IOVS Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Originally published In Press as doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1678 on July 3, 2008
 (Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2008;49:4707-4711.)
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.08-1678
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.08-1678v1
49/11/4707    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wickremasinghe, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, T. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wickremasinghe, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, T. Y.

Retinal Vascular Caliber Changes after Intravitreal Triamcinolone Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

Sanjeewa S. Wickremasinghe,1,2 Sophie L. Rogers,1 Mark C. Gillies,3 Meidong Zhu,3 and Tien Y. Wong1,2,4

1From the Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; 2Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Save Sight Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; and the 4Singapore Eye Research Institute, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
PURPOSE. To describe the changes in retinal vascular caliber in response to a single injection of intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) in patients with refractory diabetic macular edema.

METHODS. Prospective data from a randomized clinical trial were used. The effects of IVTA versus sham injections in patients with refractory diabetic macular edema were evaluated in a randomized clinical trial involving 69 eyes of 43 patients. Of these, 28 eyes (15 IVTA and 13 sham) of 21 patients had gradable retinal photographs at the baseline and 3-month follow-up visit for analysis in the present study. Retinal vascular caliber was measured from digital fundus photographs and summarized as central retinal artery (CRAE) and vein (CRVE) equivalents in all eyes at baseline and at the 3-month follow-up visit.

RESULTS. Over the 3 months of the study, there was a significant reduction compared to baseline in retinal arteriolar (147.8 µm vs. 140.0 µm, P = 0.047) and venular (219.5 µm vs. 198 µm, P = 0.039) caliber in eyes treated with IVTA. There was no change in retinal arteriolar (139.9 µm vs. 139.2 µm, P = 0.878) or venular (220.3 µm vs. 217.6 µm, P = 0.534) caliber in those treated with sham injections.

CONCLUSIONS. IVTA has a significant narrowing effect on both retinal arteriolar and venular diameter in eyes with diabetic macular edema (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00148330).

Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of legal blindness among the working population in the industrialized world today, and sight-threatening retinopathy is mostly commonly due to diabetic macular edema (DME).1 2 DME results from a series of retinal microvascular changes secondary to endothelial cell dysfunction, thickening of the retinal capillary basement membrane, and reduction in the number of the surrounding pericytes leading to increased permeability and incompetence of retinal vasculature. Although the exact underlying cause for these retinal changes remains poorly understood, recent studies have indicated a possible role for inflammation and vascular endothelial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy.3 4 5

There is increasing evidence that retinal arteriolar and venular caliber are good indicators of retinal ocular perfusion.6 Several epidemiologic studies have found larger arteriolar and venular caliber in patients with diabetes and in those with impaired glucose tolerance.7 8 9 10 Larger venular caliber has been additionally linked with increasing severity of diabetic retinopathy and also systemic markers of inflammation.11 It has been speculated that as a result of increased hydrostatic pressure, larger vessels may lead to increased retinal capillary blood flow and therefore to increased fluid leakage from the retinal capillaries.12

Triamcinolone is a synthetic glucocorticoid. In eyes with DME, injections of intravitreal triamcinolone (IVTA) have been shown to improve visual acuity and reduce macular thickening.13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Although the exact mechanisms behind this improvement are not clear, animal studies have suggested that glucocorticoids may have a beneficial effect on retinal vessel diameter.20 21 22 There are few clinical studies. In one series, among seven patients with DME, a significant reduction in both retinal arteriolar and venular diameter was seen 1 week after a single injections of IVTA.23 The purpose of this study was to examine changes in retinal vascular caliber after a single injection of IVTA compared with control subjects in a group of patients with refractory DME.


   Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients
This study was based on data from a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing IVTA with placebo for the treatment of DME. The study was approved by the South Eastern Sydney Area Health Service and the University of Sydney Research Ethics committees and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Patients were recruited from the retina clinics of the Sydney Eye Hospital.13 19 The inclusion criteria for that study were eyes with persistent or recurrent DME involving the central fovea three or more months after adequate laser treatment and best corrected visual acuity in the affected eye of 6/9 or worse. Sixty-nine eyes of 43 patients were entered into the study. Of those patients with both eyes recruited, one eye was randomly assigned to the active treatment group and one eye received sham treatment.

The procedure for injection has been documented previously,13 but in summary, the eyes were prepared with several drops of amethocaine 1% and 2 drops of 5% povidone iodine. A small amount of 2% lignocaine then was administered subconjunctivally with a 30-gauge needle to the site of the injection. Using a 27-gauge needle, 0.1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL; Kenacort 40; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Noble Park, Australia) was injected through the pars plana. A small amount of chloramphenicol ointment then was instilled. Eyes randomized to sham treatment received a subconjunctival injection of saline in a procedure identical to the triamcinolone group. In patients with both eyes in the study, the right eye was treated first followed by the left eye, using a fresh set of sterile drape, speculum, and caliper.

Of the 69 eyes included in the study, 28 eyes of 21 patients had good-quality gradable retinal photographs at the baseline and 3-month follow-up visit and are included in the analysis.

Measurement of Retinal Vascular Caliber
Fundus photography was performed with a standardized protocol.24 Two photographic fields were taken of each eye of each participant: the first centered on the optic disc (ETDRS field 1) and the second centered on the fovea (ETDRS field 2).25 Images were digitized with a slide scanner (Coolscan V; Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan) at a resolution of 150 dpi, saved in the TIFF format, and sent to the University of Melbourne for measurement of retinal vascular caliber and assessment of other retinal disease. Retinal vascular caliber was measured with a computer program (IVAN; University of Wisconsin, Madison), based on a detailed protocol.26 27 A trained grader who was masked to participant characteristics performed the measurements. For this study, field 1 photographs were selected for measurement. For each photograph, all arterioles and venules coursing through an area one-half to one disc diameter from the optic disc margin were measured and summarized as the central retinal artery equivalent (CRAE) and central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) using formulas developed by Hubbard et al.27 and later modified by Knudtson et al.28 These equivalents are projected calibers for the central retinal vessels, measured away from the optic disc. The reproducibility of retinal vascular measurements has been reported.26 27

In a recent study,29 intragrader reliability was assessed on 200 randomly selected retinal photographs, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) was 0.99 (0.98–0.99) for CRAE and 0.94 (0.92–0.96) for CRVE.

Visual Acuity and Macular Thickness
Visual acuity, central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured at baseline and at 3 months by certified, masked examiners. Best corrected logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity was performed with Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts. CMT was measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT 3 Stratus; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA), and IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Statistical Methods
Retinal vascular calibers (CRAE and CRVE) were assessed as continuous variables. Normality was assessed for all analyses, and appropriate nonparametric methods were applied as necessary. The relationship between baseline and 3-month vessel caliber was assessed by paired two sample t-test, to account for within-eye pairing of measurements. The relationship between treatment group and change in caliber over 3 months was assessed by one-way ANOVA. Changes in other ocular factors (IOP, CMT, VA) were assessed by one-way ANOVA, or Kendall’s rank correlation to account for non-normality. Significance levels were set at P < 0.05. All data analysis was performed (Intercooled Stata version 9.0 for Windows, 2005; StataCorp, College Station, TX).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Overall 28 eyes of 21 patients were included in the study. The baseline characteristics of the patients receiving an injection of IVTA versus those receiving sham injection are shown in Table 1 . No statistically significant differences between the two groups were noted. Of the 21 patients, 7 had both eyes (14 eyes) and 14 had one eye recruited into the study. Of these patients, there were no statistically significant differences between those with both or one eye included, in terms of age (65.0 ± 10.4 years vs. 61.5 ± 12.9 years, P = 0.504), male sex (50.0% vs. 42.9%, P = 0.757) and HbA1c (8.42% ± 1.20% vs. 8.10% ± 1.30%, P = 0.576), although, those with only one eye included had a median duration of diabetes of 12.0 years compared with 15.5 years in those with both eyes included, P = 0.039. Of the original 43 patients, no significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, sex, HbA1c, and duration of diabetes) were noted in those patients who were included compared with those who were excluded from the study.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Eyes

 
At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences in visual acuity (61.5 letters compared with 67.6 letters), CMT (426 µm vs. 475.3 µm), arterial diameter (147.8 µm vs. 139.9 µm), or venular diameter (219.5 µm vs. 220.3 µm) between the IVTA and sham groups, respectively.

Table 2 shows the changes in visual acuity, retinal arteriolar caliber (CRAE), retinal venular caliber (CRVE), and CMT measurements at baseline and at 3 months in individual patients treated with IVTA and sham injections. Although the absolute reduction in the mean CRAE (–7.8 µm) and CRVE (–21.8 µm) was greater in the IVTA-treated eyes than in the sham treated eyes (–0.7 and –2.7 µm, respectively), the difference between the groups did not reach statistical significance for either CRAE (P = 0.222) or CRVE (P = 0.065). In eyes treated with IVTA, however, there was a statistically significant reduction in both arteriolar (147.8 µm vs. 140.0 µm, P = 0.047) and venular caliber (219.5 µm vs. 198 µm, P = 0.039) compared with baseline. There was no reduction in either arteriolar (139.9 µm vs. 139.2 µm, P = 0.878) or venular caliber (220.3 µm vs. 217.6 µm, P = 0.534) in those treated with sham injections (Table 3) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Visual Acuity, CMT, and Retinal Vascular Caliber at Baseline and after 3 Months in Triamcinolone- and Sham-Treated Eyes

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Retinal Vascular Caliber at Baseline and after 3 Months in Triamcinolone- and Sham-Treated Eyes

 
In the seven patients with both eyes included in the study (seven with IVTA and seven fellow eyes with sham injections), there was a significant change in absolute arteriolar (–11.25 ± 15.82 µm vs. –4.19 ± 18.24 µm, P = 0.028) but not venular diameter (–23.47 ± 24.33 µm vs. –1.73 ± 23.05 µm, P = 0.128) in eyes with IVTA.

Concurrent with the changes in CRAE and CRVE, there were significant improvements in visual acuity (+7.3 letters) in the IVTA group compared with the sham group (–2.6 letters; P < 0.001) and significant decreases in CMT in the IVTA (–55.5 µm) and sham groups (–82.0 µm). There was no difference in the change from baseline, between the IVTA- and sham-injection groups with respect to CMT (P = 0.413). IOP was not significantly different between the two groups at baseline and at 3 months, nor was there a significant change in IOP over the 3-month period (Table 4) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 4. Difference in Other Ocular Factors after 3 Months in Triamcinolone- and Sham-Treated Eyes

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In this prospective randomized controlled study of eyes with DME, IVTA had a significant narrowing effect on both retinal arteriolar and venular diameter compared with that in control eyes receiving sham injections.

Triamcinolone is a synthetic glucocorticoid and has a variety of actions, including anti-inflammatory effects, and several groups have shown a beneficial effect of IVTA on visual acuity and macular edema in patients with refractory DME.13 16 17 30 31 32 33 Recent studies have also highlighted a previously unsuspected role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of DME. It has been hypothesized that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can trigger early retinal inflammation by inducing the expression and upregulation of intracellular adhesion molecules,34 which may in turn lead to leukocyte adhesion and stasis within the retinal vasculature. With subsequent reperfusion, endothelial cell injury, and dysfunction may ensue.

There is evidence that retinal venular caliber may also be influenced by systemic inflammation7 35 36 37 and in patients with diabetes and those with impaired fasting glucose, retinal venular caliber has been noted to be larger than in individuals with normal fasting glucose.7 8 9 10 It has been speculated that inflammation and endothelial dysfunction may explain the underlying association of larger venular caliber with diabetes and impaired fasting glucose.38 It has been postulated that that in the diabetic retina, hyperglycemia, and hypoxia initiate retinal vasodilatation, leading to vascular hyperperfusion,39 40 with subsequent elevation of transmural hydrostatic pressure and consequent leakage across the vessel wall. Although an attractive explanation, the counter argument that vascular dilatation in patients with diabetes improves retinal perfusion and oxygenation, rather than having a detrimental effect, cannot be dismissed.

The present study showed that 3 months after a single IVTA injection in patients with refractory DME there were significant reductions in both the retinal arteriolar and venular diameter compared with that in eyes receiving sham injection. This finding would support our hypothesis, although the absolute changes in the vessel diameter between the two groups did not reach statistical significance. In the seven patients treated in one eye with IVTA and sham in the other, there was a significant change in CRAE at 3 months in the IVTA-treated eyes compared with the sham-treated eyes. We found no statistically significant difference in CRVE in these patients, although there was a large absolute difference noted.

Similar findings, in terms of reduction of retinal arteriolar diameter 1 week after IVTA were found by Vinten et al.23 (94.9% of baseline, P = 0.05). In addition, they noted a statistically significant reduction in venular diameter (89.2% of baseline, P = 0.02). Analogous to our study, Vinten et al. had seven patients, each of which had one eye treated with IVTA and the fellow assessed as the control. In their study blood–retinal barrier permeability was also assessed, and, concurrent with the reductions in arteriolar and venular diameter, there was a significant reduction in blood–retinal barrier permeability. This reduction was not seen in the untreated fellow eye. In keeping with this increase in blood–retinal barrier permeability in patients with DME, Sander et al.41 documented increased permeability in patients progressing from nonclinically significant to clinically significant macular edema. This change was noted to precede any changes in retinal thickness or retinal vascular caliber.

Our results are consistent with the previously reported improvements in visual acuity and CMT with IVTA. There was a good correlation between improved visual acuity and CMT with the reduction in vessel caliber in patients treated with IVTA. Although there is an association between IVTA and a concurrent reduction in CMT and an improvement in visual acuity, it is not possible from our results to determine whether the IVTA is directly responsible for the change, or whether the reduction in vessel caliber is a response to the improvement in retinal thickening. Nonetheless, it is plausible that the anti-inflammatory effects of triamcinolone as well as its role in inhibiting the VEGF induced inflammatory changes in vascular permeability42 plays a role. As such, IVTA may lead to a reduction in vascular caliber and consequent reduction in pressure gradient across the walls of the retinal vessels12 and to an ensuing reduction in vascular leakage.

The principle strength of this study is that the data were taken from a double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.13 Unfortunately, due to a significant number of the original cohort having ungradable photographs, the overall number of patients included in the study was low. Although it is possible that IVTA has no effect on CRAE and CRVE, with the reduction in vessel caliber being a result of regression to the mean, we believe that this is unlikely, since there was no statistically significant difference in the baseline arteriolar diameter between patients in the two treatment groups. In addition, regression to the mean would not explain the concurrent reduction in venular diameter seen in the IVTA-treated patients. We feel that the most likely reason for the lack of statistical significance in the change of retinal vascular diameter, despite the large difference in absolute measurement after IVTA compared with sham injection, is due to the small group of patients. A larger randomized masked trial may be able to clarify these issues further. Another possible limitation is that patients in the placebo group were given sham injections rather than intravitreal injections of placebo. As such, we are not able to say for sure whether the reduction in vessel caliber is related to the IVTA or whether it relates to the intravitreal injection itself.

In summary, this study suggests that in patients with refractory DME, there is reduction in both the retinal arteriolar and venular caliber after injection of IVTA. The significance of these findings is unclear and may be the mechanism of action of triamcinolone-induced improvements in DME or may merely represent a response to the reduction in DME itself.


   Footnotes
 
Supported by grants from the Sydney Eye Hospital Foundation, the Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, the Diabetes Australia Research Trust and the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia).

Submitted for publication January 2, 2008; revised April 1, May 11 and 27, and June 29, 2008; accepted September 12, 2008.

Disclosure: S.S. Wickremasinghe, None; S.L. Rogers, None; M.C. Gillies, None; M. Zhu, None; T.Y. Wong, None

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Corresponding author: Tien Y. Wong, Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, Melbourne 3002, Australia; twong{at}unimelb.edu.au.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ferris FL, 3rd, Patz A. Macular edema: a complication of diabetic retinopathy. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;28(suppl)452–461.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Kohner EM. Diabetic retinopathy. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1977;6:345–375.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Meleth AD, Agron E, Chan CC, et al. Serum inflammatory markers in diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4295–4301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. van Hecke MV, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, et al. Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are associated with retinopathy: the Hoorn Study. Diabetologia. 2005;48:1300–1306.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Joussen AM, Poulaki V, Le ML, et al. A central role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. FASEB J. 2004;18:1450–1452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Riva CE, Grunwald JE, Sinclair SH, Petrig BL. Blood velocity and volumetric flow rate in human retinal vessels. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:1124–1132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Nguyen TT, Wang JJ, Sharrett AR, et al. The relationship pf retinal vascular caliber with diabetes and retinopathy: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:544–549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ikram MK, Janssen JA, Roos AM, et al. Retinal vessel diameters and risk of impaired fasting glucose or diabetes: the Rotterdam study. Diabetes. 2006;55:506–510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, et al. Retinal vascular abnormalities in persons with type 1 diabetes: the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XVIII. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:2118–2125.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Wong TY, Sharrett AR. Retinal vascular caliber in persons with type 2 diabetes: the Wisconsin Epidemiological Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XX. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1488–1498.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Wong TY, Islam FMA, Klein R, et al. Retinal vascular caliber, cardiovascular risk factors and inflammation: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2341–2350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Nagel E, Vilser W. Autoregulative behavior of retinal arteries and veins during changes of perfusion pressure: a clinical study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242:13–17.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Sutter FK, Simpson JM, Gillies MC. Intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema that persists after laser treatment: three-month efficacy and safety results of a prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2044–2049.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Jonas JB, Sofker A. Intraocular injection of crystalline cortisone as adjunctive treatment of diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:425–427.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Jonas JB, Degenring R. Intravitreal injection of crystalline triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular oedema (in German). Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2002;219:429–432.[CrossRef][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Jonas JB, Kreissig I, Sofker A, Degenring RF. Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:57–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Martidis A, Duker JS, Greenberg PB, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone for refractory diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:920–927.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Massin P, Audren F, Haouchine B, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic diffuse macular edema: preliminary results of a prospective controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:218–224.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Gillies MC, Sutter FKP, Simpson JM, Larsson J, Ali H, Zhu M. Intravitreal Triamcinolone for Refractory Diabetic Macular Oedema: 2-year results of a double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1533–1538.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Wilson CA, Berkowitz BA, Sato Y, Ando N, Handa JT, de Juan E, Jr. Treatment with intravitreal steroid reduces blood-retinal barrier breakdown due to retinal photocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:1155–1159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Edelman JL, Lutz D, Castro MR. Corticosteroids inhibit VEGF-induced vascular leakage in a rabbit model of blood-retinal and blood-aqueous barrier breakdown. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80:249–258.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Tamura H, Miyamoto K, Kiryu J, et al. Intravitreal injection of corticosteroid attenuates leukostasis and vascular leakage in experimental diabetic retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1440–1444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Vinten M, Larsen M, Lund-Andersen H, Sander B, La Cour M. Short-term effects of intravitreal triamcinolone on retinal vascular leakage and trunk vessel diameters in diabetic macular oedema. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:21–26.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Wong TY, Klein R, Islam FM, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in a multi-ethnic cohort in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:446–455.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:786–806.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Wong TY, Knudtson MD, Klein R, et al. Computer-assisted measurement of retinal vessel diameters in the Beaver Dam Eye Study: methodology, correlation between eyes, and effect of refractive errors. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1183–1190.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Hubbard LD, Brothers RJ, King WN, et al. Methods for evaluation of retinal microvascular abnormalities associated with hypertension/sclerosis in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2269–2280.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Hubbard LD, et al. Revised formulas for summarizing retinal vessel diameters. Curr Eye Res. 2003;27:143–149.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Sun C, Liew G, Wang JJ, et al. Retinal vascular caliber, blood pressure and cardiovascular risk factors in an Asian population: The Singapore Malay Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1784–1790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Bakri SJ, Beer PM. Intravitreal triamcinolone injection for diabetic macular oedema: a clinical and fluorescein angiographic case series. Can J Ophthalmol. 2004;39:755–760.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Jonas JB, Akkoyun I, Kreissig I, et al. Diffuse diabetic macular oedema treated by intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide: a comparative, non-randomised study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:321–364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lam DS, Chan CK, Tang EW, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular oedema in Chinese patients: six-month prospective longitudinal pilot study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32:569–572.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Ozkiris A, Evereklioglu C, Erkilic K, et al. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection as primary treatment for diabetic macular oedema. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004;14:543–549.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Joussen AM, Poulaki V, Qin W, et al. Retinal vascular endothelial growth factor induces intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression and initiates early diabetic retinal leukocyte adhesion in vivo. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:501–509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Klein R, Sharrett AR, Klein BE, et al. Are retinal arteriolar abnormalities related to atherosclerosis? The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1644–1650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ikram MK, de Jong FJ, Vingerling JR, et al. Are retinal arteriolar or venular diameters associated with markers for cardiovascular disorders? The Rotterdam Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2129–2134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Klein R, Klein BE, Knudtson M, Wong TY, Tsai M. Are inflammatory factors related to retinal vessel caliber? The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:87–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Caballero AE. Metabolic and vascular abnormalities in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes: the early start of a dangerous situation. Arch Med Res. 2005;36:241–249.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Skovborg F, Nielsen AV, Lauritzen E, Hartkopp O. Diameters of the retinal vessels in diabetic and normal subject. Diabetes. 1969;18:292–298.[Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Grunwald JE, Brucker AJ, Schwartz SS, et al. Diabetic glycemic control and retinal blood flow. Diabetes. 1990;39:602–607.[Abstract]
  41. Sander B, Thornit DN, Colmorn L, et al. Progression of diabetic macular edema: correlation with blood retinal barrier permeability, retinal thickness, and retinal vessel diameter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:3983–3987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Perretti M, Ahluwalia A. The microcirculation and inflammation: site of action for glucocorticoids. Microcirculation. 2000;7:147–161.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline][Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.08-1678v1
49/11/4707    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wickremasinghe, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, T. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wickremasinghe, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wong, T. Y.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS