IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. )
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
DOI:  10.1167/iovs.07-1609

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (P<P[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.07-1609v1
49/7/3035    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haymes, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chauhan, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haymes, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chauhan, B. C.

Article

Glaucoma and On-Road Driving Performance

Sharon A. Haymes 1*, Raymond P. LeBlanc 1, Marcelo T. Nicolela 1, Lorraine A. Chiasson 1, and Balwantray C. Chauhan 1

1 Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sharon.haymes{at}dal.ca.


   Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the on-road driving performance of glaucoma patients. METHODS: The sample comprised 20 licensed glaucoma patients and 20 licensed subjects with normal vision, matched for age and gender. Driving performance was tested over a 10 km route incorporating 55 standardized maneuvers and skills through residential and business districts of Halifax, Canada. Testing was conducted by a professional driving instructor and assessed by an occupational therapist certified in driver rehabilitation, masked to participant group membership and level of vision. Main outcome measures were total number of satisfactory maneuvers/skills, overall rating, and incidence of at-fault critical interventions (application of the dual brake and/or steering override by the driving instructor to prevent a potentially unsafe maneuver). Measures of visual function included visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and visual fields (Humphrey Field Analyzer mean deviation [MD] and binocular Esterman points). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between glaucoma patients (mean MD = -1.7 dB [SD, 2.2] and -6.5 dB [SD, 4.9], better and worse eye, respectively) and control subjects in total satisfactory maneuvers/skills (P = 0.65), or overall rating (P = 0.60). However, 12 (60%) glaucoma patients had one or more at-fault critical interventions compared to 4 (20%) control subjects (odds ratio = 6.00, 95%CI, 1.46-24.69; higher still after adjustment for age, gender, medications and driving exposure), the predominant reason being failure to see and yield to a pedestrian. For the glaucoma group, worse eye MD was associated with overall rating of driving (r = 0.66, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This sample of glaucoma patients with slight to moderate visual field impairment performed many real-world driving maneuvers safely. However, they were 6 times as likely as normal vision subjects to have a driving instructor intervene for reasons suggesting difficulty with detection of peripheral obstacles/hazards and reaction to unexpected events.

Key Words: glaucoma, visual field, driving, on-road







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology