|
|
||||||||
1From the Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; the 2Centre for Vision Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; the 3Departments of Community, Occupational, and Family Medicine and 4Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; and the 5Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. The population-based Singapore Malay Eye Study examined 3280 (78.7% response rate) Malay adults 40 to 80 years of age. Details about any fall in the previous 12 months and personal and sociodemographic information were collected. Presenting visual acuity (PVA) was measured. Mild or moderate visual impairment (0.3 < logMar < 1.0), severe visual impairment (logMAR
1.0), and the primary causes of visual impairment were determined by ophthalmologists at examination.
RESULTS. Of the 3280 participants, 3266 (99.6%) provided information about falls. Of these, 14.7% (n = 480) reported having fallen in the past 12 months. After adjustment for gender, age, body mass index, history of angina, heart attack, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, and self-rated health, the results showed that severe visual impairment in the worse eye significantly increased the risk of falling (60%; OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.3). Severe visual impairment in one eye and mild or moderate visual impairment in the other also doubled the risk of falls (OR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.4–3.1). Having glaucoma (n = 21) increased the risk of falling by more than fourfold (OR = 4.2; 95% CI 1.2–12.3) after adjustment for visual acuity. Although mild or moderate visual impairment was not significantly associated with falls, odds ratios tended toward the direction of risk.
CONCLUSIONS. Findings from this Asian population provide further evidence in support of the association between severe visual impairment and falls in older persons.
Although falls have a multifactorial etiology,9 a commonly cited cause of falls in older people is poor vision. In this regard, several population-based studies have identified poor vision as one of the most frequent risk factors for falls10 11 12 13 Compared with normal-sighted persons, individuals with visual impairment are almost twice as likely to fall and to have recurrent falls and resultant fractures.14 In fact, several interventions designed to prevent falls include either an objective or subjective assessment of visual acuity.15 However, an equally large number of studies have failed to show any significant association between visual acuity and falls.5 16 17 18 19 20 These disparate findings indicate that further research is needed to clarify the role of visual impairment in falls.
Existing data pertinent to the relationship between visual impairment and falls have been largely confined to Caucasian populations in the United States and Australia. Data in Asia are limited.21 22 23 Because of differences in lifestyle, environment, culture, and nutritional habits, it cannot be assumed that the relationship between visual impairment and falls in Western countries would be similar in Asian nations. This association should be empirically demonstrated. People of Malay ethnicity are a substantial proportion of the population of Southeast Asia. They tend to concentrate in the cities and urban areas, which can increase the risks of falling, perhaps because of living in highly populated, cluttered areas, as increasing hip fracture rates in Hong Kong and other parts of Asia have been attributed to increasing urbanization.24
An overwhelming majority of Malays in Singapore are Muslim and adhere to Islamic principles, lifestyle, diet, and culture. There are also variations in rates of systemic and eye diseases and utilization of eye care services between Chinese, Indians, and Malays.25 26 27 28 29 However, limited data are available on the relationship between eye disease and the rate of falls in Malays living in Singapore. Even less is known of what other vision-related factors are associated with the high risk of falls. If factors such as the severity of vision loss and unilateral or bilateral visual impairment are shown to be independently associated with falls, then vision-related interventions that are likely to reduce the incidence of falls in this population must be implemented. In addition, there is potential for the data on falls to be generalized to other urban Asian populations.
The Singapore Malay Eye Study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and impact of visual impairment and major eye diseases in urban Asian populations. In this article, we report the association between visual impairment and the main causes of vision loss, and falls. This information is fundamental in understanding the impact of visual impairment and in establishing prevention and rehabilitation programs for visually impaired persons who are at higher risk of falling.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vision Assessment
At the study center, participants underwent an extensive and standardized examination that included visual acuity testing and a detailed clinical slit lamp examination. For each eye, the participants presenting visual acuity (PVA), was ascertained with participants wearing their habitual optical corrections (spectacles or contact lenses). In the present study, only PVA data were used, as we believe that this acuity gives a more accurate picture of the role of visual acuity in study participants performance of the activities of daily living.30
Visual acuity was measured using a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) vision chart (Lighthouse International, New York, NY) at 4 m distance. If no numbers were read at 4 m, the participant was moved to 3, 2, or 1 m, consecutively. If no numbers were identified on the chart, visual acuity was assessed as counting fingers, hand movements, perception of light, or no perception of light. Primary causes of visual impairment were diagnosed by study ophthalmologists after detailed slit lamp examination before and after pupil dilation.
Definition of Visual Impairment
We defined mild or moderate visual impairment as PVA worse than 20/40 but better than 20/200 in the better eye (0.3 < logMAR < 1.0) and severe impairment with VA
20/200 in the better eye (logMAR
1.0).31 Participants with no visual impairment were categorized as normal (
0.3 logMAR). For analysis, we defined the preceding visual acuity categories using PVA in the better (bilateral visual impairment) and worse eye (unilateral). We also defined the following exclusive six groups: (1) severe visual impairment in both eyes; (2) severe visual impairment in one eye and mild or moderate visual impairment in the other eye; (3) mild or moderate visual impairment in both eyes; (4) severe visual impairment in one eye and normal vision in the other eye; (5) mild or moderate visual impairment in one eye and normal vision in the other eye; and (6) normal vision in both eyes. Group 6 was the reference level.
Main Outcome Measure: Falls
The following question was asked to obtain data pertinent to falls: "Did you have any fall in the past 12 months whereby you landed on the ground or floor?" A participant was classified as a "faller" if a fall had happened in the past 12 months. Otherwise, he or she was classified as a "nonfaller."
Questionnaires
Details about height, weight, body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/[height (m)]2), systolic and diastolic blood pressures, axial length, anterior chamber depth, and corneal curvature in horizontal and vertical meridians were obtained. Nonfasting serum glucose, lipids (total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, direct LDL cholesterol), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and creatinine were measured from venous blood samples collected from participants. Other collected data were country of birth, marital status, education, occupation, and current housing status. Information about participants lifestyle (including cigarette smoking), eye symptoms, use of glasses, systemic medical and surgical history, bone fracture history, current medications, and family history of eye disease was also recorded. Female participants were asked questions on gender-related health. The modified EuroQoL Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D)32 was used to assess overall quality of life consisting of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which can have one of three responses (no problems, some or moderate problems, or extreme problems). The EQ-5D utility index scores usually range between 0.0 (death) and 1.0 (perfect health).
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed with commercial software (SPSS, ver. 14.0.1; SPSS Science, Chicago, IL). P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, and binary logistic regression models were used to assess associations with each potential vision risk factor (PVA in the better and worse eyes, presenting unilateral and bilateral visual acuity and main cause of vision loss in the right and left eyes) with falls in the last 12 months, while controlling for the effects of other risk factors related to falls. Evidence of multicollinearity was assessed using the collinearity diagnostics in SPSS. Finally, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to assess the overall fit of the model, in which P > 0.05 indicates no evidence of misfit.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
1.0) in either eye, based on PVA before refraction (Table 2) . The mean PVAs in the better and worse eyes were 0.21 ± 0.23 and 0.32 ± 0.27 logMAR, respectively. Of the participants, 2421 (73.8%) and 1755 (53.5%) were considered to have normal PVA (
0.3 logMAR) in the better and worse eyes, respectively, whereas 645 (19.7%) had mild or moderate visual impairment in both eyes, and 58 (1.8%) had severe visual impairment in both eyes. The main cause of vision loss was undercorrected refractive error, followed by cataract.
|
In multivariate models after adjustment for gender, age, body mass index, history of angina, heart attack, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, and self rated health (EQ-5D utility index), the causes of vision loss for the right, left, or both eyes were similar. Unilateral severe visual impairment, defined using logMAR
1.0 in the worse eye, significantly increased the likelihood (60%; P < 0.05; Table 3 ). Severe visual impairment in one eye and mild or moderate visual impairment in the other doubled the likelihood of falling. Having cataract, glaucoma, or other causes of visual impairment was associated with falls. However, when PVA was included in the model, only glaucoma was found to be independently associated with falls. Having glaucoma increased the risk of falling by more than fourfold (OR = 4.2; 95% CI 1.2–12.3). Presenting mild and moderate visual impairment in the better eye was not significantly associated with falls, although the odds ratios were in the same risk direction.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although several large prospective or retrospective studies have found worse visual acuity to be associated with an increased risk of falling,11 13 30 33 other studies have not replicated these findings,16 17 34 and to our knowledge only one study examined an Asian population.22 The reasons underpinning these conflicting findings are unclear, although it is worth noting that in studies that reported an independent association between visual acuity and falls, the researchers used "multiple falls" as the study outcome, whereas we used "one fall" during the past 12 months as the main outcome. The Beaver Dam Eye Study reported a 2.6-fold higher risk of multiple falls over 12 months, for habitual visual acuity levels 0.09 logMAR (6/7.5 Snellen) or worse.11 Similarly, the Blue Mountains Eye Study found that multiple falls were approximately twice as likely, if habitual visual acuity was worse than 0.18 logMAR (6/9).30 On the other hand, Nevitt et al.17 did not find a significant association between visual impairment and falls, although the they reported that the risk factors for having a single fall were few and relatively weak, but multiple falls were more predictable. Similarly, Lord and Dayhew16 found that being in the worst quartile for measures of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, depth perception, and visual field angle significantly increased the risks of having multiple falls but not a single fall. It is possible that "multiple falls" provides a more robust dependent variable than "any falls," when establishing vision-specific risk factors for falls. This hypothesis should be investigated in future surveys, as the present study did not collect these data.
Although visual field data were not collected, the presence of glaucoma increased the risk of falling by more than fourfold after adjustment for visual acuity. Our finding indicates that glaucoma as an eye disease entity, rather than the visual acuity loss caused by glaucoma, is associated with falls. A diagnosis of glaucoma has been identified as a risk factor for falls in both population-based and hospital-based studies of older persons.35 36 People with glaucoma can have compromised visual field which is associated with poor postural stability and a greater capacity to bump into objects, which could also lead to a greater tendency to fall.37 38 Our finding that participants with glaucoma tend to have a greater risk of falls is therefore not surprising. There is no consensus, however, on the association between glaucoma and falls, as other studies have found no association between self-reported or diagnosed glaucoma and falls.30 33 It is difficult to explain the discrepancy between the findings in these different studies, but they may be related to study design, sample size, and how glaucoma was assessed. In a recent prospective population-based study, however, visual field was found to be the only independent predictor of falls that supports our findings of strong associations between glaucoma and falls.34 These associations were assessed after adjustment for visual acuity level or visual field defect and probably operate via poor visual function associated with these ocular conditions.
The prevalence of falls in our study was 14.7% and is similar to the rate reported in another population-based eye surveys, the Blue Mountains Eye Study (16.1%),30 a prospective longitudinal study in Chinese elderly (19.3%),22 and cross-sectional studies in Hong Kong (18%)21 and Thailand (19.8%).23 It is considerably lower, however, than the rate reported by the Salisbury Eye Evaluation (SEE) Project in which 29% of their participants reported having had at least one fall.34 Similar or even higher prevalence rates (28%–35%) have been reported in community-dwelling elderly individuals.3 4 5 6 19 The participants in the SEE project, however, were considerably older than those in our study (75 years vs. 58 years).
The implication of the research evidence is that prevention, detection, and treatment of vision-related factors can reduce the risk of falls in older people. Multifactorial trials that have included vision-related intervention components have shown to reduce the risks of falls significantly,39 40 and the results in these trials indicate that intervention to improve visual function in older people, particularly in combination with other forms of intervention, can play an important role in the prevention of falls.41 Similarly, two studies have shown that cataract surgery can prevent falls42 43 and suggest that visual impairment related to eye disease is critically important to reducing falls rates and hip fractures.
A limitation of this study is the self-reported nature of the main outcome measure, which may introduce recall bias, especially if people with poor vision recall falls differently than those who are not visually impaired. Another potential weakness is that we were not able to adjust for all variables previously shown to predict falls, such as visual field, depth perception, contrast sensitivity, gait, and balance,5 17 20 as these data were not collected. Finally, considering that the falls data in our study were collected retrospectively, it is possible that the "true" frequency of falls is than that reported, as it has been shown that more than 30% of the elderly can fail to recall falls.44
In summary, our findings from this large Asian population document independent relationships between unilateral severe visual impairment, glaucoma, and falls in the previous 12 months. These findings provide further evidence on the impact of visual impairment among older persons. Thus, strategies should be developed to provide visually impaired people with a fall-prevention environment, to reduce this impact of visual impairment and improve the quality of life.7
| Footnotes |
|---|
Disclosure: E.L. Lamoreux; None; E. Chong, None; J.J. Wang, None; S. M. Saw, None; T. Aung, None; P. Mitchell, None; T.Y. Wong, None
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Ecosse L. Lamoureux, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne Victoria, 3002, Australia; ecosse{at}unimelb.edu.au.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. L. Lamoureux, S.-M. Saw, J. Thumboo, H. L. Wee, T. Aung, P. Mitchell, and T. Y. Wong The Impact of Corrected and Uncorrected Refractive Error on Visual Functioning: The Singapore Malay Eye Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2009; 50(6): 2614 - 2620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Lamoureux, K. Pesudovs, J. Thumboo, S.-M. Saw, and T. Y. Wong An Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VF-11) Using Rasch Analysis in an Asian Population Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2009; 50(6): 2607 - 2613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Tavintharan, Ning Cheung, Su Chi Lim, W. Tay, A. Shankar, E. Shyong Tai, and T. Y. Wong Prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in an Asian population with diabetes mellitus Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, April 1, 2009; 6(2): 80 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Ng, J. J. Wang, P. Mitchell, F. M. Amirul Islam, and T. Y. Wong Prevalence and Characteristics of Choroidal Nevi in an Asian vs White Population Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 2009; 127(3): 314 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Kawasaki, J J Wang, P Mitchell, T Aung, S-M Saw, T Y Wong, and for the Singapore Malay Eye Study Group Racial difference in the prevalence of epiretinal membrane between Caucasians and Asians Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2008; 92(10): 1320 - 1324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Cackett, W T Tay, T Aung, J J Wang, A Shankar, S M Saw, P Mitchell, and T Y Wong Education, socio-economic status and age-related macular degeneration in Asians: the Singapore Malay Eye Study Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2008; 92(10): 1312 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L L Lim, N Cheung, J J Wang, F M A Islam, P Mitchell, S M Saw, T Aung, and T Y Wong Prevalence and risk factors of retinal vein occlusion in an Asian population Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2008; 92(10): 1316 - 1319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Y. Shen, T. Y. Wong, P. J. Foster, J.-L. Loo, M. Rosman, S.-C. Loon, W. L. Wong, S.-M. Saw, and T. Aung The Prevalence and Types of Glaucoma in Malay People: The Singapore Malay Eye Study Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 3846 - 3851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |