IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2008
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. )
© 2008 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2061

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (P<P[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.08-2061v1
49/11/4801    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scarpa, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ruggeri, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scarpa, F.
Right arrow Articles by Ruggeri, A.

Article

Automatic recognition of corneal nerve structures in images from confocal microscopy

Fabio Scarpa 1, Enrico Grisan 1, and Alfredo Ruggeri 2*

1 Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
2 Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/a, Padova, 35131, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: alfredo.ruggeri{at}unipd.it.


   Abstract

PURPOSE. We address the problem of automatically tracing corneal nerves in confocal microscopy images. METHODS. Images were acquired using the ConfoScan4 confocal microscope (Nidek Technologies, Italy). They were normalized and enhanced as regards luminosity and contrast. Nerves were recognized by applying a novel tracing algorithm, which includes Gabor filtering to enhance nerve visibility and post-processing procedures to remove false recognitions and to link sparse segments into continuous structures. A prototype of the algorithm was implemented in the Matlab© language and run on a personal computer. RESULTS. A retrospective evaluation of the automatic procedure was performed on a data set containing 90 images, from normal and non normal subjects. The percent of correctly recognized nerves length with respect to total manually traced length of visible nerves was on average 80.4% in normal subjects and 83.8% on non normal subjects; the rate of false nerve length recognitions (with respect to the total automatically traced length) was on average 6.5% in normal subjects and 9.1 % in non normal subjects. Correlation coefficients between manual and automatic lengths on the same image were 0.94, 0.95, and 0.86 in all, normal, and non normal subjects, respectively. A further evaluation was performed on an independent set of 80 normal subject images, resulting in a correlation coefficient of 0.89 between manual and automatic nerve lengths. CONCLUSIONS. Automatic and manual length estimations on the same image were very well correlated, indicating that the automatic procedure is capable of correctly reproducing the differences in nerve length between different subjects.

Key Words: confocal microscopy, image analysis, morphometry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
D V Patel and C N J McGhee
In vivo confocal microscopy of human corneal nerves in health, in ocular and systemic disease, and following corneal surgery: a review
Br J Ophthalmol, July 1, 2009; 93(7): 853 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology