the process of corneal maturation in terms of thickness remains controversial. Some researchers found that the central corneal thickness of full-term infants was greater than that of adults and that it decreased to adult values by age 2 to 4 years.28 By contrast, a more recent study concluded that after age 6 months, pediatric central and paracentral corneal thickness increases slowly over time and reaches adult value at 5 to 9 years.29
The values for central corneal thickness in our series, measured at 36 to 72 hours, with no correlation to gestational age, birth weight, or body length, were lower than the 581 ± 77 µm reported in a Danish series30 and the 573 ± 52 µm reported by Portellina and Belfort,31 who noted higher values at 24 hours of life than after 48 to 72 hours. Accordingly, in the series of 300 newborns of Remon et al.,32 central corneal thickness measured 611 ± 58 µm at 1 day and 585 ± 52 µm subsequently until the age of 6 days. In addition to age, some of the differences in pachymetric values among the studies may be explained by variability in time after birth31 32 and by differences in ethnicity.33
Our biometric values were similar to those in previous series.12 26 34 35 36 The mild hypermetropia noted in both our groups (+2 to +2.6 D) is consistent with that in previous studies.37 38 39 The high rate of a family history of myopia in the infants with myopia in both our groups is noteworthy.
Although there was no statistically significant difference in IOP by mode of conception in the present study, IOP in the whole cohort was lower (Table 2) than that in our previous series of premature neonates (13.2 mm Hg [SD ± 3.6]).11 Our use of an eye speculum in the present study might have contributed to this difference. Moreover, because central corneal thickness was not measured in the previous study, it is unclear whether the higher IOP in the premature infants reflected differences in pachymetry values.
In conclusion, IVF apparently has no effect on refraction, intraocular pressure, axial length, lens thickness, or retinal vascularization of healthy, full-term infants early in life. The steeper corneal curvature and the greater central corneal thickness in the smaller IVF infants might have reflected delayed corneal maturation. Our results may aid pediatricians and ophthalmologists in assessing ocular dimensions in healthy infants conceived by IVF.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication July 22, 2007; revised September 1, 2007; accepted October 18, 2007.
Disclosure: R. Axer-Siegel, None; Z. Herscovici, None; S. Davidson, None; N. Linder, None; I. Sherf, None; M. Snir, None
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Ruth Axer-Siegel, Department of Ophthalmology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqva 49100, Israel; seegs{at}netvision.net.il.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |