IOVS British Journal of Pharmacology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2008;49:270-274.)
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.07-0500
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pasutto, F.
Right arrow Articles by Reis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pasutto, F.
Right arrow Articles by Reis, A.

Profiling of WDR36 Missense Variants in German Patients with Glaucoma

Francesca Pasutto,1 Christian Y. Mardin,2 Karin Michels-Rautenstrauss,1 Bernhard H. F. Weber,3 Heinrich Sticht,4 Gabriela Chavarria-Soley,1 Bernd Rautenstrauss,1 Friedrich Kruse,2 and André Reis1

1From the Institute of Human Genetics, the 2Department of Ophthalmology, and the 4Institute of Biochemistry, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; and the 3Institute of Human Genetics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. Mutations in WDR36 were recently reported in patients with adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). In this study, the prevalence of WDR36 variants was investigated in patients with glaucoma who were of German descent with diverse age of onset and intraocular pressure levels.

METHODS. Recruited were 399 unrelated patients with glaucoma and 376 healthy subjects of comparable age and origin, who had had repeated normal findings in ophthalmic examinations. The frequency of observed variants was obtained by direct sequencing of the entire WDR36 coding region.

RESULTS. A total of 44 WDR36 allelic variants were detected, including 14 nonsynonymous amino acid alterations, of which 7 are novel (P31T, Y97C, D126N, T403A, H411Y, H411L, and P487R) and 7 have been reported (L25P, D33E, A163V, H212P, A449T, D658G and I264V). Of these 14 variants, 6 were classified as polymorphisms as they were detected in patients and control individuals at similar frequencies. Eight variants present in 15 patients (3.7%) but only 1 control individual (0.2%) were defined as putative disease-causing variants (P = 0.0005). Within this patient group, 12 (80%) presented with high and 3 (20%) with low intraocular pressure. Disease severity and age of onset showed a broad range.

CONCLUSIONS. The occurrence of several rare putative disease-causing variants in patients with glaucoma suggests that WDR36 may be a minor disease-causing gene in glaucoma, at least in the German population. The large variability in WDR36, though, requires functional validation of these variants, once its function is characterized.

Glaucoma refers to a group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous ophthalmologic disorders leading to visual impairment and blindness. The characteristic clinical sign is cupping of the optic nerve head with subsequent retinal nerve fibers loss, usually associated with elevated intraocular pressure. The disease affects more than 67 million people worldwide.1 Epidemiologic studies have repeatedly confirmed that primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), the most common adult form of the disease, is one of the main causes of blindness (8%) in European populations.2 3 The age of onset of glaucoma manifestation ranges from birth to late adulthood. Affected individuals are usually asymptomatic until the late stages of disease, when significant and irreversible optic nerve degeneration has already occurred.4 As glaucoma-related visual loss is preventable in many cases and as the sensitivity of current diagnostic methods is suboptimal, there is an urgent need to diagnose glaucoma in its early stages.5 6 Identification of the genes involved in the etiology of glaucoma provides a significant opportunity for presymptomatic diagnosis, improved prognosis, and better understanding of the etiology of this blinding condition.

Although many cases are sporadic, POAG shows familial clustering consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance and incomplete penetrance. Reduced penetrance and excess of sporadic cases is particularly seen in late-onset forms. Nevertheless, more than 11 (GLC1A-GLC1M) different POAG loci have been mapped so far.7 8 9 10 11 12 During the past decade, two genes have been reported for POAG: myocilin (MYOC) on chromosome 1, long-arm region q24.3-q25.2, primarily mutated in juvenile-onset patients,13 and optineurin (OPTN) on chromosome 10, short-arm region p14-p15, mainly mutated in individuals with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).14 15 Although investigators in several studies have consistently found mutations in MYOC in approximately 3% of cases including the German population (3.2%),16 mutations in OPTN seem to be a rather infrequent cause of POAG or NTG.17 18 In a recent study, a new POAG locus was identified on chromosome 5, region q22.1 (designated as GLC1G). Screening of the WD40-repeat 36 gene (WDR36) in 130 patients with an adult-onset form of glaucoma with high and low pressure identified mutations in approximately 5% of patients. Both familial and sporadic cases were affected.19

WD40-repeats are stretches of 40 amino acids that contain tryptophan (W) and aspartic acid (D). WD-repeat–containing proteins comprise a large family found in all eukaryotes and are implicated in a variety of functions ranging from signal transduction and transcription regulation to cell cycle control and apoptosis. The underlying common function of all WD-repeat proteins is coordinating multiprotein complex assemblies, where the repeating units serve as a rigid scaffold for protein interactions. Based on sequence similarity, WDR36 was proposed to contain five20 to eight19 WD40 repeats. In addition, WDR36 contains a C-terminal UTP21 domain that is specifically associated with WD40 repeats21 as well as sequence stretches that are characteristic for AMP-binding or which exhibit structural similarity to the C-terminal part of cytochrome cd119 Expression of WDR36 was shown in human ocular and nonocular tissues as well as in embryonic and adult mouse tissues.19 It has been suggested that WDR36 may be involved in T-cell activation20 and recently, T-cell-mediated responses have been hypothesized to participate in glaucoma-associated optic nerve degeneration.22 However, the exact physiological function of the protein and its role in glaucoma pathogenesis remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of WDR36 sequence variants in a well-characterized group of 399 unrelated German patients with POAG, NTG, or juvenile open-angle glaucoma (JOAG).


   Material and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Material and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients and Control Subjects
The study was approved by the ethics review board of the Medical Faculty of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg and was in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects gave informed consent before entering the study.

The group of patients with glaucoma consisted of 399 subjects of German (European) origin: 270 had primary open-angle glaucoma (high-pressure POAG), 47 had juvenile open-angle glaucoma (JOAG), and 82 had normal-tension open-angle glaucoma (NTG). All individuals underwent standardized clinical examinations for glaucoma at the Ophthalmologic Department of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen. These comprised slitlamp biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, automated visual field testing (Octopus G1; Interzeag, Schlieren, Switzerland), fundus photography (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany), optional laser scanning tomography (HRT I and II; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) of the disc and a 24-hour Goldmann-applanation intraocular pressure (IOP) tonometry profile with five measurements. Manifest high-tension POAG was defined as the presence of glaucomatous optic disc damage (in at least one eye), visual field defects in at least one eye, and intraocular pressure higher than 21 mm Hg in one eye without therapy. Causes of secondary glaucoma, such as primary melanin dispersion and pseudoexfoliation, were excluded. Glaucomatous optic nerve damage was defined as focal loss of neuroretinal rim or nerve fiber layer associated with a specific visual field defect. According to Jonas, stage 0 optic disc was defined as normal, stage I with vertical elongation of the cup and neuroretinal rim loss at the 12 and 6 o’clock positions, stage II with focal rim loss, stage III and IV with advanced rim loss, and stage V, as absolute optic disc atrophy. Disc area was measured with HRT or estimated with a Goldmann lens and slitlamp (Haag-Streit, Köniz, Switzerland).23 A pathologic visual field was defined by a pathologic Bebie curve, three adjacent test points with more than 5 dB sensitivity loss or at least one point with a more than 15-dB loss. Patients who showed glaucomatous changes of the optic disc and visual field but no IOP elevation over 21 mm Hg after a 24-hour IOP-measurement (sitting and supine body position) without therapy received a diagnosis of NTG. Patients were classified as having JOAG when age at onset in the index case was below 40 years and no other ocular reason for open-angle glaucoma was visible. In total, 178 (44.4%) patients had a family history of glaucoma. All patients were also screened for myocilin mutations, as determined by direct sequencing of all coding regions of MYOC. Mutations were identified in 18 (4.5%) patients also included in the present study, of whom one carried a WDR36 variant (described later). Detailed results on MYOC screening will be described elsewhere (Pasutto et al., manuscript in preparation). A subset of 96 patients tested with the same methods was negative for OPTN mutations. As OPTN mutations are very rare, the entire cohort was not screened.

The 376 control subjects were all of German origin and were recruited from the same geographic regions as the patients. In addition, the age- and sex-matched control subjects underwent ophthalmic examination. Thus, at the time of examination and inclusion in this study the age ranged from 51 to 92 years (mean, 73.9 ± 6.4). They had IOP below 20 mm Hg, no glaucomatous disc damage, and no family history of glaucoma. Visual acuity was at least 0.8, and the media were clear for examination.

Mutation Screening
Genomic DNA was prepared from peripheral blood samples by a standard salting-out protocol. Individual coding exons of the WDR36 gene including flanking intronic/untranslated region (UTR) sequences were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by the appropriate amplification protocols. Primer sequences were selected with Primer3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi/) and are available on request. Purified PCR fragments were sequenced (Big Dye Termination chemistry ver. 3.1; Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany) on a capillary automated sequencer (model 3730 Genetic Analyzer; Applied Biosystems). Each variant was confirmed by a second independent analysis. GenBank Accession NM_139281 was used as cDNA reference sequence and NT_034772 as genomic reference sequence (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD). We used Q8NI36 (WD36_HUMAN) from the Swiss-Prot/Trembl database (http://www.sanger.ac.uk, Sanger Centre, Hinxton, UK) as the reference protein sequence. Evolutionary conservation of nonsynonymous variants was investigated with protein sequence alignment generated by ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/ European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany) and compared with that presented by the Ensembl Database (http://www.ensembl.org).24


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Material and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Direct sequence analysis of WDR36 in 399 unrelated patients with glaucoma identified 44 allelic variants, 14 of which cause amino acid substitution (Table 1) . Seven of these are novel (P31T, Y97C, D126N, T403A, H411Y, H411L, and P487R), whereas six variants (L25P, D33E, A163V, H212P, A449T, and D658G) have been reported.19 25


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. WDR36 Sequence Variants in Patients and Control Individuals

 
These nonsynonymous variants are located in the amino-terminal region, as well as in the WD-40 repeat domains (Fig. 1A) . The latter mostly affect positions evolutionary conserved among orthologous in mouse, rat, zebra fish, and puffer fish (Fig. 1B) . Variations L25P, P31T, and D33E could not be unambiguously aligned because of the lack of sequence conservation of the N-terminal region.


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIGURE 1. Evolutionary conservation of nonsynonymous WDR36 amino acid variants and location on protein domain structure. (A) Multiple amino acid sequence alignment shows evolutionary conservation of seven WDR36 variants among different species. Gray: residues affected by mutations. (B) Our protein modeling predicts WDR36 to contain 14 WD40 repeats. (Structure prediction of WDR36 was performed by using the consensus structure prediction available via the BioInfo Meta-Server, http://bioinfo.pl/meta/ BioInfoBank Institute, Poznan, Poland.) All eight putative disease-causing variants identified in this study are shown (black) above the predicted domain organization. Six variants were located in the proposed WD-40 repeats, whereas none was identified in the C-terminal region of the protein.

 
Mutations that were defined as disease-causing19 were found in 1.8% (7/399) of the patients and in 2.1% (8/376) of the control individuals. Sequence variants reported to be potential disease-susceptibility mutations19 were detected in 4.7% (19/399) of the patients and 4.8% (18/376) of control subjects (Table 1) . One variant that had not been classified (D33E)25 was seen in eight (2.0%) patients and one (0.3%) control individual. The seven variants not reported before were seen in seven patients only. One previously reported nonsynonymous SNP, I264V, is a common sequence variant and was found in patients and controls at a similar frequency (Table 1) . Altogether, the nonsynonymous variants (excluding the common I264V variant) were detected in a total of 41 (10.2%) patients compared with 27 (7.2%) control subjects (P = 0.1619; Fisher exact test). However, owing to our data (Table 1) and to recent WDR36 screenings reported by other groups,25 26 27 28 the nonsynonymous variants L25P, A163V, H212P, A449T, and D658G are rather addressed as polymorphisms due to frequent detection in healthy subjects. Consequently, when these five putative polymorphisms were excluded from our statistical analysis, the remaining eight nonsynonymous amino acid alterations were detected in 15 patients (3.7%) and 1 control subject (0.2%; P = 0.0005).

Six synonymous amino acid changes, one of which was novel (R430R), and 24 additional intronic variants were seen in patients and controls at comparable frequency (Table 1) . Based on their positions we judged these synonymous changes and the intronic variants unlikely to affect correct splicing and therefore to be polymorphisms thus excluding them from further analysis (Table 1) .

In the group of 41 unrelated patients with glaucoma carrying the nonsynonymous amino acid changes, we could not detect a significant correlation between the presence of a specific WDR36 variation (either defined as polymorphism or putative disease-causing variant) and a particular clinical aspect or diagnostic parameter (Table 2) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Phenotypic Composition of Patients with WDR36 Variations

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
We report the largest variation screening for WDR36 in patients with glaucoma to date. We identified 13 rare nonsynonymous amino acid variants, of which 7 were novel and 6 had been described. Five of these described variants (L25P, A163V, H212P, A449T and D658G) were found in similar frequencies in patients with glaucoma and control subjects (6.5% and 69%, respectively) and failed to cosegregate with the disease in their respective families (data not shown). As glaucoma has an extremely variable age of onset, we cannot exclude that in some of these healthy subjects (n = 26, age ranges from 62 to 83, mean age 69.9 ± 5.6) glaucoma may develop later in life, or it may never manifest in some patients. On the other hand, the absence of a significant overall difference between patients and controls questions the previous assumption19 that these variants in WDR36 can cause glaucoma. Studies in an Australian, an Iowa and a French-Canadian population reported a single and three WDR36 variants, respectively, to be at similar or even higher frequency in controls,26 27 28 supporting a neutral role for them.

Another recent study that screened a smaller cohort of 118 patients with glaucoma in the United States25 also reported several families with three of these WDR36 variants that failed to segregate with the disease. This differs from the initial report of cosegregation in one family showing linkage to the GLC1G locus. Whereas WDR36 is located at this locus, the data cannot exclude the casual cosegregation in this family due to linkage disequilibrium. Thus, another gene located in close proximity at this locus could be the causative gene. This notion is supported by the increasing number of reports identifying families linked to the GLC1G locus but lacking a WDR36 mutation29 30 31 and by a new study that maps the glaucoma locus GLC1M next to GLG1G.32

Seven rare variants were seen, each in one patient, but not in any of the control individuals, whereas one variant (D33E) was found in six patients and only one control subject 75 years of age. Altogether these variants were found more frequently in patients than in controls (3.7% and 0.2%, respectively). The occurrence of different rare variants is characteristic of highly heterogeneous diseases such as glaucoma, as rare mutations have been also reported for MYOC. Moreover, since six of eight of these mutations are located within a WD40 domain, it is likely that their alterations directly interfere with the function of the protein. Validation as bona fide mutations would require experimental verification in functional assays, which at the moment are difficult to perform given the unknown function of WDR36.

In any case these rare variants would represent only a minor cause of open-angle glaucoma. This conclusion is supported by the recent report by Weisschuh et al.,33 who reported a frequency of 3.6% (4/112) of rare mutation carriers in a smaller cohort of 112 German patients with NTG, which is very similar to the frequency found in our NTG subgroup (3.7%, 3/82; Table 2 , and the Material and Methods section). In addition, our data suggest that these variants in WDR36 are not characteristic of any particular group of patients with glaucoma and none seems to correlate with a particular clinical aspect or disease severity (Table 2) . For example, amino acid change D33E was found in eight patients with age at onset ranging from 14 to 72 years and both normal and high ocular tension (20–40 mm Hg). Overall, in patients carrying a variant, the age of onset ranged from juvenile (14 years) to late adulthood (77 years), and the maximum intraocular ocular pressures varied from 16 to 50 mm Hg, thus indicating that WDR36 variants are equally present in all three types of open-angle glaucoma (4.2% JOAG, 3.7% NTG and 3.7% POAG patients, Table 2 ). The degree of disc atrophy ranged from mild cupping to progressed loss of neuroretinal rim of the optic disc, resulting in wide variety of mild and severe visual field loss. Also the disc size ranged from small discs with 1.6 mm2 to large discs with 5.0 mm2. The chamber angle in the eye was wide open in all patients.34 Thus, we conclude that WDR36 variations are not restricted to a specific type of glaucoma.

In summary, our findings indicate that sequence variants in WDR36 are only rare causes of unrelated glaucoma in German population. Clearly, investigation of additional families and populations, extensive functional studies, as well identification of WDR36 binding partners are essential for further understanding the role of WDR36 in the pathophysiology of glaucoma.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors thank all the patients and healthy volunteers for participation in this study, Juliane Niedziella for invaluable help with patient recruitment, and Claudia Preller for excellent technical assistance.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by Grants SFB 539 and in part by Grant WE1259/14-3 from the German Research Foundation (DFG).

Submitted for publication April 25, 2007; revised July 16 and September 18, 2007; accepted November 19, 2007

Disclosure: F. Pasutto, None; C.Y. Mardin, None; K. Michels-Rautenstrauss, None; B.H.F. Weber, None; H. Sticht, None; G. Chavarria-Soley, None; B. Rautenstrauss, None; F. Kruse, None; A. Reis, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: André Reis, Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schwabachanlage 10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; reis{at}humgenet.uni-erlangen.de.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:389–393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Klaver CC, Wolfs RC, Vingerling JR, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: The Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:653–658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tuck MW, Crick RP. The projected increase in glaucoma due to an ageing population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003;23:175–179.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Fechtner RD, Weinreb RN. Mechanisms of optic nerve damage in primary open angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994;39:23–42.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, et al. Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:450–454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ritch R. Neuroprotection: is it already applicable to glaucoma therapy?. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11:78–84.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Sarfarazi M, Child A, Stoilova D, et al. Localization of the fourth locus (GLC1E) for adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma to the 10p15–p14 region. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:641–652.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Stoilova D, Child A, Trifan OC, Crick RP, Coakes RL, Sarfarazi M. Localization of a locus (GLC1B) for adult-onset primary open angle glaucoma to the 2cen-q13 region. Genomics. 1996;36:142–150.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Trifan OC, Traboulsi EI, Stoilova D, et al. A third locus (GLC1D) for adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma maps to the 8q23 region. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:17–28.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Wirtz MK, Samples JR, Rust K, et al. GLC1F, a new primary open-angle glaucoma locus, maps to 7q35–q36. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:237–241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wiggs JL, Allingham RR, Hossain A, et al. Genome-wide scan for adult onset primary open angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:1109–1117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wiggs JL, Lynch S, Ynagi G, et al. A genomewide scan identifies novel early-onset primary open-angle glaucoma loci on 9q22 and 20p12. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:1314–1320.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Stone EM, Fingert JH, Alward WL, et al. Identification of a gene that causes primary open angle glaucoma. Science. 1997;275:668–670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rezaie T, Child A, Hitchings R, et al. Adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin. Science. 2002;295:1077–1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sarfarazi M, Rezaie T. Optineurin in primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16:529–541.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Michels-Rautenstrauss K, Mardin C, Wakili N, et al. Novel mutations in the MYOC/GLC1A gene in a large group of glaucoma patients. Hum Mutat. 2002;20:479–480.[Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Weisschuh N, Neumann D, Wolf C, Wissinger B, Gramer E. Prevalence of myocilin and optineurin sequence variants in German normal tension glaucoma patients. Mol Vis. 2005;11:284–287.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Wiggs JL, Auguste J, Allingham RR, et al. Lack of association of mutations in optineurin with disease in patients with adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1181–1183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Monemi S, Spaeth G, DaSilva A, et al. Identification of a novel adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) gene on 5q22.1. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:725–733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Mao M, Biery MC, Kobayashi SV, et al. T lymphocyte activation gene identification by coregulated expression on DNA microarrays. Genomics. 2004;83:989–999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Bateman A, Birney E, Cerruti L, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:276–280.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Bakalash S, Shlomo GB, Aloni E, et al. T-cell-based vaccination for morphological and functional neuroprotection in a rat model of chronically elevated intraocular pressure. J Mol Med. 2005;83:904–916.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Jonas JB, Papastathopoulos K. Ophthalmoscopic measurement of the optic disc. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:1102–1106.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Hubbard T, Barker D, Birney E, et al. The Ensembl genome database project. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:38–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hauser MA, Allingham RR, Linkroum K, et al. Distribution of WDR36 DNA sequence variants in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2542–2546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hewitt AW, Dimasi DP, Mackey DA, Craig JE. A Glaucoma case-control study of the WDR36 gene D658G sequence variant. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:324–325.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Raymond V, Dubois S, Marquis A, Arseneault R, Duchesne A, Rodrigue M-A, The Québec Glaucoma Network. Large scale mutation analysis of the third glaucoma-causing gene, WDR36, at GLC1G in the French-Canadian population of Québec. Presented at the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) 55th Annual Meeting. Salt Lake City, Utah, 2005. 2005;358. ASHG Bethesda, MD.
  28. Fingert JH, Alward WL, Kwon YH, et al. No association between variations in the WDR36 gene and primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:434–436.[Free Full Text]
  29. Rotimi CN, Chen G, Adeyemo AA, et al. Genomewide scan and fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for intraocular pressure on 5q and 14q in West Africans. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3262–3267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Pang CP, Fan BJ, Canlas O, et al. A genome-wide scan maps a novel juvenile-onset primary open angle glaucoma locus to chromosome 5q. Mol Vis. 2006;12:85–92.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Kramer PL, Samples JR, Monemi S, Sykes R, Sarfarazi M, Wirtz MK. The role of the WDR36 gene on chromosome 5q22.1 in a large family with primary open-angle glaucoma mapped to this region. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:1328–1331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Fan BJ, Ko WC, Wang DY, et al. Fine mapping of new glaucoma locus GLC1M and exclusion of neuregulin 2 as the causative gene. Mol Vis. 2007;13:779–784.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Weisschuh N, Wolf C, Wissinger B, Gramer E. Variations in the WDR36 gene in German patients with normal tension glaucoma. Mol Vis. 2007;13:724–729.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A. Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber: incidence and significance of the narrow angle. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68:626–629.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
T. K. Footz, J. L. Johnson, S. Dubois, N. Boivin, V. Raymond, and M. A. Walter
Glaucoma-associated WDR36 variants encode functional defects in a yeast model system
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2009; 18(7): 1276 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. M. Skarie and B. A. Link
The Primary open-angle glaucoma gene WDR36 functions in ribosomal RNA processing and interacts with the p53 stress-response pathway
Hum. Mol. Genet., August 15, 2008; 17(16): 2474 - 2485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pasutto, F.
Right arrow Articles by Reis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pasutto, F.
Right arrow Articles by Reis, A.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS