IOVS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009
(Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. )
© 2009 by The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2848

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (P<P[PDF])
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
iovs.08-2848v1
50/5/2024    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wojciechowski, R. J
Right arrow Articles by Bailey-Wilson, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wojciechowski, R. J
Right arrow Articles by Bailey-Wilson, J. E.

Article

Genomewide linkage scans for ocular refraction and meta-analysis of four populations in the Myopia Family Study

Robert J Wojciechowski 1*, Dwight Stambolian 2, Elise B Ciner 3, Grace Ibay 1, Taura N Holmes 1, and Joan E. Bailey-Wilson 1

1 Inherited Disease Research Branch, NHGRI, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
2 Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
3 Infant Vision Service, Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: robwoj{at}mail.nih.gov.


   Abstract

Purpose: We performed genomewide linkage scans in Caucasian (CAUC) and Old Order Amish (OOA) families to identify genomic regions containing genes responsible for refractive error control. We also performed a meta-analysis by combining these results with our previous linkage results from Ashkenazi Jewish (ASHK) and African American (AFRAM) families. Methods: We recruited 271 CAUC and 411 OOA participants (36 and 61 families, respectively) to participate in the Myopia Family Study. Recruitment criteria were designed to enrich the sample for multiplex myopic families. Genomewide, model-free, multipoint linkage analyses were performed separately for each population using >370 microsatellite markers. Empirical significance levels were determined via gene-dropping simulations. A meta-analysis was performed by combining linkage results from the CAUC, OOA, AFRAM and ASHK samples and results were compared to previously-reported loci for myopia and refraction. Results: Suggestive evidence of linkage was found at: 12q24 (LOD=4.583, P=0.00037) and 4q21 (LOD=2.72, P=0.0028) in the CAUC sample; and at 5qter (LOD=3.271, P=0.0014) in the OOA. Meta-analysis linkage results were largely driven by population-specific signals from ASHK and AFRAM families. The meta-analysis showed suggestive evidence of linkage to 4q21-22 (meta-P=0.00214) adjacent to the previously-reported MYP9 and MYP11 loci. Conclusions: We found suggestive evidence of linkage of ocular refraction to 12q24 and 4q21 in Caucasian, and to 5qter in Amish families. Our meta-analysis supports the view that several genes play a role in refractive development across populations. In MFS families, four broad genomic regions (on 1p, 4q, 7p and 12q) most likely contain genes that influence ocular refraction.

Key Words: myopia, linkage analysis, refraction, meta-analysis, genomewide scan







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology