|
|
||||||||
1From the Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; the 2Department of Ophthalmology, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; the 3Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and the 4Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS. A population-based cohort of all children in Denmark aged 0 to 17 years during the period 1977 to 2001, who underwent surgery for pediatric cataract, was established by retrospective chart review. Glaucoma cases were defined as those in which glaucoma surgery (trabeculectomy and/or diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation) was performed and/or permanent medical therapy prescribed after cataract surgery.
RESULTS. Of 946 eyes (595 patients) undergoing pediatric cataract surgery, 72 eyes (48 patients) had subsequent development of glaucoma. Early surgery (<9 months of age) was associated with a 7.2-fold increased risk of glaucoma compared with late surgery (
9 months of age). Ten years after cataract surgery, glaucoma developed in 31.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.4–41.1) of children undergoing surgery before 9 months of age compared with 4.1% (95% CI, 2.4 to 6.8) of children aged
9 months at the time of surgery. Glaucoma cases continued to occur more than 10 years after cataract surgery. After adjustment for age at surgery, no other risk factor appeared important.
CONCLUSIONS. The risk of glaucoma after surgery for pediatric cataract is substantial and particularly high for those below 9 months of age at the time of surgery. Because the increased risk persists for many years after surgery, careful continuous monitoring for glaucoma is mandatory.
We took advantage of the national registration of pediatric cataract surgery in Denmark to establish a population-based cohort of all children who underwent surgery for pediatric cataract from 1977 to 2005. Our objective was to investigate the risk of glaucoma after surgery according to cataract etiology, surgical technique, surgery for secondary cataract, cataract morphology, other ocular anomalies, age at surgery, and time since surgery.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cases were classified according to etiology and clinical characteristics. The main etiological groups were idiopathic, hereditary, and familial, associated with syndromes and chromosomal anomalies, and associated with intrauterine infection.25 Clinically, the cases were divided by laterality (unilateral or bilateral cataracts) and into groups including isolated cataracts and cataracts associated with additional anomalies (ocular dysmorphology and/or systemic anomalies denoted cataract plus). Data on cataract morphology were grouped into nuclear/zonular and other (non-nuclear).
In the first categorization, cataract surgery was divided into three groups: (1) Cataract surgery by lensectomy using either a suction-irrigation technique or phacoemulsification with or without posterior capsulorrhexis or capsulotomy; (2) cataract surgery by lensectomy by either the suction-irrigation technique or phacoemulsification with posterior capsulorrhexis and anterior vitrectomy; and (3) unspecified. We made another categorization to investigate whether the risk of glaucoma is associated with a break in the posterior capsule and thereby a risk of vitreous in the anterior chamber and trabecular meshwork.28 Accordingly, the second categorization consisted of lensectomy leaving an intact posterior capsule and lensectomy with a break in the posterior capsule or posterior capsulorrhexis, both at the primary surgery.
The use of intraocular pressure (IOP) as the sole indicator of glaucoma is probably not sufficient, especially in young children, in whom, for example, myopic shift or increased optic disc cupping may be the first sign of glaucoma.29 We therefore defined glaucomatous eyes as eyes that the consultant decided required permanent medical therapy and/or surgical therapy (trabeculectomy and/or diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation). Eyes with transient elevation of IOP that could be controlled with an iridectomy or anterior vitrectomy were not defined as cases of secondary glaucoma.
We excluded cataract cases that did not have a postoperative measurement of IOP, because a postoperative measurement of IOP was taken as a proxy for a glaucoma evaluation, and without a glaucoma evaluation the cases could not be classified as glaucoma or nonglaucoma cases.
Permission to receive data from the national registries was obtained from the Danish Data Protection Agency (2000-41-0285). The study was approved by the Scientific-Ethical Committees for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg (KF) 01-253/00), and it adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical Analyses
All analyses were based on eyes as the unit. The rate ratios (RRs) of glaucoma after surgery of pediatric cataract according to age at surgery and various characteristics were estimated by a Cox proportional hazards regression model (the Proc Phreg feature of SAS statistical software; SAS, Cary, NC). Time at risk (i.e., follow-up time) was defined for each eye as the time from surgery until glaucoma diagnosis, last measurement of IOP, emigration, or death, whichever came first. Time of glaucoma diagnosis was defined as the interval midpoint between time of last measurement "without glaucoma" and first "with glaucoma." In two additional sensitivity analyses, time of glaucoma diagnosis was defined as time of last measurement "without glaucoma" and time of first measurement "with glaucoma," respectively. Adjustment for age at surgery was performed by including age in the regression model with the following categories (in months): 0 to 1, 1 to <2, 2 to <3, 3 to <4, 4 to <5, 5 to <6, 6 to <9, 9 to <12, 12 to <15, 15 to <18, 18 to <21, 21 to <24, 24 to <36, 36 to <48, 48 to <60, 60 to <72, 72 to <84, and
84. Adjustment for correlation between eyes was obtained using robust standard errors,30 resulting in slightly wider confidence intervals on estimated RRs. In the Cox proportional hazards model proportional hazards are assumed over time. That the hazards were proportional over time since surgery was supported by the fact that there were no effect modifications by time since surgery (see the Results section). Proportion of children without glaucoma at a given time after surgery was estimated by Kaplan-Meier estimates (Proc Liftest; SAS).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of 697 eligible patients with pediatric cataract and surgery, we subsequently excluded surgically treated eyes that lacked any postoperative measurement of IOP, as IOP was used as a proxy for an evaluation of glaucoma. A total 946 eyes (595 patients: 306 males, and 289 females) remained in the study. Bilateral lensectomy was performed in 351 patients (702 eyes), and 244 patients had unilateral cataract surgery, 62 patients of the latter group having bilateral cataract. The median follow-up time since surgery was 4.2 years (25% quartile, 0.67 years; 75% quartile, 9.7 years).
Secondary glaucoma developed in 72 (48 patients) of the 946 eyes that had had cataract surgery. Bilateral glaucoma was present in 24 patients. The median time interval between surgery and glaucoma diagnosis was 6.6 years (25% quartile, 1.1 years; 75% quartile, 10.7 years).
Table 1 gives the number of surgically treated and subsequently glaucomatous eyes and median follow-up time by age at surgery. The risk of glaucoma after cataract surgery was highly dependent on age at surgery (P < 0.001). Compared with children who underwent surgery at an age of 2 years or more, the RR of glaucoma was increased between 5.8- and 9.4-fold among children undergoing surgery within the first 8 months of life (Table 1) . During the first 8 months of age, the risk of glaucoma did not vary significantly by age at surgery.
|
|
|
In subsequent analyses with adjustment for age at surgery, we tested whether cataract surgery by pars plana lensectomy and vitrectomy differed in glaucoma risk from other types of surgery, but found that they had similar rate ratios (RRpars plana versus other = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.20–2.76). Moreover, there was no difference in the glaucoma risk between right and left eyes (RRleft versus right = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.72–1.33), between sexes (RRboy versus girl = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.47–1.54), or according to the surgical experience of the ophthalmologist (RR
50 vs. < 50 surgeries = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.34–1.15).
Time of glaucoma diagnosis is not necessarily the same as the time of debut. We therefore used the midpoint between cataract surgery or last normal measurement of IOP until glaucoma was first registered as an approximation of the time of debut. Additional sensitivity analyses using right and left endpoints instead of midpoints revealed that the conclusions drawn were not dependent on this approximation.
In addition to the 946 surgical eyes included in the analyses, there were 91 patients (134 eyes) for whom we had a date of latest visit to an ophthalmologist but no postoperative measurement of IOP, and 11 patients (14 eyes) with no record of a postoperative visit to an ophthalmologist. As a sensitivity analysis, we added these patients as follows: the first group was assigned a follow-up time equal to the time of the latest visit, and the latter group was assigned the median follow-up time for eyes operated on in the same 5-year calendar period. Including these eyes in the analyses and assuming that none of them developed glaucoma gave very similar results. Compared with eyes in children that were 9 months of age or older at surgery, the rate of glaucoma was 7.85-fold (4.51–13.66) higher in children with age at surgery less than 9 months. The cumulative risk estimates after 10 years in this analysis were 29.2% (95% CI, 22.2%–37.8%) for those with an age at cataract surgery of less than 9 months compared with 3.4% (95% CI, 2.0%–5.7%) for those with an age at surgery of 9 months or more.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The study had several strengths, including its large size and its population-based cohort design. Based on mandatory national registration, we were able to retrieve all children with a diagnosis of pediatric cataract and over many years to follow these children with respect to glaucoma development. We thereby avoided significant problems with selection bias and differential misclassification. Previously published larger studies on glaucoma after pediatric cataract surgery based the definition of glaucoma on IOP.6 11 There is a risk that in lower age groups this definition may lead to an underestimation of glaucoma because IOP in infancy is not always increased in glaucoma; rather, there is often an increased cupping of the optic disc and/or an extraordinary decrease in hyperopia,29 in older age groups a possible overestimation depending on the method of measurement, but also when central corneal thickness, for example, is not taken into consideration. In fact, it has been suggested that children who had lensectomy with or without IOL implantation have a higher corneal thickness measurement and thereby the IOP measurement may be artificially elevated.31 Because of the retrospective nature of our study, we chose to rely on the consultants diagnosis of glaucoma (i.e., their decision to start surgical and/or long-term medical treatment for glaucoma) to avoid the risk of misclassification. Furthermore, we chose to exclude cases that did not have a postoperative measurement of IOP, because we made the assumption that measuring the IOP was an indication of glaucoma evaluation. Children without any postoperative glaucoma evaluation could neither be categorized as glaucoma cases or nonglaucoma cases. However, measuring IOP may indicate suspicion of glaucoma or that the surgeon recognized that the patient was in a high-risk group. We therefore performed additional analyses, where we also included children without any postoperative glaucoma evaluation and as a worst-case scenario assumed that none of them had ever had glaucoma. As the results of these analyses were similar to the main results, we do not think that exclusion of children without any postoperative glaucoma evaluation has biased our results.
Age at surgery as a risk factor for glaucoma after pediatric cataract surgery has been investigated in previous studies and the following age periods have been suggested to be associated with the highest risk of glaucoma: >2 weeks of life,15 the first few months of life,12 13
9 months of age,6 <1 year of age4 11 14 and <15 months of age.3 In our study, the risk of glaucoma was significantly lower when having surgery at the age of
9 months. We were not able to find any difference in risk during the first 8 months of life, which is comparable to previous findings.6 11 Vishwanath et al.13 have reported that the cumulative risk of glaucoma by 5 years among eyes operated on before 1 year of age was 15.6% (95% CI, 10.2–23.4), with similar risk reported in age groups corresponding to ours.6 We found the cumulative risk of glaucoma 5 years after cataract surgery to be 12.7% (95% CI, 8.7–18.6) for eyes of children operated on before 9 months of age and 1.8% (95% CI, 1.6–5.0) for eyes undergoing surgery at 9 months of age or after—the corresponding statistics 10 years after surgery being 31.9% (95% CI, 24.4–41.1) and 4.1% (95% CI, 2.4–6.8), respectively.
Although surgery is the necessary and sufficient event, the exact mechanism causing the type of glaucoma after surgery for congenital cataract is not well understood. Postoperative inflammation of the trabecular meshwork (the loss of mechanical support to the trabecular meshwork) or vitreous substances that are toxic to the trabecular meshwork may be involved.28 There have been several reports of risk factors associated with glaucoma,4 5 6 7 8 12 14 15 16 17 -23 32 but with inconsistent results.
Two previously published larger studies on risk factors did not include children with primary intraocular lens implantation.6 11 Furthermore, Rabiah6 excluded children with a follow-up of <5 years, which may have led to selection bias. The other study, by Chen et al.,11 was based on patients seen by a glaucoma specialist, also leading to possible selection bias, which is reflected in the high percentage of aphakic glaucoma reported in this study (58.7%). However, both studies found age at surgery, microcornea, and surgery for secondary cataract to be risk factors, and Rabiah6 also found primary posterior capsulotomy-anterior vitrectomy to be a risk factor for aphakic glaucoma. The latter result was uncertain, however, because there were a few surgical cases involving another surgical technique. In our study, we were able to investigate various risk factors for glaucoma, including primary IOL implantation and surgical technique.
In our study, we found some of these previously reported potential risk factors (e.g., age at surgery, primary IOL implantation, and surgery with posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy) to be associated with glaucoma in univariate analyses. Age at surgery turned out to be the most important risk factor for later glaucoma development, so that when adjustment was made for age at surgery, the other associations were no longer present. Likewise, in a recent study by Trivedi et al.16 no association between primary IOL implantation and microcornea and postoperative development of glaucoma after pediatric cataract surgery could be found when subjects were stratified according to age at surgery of
6 months and >6 months.
The optimal time for congenital cataract surgery considering both visual outcome and the potential for postoperative complications, especially glaucoma, is currently debated. To achieve good visual acuity, early surgery (before the age of 6–10 weeks) depending on laterality32 33 34 35 36 is favored. In one study, the risk of developing glaucoma after surgery in these first critical months has been reported to be highest during the first 4 weeks of life.13 However, in our study, only one of seven patients operated on within the first month of life had subsequent development of glaucoma, and we saw no indication that the effects of surgery within the first 2 months of life differ compared with the months immediately following, up to 8 months of age. We note, however, that few Danish infants underwent surgery the first month, perhaps because Denmark lacks screening procedures (red reflex) used for assessing the presence of congenital cataract in the newborn child. Another reason may be that surgeons previously have been reluctant to operate on infants less than 2 months of age. Thus, we were not able to draw any firm conclusions regarding the safety of surgery during the very first weeks of life.
The mean interval between primary cataract surgery and glaucoma development has been reported to be approximately 4 to 5 years,6 10 37 but there have been reports of cases occurring several decades later.4 5 28 37 38 It is obvious that measurement of IOP and other relevant measurements such as axial length in small children below 4 to 5 years of age are difficult, and in most cases a comprehensive eye examination requires general anesthesia of the infant. In Denmark there are not yet any national recommendations on when and how frequently children who have had surgery for pediatric cataract should be examined. In addition, some of the cases included in this study are from a time when the focus on glaucoma after pediatric cataract surgery was low; hence, the discovery of glaucoma may have been delayed in some early cases. Our study supports that patients who undergo surgery for pediatric cataract should be examined regularly for glaucoma throughout their lives. In the present investigation new cases of glaucoma continued to be diagnosed at a high rate, even 10 years after cataract surgery.
In conclusion, we found that surgery for pediatric cataract during the first 8 months of life was associated with a substantially increased risk of glaucoma, whereas surgery at
9 months of age resulted in a lower risk. Glaucoma developed anytime after surgery, as much as
10 years later, prompting both early and long-term follow-up of these children. However, bilateral central and/or dense congenital cataracts often leave the clinicians with little choice regarding age of surgery because of the risk of amblyopia, with the viable way being the close follow-up of children with early surgical intervention.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Submitted for publication September 5, 2007; revised December 29, 2007; accepted March 24, 2008.
Disclosure: B. Haargaard, None; C. Ritz, None; A. Oudin, None; J. Wohlfahrt, None; J. Thygesen, None; T. Olsen, None; M. Melbye, None
Presented in part at the 37th annual meeting of the Nordic Conference of Ophthalmology (NOK 37), Copenhagen, Denmark, June 2006.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Birgitte Haargaard, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark; bgd{at}ssi.dk;birgitte{at}haargaard.dk.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |