IOVS Stroke
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2007;48:621-626.)
© 2007 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.06-0538
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niederer, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by McGhee, C. N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niederer, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by McGhee, C. N. J.

Corneal Innervation and Cellular Changes after Corneal Transplantation: An In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study

Rachael L. Niederer, Divya Perumal, Trevor Sherwin, and Charles N. J. McGhee

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. Although penetrating keratoplasty is generally considered a successful procedure, transplanted corneal tissue may exhibit abnormal epithelium, decreased sensation, and declining endothelial cell counts after surgery. This study aimed to use in vivo confocal microscopy to correlate corneal microstructure and recovery of the subbasal nerve plexus of the transplanted cornea with indications for, and time from, surgery.

METHODS. This was a cross-sectional study comparing corneas from 42 patients after penetrating keratoplasty with those of 30 controls. Subjects were assessed by ophthalmic history and clinical examination, computerized corneal topography, and laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy.

RESULTS. Time from surgery ranged from 1 month to 40 years (mean, 85 ± 105 months). Significant reductions in epithelial (P < 0.001), keratocyte (P < 0.001), and endothelial (P < 0.001) cell densities were noted in comparison with control corneas. Significant reductions in subbasal nerve fiber density (P < 0.001) and nerve branching (P < 0.001) were also noted. Endothelial cell density decreased with time after surgery (r = –0.472; P = 0.003), and nerve fiber density (r = .328; P = 0.034) increased. Keratoconus as an indication for transplantation was associated with higher subbasal nerve fiber densities (P = 0.003) than other indications for corneal transplantation. Neither nerve fiber nor cell density was correlated with best-corrected visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS. Laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy highlights profound reductions in cell density at every level of the transplanted cornea and alterations to the subbasal plexus that are still apparent up to 40 years after penetrating keratoplasty.

Corneal transplantation represents the oldest, most common, and most successful form of tissue transplantation worldwide.1 In New Zealand, approximately 200 corneal transplantations are performed each year for a wide range of indications, with a 1-year survival rate of 87%.2 Despite these high survival rates, the posttransplantation cornea appears to exhibit changes in cellular structure and function for many years after surgery. Corneal epithelium shows altered morphology and function,3 4 and endothelial cell density progressively decreases at an accelerated rate for up to 20 years after corneal transplantation, with associated changes in endothelial morphology and function.5 6 Penetrating keratoplasty requires a full-thickness 360° corneal incision that cuts corneal nerves and results in complete denervation of the transplanted cornea. Unsurprisingly, several studies have observed a marked reduction in corneal sensation after corneal transplantation.7 8 9 10 11 The return of sensation to the donor tissue is highly variable, and in many cases hypoesthesia persists for many years after initial surgery.

Specular microscopy has enabled prospective longitudinal studies of endothelial cell counts to be conducted on the transplanted cornea in vivo,5 6 but, until recently, studies of other cell layers and innervation have been limited to animal studies12 and a small number of human ex vivo histologic studies, in the form of examination of failed corneal buttons and postmortem investigations.13 14 In the past decade, the development of in vivo confocal microscopy has provided a new method for corneal examination, allowing high-resolution images to be obtained in living eyes. With this technique, it is possible to assess the cornea under more physiological conditions than previously possible, enabling the possibility of longitudinal studies of corneal reinnervation and cellular changes after surgery.15

The purpose of this study was to elucidate alterations in epithelial, keratocyte, and endothelial cell density and corneal innervation after corneal transplantation with the use of in vivo confocal microscopy.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subject Recruitment
Thirty-two patients who had undergone penetrating keratoplasty (42 corneas) were recruited from subspecialist corneal clinics in the Department of Ophthalmology, Auckland City Hospital. Patients who wore contact lenses in the preceding year, had a history systemic disease or prescription medication use with known ocular associations, or underwent corneal transplantation less than 1 month earlier were excluded from the study.

Thirty volunteers were recruited as a control group. Subjects in the control group had no ocular abnormality, did not wear contact lenses, were free of systemic disease, and did not take medication known to affect the eye. All control subjects were examined by slit lamp biomicroscopy, and their corneas were confirmed to be clinically normal.

This study received approval from the Auckland Ethics Committee and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after detailed explanation of the nature of the study.

Subject Assessment
All subjects were assessed through clinical history and slit lamp biomicroscopy. Central corneal thickness was measured with a slit-scanning elevation topography system (Orbscan II; Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Rochester, NY). Patient clinical notes were reviewed to determine indications for corneal graft, date of operation, current medication, and postoperative complications. For the purpose of this study, graft rejection was defined as the development of a rejection line (epithelial or endothelial) or spreading corneal edema in a previously thin, clear graft with either corneal infiltrates or a unilateral anterior chamber reaction.16 Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) was defined as a single IOP reading ≥ 22 mm Hg after penetrating keratoplasty.

In Vivo Confocal Microscopy
Laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy was performed on all subjects with a corneal module (HRT II; Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II Rostock Corneal Module [RCM]; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). This microscope uses a 670-nm red wavelength diode laser source. A 60x objective water immersion lens with a numerical aperture of 0.9 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a working distance relative to the applanating cap of 0.0 to 3.0 mm was used. Images produced with this lens measure 400 µm x 400 µm, and the manufacturer quotes the transverse resolution and the optical section thickness as 2 µm and 4 µm, respectively. The module used (RCM; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH) uses an entirely digital capture system.

The central cornea of the eye that had undergone penetrating keratoplasty was examined in each patient. In the control subjects, one eye was selected at random for examination. Each eye was anesthetized with one drop of 0.4% benoxinate hydrochloride (Chauvin Pharmaceuticals, Surrey, UK), and a coupling agent (Viscotears; Carbomer 980, 0.2%; Novartis, North Ryde, NSW, Australia) was used between the applanating lens and the cornea. All subjects were asked to fixate on a distance target aligned to enable examination of the central cornea. The full thickness of the central cornea was scanned using the device’s "section" mode. Total duration of in vivo confocal examination was approximately 2 minutes per eye. None of the subjects experienced any visual symptoms or corneal complications as a result of the examination.

Image Analysis
For each cornea, three images were taken from each of the following levels: basal epithelium, subbasal nerve plexus, anterior stroma, mid stroma, posterior stroma, and endothelium. Anterior stroma was defined as the first three clear images (without motion blur or compression lines) immediately posterior to Bowman layer, posterior stroma was defined as the first three clear images immediately anterior to Descemet membrane, and mid stroma was defined as three images equidistant from Bowman layer and Descemet membrane in the full-thickness section. All images were subsequently randomized and encoded by a single independent observer (DP).

Measurements were performed using a caliper tool (analySIS 3.1; Soft Imaging System, Münster, Germany). For all epithelial and endothelial pictures, a standard central counting frame measuring 200 x 200 µm was used. For all subbasal nerve plexus and stromal images, the full 400 x 400-µm frame was used. Nerve fiber density (NFD) was assessed by measuring the total length of all nerve fibers and branches per square millimeter. Nerve branch density (NBD) was calculated as the number of nerve branches or anastomoses per square millimeter, and nerve branches per millimeter nerve (NBN) was calculated as the number of nerve branches or anastomoses per millimeter nerve. Interobserver error was estimated by reassessing 10% of the images captured by an independent, blinded, second investigator (DP).

Statistical Analysis
All values were entered into a database (Excel; Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and were subsequently imported into statistical software for analysis. Snellen visual acuities were converted to equivalent LogMAR values for analysis, and statistical analysis was performed (SPSS Version 12 for Windows; SPSS, Chicago, IL). Basic descriptive statistics were calculated on all data gathered, and values are reported as mean ± SD. Correlations between continuous variables were examined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Student independent t test was used to compare values between two groups. The 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for interobserver repeatability were calculated using the method of Bland and Altman.17 All tests were two-tailed, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Results from in vivo confocal microscopy of 42 eyes that had undergone penetrating keratoplasty in 32 subjects were included in the study and compared with a control group of 30 eyes from 30 volunteers. Mean ages were 45.3 ± 17.3 years in the posttransplantation group and were slightly younger, 40.9 ± 10.5 years, in the control group, though this was not statistically significant (P = 0.225). No significant difference based on sex was observed between the posttransplantation and the control groups (38% male in the posttransplantation group; 33% male in the control group; P = 0.682).

The most common indication for penetrating keratoplasty in the posttransplantation group was keratoconus in 32 corneas (76%), followed by Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy (7%), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (5%), and infectious keratitis (5%). Posttransplantation patient characteristics are reported in Table 1 . Mean time from surgery was 7.1 years (85 ± 105 months; range, 1–480 months). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/50, mean corneal astigmatism was 5.7 ± 3.7 D, and mean keratometry was 45.7 ± 4.8 D.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Posttransplantation Complications and Topical Medication

 
The 95% limits of agreement for interobserver repeatability were epithelium (±7%), NFD (±16%), anterior stroma (±10%), mid stroma (±7%), posterior stroma (±12%), and endothelium (±11%).

Significant reductions in cell density were observed at all levels of the posttransplantation cornea compared with controls. Significant reductions in subbasal NFD, NBD, and NBN were observed in the transplanted corneas (Table 2) . Reduction in endothelial cell density was associated with an increase in central corneal thickness in the posttransplantation cornea (r = –0.569; P < 0.001). No correlation was observed between NFD and epithelial (P > 0.05), endothelial (P > 0.05), or keratocyte (P > 0.05) cell density in the posttransplantation cornea. No association was observed between age or sex and cell density or nerve fiber parameters at any level of the posttransplantation cornea (P > 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Comparison between Control and Posttransplantation Corneal Parameters

 
No statistical association was observed between BCVA and endothelial, keratocyte, or epithelial cell density, or innervation density at the time of examination. In addition, no statistical associations were observed between mean keratometry or corneal astigmatism and cell or innervation density. A modest correlation was observed between BCVA and corneal astigmatism (r = .380; P = 0.038), and corneal astigmatism increased with time after surgery (r = .564; P = 0.001).

Endothelial cell density in the posttransplantation group decreased with time after penetrating keratoplasty (r = –0.472; P = 0.003). NFD (r = .328; P = 0.034) and NBN (r = .322; P = 0.038) increased with increasing time from surgery. No correlation was observed between epithelial and keratocyte cell density in the posttransplantation patients and the time after keratoplasty (P > 0.05).

Endothelial density was reduced in posttransplantation patients with a history of previous graft rejection (1396 ± 697 cells/mm2 vs. 902 ± 539 cells/mm2; P = 0.023) and in patients with a history of elevated IOP (1260 ± 697 cells/mm2 vs. 786 ± 192 cells/mm2; P = 0.018). However, no significant difference in epithelial or keratocyte cell density or nerve fiber parameters was observed in posttransplantation patients with a history of previous graft rejection or high IOP (P > 0.05). No significant association was observed between use of topical medication and any of the corneal parameters measured (P > 0.05).

Patients who underwent the initial surgery for keratoconus had higher NFD (2.36 ± 3.77 mm/mm2 vs. 0.16 ± 0.39 mm/mm2; P = 0.003), higher NBD (6.12 ± 11.48 branches/mm2 vs. 0 ± 0 branches/mm2; P = 0.005), and greater NBN (0.63 ± 1.25 branches/mm vs. 0.00 ± 0 branches/mm; P = 0.008) than patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty for other indications. No association was observed between epithelial, keratocyte, or endothelial cell density and the indication for corneal transplantation (P > 0.05).

Qualitatively, subbasal nerve fibers appeared shorter and more tortuous in the posttransplantation corneas than in control corneas (Fig. 1) . Particularly abnormal regeneration of the stromal nerves was noted in one patient (Fig. 2) , a 37-year-old woman with keratoconus who had undergone bilateral penetrating keratoplasty. Transplantation was performed in the left eye 14 years earlier, and the stromal nerves showed prolific regeneration after a coiled course with an abnormal branching pattern. Stromal nerves in the opposite eye, 17 years after corneal transplantation, were normal.


Figure 1
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1. Subbasal nerve fibers after penetrating keratoplasty. (A) Normal subbasal nerve fibers in a control subject. (B) Decreased subbasal nerve fiber density after penetrating keratoplasty.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 2. Abnormal stromal nerve regeneration after keratoplasty. (A) Prolific regeneration of corneal stromal nerves in the left eye 14 years after corneal transplantation. (B) Normal appearance of a stromal nerve in right eye 17 years after transplantation.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Penetrating keratoplasty is the most frequently performed transplantation procedure, and, though success rates are high, long-term graft survival remains limited by graft rejection, late endothelial failure, and recurrence of the original disease.1 18 19 This study used in vivo confocal microscopy examination of a cross-section of eyes 1 month to 40 years after corneal transplantation to assess cell density and innervation in the postkeratoplasty cornea.

Corneal nerves provide important protective and trophic functions, and interruption of corneal innervation may result in altered epithelial morphology and function, poor tear film, and delayed wound healing.20 21 22 23 Penetrating keratoplasty causes complete sensory denervation of the donor cornea; the nerves of the donor cornea undergo rapid degeneration after transplantation, though Schwann cell sheaths remain empty and intact.12 In the present study, reduced subbasal NFD was observed in the cornea up to 40 years after penetrating keratoplasty. To our knowledge, this represents the first quantitative study of corneal NFD after corneal transplantation and is consistent with previous observations of highly variable corneal sensation after transplantation, with abnormal sensation observed up to 32 years after corneal surgery.7 8 9 10 11

Regeneration of the subbasal nerve plexus occurs at a far slower rate after penetrating keratoplasty than after cataract or refractive surgery.24 25 The rate of nerve fiber regeneration after surgery is dependent on depth and circumference of incision. An incision smaller than approximately 50% corneal thickness or smaller than 360° circumference spares some of the stromal nerves, allowing neural regeneration from adjacent stromal nerves.26 Impaired sensory innervation after penetrating keratoplasty may contribute to the relatively high frequency of epithelial complications observed after the procedure.4

No correlation between recipient age and reinnervation was observed in this study. A similar lack of correlation between return of sensation and recipient age after penetrating keratoplasty was noted in an earlier study of 71 corneas.11 Others, however, have observed a correlation between age and return of sensation up to 3 years after surgery. Faster return of sensation and nerve regeneration is reported in young rabbits after corneal transplantation,12 27 and studies have demonstrated quicker peripheral reinnervation and better nerve morphology in younger animals,28 possibly because of age-related impairment in Schwann cell-axon interactions. No regeneration of the Schwann cells has been observed in transplanted corneas, and regenerating nerves occupy the empty Schwann cells of the donor cornea.10 12 Theoretically, therefore, donor age may influence reinnervation.

If the subbasal plexus was regenerated, nerve fiber morphology was markedly altered, resulting in increased nerve tortuosity, reduced branching pattern, and shorter nerve length. Qualitative changes in corneal innervation after corneal transplantation, with slow reinnervation and increased nerve tortuosity, have been reported and have also been noted in regenerated corneal nerve fibers after refractive surgery and in the diabetic cornea.29 30

Patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus experienced greater regeneration of the subbasal nerve plexus than patients who underwent surgery for other indications. Although a faster return of corneal sensation after corneal transplantation in patients with preoperative diagnoses of keratoconus has been reported,27 other studies have observed no significant difference in recovery of sensation.7 9 11 After corneal transplantation, corneal nerve regeneration proceeds from the peripheral recipient cornea, through the scar tissue, and into the donor cornea.10 12 Hence, it may be that corneal nerve regeneration is dependent on peripheral corneal innervation. Many diseases requiring corneal transplantation, including keratoconus, are associated with abnormal corneal innervation and reduced corneal sensation.31 32 33 34 35 However, unlike other indications for corneal transplantation in this study, keratoconus is a disease primarily of the central cornea, with relative sparing of the peripheral cornea.35 In a recent study by Patel and McGhee,36 in vivo confocal microscopy mapping of the subbasal nerve plexus in keratoconus revealed that though the corneal nerves at the keratoconus cone were markedly disrupted, peripheral innervation remained intact. Perhaps retention of healthy peripheral innervation in keratoconus is responsible for greater regeneration of corneal nerves, as demonstrated in this study. Alternatively, the keratoconus group might have been younger than patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty for other indications and might have experienced faster corneal nerve regeneration. This study failed, however, to observe an association between recipient age and nerve regeneration in the transplanted cornea.

The density of the basal corneal epithelium in postkeratoplasty corneas was reduced compared with those in the control group in the present study. Changes in the basal epithelial cell morphology and increased cell area have previously been noted by specular microscopy with the use of a contact lens to view the epithelium.37 The high frequency of epithelial complications, particularly in the first year after keratoplasty, suggests abnormal epithelial function, and studies have identified altered epithelial metabolism and barrier function for several years after corneal transplantation.3 4 No correlation was observed in the present study between time after penetrating keratoplasty and basal epithelial cell density, in contrast to the results of Imre et al.38 who found a reduction in epithelial cell density between 15 months and 66 months after keratoplasty.

In the present study, keratocyte density was observed to be significantly lower in the posttransplantation corneas than in corneas in the control group. In vivo confocal microscopy has enabled the imaging of keratocytes in living patients, but to date only three published studies have examined keratocyte density after penetrating keratoplasty, with conflicting results.5 38 39 Bourne et al.5 showed a reduction in keratocyte density after transplantation at every level of the stroma. Keratocyte density was not reduced with duration of time after transplantation. Conversely, Mikek et al.39 found no difference in keratocyte density between normal corneas and posttransplantation corneas. Why keratocyte density is reduced in the posttransplantation cornea is unclear. Increased apoptosis has been noted in transplanted corneas, particularly at the wound edge.40 Donor cells initially persist in the donor cornea but are gradually replaced by host cells, though small subpopulations of donor keratocytes may persist in the cornea up to 5 years after transplantation.41 42 43 It is also possible that reduced keratocyte density in the post keratoplasty cornea does not represent true loss of keratocytes but is instead the consequence of either binomial expansion caused by edema (keratocytes are conserved but are distributed in a larger volume) or optical artifact (image quality degraded by edema).

Reduced endothelial cell density in the posttransplantation cornea was identified in this study in correlation with time after keratoplasty, previous rejection episodes, and previous high IOP. In vivo confocal microscopy allows noninvasive imaging of changes in endothelial morphology after transplantation and may confer an advantage over specular microscopy in the imaging of patients with significant corneal edema.44 The present study tends to support the observations of Bourne et al.,5 45 46 47 who illustrated accelerated endothelial cell loss over time in postgraft corneas (4.2% per year compared with 0.6% in healthy subjects and 2.5% in patients after cataract surgery). The cause of accelerated endothelial cell loss after penetrating keratoplasty was uncertain. An immunologic mechanism has been suggested, and a study of endothelial cell loss in autologous keratoplasty compared with homologous keratoplasty showed lower endothelial cell loss in the autologous transplants.48 Furthermore, long-term increases in aqueous flare have been noted after keratoplasty, suggesting chronic, subclinical inflammation.49 However, light and electron microscopy study of late endothelial failure provides no evidence of immunologic reaction,50 and immunologic reaction alone does not explain why accelerated loss of endothelial cells is also observed, albeit to a lesser extent, in eyes after cataract surgery.5

This study noted a correlation between endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness. Despite this association, however, many grafts with profoundly reduced endothelial cell densities retain graft clarity and function, possibly because of the concurrent reduction in intercellular spaces associated with larger cell areas.6 Patients who experienced previous corneal graft rejection had lower endothelial counts than those with no history of graft rejection. Corneal graft rejection has been associated with loss of endothelial cells,43 51 but the degree of endothelial cell loss after graft rejection may be increased in older recipients and with delay in diagnosis.51

BCVA was associated with astigmatism, but no correlation was observed between BCVA and cell or innervation density. However, this was a cross-sectional study representing a wide range of visual acuity and time after penetrating keratoplasty. The role, if any, of cell density and cell reflectivity on BCVA might be further explored in a longitudinal study of corneal transplantation.

In conclusion, in vivo confocal microscopy offers exciting insight into microstructural changes in the posttransplantation cornea. This study highlights a profound reduction in cell density at every level of the transplanted cornea and alterations to the subbasal plexus that are still apparent up to 40 years after penetrating keratoplasty, which may have important implications for corneal wound healing and the health of the transplanted cornea. Further longitudinal studies are necessary to investigate the role of these alterations in graft survival, visual acuity, and postoperative complications.


   Footnotes
 
Supported in part by an unrestricted award from The Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust.

Submitted for publication May 15, 2006; revised August 27, 2006; accepted December 14, 2006.

Disclosure: R.L. Niederer, None; D. Perumal, None; T. Sherwin, None; C.N.J. McGhee, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Charles N. J. McGhee, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; c.mcghee{at}auckland.ac.nz.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Waldock A, Cook SD. Corneal transplantation: how successful are we?. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:813–815.[Free Full Text]
  2. Patel HY, Ormonde S, Brookes N, et al. The New Zealand National Eye Bank: assessment of survival and visual outcome one year following corneal transplantation, 1993–2001. Cornea. .In press
  3. Vannas A, Holden BA, Sweeney DF. Epithelial metabolism of the corneal graft is abnormal. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987;71:593–597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Feiz V, Mannis MJ, Kandavel G, et al. Surface keratopathy after penetrating keratoplasty. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:159–168.discussion 68–70[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Bourne WM. Cellular changes in transplanted human corneas. Cornea. 2001;20:560–569.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Bourne WM, Brubaker RF. Decreased endothelial permeability in transplanted corneas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:362–367.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Rao GN, John T, Ishida N, Aquavella JV. Recovery of corneal sensitivity in grafts following penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1985;92:1408–1411.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Ruben M, Colebrook E. Keratoplasty sensitivity. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979;63:265–267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Mathers WD, Jester JV, Lemp MA. Return of human corneal sensitivity after penetrating keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:210–211.[Abstract]
  10. Escapini H. Nerve changes in the human corneal graft. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1955;53:229–235.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Tugal Tutkun I, Akarcay K, Kozer Bilgin L, et al. Corneal sensitivity after penetrating keratoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1993;3:66–70.[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Rexed U. Nerve regeneration in corneal grafts in the rabbit. Br J Ophthalmol. 1951;35:89–97.[Free Full Text]
  13. Bourges JL, Savoldelli M, Dighiero P, et al. Recurrence of keratoconus characteristics: a clinical and histologic follow-up analysis of donor grafts. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1920–1925.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Tervo T, Vannas A, Tervo K, Holden BA. Histochemical evidence of limited reinnervation of human corneal grafts. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1985;63:207–214.
  15. Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM, Alizadeh H, et al. Clinical and diagnostic use of in vivo confocal microscopy in patients with corneal disease. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:1444–1454.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Alldredge OC, Krachmer JH. Clinical types of corneal transplant rejection: their manifestations, frequency, preoperative correlates, and treatment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:599–604.[Abstract]
  17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Wilson SE, Kaufman HE. Graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 1990;34:325–356.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Marcon AS, Cohen EJ, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR. Recurrence of corneal stromal dystrophies after penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2003;22:19–21.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Rozsa AJ, Beuerman RW. Density and organization of free nerve endings in the corneal epithelium of the rabbit. Pain. 1982;14:105–120.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Beuerman RW, Schimmelpfennig B. Sensory denervation of the rabbit cornea affects epithelial properties. Exp Neurol. 1980;69:196–201.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Gilbard JP, Rossi SR. Tear film and ocular surface changes in a rabbit model of neurotrophic keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:308–312.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Araki K, Ohashi Y, Kinoshita S, et al. Epithelial wound healing in the denervated cornea. Curr Eye Res. 1994;13:203–211.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Kohlhaas M. Corneal sensation after cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:1399–1409.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Linna TU, Vesaluoma MH, Perez-Santonja JJ, et al. Effect of myopic LASIK on corneal sensitivity and morphology of subbasal nerves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:393–397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Chang-Ling T, Vannas A, Holden BA, O’Leary DJ. Incision depth affects the recovery of corneal sensitivity and neural regeneration in the cat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1533–1541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Richter A, Slowik C, Somodi S, et al. Corneal reinnervation following penetrating keratoplasty—correlation of esthesiometry and confocal microscopy. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1996;5:513–517.[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Kawabuchi M, Chongjian Z, Islam AT, et al. The effect of aging on the morphological nerve changes during muscle reinnervation after nerve crush. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1998;13:117–127.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Linna T, Tervo T. Real-time confocal microscopic observations on human corneal nerves and wound healing after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:640–649.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Kallinikos P, Berhanu M, O’Donnell C, et al. Corneal nerve tortuosity in diabetic patients with neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:418–422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Grupcheva CN, Malik TY, Craig JP, et al. Microstructural assessment of rare corneal dystrophies using real-time in vivo confocal microscopy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;29:281–285.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Grupcheva CN, Chew GS, Edwards M, et al. Imaging posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy by in vivo confocal microscopy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001;29:256–259.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Adamis AP, Filatov V, Tripathi BJ, Tripathi RC. Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. Surv Ophthalmol. 1993;38:149–168.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Zabala M, Archila EA. Corneal sensitivity and topogometry in keratoconus. CLAO J. 1988;14:210–212.[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Brookes NH, Loh IP, Clover GM, et al. Involvement of corneal nerves in the progression of keratoconus. Exp Eye Res. 2003;77:515–524.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Patel DV, McGhee CNJ. Mapping the corneal subbasal nerve plexus in keratoconus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1348–1351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Tsubota K, Mashima Y, Murata H, et al. Corneal epithelium following penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:257–260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Imre L, Resch M, Nagymihaly A. In vivo confocal corneal microscopy after keratoplasty [in German]. Ophthalmologe. 2005;102:140–146.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Mikek K, Hawlina M, Pfeifer V. Comparative study of human keratocyte density after corneal grafting by using confocal microscopy in vivo. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2003;220:830–834.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Ohno K, Mitooka K, Nelson LR, et al. Keratocyte activation and apoptosis in transplanted human corneas in a xenograft model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1025–1031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Hanna C, Irwin ES. Fate of cells in the corneal graft. Arch Ophthalmol. 1962;68:124–131.
  42. Wollensak G, Green WR. Analysis of sex-mismatched human corneal transplants by fluorescence in situ hybridization of the sex-chromosomes. Exp Eye Res. 1999;68:341–346.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Hori J, Streilein JW. Dynamics of donor cell persistence and recipient cell replacement in orthotopic corneal allografts in mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1820–1828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Wiegand W, Thaer AA, Kroll P, et al. Optical sectioning of the cornea with a new confocal in vivo slit-scanning videomicroscope. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:568–575.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Bourne WM, O’Fallon WM. Endothelial cell loss during penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;85:760–766.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Bourne WM, Hodge DO, Nelson LR. Corneal endothelium five years after transplantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:185–196.[ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Patel SV, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2004;102:57–65.; discussion 66[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Bertelmann E, Hartmann C, Scherer M, Rieck P. Outcome of rotational keratoplasty: comparison of endothelial cell loss in autografts vs allografts. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1437–1440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Ma DH, See LC, Chen JJ. Long-term observation of aqueous flare following penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2003;22:413–419.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Bell KD, Campbell RJ, Bourne WM. Pathology of late endothelial failure: late endothelial failure of penetrating keratoplasty: study with light and electron microscopy. Cornea. 2000;19:40–46.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Claerhout I, Beele H, De Bacquer D, Kestelyn P. Factors influencing the decline in endothelial cell density after corneal allograft rejection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4747–4752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
N. Lagali, M. Griffith, P. Fagerholm, K. Merrett, M. Huynh, and R. Munger
Innervation of Tissue-Engineered Recombinant Human Collagen-Based Corneal Substitutes: A Comparative In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3895 - 3902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
R. L. Niederer, D. Perumal, T. Sherwin, and C. N. J. McGhee
Laser Scanning In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Reveals Reduced Innervation and Reduction in Cell Density in All Layers of the Keratoconic Cornea
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 2964 - 2970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch OphthalmolHome page
S. V. Patel, J. C. Erie, J. W. McLaren, and W. M. Bourne
Keratocyte Density and Recovery of Subbasal Nerves After Penetrating Keratoplasty and in Late Endothelial Failure
Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 2007; 125(12): 1693 - 1698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
R L Niederer, D Perumal, T Sherwin, and C N J McGhee
Age-related differences in the normal human cornea: a laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy study
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2007; 91(9): 1165 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niederer, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by McGhee, C. N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Niederer, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by McGhee, C. N. J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS